Ligonier Banner., Volume 14, Number 50, Ligonier, Noble County, 1 April 1880 — Page 4

o> ® g . The Ligonier Bamrey. J. B. STOLL, Editor and Proprietor. —— e ——— THURSDAY, APRIL 1, 1880. Democratic County Convention. The voters of Noble county, regardless of past politieal afliliation, who are desirous of co-operating with the democratic party in support of its principles, are invited to attend and participate in the meeting of the Demoecracy, to be held at Albion, on SATURDAY, the 17th DAY of APRIL, 1880, for the purpose of selecting delegates to attend the Democratie State Convention at Ihdiahapolis, June 9th, and also to attend the Democratic Congressional Convention at Auburn, April 29, and to tragsact such other business. as the party m::;%\‘em hest for its thorough organization. : By order of Central Committee. H. WAKEMAN, Chairman.

. COUNTY PRINTING. : One of the most unpleasant features of countiy newspaper life is the existence, in many localities, of snarling; envious creatures that through some unaccountable and. incognprehensible circumstance manage to impose themselves upon an indulgent reading public as managers of alleged county papers. Noble county. especially, seems to labor under the misfortune of such an affliction. For years the people of this county have been disgusted by the foaming and raving of these *vermin with types,” as the Cincinnati Enquirer aptly styles these detestable creatures. Whatever could be done by them to degrade rural journalism, to lower the press in the estimation of men of a high sense of honor, has been resorted to by this stripe of so-called editors. L

These prefatory remarks are prompted by the appearance, in last week’s Albion New Era, of an article nearly one-and-a-half columns in length, with flaming headlines, put up in true blacksmith style, and in spirit characteristic of the whining sycophant who presides over the columns of that lying sheet. The whole tenor of the article betrays the sourness of its narrowminded author. Glancing over the recent- allowances by the board of county commissioners he espied the (to him) dazzling figures of $208.95 in favor of THE BANNER and only $4.60 in favor of the Era. Terrible, monstrous, shocking injustice to Jacob P. Prickett! Take heed, ye tax-payers; your treasury is being “plundered,” and Jake Prickett is boiling over with rage over those luscious but to him utterly inaccessible grapes! -

Let us examine a little into the “startling facts and figures,” presented by this Albion hypochondriac. THE BANNER received at the Mareh term $208.95 for publishing 18 notices of sales of school lands, and ‘posters for same, delinquent tax list, treasurer’s notice to tax-payers, rules of the board of commissioners, unclaimed county orders, allowances, stationery, &c. For the notices of tax sales, published by Auditor Stewart, we received the usual legal fées charged by the Era and other papers for similar work. The money expended for this advertising will flow back into the treasury whenever final sale is made of these school lands in Rome City. This advertising was rendered necessary, and was done at the instance of a number of citizens of Orangé township, in order to vest the title in.the county to such of the sehool lands as failed to sell for the amount due, that they might be re-appraised and sold.

For publishing list of unclaimed county orders, required to be published in the paper having the largest circulation, we received the legal fee of & cents per name or order, amounting in all to $5.95. No similar: advertising was required to be done heretofore.— Thus itappears that $05.95 of the $208.95 allowed us were for items not hitherto required to be published. - For publishing the delinquent list we received $31.30 less than the rate established by law. | For publishing the notice to tax-pay-ers we charged $5 less than legal rates, and 50 cents less for printing posters thereof than allowed to the Standard ‘the year prior. : ‘ For publishing the rules adopted by board of commissioners, our charge is ten cents less than charged by the economy-loving New Era, though the circulation of THE BANNER is nearly double that of the Bra. : The pay allowed us for printing blanks, &c., is in eyery instance moderate, and fully \as low as the same can bedone by any respectable printing establishment in the State. And while on this subject it nay not come ~amiss to state that in the several sums

allowed us during the past year, a considerable proportion was for printing blanks, which had hitherto been done by Indianapolis, Lafayette, €hicago and Ft. Wayne firms. Does any fairminded citized object to having this work done 1n the county when it can - be obtained here fully as cheap if not cheaper and fully ag good if not better - than elsewhere? We think not. We pay annually from $7O to $3O taxes into the county treasury, and when work 4n our Jine is to be /done we think we

have as'good 3 right to the job as any foreign institution in the land. 5 It is a noticeable fact, as demonstrated by the Era’s own figures, that for the years 1876, ’77, ’lB, the Era, notwithstanding ‘the fact that during that period, under the guise of independence, it teemed with misrepresentations of deixnocratic men and measures, received $80.06 more of the county printing than THE BANNER, and that, too, principally from officers elected by the democratic party which this same New Era has defamed and traduced’in. season and out of season, disseminating the grossest falsehoods about its leaders and never manly enough to correct its miserable lies after their utter falsity had been clearly demonstrated to their uhscrupulous and malicious author. Yet this whining booby now raises a tremendous howl because he can no longer monopolize the county printing and because the democratic papers of this county have at last made it clear t» demokratic officials that it is not wise to turn the cold shoulder to those who helped them to office and to fatten the insatiable rats that are always on the alert for official crumbs, whether falling from democratic or republican tables. So far as we are concerned, we have not the slightest hesitancy in publicly proclaiming that such political freebooters as the editor of the New Era will not be permitted to plow with democratic heifers if it be in cur power to prevent it. : ~ There is absolutely nothing in the New Era’s article to show that a single dollar has been improperly expended by the county authorities for public printing. Sifted of its bombast, claptrap, hoodwinking, whining and snarling, it simply amounts to this: That the Era thing feels wondrously sore because THE BANNER has been per-. mitted to do a good deal of the work formerly done by Indianapolis and other foreign firms and that J. P.Prickett has not fared quite as well as hedid in former years. That’s all there is to it., - 'We propose now to devote alittle attention to the past, just to see what figure the E7a man cuts as a champion of economy in the administration of public affairs. Until about a year ago Prickett had the printing of the bar doeket, and a nice piece of “blacksmithing” did he make of it. Fordoingthat job for four terms of 1877 he received the neat little sum of $96.00. THE BANNER, for printing the bar docket for four terms of 1879, received $67.00;— excess paid £7ra for same period, $29.00.

The Era talks about competition in publishing the delinquent list. Did it ever occur to a republican official to inyite competition in matters of this kind? If so, please name the republican official who ever invited a democratic newspaper man %o compete for the publication of the delinquent list or anything else in the line of official patronage. The nearest approach to an invitation of that kind was the remark of Auditor Fisher, during the celebrated Myers - Palmiter squabble, that if they did not soon come to an agreement he would let the job to the lowest bidder. The editor of THE BANNER, to whom this remark was addressed, replied in substance that so far ag he was concerned he did not ask to be admitted to such competition; that so leng as the Republicans had control of the eounty offices the patronage thereof properly belonged to the organs of the republican party; that whenever a change oceurred THE BANNER would expect to receiwe the same professional courtesy—a delusive hope, as the subsequent disreputable course of republidan organ -grinders amply attests. f We have before ug an official statement of the amounts paid out of the county ¢reasury during the past twenty years for the publication of the delinquent list. From this it appears that the following amounts were expended under : ; REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION:

1860.......5806.68]1867.... ..*s«»—J 1861....... 653.74(1868....... 625.20; 1862....... 782.68/1869....... 144.00 1863....... 58340/18%0......,. /870.00 1864 ....... bi 18.16 b s 1865... ... 457.92{ T0ta1...55246.78 1866....... 34440 . (*For the year 1867 no order was drawn on the county treasury for publisking the delinquent list, the Myers-Palmiter squah-. ble having resuléed in an offer by Myers to do the work for mothing. -In 1870, when Lvtryers made a bitter fight aiz[a,inst Billy illiams for Congress, ﬁﬁeriﬁ' oses Kiser, Clerk “Williams, Treasurer Mendenhall, and three others paid 'Mzem $6OO to compensate him for the work he velanteered in 1867 to do for nothing and to induee hjim to sllxlpﬁprtd the tiecket with Billy Williams at ‘the head. i :

UNDERDEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATION. 1871.. ....$159.60/1877.......% 69.00 A8N2i5...,. 9U940118%8...... 8695 1878.,..... 2689/1879....... 9825 1874..;.... 5400 e 1875....... 46.00 f T0ta1....5600,39 1870, 5 ve- 0 MLIOL . Above you have the figures. For publishing the delinquent list for ten years Noble county, under republican administration, paid = | $5,246.78. . Under democratic adminmstration for niae years . | “ ; - $600.89. i We shall have more to say on the subjec) of public printing, hereafter,

THE AMENDMENTS. Important Letter from Attorney-Gener-i al Woollen. j Office of Attorney-General, ) - INDIANAPOLIS, March 27, 1880.) HoN. JorN B. StoLL—Dear Sir:— Ycur favor of the 2d inst. was duly received, in wkich you enclosed me the opinion of the Hon. C. A. Q. McClellan on the constitut.ionality of the act approved March 18, 1879, and requesting me to give you my opinion on the question. - After mature consideration I proceed to comply with your request, premising that this letter is written as a citizen and not as an officer of the State. :

The act of 1879, supra, attempts tc apply the laws on the subject of general elections, in force and applicable to the October election, to any other general election that may be held in lieu of the one as now fixed by law. It is contended thtét this cannot be done, as it'makes the taking effect of the law to depend on another authority than the Legislature, This is probably a mistake, as similar laws are upheld. Says Cooley in his work on “Constitutional Limitations,” page 117: “But it is not always essential that a legislative act should be a completed statute which must in any event take effect as law, at the time it leaves the legislative department. A statute may beconditional, and its taking effect may be made to depend upon some subsequent event. Aflirmative legislation may, in some cases, be adopted, of which the parties interested are at liberty to avail themselves ornot at their option”’ In the event of the adoption of the Amendments, I think the court would hold the law of 1879 constitutional. You say you are “in favor of all the Amendments except ‘one’ and ‘three.’” I think your objections to these are well founded. . : If number one is adopted it will, I think, create great confusion. - I submit to your consideration one point that strikes me very forcibly. After fixing the qualification of a voter as to residence, &c., the section concludes: “if he shall have been duly registered according to law.” Now there is no registry law, and a voter cannot comply with this mandatory elause, and what is to be done? Certainly the voter is not to be disfranchised; still he cannot vote under this section unless he comes within the language of the Constitution, for Constitutions are not to be whittled down by declaring a positive mandatory provision merely directory. What then? My opinion is, that the courts will be bound to hold that this provision, if adopted, will not becoms the law 'until the Legislature shall put it in operation by passing a registry law, and.that until that time the present provision on that subject will define the rights of voters, This uncertainty will bring confusion and litigation that cannot be compensated by any good the section will do if adopted. Amendment 3 is very objectionable because of the fact that it embodies so many propositions, Most voters would favor some of its provisions, but few all. It provides for, three different elections, and also a registry law. Here again is a mandatory clause providing for a registry law. - :

But there is still a more serious matter connected with these Amendments than any I have mentioned, and which may precipitate complications and difficultias now not dreamed of ; and that is, that it is doubtful if the law submitting these Amendments to the people is not unconstitutional, because it undertakes to amend the Constitution in an unconstitutional manner.

The language of the Constitution is, that when the proposed changes have been agreed {0 by two separate Legislatures, “then it shail be the duty of the General Assembly to submit guch Amendment or Amendments to the electors of the State; and if a majority of said electors shall ratify the same, such Amendment or Amendments shall becosae & part of this Constitution.” :

" This provision evidently contegaplat-, ed that proposed Amendments. to the, Constitution should be submitted to the electors at a separate election held solely "for that purpose. The act of March 10, 1899, indertakes to submit the proposed A mendments “tc the electors of the State, at the election o pe ‘held on the first Monday of A pril, 1880.”' Section 3 says, “if a majority of the eleetors,” that is, a majority of the persons who yote at the April election, .shall ratify the Amendments, they shall become a part of the Constitution, I think there is nothing elearer than that it will require a majority of aill the yotes cast at the April election to ratify an Amendment, whether all the electors vei® on that question or not. It is true the gerfificate required under the sth section of {hie zat of March 10, 1879, only includes “the woles cast for and against each Amendmeni,” but it is 8 very grave question whether such & gertificate is in compliance with the requiresents of the Constitution, and whether the iaw ég not so de{active as to render the su m&saggja pnavailing. I think if these Amendments are desirable additions to the Constitution, it is t{]; bo regretted that theact submitting them to the electors of the State for adoption or ryecj;ion were not motje»ceftainly’_in accordance with theorganic law, ¢« ' 0 o B m ¥ Very Respectfully, : ‘ “ T, W. WooLLEN.

. Deputy XMarshals. The Democrats in the House compelled the Republican extremists to accept an amendment to the present objectioq‘al, if not unconstitutional, election !laws, which was offered by Mr. Garfield. When he offered it he probably had not the remotest idea it would be acceptable to the Democrats. It provides that hereafier special and general deputy marshals for performing any duties in reference to elections shall be appointed by the Judge of the United States Circuit Court for the district in which they are to perform their duties, instead of being appointed by such political mountebanks, as Davenport. This plan is a decided improvement on the existing method, and was generally acceptable to Democrats, who saw thag it is useless to contend for a total repeal of the obnoxious law in question so long-as Hayes is President. The radical Republicans filibustered and there was a fusillade of partisan rhetoric to prevent the adoption of an amendment which would make it impossible for the Republicans to put their worst men into positions where they can use their authority to persecute and intimidate democratic voters. - The republican opposition to the’amendment of their own leader shows their factional and obstructive spirit, but its passage in spite of the ultra Republicans is proof that the democratic majority care more for the interests of the. country than for mere partisan advantage.—New York Ewxpress.

Nothing to be Gained. v ‘ (Goshen Democrat.) i There is nothing to be gained by the adoption of the amendments (Nos. 1 and 3) requiring a registration of voters in this State. Registration does not prevent frauds in elections, nor render them more difficult. It offers no guarantees for the purity of elections that we do not already possess. It accomplishes no good in any other direction. There is much to be lost by making registration the rule. 1t will cost a great deal of money, direct--Iy, $0 provide the necessary machinery for the work, and a great deal more, indirectly, in the loss of time and the expense attendant upon going to and from the places of registration. And for this /reason it will prevent many good citizens from exercising the right of suffrage; which is a dangerous evil. It gives the designing politician an opportunity to inspect in advance the list of voters at any precinct, and enables him to bring to bear whatever corrupt influences he can command upon the individual voter personally, and with ten-fold more weight than he could otherwise give them. There are many other good and sufficient reasons why voters of all parties should answer “No” to the proposition to engraft the registry clause upon our State constitution. :

Gov. Hendricks on Registry Laws. Speaking of the Amendments the Goshen Democrat says: Stress is laid by republican papers upon the fact that these amendments were proposed te and passed upon by two democratic legislatures, and therefqre should receive democraticsupport. Thereis no force in this. If they are objectionable. they should be rejected, without inquiring into the source from whence they came. Gov. Hendricks is also quoted as favoring their passage. Here is what Mr. Hendricks said about that matter in a recent interview “It was never my intention to recommend the legislature to {)ass a registry law when I suggested amendments to the constitution favoring a change in the date of election and the fixing of a limit of residence.” : : *] am opposed to this registration scheme, because I do not know of an instance in which it has promoted the purity of elections, and 1 do know that in Philadelphia, where they have a registry law, there is more illegal voting than in any other city in the United States.” The Democrat is in error in this particular: These amendments originated with a republican Lesislature and were passed by the late Legislature, enough Democrats voting with the Republicans to insure their pagsage, — { ED. BANNER. o s

Vote It Down, s (Indianapolis Sentinel.) The constitution as it is, provides that a residence in the State for six months, immediately’ preceding an election, entitles the citizen to vote in the township or precinct where he may reside—whereas, by the proposed amendment, if adopted—the residence of a citizen must be six months in the State, sigty days in the township, and in the ward or‘precingt thirfy days to entitle him toa vote. -~ ° - -~ The constitution as it now stands, meets every reasonable requirement as to residence—but the proposed amendment is illiberal, arbitrary and disfranchising in iis provisions, and ?ogl@l not be adopted. It absolutely eprives a man of the dearest rights of cltizenshig? no pasier how exalted may be his reputation for svery virtue that adorns a good citizen. Ilf he ‘has not resided 60 days in the township ‘and 30 days in the precinct where he offers his vote, he is as certainly digfranchised as if he had committed a felony and had heen sentenced to the penitentidry.

All Opposed to Registry Law. (Fort Wayne Sentingl) °*° : The attempt to represent Gov. Hendricks as in favor of the proposed constitutional amendments does injustice to the leader of the Indiana Demogragy. (ov. Hendricks is and always has beey; stoutly opposed to a registry law. He will therefors vote against the first and third afgepdigente and advises every Demoerat to do the same thing. Thesame may be sald of Senators McDonald and Voorhees, Gov. }yi}}}ams, Hon. Wm. H. English, and other’ i‘em%gized leaders of the Indiana Democraey, - .

A conscientious,Apothecaﬁy wiid ae).é only such preparations as he knows t£o'he geliable, ' The fact that every regutable ,dljﬁgii@}; inthe country keeps E. A. Young’s Cough and L;ﬁig .Sgrup. is ample proof that its efficacy has’ ecy thoroughly tested. Trial size 26 cents.” *'' 11 j

A registry law is a 'artificial and unjust regtriction upon the right of suf‘frage, and is opposed te the spirit of our conspitution, ~

i 15-15-14. ; The game of “15,” or “puzzle,” more properly, has struck this vicinity, and a large number of the people are down with the disease. No casesof insahity have yet been reported, but what may be the result, if the excitement continues, is beyond human conjecture. [t is astonishing how many sensible people have been sold on this puzzle, and how many more are likely to be taken in before they get their eyes open. Many alleged sollutions have been reported, but none have been correct when the blocks have been properly placed. - The following is- the position the blocks should occupy: . 12l s ' Blalis] . Then reverse numbers 1 and 2, or if you please 14 aud 15, and by moving without lifting them out, get them into position as in the diagram above. If you begin by reversing nuwmbers 1 and 2, you will find when you have them correctly placed, and also the numbers in the rows beginning with 5 and 9 that the then remaining numbers will be 13-15-14. If you have them disarranged in this order to begin with, you may work -at it all the remainder of your days, and you can’t get the 14 before the 15 to save your neck fro eternal perdition. Of course the WhOT; secret of the puzzle is to get 14 and 15 in their proper position. This 1t will be found cannot be done. Take for instance this diagram: : _ _ llml : 15| You can disarrange them by simply moving them out of their position, and can then easily move them back again into their original places. But now take up numbers 13 and 14 and put number 13 in the place of 14, and 14 in the place of 13, and try by moving to bring them back to their original position as shown in the diagram, and you will see that it cannot be done. The same principle is involved in the puzzle of *l5” and as it is an impossibility to arrange the numbers in consecutive order by simply moving them, the question naturally arises, “What 18 the use spending time trying to do that which cannot be doné?” - Another game played with these blocks adding the number 16, is to so arrange them that the sum of each column—horizontal, perpendicular and diagonal —will be 34. The solutivn of it is:as follows: - 111514 4 ' L 12] 61 7| 9' , gllo] 11| 5/ ¢ 13] 3| 2l i?;l And these figures may be changed in such a manner as to produce the same result in so many ways that the average life of man would not be sufficient length of time to write the figures.—Plymouth Democrat.

Two Views of the Election Law Modification. 2 WASAHINGTON, March 20.—The Star of this evening says that Representative springer, of Illinoig,” is jubilant over the passage by the House yesterday of the amendment to the Federal Election Jaws. Hesays of it: “This is the greatest victory for the Democrats we have yet won. We have regained all that welost by the extra session and a great deal more. Wedon’t want any more riders now. The Republicans are completely demoralized and don’t know what to do, It is a sad blow to the Grant boom, too, because there can be no more talk about Democrats nullifying the laws. Under this amendment the court must appoint the election marshals, and they must be taken from the different political parties. That will prevent a partisan use of the laws, and it puts the Democrats in a strong position before the country. We have the Republicans in full retreat, and they are blaming Garfield for bis bad management of the matter. We, theDemocrats, have got all we want now.” Mr. Hurd, of Ohio, who yoite,d against the compromise, takes a little different Yiew of the situation. He gays: ¢“The amendment does not strike at the root of the evil at all, The laws are as objectionable as ever. The ameudment d(;%s not restrict the number of deputy mharshals or their power to do partisan work. The Democrats have surrendered, and for what? Why, for half the marshals appointed to interfere with elections; and if Democrats are appointed at all—which I doubt—they will not be such Democrats as we want, byt men who will work for the republican party for 8§ a day, The Democrats have by this amendment recognized the law, for they voted money to pay the marshals employed last year in California, and have made it permanent with all its evils. I am sorry now that I did not speak against it. Had Blackburn, Knott and myself pregented our reasons for voting against it, we might have defeated it, As it is,'ony’ only hope ig‘ that it will be beaten in the Senate;”

What Regiatration Costs. (Brownstown Bannoer.) In Pennsylvania they have a regisg;i‘abion law, and we have before us a copy of the Hanover Citizen, containing theannusl state ept of the receipts and expenditires o? %ork gonnty for the past year., We thépe seo that the county paid the enormous sum of $l,861.40 for taking the registration in 1879. The shortest way for the people of Indiana to avoid such a waste of money is to vote solidly NO upon the proposed . constitytional amendments Nos.land 3. R (Fort %ay'ﬁsgséﬂincu : The pretense that the proposed gonstitutional amendments are in the in-; terest of economy is entirely unwarranted by the facts. The saving by ‘disp;an;’ixl;g with one election every four yza- is” wozp ;;ég,n. balanced by the additional expense’ 6f Tug,n;it?*%%n for every election, not to spe: [ 1@ loss. of time occasioned in registering, | @h{; Voltaic Belt Co., Marshall, Mich., Sl osed ek gelonied g Yolle elts 10 % L 1 \ ; al. Doty Gurbe Hsbiateod Trey isswarbal ‘theysay. Write tothem withoutdelay, [Qlt

- Grateful Women. » None receive so much benefit, and none are so profoundly grateful and show such'an interest in recommending Hop Bitters as women. It is the only remedy peculiarly adapted to the many ills the sex is almost universally subject to, Chills and fever, indigestion or deranged liver, constant or periodical sick headaches, weakness in the back or kidneys, pain in the ‘shoulders. and . different dparts of the body, a feeling of lasitude and despondeney, are all readily removed by these Bitters. : & TR | “Few of the Ills of Life” are more prevalent and distressing than bilious disorders. The symptoms are low spirits, Want of enerEy. restlessness, headache, no appetite, sallow skin, costiveness and other ailments which show thg liver is in a diseased state and needs regulating, and the proper way to do it is to use lgr Swayne’s Tar and Sarsaparilla Pills.” Their effect on the liver and blood is wonderful. removing pimples and all eruptions. leaving the complexion fair and fresh as in youth. Price 25 cents a box of 30 Pills; or tive boxes for §l. Sent by mail on receipt of prlce.‘bg Dr.Swayne & Son, 330 North Sixth street, Phila e(liphin Sold by all druggists. For sale by C. Eldred & Son, Ligonier, Indiana. ; e 23-ly e — 8 USED ALL THE YEAR ROUND! 'S SARSAPARILLA JOHNSTON'S SARSAPARILLA, : ! ~—FOR— S LIVER COMPLAINT : ~AND—= ‘ -PURIFYING THE BLOOD. It hasbeeninuse [} 2 'oﬂOyears.andhns proved to be the |§ sest pre, tion in themarketforSick | Hen.ga.oge, Pain intheSideor Back | 3 : Liver Complaint, Pimples on the “‘ }\ . Face, Dgaé)epsia, Piles, and all Dis: \ k eases that arise from a disordered | Y =BB Liver or an impure blood. Thousands{j3 N of our-best l]Beople take it and give it _ to their children. Physicians pre" \\ 7 scribe it daily. oo ue it \TR cncecommend and %g:r%t, htur% o \;//,// / o the most ﬁglicaté constitution. ‘ltis NS < Pne, of the best medicines in use or regulatipg the et ar o i ﬁé‘c‘{’fé‘ or six ot I txestornvedoffns.rs. "~ 'W. JOHNSTCN & CO., Manufacturers: DETROIT, MICH. = AMHERSTBURG, ONT. Sold by C. Eldred & Son, Ligonier, Ind.

The Purestand Best Medicine ever mnde‘.‘ A combination of Hops, Puchu, Mandrak. and Dandciion, with nJP:.’w_ best and most cur& tive lg{-opcrties of all other Bitters makes tg.ggregb- | est Blood Purliler, Liver Regulator, Life and Health Restoring Agent on varth, No disease or ili hoalth can poseibly long exist where Hop Bitters are used, so varied and perfect are their operations, i : They give new 11%0 and viger to the aged and infirm. To all whase employments cause irregularity of the bowels or urinary oxg&ns,, or who require an Appetizer, Tonic and ‘mild Stimulant, Hop Bitters ‘are invaluable without intoxieating. Re matter what your feelings or symptoms are, what the disease or ailment i 3, use. Hop Bitters. Don’t wait until you are sick, but if you onli feel bad or miserable, use the Bittersatonce. It may. save your life, It hassaved hundreds, 8500 will be paid fora case they will not curs or help. Do not suffer nor let your friends sufer, but use and urge them to uge Hop Bitters, i ‘Remember, Hop Bittersisrio vile, druggred, drunken nostrum, hut the Purest and Best Medicine ever made; the ““Inval!d’s Friend and llopne,” and o person or family should be without them, | Get some this day. e Hor Couen CURE{s the sweetcst, safest and best, ! Ask Children. St The Hop PAD for Stomach, Liverand Kidneyis superior toall others, Cures by absorption. Ask druggist. D. L C.isanabsoluteand irresistible cure for drunk enness, use of opium, tobacco and narcotics: Sold by druggists. Hop Bitters M. Co. Rochester, N.Y. " g Send for Circular, .

3E P e .A i . LADIES (AR R A ‘\\,&“-“."_“ SR @G d . ';;g? A q&,_ g’ Randall’s Circassian 2 '%;%f Cream Wasl o i re i asil s 93.5-"3'\":? LIRS W , “ﬁ%&&". I:\‘2)%s‘,@‘&% : will give you R 05 AR SRR l?wgé"?%%&d? S Complex ion LA e —aB—- — e g . o o . Bureasaßaby's From the time of sweet Mother Eve down to'the gresent day, the highest aim of female ambition has been beauty of face and figure, and to this end every art and gmhellishment of the toilet has been eagerly songht after and used. Of all the points that go to make up female loveliness, a beautifnl complexion is the mpst important. Toobtain tgis many so-called beantifiers have been placed before "the public. But all have failed, principally becanse they have been composed of liguid pasts, ﬂllinﬁ ug and choking the pores.of the skin, thro! which the body natnrally seeks its health, ang making the complegion of every one' using them sallow, pasty-looking and unhealthy. Randall's Circassian Cream Wash now comes to the rescue. It is composed of the purest and most harmless ingredients. Is as colorless and himpid as water. Will remove freckels, blotchee, fan and pimples without fail. If gives. and above all, keeps the complexion pure, brilliant and velvety, For sale by D. 8. SCOTT & SON, Ligonier. 10-ly,

Children Children s:r';.;,‘x‘ ‘ »FOE_ : :}. e o - ) Pitcher's ? L = - QCastoria. Mothers like, and Phys.i'éianL PR IT IS NOT NARCOTIC.

CENTAUR LINIMENTS ; the World’s great Pain-Relieving remedies. They heal, soothe and cure Burns,Wounds, Weak Back and fghﬁumwsm upon - Man, and Sprains, Galls, and Limne: ness upon Bedsts. Cheap, quick and reliable. M

A S'K the recoyered Dyspeptics, Billious ‘Sufterers, Victims of » Fever and Ague, the Mercarial Diseasg } Patient, hqw thdy e covered Health, Gheer® ful Spirits and Googd Appetite — they will F tell you by taking

BTN AN b \fﬁ“_{“ ____;Ll’_— G

Simmons Liver Regulator. For DYSPEPSIA, CONSTIPATION, Jaundice, Billious “attacks, ,{ﬁxox Hzavaoug, Colic, Depression of Spirits, Sovr Sromkom, Heart Burn, &c., R AL 8 ypriyyled Boubbern yomecy 18 warrante Dot to €oniain « & SIREME paptisie of Mprougy, of any lnj‘n%gous minez&fﬁﬂfm& %Hﬁ,ff:?‘ §OeE PURELY VEGETABLE, If dyou feel drowsy, debilitated, have frequen: headache, mouth tastes badl{. poor appetite and t.ongue coated, you are suffering from torpid liver or *billiousness,” and nothing will cure you so apggdi_}g and permanently as to tqke S 5 et mm§§ % er Regulator, It is givenswith safety amd the happiest results to the most.delicate infant.: It '?zﬁphq‘s of quinine and bitters ofevery kind,\i. It idthe clied est, purest and best family medicine in mmﬁ" J. n..znmm-&oo.,rm%gm, Pa, i SOLD BY ALL DRUGGINTS., '. ' . Mgrch 11, 1880,47-Iy-cntrm-alden = T