Rensselaer Republican, Volume 25, Number 6, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 6 October 1892 — The Only One Ever Printed—Can 'Tod Find the Word? S [ARTICLE]

The Only One Ever Printed—Can 'Tod Find the Word? S

There is a 3-inch display advertisement In this paper this week which lias ne two words alike except one word. The same, is trneof each new one appearing each week from the Dr. Harter Medicine Co. This house places a crescent on every thing they make and publish. Look for it, send them the name of the word, and they will return you BOOK, BEAUTIFUL LITHOGRAPH* or SAMPLES freo.

“Oh, wen, just BO we can get them to believe it until after the The members of the Pilot gang are hard to please. They first declared the attributing the above remark to one of their number was a lie, and wanted to know which one said it When we accommodated them with the information'they asked for, the denial of having used the words is still persisted in, and the name of the person to whom the words were said, is asked for. We do not care to publish the gentlemen’s name jjfo, this connection without his consent, no more than any other honorable paper would, bat we wil give his name to any officer of the PtW Publishing Oa, who wil call upon ns for it, and who will * agree not to publish it without his DOußOuii

The increase of local taxes by Republican local officials in Indiana last year was $1,623,013.30. The only reason for potting this immence burden mi the people IWS to make them believe the state tax law did it. Can the people be deceived by this shallow A food idea of how much truth there is in the above paragraph, may be had by studying the complete statement of taxes in this county, in another part of this ' paper. The Democratic State Committee obtains its figures of | Bepublican increase of taxes, by t counting all the increase in Re- | publican counties, whether made by s Bepublican trustees or Democrat ic trustees. Bat the same role don’t work in Democratic counties, for in them they do not count the increase made by Bepublican trustees as part of the Democratic increase, Riddell would only be fair, but they count such increases ss part of the general Republican increase. In E&ther words ALL the increase in Bepublican counties is counted against the Republicans, and also a Democratic counties. There is also little doubt but that in making up these statements of increase, tiie Democratic committee dishonestly saglecte fb deduct the d&ve&hes made by Republican officials. They thus give the gioss increase when they ought to give ware made tor the purpose of . making the tax lew odious is also conclusively disproves by oui