Rensselaer Republican, Volume 20, Number 20, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 19 January 1888 — In the Circuit Court. [ARTICLE]

In the Circuit Court.

In the old case of Fui'st A Brad . ley vs.Sainud M. Black, formerly of Remington, a judgment for j 82T02..J5 and costs was entered against Black. This case was decided in this court; once, and re-t ! versed in tlie Bupremo Court, . Black is in Colorado and sai l to i be Well fixed, financially. In the case of ' -amT. W. ITitchcy ct a!., vs. ().. K. Ritchey et decree for partition of TTfute / vTS mitered.. The court found, that defendants, O. K. ! lbtrhoy, Aurelia Downing and Mary E. Welsh bad each Twoived frou.i the estate of Alary E. Ritchey, deceased, 8580.. Coumiission--uui were appointed Lo partition th c estate.

Decrees to quiet title were or- ; dcVcd in tlie crises of S. P.Thotupi son vs. John Aioxan’der. et -al; J horn as Thompson vs T. N. Williams et Jil; James Cooper vs Michael H. Good et al. Bam McGorkle vs. Percy S. Tay- ! lor, suit on note, was dismissed at tfeteudamt-’wcost,— Percy 3. Taylor vs WvdterTYise- ' man, et al, suit for damages' from burning liny, was compromised by parties and dismi -H d, each partypaying his own c- st:;. The replevin suit of Chile. I*'. Marlow vs Julia \V. Duvall was Iri.-d bv n jury and the property| ftwiu-lcti to the phuntifi:. \Ym. B. Austin vs Juba M, Welsh,, to foreclose moitgage/j judgement for,plaintiff for $853.70 . and costs. * j I lm case of Frod J. Lang vs. Godfrey Shultz was tried by a jury; the parties are neighbors and live near Surrey. Lang bought-a mare of Shultz paying $125. cash. According to Lang Shultz reedmmended the animal as entirely gt ntle, but she-proved; so vicious that nothing could be dt.uie with her. Lang asked Shultz to take the mare back, and return the purchase money, but Shultz refused.' Shortly afterwards the mare was found dead, In the .pasture, with her foot fust m her halter. Lang still demanded bis money back and Shultz compromised by giving. Lang his note for: .&G.O. This b’imltz refused to pay, ] ■ ci.d-ini-.'ig ruT of—c-ms’dm’alam ] The suit was to recover on the note, j and the j ary gave judgment iyA favor of L..iig'for 378.7j0a.aci costs.- ’ In the case of E. E. Fdloy vs. ; suit cm note, from WhAe c.e.itiy, A intiif :ot judgement' for f 21‘fi.l-i. Renfield Afean vs. M. G. Stackhouse, suit on note, juJg. forplaiu--tift for 32114:3. : The jury was discharged Thursday, of last week. On Friday court was adjourned until Wednesday, of this week.