Richmond Palladium (Daily), Volume 36, Number 59, 7 January 1911 — Page 2
PAGE TWO.
the mcmioXD palladium and sun-telegram, Saturday, January t, ion. r Enquired if wc were "hiring" a certain "weekly" paper to abuse, us
' . ! . '
Of course every time a spot light is turned on from any source It offers a splendid chance to talk about the merits of the products, but 'pn honor now, we are not hiring that "Weekly." The general reader seldom cares much for the details of "scraps." A few may have read lately some articles attacking us and may be interested in the following: Some time ago a disagreement arose with a "Weekly." They endorsed our foods by letter, but wanted to change the form of advertising, to which wc objected. The "Weekly" discontinued inserting our advertisements while they were negotiating for some changes they wanted in the wording and shape of the advertisements, and during this correspondence our manager gave instructions to our Advertising Department to quit advertising altogether in that "Weekly." Quite a time after the advertising had been left out, an editorial attack came. We replied in newspapers and the scrap was on. Then came libel suits from both sides, and some harsh words. Generally tiresome to the public. That "Weekly" has attacked many prominent men and reputable manufacturers. Our Company seems prominent enough for a sensational writer to go after, hunt for some little spot to criticise, then distort, twist and present it to the public under scare heads.
So an attorney from New York spent more or less time for months in Battle Creek hoping to find impurities in our foods, or dirt in the factories. After tireless spying about he summoned twenty-five of our workmen and took their testimony Every single one testified- that the foods are made of exactly the grain and ingredients printed on the packages; the wheat, barley and corn being the choicest obtainable all thoroughly' cleaned the water of the purest, and every part of the factories and machinery kept scrupulously clean. That all proved disappointing to the "Weekly." There are very few factories, hospitals, private or hotel and restaurant kitchens that could stand the close spying at unexpected times and by an enemy paid to find dirt or impurities of some kind. In any ordinary kitchen or factory he would find something to magnify and make a noise about. But he failed utterly with the Postum Works and products. Twenty to thirty thousand people go through the factories annually and we never enquire whether they are there to spy or not. It makes no difference to us. He next turned to discover something about our advertising that could be criticised. An analysis of the methods and distorted statements of the "Weekly" may interest some readers, so we take up the items one by one and open them out for inspection. We will "chain up" the harsh words and make no reference in this article to the birth, growth and methods of the "Weekly" but try to confine the discussion to the questions now at issue.
Battle Creek, Michigan, December 30, 1910. We the undersigned certify that never to our knowledge has a testimonial letter been printed by the Postum Cereal Co., Ltd., which did not have behind it a genuine letter signed, and believed to be an honest statement. To the best of our knowledge and belief thg Company has received upwards of fifty thousand (50,000) genuine testimonial letters. This Company has never knowingly made nor permitted an untruthful statement regarding its products or its methods. M. K. HOWE, Treasurer. (With Company about 14 years.) L. J. LAMSON, Inspector Of AdvtS. (With Company about 9li years.) F. C. GRANDIN, Advertising Manager(With Company about 13 years.) R. M. STERRETT, M.D., Physician in charge of Scientific Dep't (With Company about i years) CHESTON SYER, Advt. Writer. (With Company about 3 years.) CHARLES W. GREEN, Advt. Writer. (With Company about 5 years.) HARRY E. BURT, General Sup't. (With Company about 13 years) H. C. HAWK, Assistant tO Chairman (With Company about 7 years.) . C. W. POST, Chairman. (With Company 16 years, from the beginning.)
Distortion No. 1 Btated that we have, been accustomed to advertise
jl iw.tuia fiuii iwmiu mm vu.vw..for everything." It has never been the policy or this Company .to advertise Grape-Nuts or Postum to cure anything.' 'We say that In cases where coffee disagrees and Is causing sickness its dismissal will remove the cause of the trouble and we suggest the use of Postum for the reason that It furnishes a hot palatable morning beverage, and contains natural elements from the grain which ran be. used by nature to assist In rebuilding nerve centres that coffee may have broken' down. Likewise Grape-Nuts food docs not cure anything, but does assist nature tremendously In rebuilding, providing the undtgestlblei food that has been used Is discontinued and , Grape-Nuts taken In Us place. Charge No. 2 8tate" that the passage ot the National Food & Drugs Act compelled us to drop from the package some assertions regarding the nutritive value of Grape-Nuts. We have never been "compelled" to make any change. Since the beginning it has been a tiniversal rule to print clearly on every packaao exactly what the contents are made of. Ik-fore the passage of the Pure Pood Law the packages Btated that GrapeNuts food was made of wheat and barley. We did not esteem the small amount of salt and yeast of value enough to speak of, but after the Law came In we became as technical as the officials at Washington and added the words "yeast" and "salt" although we have no recollection of being asked to. We believed that our statement that GrK-Nuts will supply elements to nourish the brain and nerve centres Is true and bring authorities to support the fact. Some state chemists believed this a gross exaggeration and Inasmuch as the Food Dept. at Washington, could easily harass grocers, tending a trial on the disputed Question, we concluded that much the better way would 1h to eliminate from our packages such claims, however certain we may he that the claims are true. Another statement objected to read lis follows: "The system will absorb a greater umount of nourtxhnient from one )ound of Grape-Nuts than from ten pound of meat, wheat, psJsor bread." Some Department chchiUfs Troeolve themselves as well as the public. "Calorie" Is the word which defines n unit of heat determined by the amount necessary to raise one kilogram of water one degree centigrade. On this basis a table of calories Is prepared showing the percentage of different kinds of food. nutter shows 8.60Y Grape-Nuts 3.96: milk 0.70. Remember the statement on the package
spoke of the nourishment the system would absorb, but did not speak of
th calories of heat contained in it, for the heat Is not nourishment, and the nourishment cannot be judged by the number of heat units, notwithstanding the fact that certain chemists would have the public believe so. As an illustration: Attempt to feed a man sixty days on butter alone, with Its 8.60 calories. The man would die before the experiment had run sixty days. Then, take Grape-Nuts with 3.96 and milk with 0.70, the two combined equal 4.66. about one-half the number of calories contained In butter. The man fed for sixty days on this food would -be well nourished, and could live not only sixty days but six months on that food alone, and we do not hesitate to say from our long knowledge of the sustaining power of the food that a inan at the end of sixty days would be practically the same weight as when he started, if he be a man of normal weight. We will suppose that from his work he lost a pound a day and made up a pound each day from food.. If that premise proved to be true the man In sixty days time would make sixty pounds of tissue to replace what' had been lost, and this would be done on Grape-Nuts and milk with half the number of calories of butter, upon which no one can sustain life. Therefore, we have reason to believe that our contention Is right, that concentrated food like Grape-Nuts, which is partly digested and ready for easy- assimilation by the body, presents more nourishment that the system will absorb than many other forms of food and we will further say that in cases of digestive troubles where meat, white bread, and oats cannot be digested, that Grape-Nuts and milk contain more nourishment that the system will absorb than many pounds ot these other foods. Distortion No. 3 cnare3 that our testimonials were practically all paid for and re-written in Battle Creek. These testimonials were demanded by opposing lawyers. Naturally this demand was refused, for they are held in vaults and kept safe to prove the truth, and are not to be delivered up on demand of enemies. Testimony at the trial brought out the fact that we never printed a single testimonial that we did no have the genuine letter back of. Many of these letters came spontaneously. A record was kept of twelve hundred and four (1201) letters received in one month from people who wrote that they had either entirely recovered their health or been benefitted by following our suggestions on food and beverages. On three or four occasions in the past ten or twelve years we printed broadcast In papers offers of prizes to users of Postum and Grape-Nuts, two hundred $1.00 prizes, one hun
dred $2.00, twenty $3.00 and five $10.00 i
each, stating that each must be an honest letter with name and address.
We agreed not to publish names, but to furnish them to enquirers by letter. These letter writers very generally answered those who wrote to them, and verified the truth of the statements. Under this agreement not to publish names literally scores of letters came from doctors. We kept our word and neither printed their names or surrendered the letters. Right here notice an "imitation spasm." The "Weekly" says: "Post got those testimonials by advertising for them. In New York he used for that purpose the New York Magazine of whose editor Is now in the Federal Penitentiary for fraudulent use of the mails. For example, Post announced in that magazine in 1907, etc.," (then follows our prize competition). We used nearly all the papers and magazines lTewTorTmTTeest
of America, out the sensational writer gives the impression to his readers that the only magazine we used was one "whose editor is now in the Federal Penitentiary," etc., something that we know nothing of the truth ot now, and never did. Space was bought in the magazine spoken of cn a business basis for the reason that it went to a good class of readers. The incident seems to have furnished an opportunity for a designing writer to deceive his readers. We look upon honest human testimony from men and women as to the means by which they recovered health as of tremendous value to those in search of it. Our business has been conducted from the very first day upon lines of strict Integrity and we never yet have published a false testimonial of human experience. Many of these letters covered numerous sheets: some, if printed, would spread over half a page of newspaper. If we would attempt to print one such letter in every one of the thousands of papers and magazlnees we use, the cost of printing that one letter would run Into many thousands ot dollars. We boil down these letters exactly as a newspaper writer boils his news, sticking sacredly to the Important facts and eliminating details about the family and other unimportant matters. This work of boiling down, or editing, is done honestly, and with a full knowledge of our responsibility, but notice the art of the "twister" in the way he presents to his readers this matter of testimonials. Distortion No. 4. is a bad one. It reads as follows: "The only famous physician whose name was signed to a testimonial was produced In Court by Colliers and turned out to be a poor old brokendown homeopath, who is now working in a printing establishment. He received ten
dollars ($10.00) for writing his test! monial." We will wager ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) with any investigator that we have, subject to Inspection of any fair committee, upwards of three hundred (300) communications from physicians, many of them expressing the highest commendation of our products, but these will not now or ever be turned over to the publisher for his use. Notice the statement in this charge: "The only famous physician whose name was signed to Postum testimonial, etc." The truth is, this Dr. Underwood was oue of a great many physicians who have not only written comendatory words about the value of our foods, but every now and then some physician writes an article on coffee or on food, and sends it to us with a suggestion of compensation for his time and medical knowledge. Previous to the time when we employed physicians in our own business, we occasionally employed a doctor to write an article on coffee, always insisting that the article be an honest expression of his opinion and research. The "Weekly" hunted up this physician, and because he seemed to be poor, and as it says, "brokendown," had him brought to Court to be exposed before a jury as the "only physician that had ever endorsed GrapeNuts," but much to the chagrin of the "Weekly," when our attorney asked him if the article he wrote about coffee was true, he replied, "yes." Statement No. 5. reads: "The health officers of Mich., Maine, Perm., New Hamp., and other states in their official bulletins have for years been denouncing as preposterous and fraudulent the claims made by the Postum Cereal Company." We do not recall any criticism except from Mich., Penn., Maine and S. Dakota. The average reader might think that the opinions expressed by the State officials are always correct, but that conclusion is not borne out by facts. As an illustration: About thirteen years ago the Dairy and Food Commission of Michigan for some personal reason printed a severe criticism on us for making Postum of Barley (according to his official chemist) at market price and selling it too high. He was shown there was never a grain of
barley in Postum. His report was false and misleading. The governor dismissed him. We believe that most of the state officials are honest, and on the other hand we are firmly convinced that some of their conclusions cannot be substantiated by facts in scientific research. They never criticize the purity of our foods, for so much we are thankful. If our conclusions in regard to its being a brain food differ from their's, and we are both honest, they have rather the advantage, because under the law they can order us to eliminate from the package any statement if it disagrees with their opinion. Otherwise they would harass grocers.
Spasm No. 6 says: "Tne most dangerous thing in the world for one threatened with appendicitis is to eat any food whatever. Notwithstanding he knew that danger, C. W. Post advertised Grape-Nuts at II f teen cents a package for those so threatened." This is intended to muddle the reader into believing that we put out Grape-Nuts as a cure for appendicitis, Mr. Post, himself, has had probably as wide experience as any other man in America in the study and observation of food as related to the digestive organs, and we proved in Court by physicians and surgeons on the witness stand that the predominating cause of appendicitis is undigested food, and that it is necessary to quit eating food and when the body requires food again, use a pre-digested food, or at least one easy of digestion. Dr. Ochsner in bis work on appendicitis refers directly to the use of the well-known pre-digested foods that can be obtained on the market. He also brought out the fact that in "after treatment" it is advantageous to take on a pre-digested food. The price of the package (referred to by the weekly) is not known to us to have any relation to the question. Our advice to stop using indigestible food in bowel troubles and to use Grape-Nuts food has been a great blessing to tens of thousands of people, and we hope will continue to bless a good many more in the succeeding years. No. 7 ,s a live wire- !t refers to C. W. Post and his studies and experience in "Suggestive Therapeutics," or "Mental Healing" which further lead to a most careful and systematic 6tudy of the effect of the mind on the digestive and other organs of the body. , He attended clinics in Europe and fitted himself for a future career in which he has become known as one of the food experts of the world, fitted to judge both from the material as well as the mental side of the question. For about eight years previous to 1891 he waS an invalid. In that year, after being under the care of several well-known physicians he was quickly healed, by what to him was a curious and not well-understood method. Sufficient to say he became a well man weighing about 185 pounds. ' This experience challenged his Investigation into causes of disease and their amelioration. Those studies and experiences developed a very pro
found reverence for a Supreme Power
announcements. Newspaper me' believe our statements truthful or they would not print them. Large numbers of newspaper men use our products. They are capable of telling the pub11c whether or not we "bribe" them.
It may have escaped notice that we did not "bribe" that particular weekly.
No. 9 Btatea tnat tDe amount of the verdict will be "devoted by the 'weekly to exposing fraud." This is almost real humor. We have two suits pending against the "weekly," total, $500,000.00. We haven't "devoted" the sum to any particular purpose yet. Item 10 is a "discovery" that wheat bran is a part of Postum.
j But the criticism neglected to mention that for years every Postum package announced in plain type that the
outer covering oj waeai luranj, maue part of the beverage. They ignorantly fell Into a trap here not knowing enough of food value to know that "Taka-Diastase" the article used by physicians the world over for "starch indigestion" is made from "wheat bran." So we use that part of the wheat berry because it contains the element needed to develop the valuable diastase in manufacture. Good Postum is impossible without this part. These self-appointed critics do make some laughable blunders through ignorance, but be patient. Item 11 is an illustratlon of tne squirming and twisting of the sensa-
which directly ODerates unon the hu
man being, and this reverence for the Infinite became to him a form of re
ligion which Included honesty of purpose towards his fellow-man. A statement which will be indorsed by every one who knows him closely. He will make a public announcement in detail of these facts, and the Postum -Company will cause that statement to be published in newspapers and magazines in due time. We suggest the reader look for it. Prevarication No. 8. "Poet spends nearly a million a year in advertising and relies on that to keep out of the newspapers the dangerous nature of the fraud he is perpetrating on the public." The Postum Company does pay out upwards of a million a year for trade
tional writer delivering distorted matter to his readers. While on the witness stand Mr. Post testified to bis studies In Anatomy, Physiology, Dietetics and Psychology, all relating to the preparation and digestion of food. Asked to name authorities studied he mentioned six or eight from memory, and commented on some clinical experience covering several years in annual journeys to Europe. Now notice the distortion. (Copy from the printed criticism.) "He (Post) pointed out a pile of books in possession of his attorneys as the very ones he had read." (Notice, "the very ones he had read," leading the reader to believe that they were the only ones.) "Did you consult the books from these editions?" was asked. "From those and various editions," answered Post. The attorney "picked up book after book from the pile and showed the title pages to the jury, all except two had been published since 1905." This is an example of distortion and false coloring to produce an unfavorable impression. The facts are Mr. Post purposely introduced the latest editions that could be obtained of prominent authorities to prove by them the truth of his statements regarding appendicitis and and the analysis of brain, also the latest conclusions In regard to the action of the digestive organs. These works are: Human Physiology, by Raymond. Physiological Chemistry, by Simon. Digestive Glands, by Pawlow. Hand Book of Appendicitis, by Ochsner. Physiological Chemistry, by Hammarsten. Biochemic System of Medicine by Carey.
The "Weekly" carefully eliminates from its printed account, testimony regarding the years of research and study by Mr. Post in fitting himself for his work, and would lead the read-
er of the distorted article to believe that his education began since 1905. Distortion No. 12 rePrts Mr Post as a "dodging witness." His eye is not of the shifty kind observed in the head of one of his chief critics. On the witness stand Mr. Post looks quietly but very steadily
straight into the eyes ot the haggling twisting lawyer, trying by all his art to ask double-barreled questions and bull-doze and confuse a witness. The "dodging" It seems consisted ot replying, "I don't know." Opposing counsel holds a book In his hand while he queries "I want to know if there is a single thing in your whole book here that suggests any particular kind of food." Then followed some discussion between attorneys. When Mr. Post was allowed to reply, he said. "I don't know until I read the book over and see." This book, it turns out, was written by Mr. Post seventeen years ago and probably has not been read carefully by him in the last fifteen years. It would require a remarkable memory to instantly say "yes" or "no" as to what a book of 147 pages did or did not contain, without reading it over, but such conservative and well balanced answers are construed by sensation seekers to be "dodging." The attorney sought by every art to impress the Jury with the fact that Mr. Post's belief In the power of Mind
In relation to the body branded him as unreliable and worse. The following is quoted from one of the questions: (The lawyer reading from the book.) "The writer of these pages desires to say nothing of himself other than as a simple instrument through which the Divine Principle chooses to manifest itself by precept and example. "Skill in mental practice is sained in the same way as skill in any department of science by observation, study, experience and the ability to evolve correct conclusions. "Read carefully, thoughtfully no more than twenty pages daily. Afterward seek an easy position where you will not be disturbed. .- Relax every muscle. Close your eyes, and go into the silence where the mind is plastic to the breathings of spirit and where God talks to the Son. The thoughts from Divine Universal Mind come as winged angels and endow you with a bealine power. If you so into
the silence humble and trusting, you will come out enriched and greatly strengthened in body bycontact even for a short time with the Father of all life and all power. You will feci refreshed in every way and food taken will digest readily as the stomach works smoothly when under the influence of a Higher Power." "I ask you if you did not write that, and if you did not believe It when you wrote it." For a moment the Court Room was in absolute silence. Mr. Post slowly leaned forward over the rail, pointed his finger at the Atty's face to emphasize his reply and with eyes that caused those of the At torney to drop he said- "Yes, I am proud to say I did."
,' It may be remembered that we were first attacked and have sine rV Tonfc cursdves bv nlacing facts before that great juryThe Public.
Jk good "scrap is more or less comforting now and then, if you know you are right. v'; In the case lately tried, an appeal has been taken to the higher courts. We have unbounded frith in the ultimate decision of our American Tribunals. :.:j;,Oiir.wito against the "weekly" have not yet been tried. They are for libel and $500,000.00 is
asked as damages, and may the right man win.
After all the smoke of legal battle blows away, the facts will stand out clearly and never be fof-
gotten that Postum. Grape-Nuts, and Post Toasties are perfectly pure, have done good honest service to humanity for years, the testimonials are real and truthful and the business conducted on the highest plane of commercial integrity. "Thoro'o a Koacoitt"
Cof td ISattlo Croc!s. MIcH.
