Rensselaer Republican, Volume 20, Number 32, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 12 April 1888 — The Court Record. [ARTICLE]

The Court Record.

The MKrch term of the Jasper! Circuit Court closed last S&tOr’daj’. The term wee peculiar in thel particulars that the docket was upusunlly light, that thd grand i jury found no" indictments and j that the pettit jury trvd but one 1 ciise. All state cases on the dock{et were continued to the June 1 term. Disposition of civil ! w;is made, ne enumerated below, I except that no mention is hiade of 'ciiiifinilinnccs. Mary E. £ahzy vs Mary J, Nash et al, m partition, land repotted sold to Peter Naslt, for $1096. Eugene Park vs Erniina D. Raymond, in partition, land reported sold io,Eugene Park, for i?4S(X). C. & 1- C. Uy. Co. vs J. C. Dunn et al, judgment against plaiutiff for-costs. " Geo. H. Drown, adnt’r. vs Lucy Clark et al, petition to sell to pay ' di'i>is,.luud reported sold to 11. W. Porter, for SSOO. G. 11. Brown, ex’r. vs. M iry E. ! Gulp et al, ertle-s+f-kmil reporttd to i R. B. Harris for $122. Jacob liosecraiis vs. David C. Hahn et al, partition, land sold to Mary E. f.angldin, for SI,OOO. Daniel C’Connbr, adm’r vs, An-, na Eck et al, real-estate sold to Andrew Bukowski and James Hogan. Mary E. Oos’ey ve. Joseph Ocsley’divorce eranted plaintiff. JolniH. Wo.nl vs Haisar K-Jl-Icr, i .i i o;i note disniEsed at def’s ‘ cost. ( IJaffimjLUttiiy, et al vs. Taylor Orbofiic et ;d, in partition. Property (iFilered sold and proceeds distributed. State ex rel, Mary Hines vs Per- ; ry Britton, b tstardy, plaintiff mmle 1 suitable, provision for maintain-: ance of child. Costs paid and J case dismissed. Beuj. \V. Lam son a t s,. Eliza J, Cooper et al. note and mortgage, judg. for. $1085.06, costs and fore- I closure. ‘ e i

Warren D. Swisher vs. Sarah E. , Elliot, to quiet title to a-eal-estate dismissed at pl?s. c st. W. 51. Timmons vs. E. L. McCaslin, to quiet title, dismissedArther 11. Hopkins vs Jane DeLong et al, decree quieting title in plj, and judg. against plf for costs. Livingston et al vs Sayers & I Tyler, on account, dis. at plf’s I cost. I Prior Bowen vs L., N. A. & C. j Ry., suit for damages for stock killed, venue to White county. - Cox vs Aman et al, note and mortgage, judg. for plf. for $409.33 costs and foreclosure. Wm. B. Austin vs Engbert ,01son et al, decree to quiet title, plaintiff’s cost. Nolan vs Ranney, note and mortgage, judg. for pit M6H.20, costs and foreclosure. R. F. Priest vs F. M. Goff and F. M. Hays. t note, judg. for plf.,! $52.80 and costs. Aetna Life Ins. Co. vs Elias Driscoll et al, note and mortgage, judg. for plf. $816.40, costs and foreclosure. Hursh, Elson <fc Co. vs Nathan I Fendig, on acct, judg. for pit $235 ■ and costs. Omar AV. Calvert vs. Cyrus J Haas et al, attachment, dismissed, I claim paid. I Danid H. Turner vs Win. H. [ Muflley, note and mortgage, judg. * for plf. $44.10 and foreclosure. Merriman, Collins A Co. vs Sayers & Tyler, judg. for plf. 810,9.71 and costs. r « i R. P. Benjamin vs John L. | Biekness, et ux, on acct., dismissed claim paid. I —Dwiggins vs Davail, note judg ’ for plf $93.56 and costs.' AV. B. Austin vs Leroy Sayer.-, i note and judgment for plf 8221.33 costs and foreclosure. ; Robe ts, Throp A Co. vs John' and James AVhittaker. judg fotplf. j 46.33 and for def for costs. o ... . . ... _ ......... .. .. .......... I