Jasper Weekly Courier, Volume 19, Number 3, Jasper, Dubois County, 19 January 1877 — Page 1
asper Weekly Courier.
VOL. 10. JASPER, INDIANA, FRIDAY, JAN. 19, 1877. r NO. 3
VoMMSIIKH KVKKV fKtlMV, AT JAWl'Klt,
yUHOlS COUNTV, IN1HAXA, UV CLISM ISN'T DOANF. OFKICK. In Courier Buimuxo ON yiftsT Main 6th kbt.
I'ntcj: or simsCRii'TioK.
tfngle Subscription, for llfty JCos., $1 50 KW six months, : : : : : 1 00
KATKS OV ADVUKT'SKIXO. For square, 10 lines or less, 1 week, $1 00 Each subsequent insertion, 75 ots. Longer advertisoinentsat tins same rate, A fraction over even square or squares, 'counted as a square. These are the terms for transient advertisements ; a reasonable (luduetion will be made to regular advertisers. Notices of appointment of administrators and legal notices of like character to be paid in advance. AN'tfOUNCINO CANDtt'ATES.
ifr 'lWiiRhin Officers, each il.OO'
For Ooutity " " 2.50i
For District, Circuit, or State, fi.tX)
Tim Eighth f Jnn, Convention The Convention at Indianapolis on the 8th was a very large gathering, overv county in the State bejng represented. Gen. Maiison culled the assembly to order, lion. D. S. Gooding was elect ed Chairman and delivered a speech reviewing the notion of the Iiadleal jwtrtv in the ialo nimnajjfii and since. Hon'
Geo. W. Julian then addressee! the Con
vention nl length in rcgnrd to Louisiana nnd thn Upturning Boards, showing how they were opposed to fairness or public decency, and if thev were recognized would eventually subvert Kopublican institutions. 11. y, llauna made a speech on the resolutions, and D. W. Voorhees made about a ten minutes speech, counseling peace, hut llrmly resolving to .stand by Hip right, and offered a resolution for the appointment of a Committee. The folio win are
tuk itr.soiiUTio.v8. "We, the conservative people of Indiana, assembled in a .State delegate con
vention, no declare :
That, while u convention of the people
IS. ID.
Phys
&iis uy
ur$eon
OrWCK-South Stile of thn ruhlte SqHure, jasi'jm:, i;;iiaxa.
for uclihcraiimi touching the result of
an election Jong alter it has been held
nod the votes counted h tiuiiMial, vet
or emergency widen cans us loguther is
umwini. ijje tart can not be denied that a formidable conspiracy exists to fn!-ilv the vote of the people and impose upontheina President and Vicc-Prnsi-
dent whom they have not chosen. The
ment to its despotic will, is unrepubliean in Its structure and its purpose. It is bcir-pprpoltutiiifr, having power to till vacancies in it own numbers. Its duration has no proscribed limit. It is abovo tint reach of law, for it can count in its own Ihw maker. Composed as it is of men who have -committed the highest crimes against Jtcpublican government, it can perpetuate its despotism at pleasure. It is wanting in no bad feature of hereditary despotism. Under the Constitution of the United States, which guarantees to each State a Bepublican government, audi an institution has no ehtim to recognition. Jt could not rightfully exist even for the exercise of a legitimate public function. It lias arbitrarily rejected timnv thous
and ofthe votes cast hv tJio citizens of
Louisiana, which had been dtiJv certified by the proper returnin-r olMcccs. This
act changed the government of that
nioiiy of opinion and 'nncert of actioi
In the present perilo us crisU of our nn
J. Kills ct al, ; partition ; continued.
IS. Mrcen et at.; imrtitiou; no sale
tlonal affairs ; also, to consider tlie nro-and ordered continued.
priety of palling a National Convention, James Fubrimo), aduiY. v. Margaret of (he Democratic part v. and to cone- Kuhrman : judgment of foreclosure for pond with the different Stajps in rcgardCcorge Siu for S34 00. thereto. It shall also bo the dutv ol aid J. PAilarbtson, adm'r. v (Mary A. committee to consider and devise theJohnsoirat-al.; petition to Sell; coubest method by which the people mavitiiiued. exercise the rlsdit of petition to the Con- Grav, adm'r. of E. Gray ; pale of land gross of the United Stales whether in fer $S00 00. writing or in person, in order that the John A. Leininon vs. Clay Lemmon,public peace may be preserved. popnluradm'r. ; dismissed, liberty maintained and the laws upheld. Clara Goetz, exr. v. W. Hannamaii tub Cummittck ok ithmp satttv. et ? foreclorture for $3,OR3 00. Tim n.,. ?,.,.,.. .ni.ninM,i ....,... A. Emmick v. John II. Beckmaun;
Br Oir hit prirt,iut KrvicM to the citlns. main objects for which wo struggled in r taloi ewmitjr. the political contest of 1870 were: The
Phy
1K. W. BEiltilI,
sician & Surgeon
OKl'lCI". Kt rpuldenep. Corner of Ninth and Newton ritrcotrt, JASl'KU, INDIANA. Kit "!rri hit prnfuluil i-ctvIcm U the citizens ( Outiul eounly rb, 57 tSTJ.-Cm.
5. H. M.30M, KOCKt'OKT,
W. S. HUMTER JASPHK.
rtf lomeys at Law. "XrH.Ii pricllcp In Uuboi M tutjolritne sountlm V Will iU uttrnJ CikuU Cuurt iit V srtk-lt, UuUui a t 'ry comiI'. OV'trn;-!outh Kldn of JHtillP Siwar, Jiu,'i-. ZHit. Srft, 17ilj. IS"', t).
IIOK, JOHN UAhUa, ViriiKsm:.,
" A TV A TV "XT'
restoration of good government in the
Southern btates, a purer civil service, and the enforcement of economy in all the departments of the government. "We were successful at the polls. Nearly a quarter of a million majority of the voles of the people was con fondly cast in favor of the reforms for which, we contended and for the candidates representing' those reforms. This large ma
jority of the popular vote remains in our
tavor, even it the work of (he Returning Boards of Florida and Louisiana is permitted to stand If the votes of the Electors fairly appointed by the people of cither of these States shall he counted, Tilden and Ilendriek will have a ma
jority in the lctortil College. Shall
they no counted i It is known that in each of fhese States, the majority of tho votes nrtuallv oast were in favor of candidates for Elector pledged to vole for Tilden and
Ileilttricli, and that upon tho thee of
ttiese electoral candidates
State, and was intended to change the A ll 111! tl ?il io I i.ta. Mxt' r.v..i ...... 1
jiMiiiiiiuiinuvil vii iiiu i'UUUlttl VJUVtlHment, To hold that certificates bv euch a Board, of a ivsult tiius nroduce'd. is con
elusive evidence Of tlie will of the people of Louisiana, would be a mockerv and an outrage upon the rights of the people. A false government set upon such technicality would command no respect and would deserve none. If a Upturning Board thus constituted and clothed with such dangerous power could under anv circumstance be a legitimate institution, still this Bcturuing Board was not such, for it was not organized as the law of its existence required. That law requires that it should be composed of live members, and that all political parties should be represented in its membership. These were essential features in its standing existence.
iuui wuiie either was lacking It was incompetent to perforin the functions of a Returning Board. It was lacking in both these features, as it. was composed of but four members, and thev were all members of the Republican partv, Its proceeding were fraudulent, and con-.-cquenUy its decisions and pretended
liuduitrs were void. In disregard of
justice aim right ami law returns were
opened, papers attached, and scaled
again: in oilier cages returns were nnt.
obtained upon a pretext : parishes and
parts of parishes were thrown from the
count without oiial riant or iustifh-
tion, and always so as to weaken the Democratic vote, and never to diminish tile Republican vote. Is it expected that more than four . S t Itsilt c ...711 ...... i.
. . . . iiiicii win ruillf'lliomv ni?-
IllgllPSt Ifiiiinso ill tiiMli.r iliOM-ivml .C II. .'...rsi.
... .. ... . .i , , i,,, , ,tlv 1 1 ii us U I
the coutet through which we have passed ; fruit ? which thev prize because they are the reforms thatVill bring them and their children blessing, bv a political machine unknown in" all" tirnvlona
hKtory of the country and incapnble of
ii.ii MiuiiiiHiH jicuuit -wiin the other Ri-
n.trn.UH ii...,. a I. iimiiim..) . . ' ..V. ... . ' .!t)uninfcr; jnduHnt lorluO00.
i vs. John itenaer augment
.tion adjourned, d the ero.wxl dfspeis-V.afJi aft' ' nil u-nU ,ttl ,,;n. ,l. .. it .lor . "5 103 80.
- I I J. ILIILIIL'1 llll II. nilill I. 13,
John Tl.im-
Disposition of tlie Viiriotta Catise.K -L x" ' . nt. . on the Docket of thv DuFiois . ' li' 1 man oh 1 1 f; r 'f -V Circuit Court, .Tanuury J f""t for 10 Oj at ilaintttr , co,t. Term, J 877. Ji,ii,-',ie1' vs Collius et al. ; lore-
.Iasi'kr, Indian a,
f. tifS7i lu'thoStn'P of Florida, the
jtuuciui irojusiai nas vtriuaily de itled "ttru.ii tT-Kt'ew n tiieCmirtd of Uui w cnunty, snt' 'n 1' fffd fittest directed against the it- j t ..vii v i imcii?. nu im(,:,i i.,tium Beturu tug Board of that State on the , th '"y"1:''':"":! nf: M"!n s'ro"1' qtuMionofconntitt',' the vote for GuyiVilJiSi t. i:KVlii icriior, that said, Sitae hud given n pophilar and Irgal nitijorjty m favor of the r$?tom0Zi fit ',fiW '1""r-- KlwtorH.and yet said Re
. j,,, u rn t.noaniHcnir -nine vote in favor ,,,ii,.ii, i,i,,chlni.t. ,.r . .." V
?L lZ ZJTtn' "ml k auizatim k legully detective' and 7u-
4, w, ... iva.Ul. Mint wlmci. uiMii.ii Iw f.o..,i..i...
.... lu Louisiana that ma or v was so i ....u .....i ....!. u ,""",u"'m'
V fiij: r.iwiw. J'rikuir ttcHtk clrm i vol. l-raoa. to defy concealment or denial. UV-'.. , ... . r.L . . . . i Init under the fraudulent manipulation XuTrhM6Ttht"l CUl UoUh aMteturniug Hoard, which long ntw -.. 1 rendered itself iufamous, that majoritv tt K tl N ( H U K T T N K It, jlias been revised. JShail that reversal ' inland? .ShrtlMhe decisions of the Re"lu,w Al kAX U j judjrment oi the American people? Ah Notary Public, I 1,1 nnd Reimoli- ' ' jean government, we protest ay;runt the T atRi lai)iArA, 'uccepta nee of the notoriously ful.m udg-
iiiienf ot tiiat itetiirniug Hoard an eon-
W ' wrJS ZCaM 1" pyWenm of th elective will of
-". - . ... the neottli! of Louisiana.
c. ii. dii.i.on. liJs true ill the highest affairs of irov-
'ernmcnt a in the common transactions
J r. ii,i,oy,
T i tl.v,- - Tnw T l imi' iii in uiu ruiiuiiun i rausactioite '1"1n iilion, flf private life, that fraud vitiates ovcrv
A WT-Al)7TrV3 iT T Ti? !-,s''H "o which it enter. If the people k A A UIilI! Ik) k I SSiX it 'HrcfovurMgn, no power can reverse their
..., . onoire, aim no mere teciinicaliiv can : Ok FItK over Jo. Trnslrr' fcHit.Uer Shnp. filn tMr HOVereigllty. Wfl deiiOUl
JASPER, IHDIAHA.
can re
ice
VVVS KISS.:" Ihe mrU rJSthraSK'1' 5oiiil of alleged inthnnktir . f,Vr.r,w,,",.votcr!i as arbitrary, unrcpublican N'KW iiLAOKSMITU SII0L,rcT"!,,tr,a7- , , It is the duty of a just and efll
the assumption of power to reiect tho
votes oi wuoio precincis or districts on
timidatiou of
and
efficient
ir"T i CGTliD government io prevent tno intimidation V iX. VJlOOJiXt, of it voters, and to restrain ami punish
in ii lawless persons "wno would molest oiBc. tjICS(J votersorinlerfero Willi tho freedom
lot elections, nut
Kartk Main
and null and void ?
Entertaining thrR views, j-o resolve: That it is the iinperativediity of Congress to provide by law a plan for counting the Electoral vote, which by its rcasonabit!Mes and justice will commend itself to the judgment of the peopic amj command tteir acqnieseuce in tho result of the count, Mud that this should be done at the earliest da v conifcnt with due deliberation, to the end that the disquiet which now pervades tho people may be allayed. That, according to ihe plain meaning of the constitution, and according to all past political usage, the power of counting the vote resides in the two Houses of CotiirrPKH. . That we denounce the proposition that the President of ihe Senate lias the power, not only to open, but to count the vote, a an innovation which the sentiment of the people will not tolerate. If such pwer shall lie assumed, uml Si
exen'ise attempted, we call upon the two llotHcs of Congre-s to take prompt and chVetual measures for the assertion of their constitutional prerogative in that regard. That "if Congress shall provide bv law
hjiim iuhii ior counting the c cc oral
closure for idii SO.
E. Btichart vs. It. Spurlock ; judgment for $93 45. W. Bret, etal. vs. "Win. Hannamaii
ct al.; foreclosure for $71-2 tX).
h. L. Tavlor vs. -Mary Taylor; judg
ment for defendant. h. Bretz vs. N. C. Kelso; judgment for $1)7 00. C. Klesman v. P. Gosmatm ct al.;
judgment for $:)49 90.
Moses Wetstroti et al., vs. t. .1. uos-
iihiiu etal.; judgment for $S74 91.
A. T. Fleming, adm'r. vs. B. Hawhee;
judgment for $234 BO.
Jaek.sn Jones vs. dames it. Lnvinc;
continued.
K. Kappler v. Aug. Litschgi; judg
ment for 182 85.
E. Hatfield vs. P. M. Biackwcll ct al. ; limissed. W. i. Cnlbertson vs, J. Dentie; judg
ment for '50 05,
V". S. Culbertson vs. II. Ivelch; judg
ment for 10ti 35.
L. JJ. Leinmtm vs. Lemmon; pu-
titioti : continued.
W. . CiiUiurtson vs. .1. II. Divine et
ul jjudgnmnt for $131 45. Same partie let id.: jud-imeut forlUii 75 .
v. . Culbertsou vs. donn arnoju; dlinsseil. ". si. Cntbcrbon vs. J. II. Divine et
al.: judgment tor 00 75.
I oh u .lochim v. .io-. SjtricKiancn ni
ill. ; judgment for $121 56.
(i. Hon Alter, jtttm r. vs. u. liuismcicr; foreclosure for SiGS 4').
V. S. t'tilbet t-.on vs. John Parsons ul
al.: forecloture lor &15ti 00.
cases.. i Fink v. F. Gephart ct. al.; judg-
Sfate vs. V. S. Hammond: luintlnjr Cf .1 . lit .. .1 o
on ouiiiinv ; liuuiuu.
t5late vs. J'. Senuinger; retailing :j
pica not guilty; limling guilty; lined 00.
State vs. .7. Altmcvcr; three caes;' retailing; plea not guilty; lined $300v:
caen case. Htate vs. George Melding; ret.; not guilty.
Stato vs. Joseph Melding: ret : two
tenses ; not guilty ,r
fctate vs. Aug. Litschgi; ret.; not guilty.
Stale vs. Jos. AHmeycr; ret.; notj
ginuy. State vs. Jos. Goepfrich: two cases:'
ret. ; lined $20 in each case. I State vs. George Melding; ret.: not! guilty.
State vs. F. Scnninger ; ret. ; two cases ;'
hul gniuy. State vs. George Smith : carrvinsr con
cealcd weapons; guilty; llaed $5, and
recognizance lorteltcti, State vs. P. J. Gosmann; ret.; not guilty.
state vs. unri!. Kmmer; ret.; two
cases : Jlaed $20 00 in ouch case State vs. J. Altmeyer; ret.; fined $2000.
State vr. P. Senninsrer; ret.: three!
cases; fined $'40 00 in each case. State vs. 3likc W'eikel ; two cases, A & li. ; quashed.
btate vs. Joseph Aran, A. 4b B. :
qnasfied. Stato vs. F. Bnchsrt : ret. : fined $20 00.
Stato vs. "VV. Ktipcr; ret. ; lined 20 00.',
atntovs. A. B Spradlcy; two A "I ft nilllollnil
. incut for 5122(50.
ouue s. y. ucitman and k.. Jr-.rt : .,. n tt.r t a!., vs. Daniel Miller:
' , V,,,U io j-.g0ert; conmmed oiecitneui: dismissed.
as to iieitmaii. Y ,.i va t
s"i. MrVr V" """ . , ,1 K-KapplM-v,. A.J.
Ilotriiausctal.
Goiinaun etial.
....... .... . wki.iiiiiv, , .,;(.; " I " 1 IM-U' 'COIltHI u id HfnT'ini'vt!'' ,Ct-: m"lV't'V,. ! State ex rel.. Peter Hollman v. LewisKS 1: r , ' Tl lm' ; "?l -'""iMillor et al. ; judgment for 1 to. -.(.eortfoMchlitf;ret.; lined c. Ault.nat, et al.. vs. P. Campbell;
Slate vs. P. J. Gosmann ; rot.
S20 00.
liiiii.Mii.Mit ii.. it'.K r;."..
fmedt sfini.on hixlcr vs.
Clay I.emmon :
i ,.1. . . i f i;t...... ....it ik
State vs. .Toseph Mchlinjr: ret.: five v v itii,M, . iti.,..-,! ,,f Cmtutv
ce : lined 20 00 in Muh w . " ' -.7. . '
' - - 'i .lint til i .viiftii.t4 ? liiii'.'ini'iii iiir-ki. vv.
s ! o i i! Lvam : A & 11 """Mi A. C Hose vs. Lewis G rcen ; dis.nibsed. S i Si i ,mie-v: ,c"'; ,,ot "'""J'-i -T. Ilerbig vs. ,F. Biegltuo; juoState .. J. Altmeyer ; ret. ; not guilty .!., ,,. i70 03.
ouuo h. ,joi.u Altmanret.; lined; M. (Jhanlev vs. Paul Kunkel; con-
2tl 00.
State vs, Geo. Molding; ret.; nollied. State vs. A. B. Spradlcy; cruelty to;
niuuiHi , iiocu UU.. ' State vs. John Scharer; contempt; fined $25 00. i
State vs. F. Wctihold; iusanitv: off of docker. State vs. A. B. Spradlcy; A. & B.;
1IIICO $J uw
tinned.
Kemington Sewing Machine Co. vs. A. Miller; dismissed. A. Krans et al., vs. M. A. Cook el al. ;
continued.
Dortluila Harbison et al. ; petition to
sell laud ; sale ordered. .
The latest thing out in mothers-in-
law : She had succeeded
, ,, JT a t? o i. . RW: one imu succeeded in uiarrvmg ''!. ;.' A K Spi-adlcy; A. & B.;j,er pm, Hnd naturally undertook the
1.1 1.S omcrgency, but for all future in on disturbed sli I 1p1c.c Ion ,H y e,,,wo lllgo our icihisnt . TiSt hi hI wanit, whatever it
HAS bnttf n.l orc.M n W for nit ktnrtf -if , l'""' fcltllM H'nfL' llt li.. .......... ...1.1. .... ... , rltfo lllllf, ti.ul
tiBfTT it i 7: V j,y'lM...iimnv rni, menu. . .n,r? i- ."'i UIBIHIUI'I h 111 .X6II4 0. Itlltx.fM Clllltjf. Ititt tllR Well klJOWIl tfllAft I'.llnf. ....I IT.... .1 ( 1 .1 V !
"ti,Kr. iitprtc.Wititio,iift(itttiih;iiBiM of such ollenders. We hold lhat no justl A?, 'f ',
w7r-norfemtomK Ami iroaiHg or wgtii tr buif. power result s u a iren goveuuunt to ,.,.,it. . ,T lirdtnptIjrttii.t4to. ,tIaiW..l.lt I,,.U-,I.. I . " t'0Hldll Olht
'ovwl)r 13th, IRTv 1y
8lret, ppjiftMIo tlie Vet. Jaswir, Ikihaxa,
Itt litf acrtUrtiutniico nllli the ttlt- ' gIIS have Hot OtOll
lilt! well K1IOWII Komi o!,nr. ,,.,1 cntTV.i. ,l,af ni.l
I 1, 1. 1 i 1 1 riiu'l Mini i imiuii
" mml ,,,;u J" That if the fnnfo clmtl Hit.,, o.
. mm. nil I'l'MI'lil'S 8m, likn llm Jlotnrnlnir
luwlest.ne!h it i Ihe dutv of that gov.
eminent, to restnilu. The Jietui'iiittg Board of Louisiana cluiins to he invested with this thinvrer- . am and despotic newer a power whicli
aosouiie ties tot. m sint. euvv-mid
exercise of that, newer U finnl
................. .4 ! 1 .
1 wMr,jHrfffirH. which iYewtii J Hfi ""pHoii ot power by any dc. trtmeiit
IIJUSl
ELECTION. IVow Winter feloclc
boots xm mom itfitfr,
nil V U llU I M tXl IlUlinl. M..Mul.. t . I .
t,. . " V """J l'it"'iwin ' ' ' ihiuuii v. kuoiiiiiiuiii, Hd III U1I MtopV Ml.Il1 Itunia ... ...1 ......... I ... I
ch' r.HMn Htim-M, - . . ' . ' " nemrnuig uoani, willPli Hdl' FImii Sl.npa. . i n,i tn linlil tint inviiinl
assumes I... c... . .
At,. I -tl . . lm, ......... ...v.-.,.MU,gl, rut.ui HI IIIK OIIUP
!CAaTs t7BS?TuM itillrt, wi1clhM repeatedly falsi! -Aora, imjj. po to jnhjngate the fdei'al govern-
absolute power to designate the Pros!
tieui aim vice t'lcddcut, wo call upon Ihti House of nt'proontatives focxertali its constitutional powers to defeat the usurpation, and we pledge It our support with all the resources which a people whose tiimlamental liberties are threatened, can constitutionally command, VOOMllKKS' ItKSOLHTIO.V. Ecsolvetl, That a committee of five he appointed by tho President of ihh Conveutlon, to ha known as a comiiiitfpo of Correspondence and Public Safetv The duties of said committee t,
correspond with otheiv similar commit, tees ami tho leading men of other States.
ior me purpose oinnngtng about a har-
flned $J00.
State vs. Jesse Evans; A. & B. ; fined tlO 00. Btate vs. X. Ilerbig; A. & B, ; fined $5 00.
Stato vs, T. Steflb; provoke; fine
$3 UU.
management of his household. Pre
enlly the son died, but she continued to advise, direct and worry generally her daughter-in-law. Then the d iugh"-fpr-iu-? w married arain, but still tlie
'juhi lady insisted oh bossing things. A
, II ntltAt. Ctl ""'.' '"'"
... ..v... .iinil) til1lni:3 IV t-l I! . ..nul.l I....... . ......M.l. ..tl. t n. I..l....r
I... : J "inn itt; iiw iiu.viuic lis ill. lu unci inn li. 1. l.ltlttttlftl. ....... . T...t,l . . . .
, .,i-iHim nave
it. union vs. esiam m .men i t. .1 ...i.:.
lKliui.ni.lall.,1, I fllM i"H I1HJ IICT. IIIISUI1IIU T 1S IIV1 III 1 1 1 Z IU Lcniinon 5 allowetl $14 00. hP. -l,lil:,,u.n ti, . i, nA(i,.
Hili!,riU'nV,iS,!ttoofJohnFuhr.i'b m? Why, am I not his step-
v.. iilliii.liloi4 tit Ii i itMln t,idnVn
-ill-am v 1 Mis 1 v. q oiuu
man ;
.lacoli Jocliim vs. etato of Daniel .liwtltttii atluw..! CO n Alt
Joseph Buchart vs. estate of M. Goetz;
UUMlllllll-ll, John Jochim vs. estate of Daniel Jo chim; allowed 41.087 00.
J. Garnian et al.; partition: dlstri-
IMIUUII Ul HSSClS ended.
Slate ex rel. of L. Hobbs vs. L. Mc Cany ; continued. Curtis et al. : nartition : enntlnimd.
11. Holcrort y. W. Newttm el al.; judgment for 1448 6. V. L Bret7. et al., vg.Huiitiugbnrg;
j ui.x. .n:in iur jimiiHin ior 91U 011. F. W. Bptlierl, guardian vs. C. Feldwish; partition: endsd hv i.trthmi,..
Joseph Jones et al.; partition; sale
icpurieu tor Jin mi ; contf lined. Sprauer, adm'r. vi. Sprar? land sold fpr$UO0O.
Tim Republican party has lotnr, lainii'd to bo the great "moral idea" or
ganization of the country, and has pre-
tendett that the Democrat were the
eiicinicrt ol the tree schools. Aow, in
view ol'tlih claim, is it not a little rotth
repotted, ami cause on the great "moi-al Idea'Tparty tint
the trustees or the reabouy Educational fund for the South, have decided to withhold all contributions from those
Southern States which are governed by
tho Kepuulicans,a9in every totale where
they have had full sway, the leader have stolen all the school funds and divided it among themselves and the r needy partisans. Over live million dol
lars have been stolen In-Louisiana aione.
IKvmisvllle Courier. More gas than gore in the BennettMay duel.
,1 I f 1
1
t