Vincennes Gazette, Volume 3, Number 20, Vincennes, Knox County, 26 October 1833 — Page 2

mm

VlNCfiNNES. sat; ito vv, ocrr. -Tin-: an "wr.is. H seem hy the last Ni. of the Sun that its editor ha hc-en frequently asked whether we w ill -publish the expose ofl'f the President, and the report of the Gov , n;.rinroii the subject of the tlllU.UH " . . Depositee." and adds very sagat .u..,, ?hat "he does not know our intentions," hut that -justice would seem to require thai ... . tv tve should publish mem. answer the que-tion, and remove all doubts from his mind upon this subject, and from that of those who put the question to him We will not do so for rt number of good reasons; one of which is, that the Expose nn I Report have been puhli-hed often be lore in the columns of the Globe and the other "collar presses. ?' The expose ot the President i9 hut a heaping together ot all the filthy slanders which have been circulated thiough the columns of those papers for the last few months against the U. S. Bank a most homble compound of political skunk's grease and asafcetida We have more important, and we will add, note true, decent matter lor the perusal of our patrons We will also remaik on this topic, that we shall he guided by our own ftuse of ' Justice," and leave our neighbor0! tW" Sun to entertain his own like wise. We make these remarks with veins oveitl '.vmg with the milk of kindness to cur neighbor We would not see a mosquito light on his nose without brushing it off. Not we. 1 1 EN It V CLAY. Mr Clay has arrived in Philadelphia flo was greeted at the wharf with the enthusiastic gratnlations of thousands ot delighted fieemen who were anxious to pay their unhought homage to the man tvho has twice saved the Republic How much more enviable is the state of Henry CI iv with his undying fame, than that of President Jackson whope laurels have teen withered on his brow by the poison cus influence of the venal miscreant that surround him, and give an impulse to his every action A public dinner was ten

dered to him in that city, as well asiniy, anu mat inu giuunu- upimwuit.11 n ' " . IL 1 oere ' . . . ' . .. . ' should he made, might be distinctly uu-'you stated y our desire, that this applicartahirriore, both of which he declined jdprstnQ(,t ; BUggeed the propriety of its' n for the adjournment, should be in 7 " t : rt, , . "I being reduced to writing-whu h w-.s ac-i writing that Major Dewey, wrote the Late at ronton Sunday the Uh o bep A copy of this .locume-.t application, and that I insisted on some parted thi. life at his residence in llarmo I" forwarded to the Secretary ; and con .correction, the original in your possession ny. Immediately alter the opening of s"'er,n? its nature, and the object tor! "dl show, think, some interhueation. Court on Monday morning, Anvs Clark,! "hich il " ae furnished, no person heliev-j It is true, ir, you did state, that 'pri-

E-q. of Evansville, asked pei mission to:mB mar you acted wun cumior, w,s au -

vausviiie, asKeu pei mission 10 n ......w., nu - oiloing resolutions spread upon!thri'ipd in looking beyond it, for the raBook ofthe Posey Circuit Court, ison ,hat i'dluenred your cond ict. -The

have the t the Unier tSook ot the rosey w hich as acenrdioh done. The members of the bar attending the !

Posey Circuit Court, take this meatu ofl,reePnt' a witness suited by Woolver- Vou seem to take pleasure in dwelling informing the Court, that at a late hour; ton being absent ,) they agree" &c was upon it. Hut, sir, let me tell you, howlist evening, the honorable James O. Wat-!,he cause assigned. The convenience", e ver you may admire however Mr. Se lies departed this hie. This event they j of ,he VTy . i a term q ute flexible , and cietary McLane may approve the senli dceplv deplore. It severs them from one: would suit any busine in the various de- mer:t,so tar as it relates to the professional w!ioe talents and legal attainments, whose Fitments of life; but it was not for me to business of a Lawyer, it is unworthy the virtues and urbanitv, have secured their hazard a conjecture as to its being osten- years y ou have spent and the station you respect and won their affections As a f,lle- or real; and I certainly did not know occupy in the profession. It is false in itniember of his profession, his legal know I- u,ltl1 30,,r recent avowal, that being mere- self. For a lawyer to use it is bae and edge, and the readiness with which he' ' colorable, your desire to attend the court dishonorable. My ease and convenience brought his powers of mind into action, in levies was the ruling motive. Wool-are doar to me. My property and intermust' have attained for him a distinguish- Vprton placed himself upon a different foot-: est are near and dear to me character ed place at any bar; while in society, his m" ,n alleging the absence of a witness, ii nearer and dearer than all other persociil qualities and honorable conduct, 1 'bought him disengenuous Johnson was sonal considerations; but I have ever con would have secured the affectionate re ,he Prison alluded to; and as he had as- sidered my professional deities the duties gard of all who knew him. The rm-m mr(i ,ne ,,liU h,s (Johnson's) attendance I owe to those who confide their interests, bers of the bar, recognising his talents, co,,tl be procured in a few days, at all, their property, or their characters to my and appreciating his worth, as a mik of;'even,e by llie t,rne tIie n,,,er witnesses attention and exertion as being far above their high respect for bis memory, would were examined, I considered the allega-lt duties to myself; and no lawyer is offer the following resolutions: tl0n a mere make weight, and therefore; honorable, or honest, conscious of his situa1st. That we deeply regret the loss object to animadversion. There is ano-1 tion , or worthy the trust of a client, who from cur Circuit of the Hon. James O. ther mat,er (hat it is necessary to notice; thinks otherwise Wattles, who has long beer, endeared to for a? tl,e worfl "forgot" is italicized, (i.,. Your gecon(, 6U,,ject for remark u ,he os bv the strongest, social, and profession-j avt:ritent,' ' presume) it may convey ; expression, "unfortunately forgot" ''Pbe al ties. j !he If!e? to POcne '"ur refers, that the ,,tst worU wa9 Qot ..inadyc.fenf, 'ilaiciZ. 2d. That we unite with the Court in ex ' ,irl,u!ef5 omission occurred from a sinister e j I 1 A 1.1 . I I I .

prying our regret that the distance and; ""J'-1. ari(1 in u au inieutionaiiy suppress of business at the present term, ren-' PrPtffleil a material fact for the purpose of

dor it inexpedient for the Court to alinurn,,tJ,,rn,g ou' 11 therefore requires ex- " " ' V me, aiiier (inexpedient tor uie coun to adjourn j ' , though you knew well that on each of for the purpose of j uning their fellow c-j I ,a UIQn- jthosc the d.-ch.arge of duties pan-!i2en-m paying the last tribute ot respect 1 might have "unfortunately forgot to;raoant to all pe. soual considerations ento the memory of the deceased at hie m-jcommunicate" certain facts to the Secre -Wed my atteutim in the rourt house u'"r;. rcvj - h did not state

. yy ui luc-t? irrumiiuiKi In ..i J , , Li '-V.llWi. ' V- wv-x- ft U pdHii-e. 4th. That permiinn of the Court be! nked to spread thn foregoing upon the! Order Book of the Co,lrt. b j To the Editor ofthe lrincennes Gazette, biR-lu requesting the publication off me enclose. i copies ot a letter from Judge Parke to rne, and of my answer to it" I uoi only actuated by a wish that simple justice should be done. Judge Parke seems t think that my address of the 17th Auguet, requires explanation, and imputes to me a want of accuracy and of candor. My answer very clearly evinces my feel-:, irg and discloses my opinions. The whol matter is of a public nature, and it is therefore proper lor the public io decide upon it. Very respectfully. SAMUEL J'UDAH. Vincennes, Oct. 20th, 1823. Salem. Imia.na, Sftt. 10, 1C33. in vo, Itf eddress to the public

(Western Sun 17th H.) I observe the fob Icmmgr statement: "Judge Parke wks le qe?tel to make the investigation. It was during the Session ot our Court, which two weeks fix wiinesses weie

-vimmed on die part ot Woolverton, and hy request, the ;ifhtavit of John M. Le ov wiis taken, concerning bae money, to be used in case I could not procure Mr. Le Rov at the proper time At this peiiod, he tore Woolverton was through, he - ore j commenced, the counsel tor Woolverlon, Mr. Dewey, proposed an adjournment until June The avowed motive ;. . , " ..,! iv id i n o r ornchi v iii i 11111 ri im iiur iih intr Lawrence Court, and that I was under W 14 U. V. I1J " " of going to Daviess County, both the next week Exhausted hv incessant labor, icon

sented on conditions favorable as to tne asiiemoved; and the cause or reason have

to taking testimony. Judge Paike very well knew the history of the rontinuance. but unfortunately forgot to communicate it to Mr McLane. So soon as Mr. McLane, learned the continuance, 1 was removed; and the cause or reason have never been Invade known to me or the public." This paragraph is chargeable, probably, with several inaccuracies; but my business, at present, is more particularly with an error into which you have fallen, and lor the correction ol which, I wish to afford you an opportunity That you were desirous of going to Dav iess, and Dewey to Lawrence, was known; and that you intended to go to the former, and Dewey to the latter, in ca-e the examination was suspended, was likewise known; hut that, that was the only object in desiring a post ponement of the investigation, was not avowed to me. 1 state this with great confidence; and the circun.stanccs of the case will naturally lead to the same conclusion. Until Saturday, (16th.) the greatest difficulty appeared to be to get along wi.th the enquiry, during the sitting of the court, at Vincennes; the peisonal inconvenience ou may have suffered, trom its being unexpectedly prolonged, furnished n ground of complaint; you pioposcd the second Monday in M rrh yourself: and beiiifir absented to bv Woolverton, was fix

ed upon hy me lit legaul to 0ur goingjit by stating ttie motive avowea uy mat to Daviess, I would not have been justified other, avowed nor by me, but to me. I in the belief, that, that alone wouhi oppose.ued the terra avowed motive, because 1 anv seriom obstacle to the enquiry ; for in believed that there was another and pn reference to your business in that court, vaie motive, as is 'intimated iu another you assured me, repeatedly, that the only! part, the next paragraph, of my address, indulgence you asked was a tew hours de I And thus it is sir, that upon a imsipphcilay on Monday, (the 18th.) and ot thisltion of a plain sentence, so gross and abthe Secretary "as informed. I urged thelsurd as to ba utterly unaccountable, and impropriety' and impolicy of the coursejscarcely credible, you have built up a proi.osed.and amongst other things, stated,; charge against me of want of accuracy

that private and professional bu-qne-s

ought not lobe permitted to interfere with; Vou know that Major Dewey, proposed ttie enquiry in which we were engaged the adjournment, that the motive assigned and of this the Secietnrv was also mform-lby him was the Laurence and Davie?s ed. As the proposition for an a I j .urn-! Courts, and afterwards as a make weight, merit appeared to me rather extraor iina D. C Johnson's absence, and that I only

convenience ot both parties requiting a postponement of the examination tor the uB.a,ij diuiuuiiug iu uir i u t sign i i .1 . - - - --- --... .i vju m J MM I V I niirpi into vnur nirfrta li.(rriin,ti.inc from ill health, and other causes have i revented an earlu r attention to this sut tect I am, Sir, Your obedient Servant, B. PAItKE. SAMUF.L JADAII, Esq. Attorney at Law, Vincennes, Indiana. ViNCEXNrs, Sept. 24, 1833. Sir I received v our letter of the IDth instant, concluded that it was written to answered, and determined to devote the first leisure evening in affording the gratification Thi- letter recites an ex tract from my address contained in the Western Sun," ef the 17th August, as follows. Judge Parke was requested to make the investigation. It was during the session of our Court, which contirurd fw. weeks. Six witnesses were examined on the part of VVoo!verln. vr.l by icquest,

(he affidavit of John M. Le Hoy was taken, concerning base money, to be used in case I could not procure Mr. Le Hoy, at the proper time. At this period, before Wool

verton was through, before 1 bad commenced, the council lor Woolverton, Mr Dewev, proposed an adjournment until June. " The avowed motive was, the necessity he wa9 under of attending Law rence Court, and that 1 was under of go ing to Daviess County, both the next week. Exhausted by incessant lanor, 1 consented on conditions favorable as to me as to taking testimony. Judge Parke very well knew the history of the continu ante, but unfortunately forgot to commu nicate it to Mr. McLane. So 6oon as 31 r Mr.Lnne learned the continuance, I was never beeo made known to me or the public." 1 This paragraph seems to me to contain merely the sort of plain English I am in the habit of using. Your letter states, however, that it is chargeable probably with "several inaccuracies.1' I am not aw are of any ground it can afford to charge me with a want of accuracy, or to impute to me a want of candor You refer to two particulars The first is intioduced, as follows: "an error into which ou have fallen and for the correction ot which I wish to afford you an opportunity and is founded upon the following sentence ol my address. "The avowed motive was, the necessity he was under of attending Lawrence Court, and that I was under ol goiny to Duvies County, both the next week." To understand this sentence or rather that part of it which seems to have troubled you, it is only necessary to look hack to the immediate preceding expression, which is as follows: "The counsel tor Woolverton, Mr. Dewey, proposed an ad. journment until June." Then follows, "the avowed motive," that is to eay, and in li Jlh i am sorry I did not u-e the expression, since it might have saved some ink and paper His avowed motive xaj, & c 1 was stating a proposition made bv another, Mr. Dewev; and I followed 1 . . . . ...1. :and an imputation of a want of candor. vate or professional business should not ,,m: ui inoitnnni business piiouiii nui be permitted to interfere with an enquiry in which character was at stake." You informed Mr McLaue, that you made this statement You reminded me of it Your communication to Secretary Mc- ( ., , , v antj icnpartmli v the. history of the

aojoururnern. louunewtne proposition'npreaa,tv Comre 9 me to rermest that von

Mill II II I 111 lirill'l I U I 7 II II tVl rknnxlftU.ftl.l acceded on condition You did not sfnie .i. i j .- - .. . J this you do not pretend that you did. Vou left Mr. McLane to presume that I sought the adjournment, h is not for me to decide on motives hut certainly I mav pass upon facts. You made the imputation. You made the omission, and doubtless, I have been injured by the inference, Mr. McLane would make upon the one, especially when suggested by the other. Inasmuch as this, communication has been forced upon me, I will allude to oth er matters. You forgot that the evidence against me was only a mere presumption, aiisiug from a tesemblance of writing, and consequently that it would be proper for me to meet ibis presumption by any othet arising from the facts of the case. This you forgot und wished to curtail my cross ex iminatioii of the witnesses. You forgot that the evidence against me was mere opinion, and that consequently it would be proper for me to show the circumstances uuder which those opinions vreie formed- This you forgot, und Ja-

bored to retrain my investigation unto the I

passions and prejudices, the feelings and the interests ot ttie witnesses. aj. k.-. Johnson had admitted that he and not I, had wiilten the papers in question. You inrfrot that his ability to counterteit wri tings might te materia in support of his n.. ik This vi nil forgot, when I nroveii that he had committed other forgeries, and wondered that I should attempt to blacken the character ot my own witness. The charge against me was that I was the authorof the Cottrell charges against Woolverton. If I were. 1 rrnst have had a motive. That motive could only have been a wish to injure this person. Rut Mr. McLane knows that I recommended an abandonment of the charges on the ground that Cottrell was a ticticious name, j and wherefore did 1 do this? Why did lj not use the power when 1 had it? Why did I seek permission to give it up? But two rational answers can be supposed to these questions. Either I did not wish to injure this person, Woolverton, a supposi tion entirely inconsistent with the charge against me, or I feared thai the charges could not be sustained. On the investigation before you, I wished to prove the truth, the notorious, undoubted and undeniable truth of one of the Cottrell charges against Woolverton. That charge is the seventh, and is as follows: "That his pub lie and private character is so notoriously

bad, that his appointment disgusted alljsources? And, suppose the Treasury to

parties, and the people, nay his family I hav e reason to distrust any oiaie nanu so connexions so distrusted him, that he waV.employ ed, what control, or right of saunable for a long time to give security,1'! pervision, has it over that Bank to enablo shewing that the truth of this charge wasjit to guard the public treasure from dilapinotorious, and thus precluding the second nation! It is easier to multiply, without

of the only two probable explanations my own conduct, would, I pretume, induce the adoption of the first, that J did nor wish to injure him; an answer incon sistent with the charge against me. This couise of reasoning y ou could not understand, or forgot, when you wrote your letter of the 18th March, to Mr. McLane. In that letter, in allusion to Mr Lelloy's counterfeit dollar-story, you observe as follows: "proving that Duct Woolverton was an utterer of counterfeit money, would not disprove the charge." aijain?t me; and tru ly it would not. But nevertheless, it might 6hew the charge against me to be very unreasonable and utterly inconsistent with any rational explanation of my conduct. 1 wished to prove that the truth of this seventh charge was so notorious. that I could not have feared the want of proof of it. You thought this irrelevant, and well enough recollected to give Mr. McLane your opinion J.i conclusion, let me observe that you know it was pi oven by Cunningtiam on his cross examination, ,L, n r 1.1 , :.. -r ii,.,.: ... . r, ,, ,, , al the time the Cottrell patters were mail- . A. , . ed there. 1 his is a complete answer to ., . ' . the strongest circumstance aarainst me, . 4- ,? . i- t 1 nart1 it, lull r r i rn. n i rfi I inn nl l.tlwi.or. a ilti UIJ IU lull witwianvu 'l v uuuwii UIJ1 davit You know too that the only wit-1 ?J ,u"

10 iaoor unuer pre unices or iniere-i, sum- e , . ; I. r 11 i'r the safe keeiting ot iirisoners, or of cient to warp their feelings and mislead1 , , c . ,u , . . 1 u 0 y c. . , i their courts tor trying them, &c and it their opinions. I mean :lessrs. Stout and . . . . , , .. . . .. ' ', . , , , . cannot be doubted, that the Government I omhiifon, and those too, who have had . .. TT . , . . , r . . . ' , . (of the United states, m any time of trial, the best opportunities ot becoming aci, r . r .u o. . t i . , Jleft to the mercv of the Stale Banks, quainted with this same hand-writing of ' . . , , . c . . , . . . . f .- should it be made dependant on them for mine, doubted whether 1 wrote parts of. , ,, 1. c . . ,, 1 i ! the collection and transier ot its revenues, the Cottrell papers And hence, you1 . r -t ,. . , , , 1 .u . .u . i-.i . ' would find itselt hampered and cnpiled know, that the testimony of the witnesses, , t, ,. r , , ,, '. c , - .11 1 .by them. Lqually embarrassed would instead ot being at all conclusive against . . rT . , ... , .. , 1 .rn 11 . the Government of tne United States find me, wasasto the post markat rerre Haute , , - , 11,, . . 1 . ,u 11 -. 1 itselt. in the absence of a ru ilional bank, entirely , aud as to the resemblance of the , . ... J . , ion ihe occurrence ot any emergency in wilting in part, exculpatory. AH lim tooi ., n- J ; ' iji 1 . public aflans requinug the imtrediate use you toigot or yon would have inlormed '.. . . n ? . ., 1 . -f- 1 . . : of considerable sums ol money C ongress

iur. .iicijane 01 11. rtiu navenoi uresrui- , r ..... ... , imav raise money, it is true, hv taxation: ed this testimony to the government ,, . . J . v . J . , , , ,, . c hut that iroce;s requires too much time You have not proposed to do it. But af- . , . . , . 1 1 - 1 to be available on the sudden. Congress ter sentence had been passed upon me on , . c ... . . n . ' , may also borrow money trom individuals-; suspicion after I had been removed on , ... . . J . r. . ... , . . , but lliat operation also requires more desiiMucion after mv character had been , , ' . .. . . , ', , , .. ; liberate action than an insurrection or in. blackened on suspicion, as far as it was mi ,, c n-i , . ri it 1 . 11 1 .! vaaion allows of. I fiere is no financial inthe power ot Louis McLane to blacken it,' . . . , , - ' . . . istrument ty which in such an emergency, you most generously propose to execute;., J . ... ,t,J r . " .- . 1 the Gov ernment could be enabled to act

his most magnanimous proposition to per mit me to prosecute the enquiry at my own expenses and for what good to me?

ttye, hi, wui guou, wuai ui'iirin luuiii ,;UDjjj jj , hope for? Think you, that I can have an' 8 :...i:-...:... . I tlOD.

, , t . . i uiciiuaiioii iu ituuxe iu my uwu person the labor of Sisyphus?

I had fathomed the depth and compassed i,,,e nunently wise and sagaaous sfatcsthe breadth of your wisdom and iinpar-imPn nder whose counsels the first Bank tiality, and of Mr. AIcLane's independence1! of ,1)e United States was established, may and justice. All this I had experienced ! be gathered from the Preamble to the too much, to leave me soon for hope for!art for incorporating the firt Bank ofthe any thing but from time and the good Lni,ed States, in the following words: sense and honesty of the people. j "Whereas, it i conceived that the estah. It has always been my intention at al,i9nment ot' !l I1:,nk ,or 'he United States, proper time to submit to the President! uPnn a foundation sufficiently extensive to himself an exposition of my case. ForanSwfT the purposes intended thereby, this purpose it is necessary that I should; ancl altne sme timeupon principle? which hav e a copy of your record. Loathe as afford adequate security for an upright and am to ask tor any thing, even for the mere' prudent administration thereof, will be vc-

means of simple justice, at your hands,r.V conductive to the successful conductive

.. vvill cause a complete copy of the record to be made out at ray expense, to certify its correctness, and to forward it to me by mail. 1 am, Sir, Your obpdient Servant, SAMUEL JUDAII. HON. B. PARKE, Judge District Court, U. S. Indiana District. From the National Infcligcnrer. THE BANK QUESTION NO. V. In our last number we admilted, for the sake of argument, that a single local Bank might be capable of transacting (at great expense to the Government, however.) the business, for the Treasury of the Unit ed States, which is now transacted, free of charge, by the Bank of the United Staff -We now retract that admission, whit h nothing but the purpose of our argument could have justified our making. No local Bank, we now maintain, eould, at nnv expense, satisfactorily supply the agency

of a Hank of the United States, shorn-; he

Treasury be dciuived of the aid of such an Institution by suffering the charter ol the liank to expire. We do not hesitate to say, that not only no single Hank, but m set of State Hanks, can afford the same security and the same facilities to the Treasury for the deposits, and transfer of its fund, as those which iare furnished bv the Dank of the United States. What State lianK in iew iorii, Uoston, or Philadelphia, would transfer half a million of dollars, at one stroke of the Secietary's pen, and without one day'a notice, to St. Louis, for instance, as the Bank of the United States has done? Or, in the same way, without notice, could have transferred from East to West, and from South to North, and the reverse, tho sixteen millions which the document pub lished by order of the Senate, at the close of the last Session, shews that the Bank transferred during the year 1832 alone It is certain that no Stale Bank can do this without notice, and the allowance of time, to the extent in some cases probably of several months a day which, it must be obvious to every one would entirejy frustrate the purposes of the Government in having transfers made. What sufficient security, moreover, could any Slate Bank give for the safe disburserr ent of sums of money so far beyonri the amount of its capital or its reofjend, such questions as these, than it would be to answer one of them Thx-y cannot be answered. We doubt, nevei thelea, whether they have ever been senounly weighed by those who, trom personal motives, are plotting the dertruction of the Mank of the U. States. Wc challenge any one, who has any pretension to political sagacity, to state a single reason , connected with the public good, why the government of the United Slates should be made dependant on tho State Banks, for the administration of the public finances. The use of the State Banks in any particular State, (or in any number of States,) may be even forbidden to the United States by the State Government. If it be replied to this, that it is improbable, we answer that it has, in fact, been done; for the charters of sme of the'State Banks do absolutely forbid them from loaning money to the United States. But, suppose that fact to be mereiy accidental, it ia . r . . .. , , c. . o matter of history that the State Govern ments are capable, one or other of them, c , . - f , 1 .1 . .i of entertaining feelings so hostile to the . 0 , 0 . f , . iGeneral Goveniment as to forbid the use r . , .-. c .1 r l0 btate Institutions lor the purposes of , IIthe United States. During the late ivar, for emample, the Legislatures of partial'Jar States refused the use of their iuU so promptly, energetically, and efficiently, as a Bank of the United Slates, able and 1 1 1 r 1 rr Ir. I 1 I ha ..Aiira rt lliA CI i r r r. nr Tillliirj; uraill llir urii'M Mil uniciuulCU. resources can be brought into ac How well all this was understood by ' t,lC national finances ; wi lend to crive facility to the obtaining of loans, fur ihe use of Government in sudden emergencies; and wi'.l be productive of considerable advantages to trade in general; therefore, &c.v' The mere rectical of thia preamble, is a reply to every argument of expediency that can be urgetl against the existence of a Bank of the United State?. Less wise than their elders, the cupidity of certain S'ates had sufficient influence to cause the Congress of 1811, to do away the agency of this first Bank when its charter expired. But, so indispensable did experience-prove it to be, that four years only elapsed before the same party established the present National Bank, with three times the capital of that which they had put down. How dear bought the experience which taught the absolute necessity of this measure! Now reat Ihe folly even to madness, of those who persuade themselves that this Bank'can !e put down, and the Government depositee surrendered into the hands of the State Banks, without a repetition of the icencsof 1813and 1814, when Treasury