Jasper County Democrat, Volume 5, Number 6, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 17 May 1902 — ABOUT THE COURT HOUSE. [ARTICLE]

ABOUT THE COURT HOUSE.

Item* of Interest Gathered In tha Offices and Corridors of the County Capitol. New suits filed: No.« 6390. Ira W. Yeoman vs. Vincent Eisle; appeal from _Justice Churchill’s court. —o— Marriage licenses: May 8, John W. Hutchinson to Mary A. Allen. May 9, Leslie B. Hewitt to May Walker. —o — Edwards and Chadwick were taken to Michigan City last Monday. Young Edwards was taken to Jeffersonville Thursday. —o — Three applicants for license will be heard at the June term of commissioners’ court—John M. Johnson and John W. Alkire of Remington, and J. G. Moritz of Kersey, Keener tp. —o — The tax-ferrits have caused to be placed on the “omitted taxduplicate” the following amounts since our last report: Lena Tuteur, Rensselaer $378.00 (One adjustment in March, which we believe escaped our notice, was that of the Thomas Tnompson estate, of. Rensselaer, amount $389,44.) —O Following is a report of the proceedings of the April term of the circuit court, other than has been previously reported. Murv E. Lowe administratrix, vs. Clurisa P. Hussel et al; H. J. Kunnal and J. M. Wasson. appointed to appraise certain lands, report value at $4,500. Administratrix ordered to file additional bond in the sum of $lO.000, which is done, with Hush Lowe as surety : approved and cause continued. John C. Vanatta vs. John Bradbury; plaintiff (riven possession of premises and judgement for costs. Harvey W. Bledsoe vs George W. Tudor et al; judgment for plaintiff for *75 and costs. Defendant prays appeal to supreme court. Commercial State Bank Vs; Hester (irayson et al; judgment for plaintiff fors2B9 89und costs; real estate ordered sold. Amandu Jane Roberts vs. Mildred Tyler and W. C. Tyler et al: judgment for plaintiff for $579.15 and costs; real estate ordered sold. William T. Beahler vs. J. L. Wood: judgment for plaintiff for $70.08 and costs. Harney Clark vs. William T. Beahler: motion for new trial over-ruled; defendant prays appeal to appellate court, which is granted. Rensselaer B. L. <4 Savings Asso., vs. Mary E. Bull.(Hiram Day files cross-complaint on mechanic's lien). Verdict for first plaintiff for 1414.91 and costs, and verdict for plaintiff on cross-complaint for $46.65, Real estate ordered sold. M. E. Irwin vs. A. G. Hendryx; judgement against defendant for $54.40 and costs. Joanna M, Chlpman vs. Charles C. Chi(man and Milton D. Chipman; C. G. Spitlcr, commissioner, reports balance ofs2soinhls hands, which he pays into court; commissioner discharged and clerk of said court is directed to pay said sum to Charles Chipman, and the life interest of Milton D. Chipman, estimuted at $l9O, and Win. H. Parkison is directed to pay to the clerk of this court the sum of $lO for the use of said Charles C. Chipman in addition to the $250 paid into court by said commissioner. Joshua Goddard et al vs. William G. Stone; settlement agreed upon between plaintiffs and Willis J. lines, guardian for defendant, by which second item of w ill Is declared void and plaintiffs give young Stone $250. which is approved by the court State vs. Lee Richards, affidavit of Wra.S, Richards to have defendant committed to reform school: Sylvester A. Richards, an uncle of the boy. offers to take care of him and the court gives him into said uncle's hands until Sept. 1. State vs. William G. Stone, same kind of case: Perry W. Liston agrees to keep and board defendant until next term of court and pay him $1.50 per week. He is directed to remain in the care and custody of suid Liston, whoit to report at the next term of court for further orders. The mother of defendant is restrained from interfering w ith said custody, but umy visit the defendant. Everett Halstead vs. John Duvall et al; motion of pluiutiff for change of venue overruled and case coutinued for the term--

TITI.EH QUIETED. Hugh Roberts vs. William J. Stoval et al. Bert O. Gardner vs. Jonntl a i Lee et al. John English vs. William Wyatt et al. Joseph Moritz et al vs. Martin Warner et al. David A. Bickel vs. Peru A Indianapolis Railroad Co., etal. James L. Babcock vs. Erasmus B, Collins et al. CABES DISMISSED. Alfred McCoy et al vs. Simeon A. Dowell et al. Norman Warner vs. William Vedder et al. Louis H. Meyers vs. J. C. Larson et al. Albert E. Zielmie vs. Joseph H. Tyler. John A. Smith vs. John L. Smith, Ray D. Thompson vs Thomas Tanner et al. James H. Chapman vs. Walter Disbrow. James H Chapman vs. Joseph Chadoin. Geo. K. Hollingsworth et al vs. Abraham HallecU et al. Joseph Chadoin vs. Francis M. Walters. King Hamilton Co., vs. Isuuc A. I.ravel, B. J. Gifford vs. William C. Hulx-ock. W. B. Austin vs Gamaliel G. Garrison, James H. Chapman v*. Francis M. Goff. May K. Spltler v*. Seth B. Moffitt et al. CXBM CONTINUED. Jennie A. Gray, guardian, vs. Frank B. Veuiium et al. Samuel A. Spry et al vs. James C. MoColly et al. Garrett Gruvenstuuk vs. Charles F. Otla. Henry Hell vs. Elizabeth Hell. Torry Cedar Co. vs. Ahraham Halleck. William H Handle, adin., vs. JohuC. Barkley et al. Julia A. Richardson VS. William A. Richardson. Joseph L. Tyler, adin., v*. Paul L. Tyler et State of Indiana for use of John W. Fish, drainage commissioner, vs. Staver Carriage Co. Maggie E. Clifton vs. Samuel G. Clifton. Rial H. Burris vs. Charles W. Baker et al. Ray I). Thompson. exr.,vs. Abrahan Halleok et ul. William K. Moore V*. Rebecca-.!. Porter. Emerald Aldrich vs. Theresa McCnrtain. Warren D. Swisher vs. Federal Oil A Asphaltnm Co. A ii It man Taylor Co. v*. Kranklin Gray et al. K iridoiivs. Raridcu, action for divorce. Benjamin K. Harris vs. Louis Poyer etal. John W. Fish, commissioner, vs. Mary Satiford et al. You never heard of any one using Foley's Honey snd Tsr and not being satisfied. Sold ] by A. K Long.