Jasper County Democrat, Volume 11, Number 84, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 27 March 1909 — THE GOURT HOUSE [ARTICLE]
THE GOURT HOUSE
Items Picked Up About the Couiity Capitol. .r v :^v.r : Attorney Jasper Guy of Remington was over Wednesday on abstract work. The marriage license business has picked up a little this week, and the number issued for the month has now reached five, still several below the average of former years for March. Last March 13 licenses were issued. Wm. W. Lyons, aged about 60 years, was brought over yesterday from Remington to lay out a fine and costs of $28.25 for intoxication, miking the only star boarder in Hitel DeShirer at present. In fact, h«F is the only boarder Sheriff Shirer has had since being inducted into office Jan. 1. J —~ jk Marriage licenses issued: March *3, Albert Brook of Keener tp., aged 63, occupation farmer, to Elenora Bruck of Demotte, aged 22, occupation housekeeper. Third marriage for male, first two marriages having been dissolved by death in 1896 and 1901. First marriage for female. *4 March 24, Marion A. Robinson pf Hanging Grove tp., son of George A. Robinson, aged 25, occupation farmer, to Ella Mae Crowder, daughter of Marion M. Crowder of Marion tp., aged 18, occupation housekeeper. First marriage for each.
March 26, William C. Faylor of Jasper county, aged 58, occupation farmer, to Estella Weston, also of Jasper, aged 45, occupation housekeeper. Second marriage for female, first for male. Both are from Union tp. O-' — New suits filed: No. 7428. Thomas H. Lackland vs. Frank B. Ham; action to recover the amount of taxes for the years 1906-7 on certain real estate in Pulaski county which plaintiff purchased of defendant lm June, 1908. Demand $125. % No. 7229. George K. Wentworth vs. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co.; action for damages from fire, alleged to have been started from defendant’s locomotives. Demand $1,450. No. 7230. Same vs. same; same kind of case, fire occurring at another time and on different lands. Demand $350. No. 7231. Benj. J. Gifford vs. Joseph Eichelberger; suit on account. Demand $i,500.
