Rensselaer Union, Volume 9, Number 7, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 2 November 1876 — The Vicissitudes of a Stolen $64,000 [ARTICLE]

The Vicissitudes of a Stolen $64,000

IWfc^k'sthfbtiwwi -jhWtbidwGith bonodfti^biiiiihn pwicadt WAttWl eiatki onoisekitiiigihis-BaifereeowJe unaafdiodiunfthariallM sAwita oapturdd by suwboiit|es :§Mi, sf ith-ttvt ataman iODJsgbt tgreans* '»St*eMn*uttfe #p®WIoSIWOWW tokl kdlL^ocdihsnadltlbaMisttiSftßtOMMU jtffc guaKfliiWie ltrt^U.i«Aidlii» been uniformJy iindJorhkn. This,nuajx eiiaejivoiid TOnOTme 4 *plant, deaotiptiooiof thepl&cfc»fiibamil*&» «c unthuihdi, coidurfed ftyjtiveJtfcg agbdiiiSi year ago Wells, Fargo & Ca.‘%igWged«S. case,*onenng nim a nanaspme percentage •fiiwWatGt«# bilWibtt the plant was supposed to .be ana found «hbolttsKr»VH|ddUi% t»MbebM reaciitafk. raised tind removed to another place, ertkoaf Of lAeiftbiHpads #66 '««M#d Ms WWiioft: wlio. ft Appears, a sliort time before Mr. fUAdMIM spofc,' Hkd : H3«ii rebf tlieVbuHKin,: aim)oimtlhg<*v»SHmit Jrtfif;000 or $15,000, had been various places around,Virginia,City, ,-and ItWasHnalfyifriieeff W tfe iOrfCo# 4fint, fililWbWffi, alarmed at. the close watch Kept upon m ( ‘ilrit'P Vlim la?# without any, prearrangement whatever, aid*' wfttfbtrt* 4i«i^tfW^h I s\*pirtbn' i llMt bttwd«ed» fifumilefi SJPW'jg,. party tamTOw ff *ne s *\TOrtr to nan rTanfiWftiliSirrultl QMUbqMkm <he«la>dsrtb tiinp iJh#t i«jey| iadlibbtn tong fcsssysii^ ftwttdg.Ato* i«Woni ipWMMwpKiiiisnW.ioa.ojll.il'J-.K f*n toiKberhaM lass mfrfTravcica across tne mountains, •si) uwiUp»o4inkt»*Ma tAsfiiMmmk theiiullion had nefififJSTtfd Wifc'lfa.iiTlMff sft sSScFforfl^ - »-J Mhmm •WSHBw omDH|^ilnM(W They either lwiUM»Sth I toHftcfciMtoqfefiti't’do torotfUsttoeroiid ttoftWthnoi JalV,l.-*SIAvMi« qfSwavU arwkto aalfi»i<Asciwf^h«rasatetloted) %£&f*smZ3i wmwoiN: li>H bsflr sndutbkosm KsßaasS

[HUIIIWI WHWWPWFUII! HIWWIP 111 l parties, charging them with grand larceny in of bullion valued at ’eS ffiF'lr I'* 1 '* Cf)nD^l^-§f n y nary examTnaiion for po other purpose than to shut out the facts of the case. n,,Tiw imfimntmtfm<*f witnesses developed the fact that the bar aymyhogus, which appeared to greatly as'lohisli the prosecuting witness. However, the counsel for the defense said he wished [ 1 11 itoiilni pp ItotouUbU hcjfoii- the [lUftW!att«ira(ptiWßr!iun! ■ answer in baU it is fhar'ln l kdtiß J lbci - tion of the bußhmaiaf e 5»sW®9W W» 1 1 gWvW Hmni *o