Indiana State Sentinel, Volume 30, Number 33, Indianapolis, Marion County, 17 September 1884 — Page 5

THE INDIANA STATE SENTINEL, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1884.

wmm ahd shml alio Plumed Knight Dodjins Behind Inegal Stumps

Jo Avoid Answerin? the Sentinel's In terrojratories Ilia Telejrraplilc Haste In Starting the Snit All Tetered Ont, And Tee Sentinel Has No Help From Him in Speeding the Trial The Same Old Uulllaran Letter Bluster Photographed In Elaine's Attorneys. At 2 o'clock on Saturday argument was Irtgun in the United States Conrt npon the jntinel's motion for a rnle to compel James G. Llaine to answer the interrocatories filed as a part of the Sentinel's answer to Mr. 251aiae'a complaint ol libel. The proce?d Inj3, which are here published, tell the story Of the I'lamed Knight's avoiding answers to the interrozatories. The Sentinel was represented by Judge Day id Turpie aod Aqnilla Joaes, Esq., while Senator Harrison, W. IL 3f. Hiller and Sol. Clay pool represented Mr. IBIaine. The following is a report o' the proceeding: Mr. Jones If your Ilonor please, the que lion presented i upon the motion fcerexJoie filed for a rule against the plaintiff to answer the Interrogations, and if your Sonor desires to hear armament on that proposition, we are ready to argue the question. C Judge Woods I can hardly express myse!f as having a desire on the subject one vay or the other. I am willing you should srgue it. General Harrison When these interrogiJories were filed in the case the impression snade upon the minds of counsel for the pleintiffwas that they were scarcely filed cocformatory to the practices and usages of the Circuit of the United States. "We believed, and still believe, that in the twelve years or more of practice which has been had under the statute of United States, no such order in aDy common law case has ever been made by the Court. "We understood this jirsctice to be so settled and so uniiorm, and to have been so generally conceded by a large circle that we did cot suppose that the counsel were presenting these interrogatories supposing ihej were pursuing the legal methods of obIjioing evidence. I may say so tar as CJunBel for the plaintiü went, as far as their opiuion went, they were of this settled conviction and are to day, that we were uader BO mere obligation in law to answer these interrogatories than we would have been if lhey Lad been published in the columns of the rewspaper that published the libel not a whit more. Under those circumstances I think any honorable counsel would advise his cliect to decline to have this extra juil--cial method of obtaining his statement adopted. We were then in hopes, If ycur Ilonor please, that this case anight be brought to such an early hearing that our client should have that opportunity which he has coveted from the beginning to appear in your courts and confront those who have published this libelous statement about him and about his family, and make in their presence and in the presence of the "world a full statement of his domestic life, 2 hat he might give to the defendant here a lull opportunity for the fullest cross examination. We were of the opinion, and so decidedly, that if an early trial could be procured that was the right time, and the legal occastion and method by which he should jrive the people and these gentlemen his statement We have concluded since from the fact that we have been served with nonice to take deposi tions on the -21 of Sepiembtr, tc rü'ir.s t.vo tvec-to r.fter ths lo tice w.t- jtrved in K""it'irky. a cay's joar it-y J'fiv here, an continuing there until soma time in October, and being advised that in divers other portions of the United States lhey propose taking depositions, we Lave about concluded that it can not ba within our power to briDg the case to that early hearing io enable our ciient to make his statement in that legal and ordinary method which we jbrst adviftd. Now, in view of tbse iaota, we are here tvday to say that if & rale ij asked at the Ltnds of this Court tc answer these interroeatrries, we shall co:.te3t it upon the authority; but while I wy ht, I also say that, of öür own volition, and not zinder compulsion of anyrua of th! Court, we bhall at an early day as wer these i'iterroatoiies and put oar answers oa file 'n tUI Court. 2 have thought the making if this statement in adince was proper a? predentin? a contingency upon which counsel might choose to act. If tbe motion ta rule to answer these interrogatories is insisted upon we shall contest that and pre39nt the authorities to the Court. ' The Court Let n.e e.iy to you, gentlemen, before entering upon the discussion, hot I feel about the mattet in reference to it ai a question of practice in the Coart, and iiioilentally give a suggestion as to the present situation in this case, as I understand the practice has been in the Court not to admit these interrogatories Judge Turpie told me some days eo that Judge Gresham refaed s rule that interrogatories olfered by him were to be answered in some ca3e. Since 1 have ccme upon tbe bench the matter ha? several times been mentioned, bat no formal request tipon me for a rule of this kind until within the past week at Fort Wayne. It seems tinder the circumstances somewhat improper that I should undertake to introduce a new rule in view of the present situation, especially as Judge Drummond is practically oü" tbe bench as Circuit Judge, and within a few "weeks will be ?ucceded by another, and if the question of a new practice in this respect 5r to be mooted and passed upon it ought to be done in consultation with the incoming Circuit Judge, whoever he majk.be. Si far as my own personal feeling is as to what the rule out-lit to be. saying about what it is, I would be desirous to lind it possible to adcmit of the filing of interrogatories in this class of cases. 1 would think it woakl be a great convenience and Fave the trouble of taking testimony. But as I ruled at Fort Wayne the other day, deciding it as much as I could to keep the question open, I refused to have the interrogatories answered, saying that I Hifcitfcü tu l.ve the question open until tbe "incoimi g Judge conies on the bench and then coiisult with him, as he was my superior nicer. That being so, and the plaintin" heie Laving announce! by his attorney that Le will, within a few days, answer be3e interrogatories, would not that bs the Y)e&t disposition of the case, speaking of it 'irom my standpoint, and to allow the interrogatories to remain on file with the understanding based upon General. Harrison's t tat foment tbat they will be answered in a few dnyi? Jdo Turpie I did not understand General Harrison made such a statement.

If he will indicate a time witkin a few days we will make no further argument. General Harrison In the present aspect of this case I think I have said all I can say on that subject. We shall answer those interogatories and answer them very soon. In tie aspect of the case which your Ilonor has suggested, I think I have gone as far as I can go, but we propose to answer those interrogatories, and we propose to answer them very soon, but I do not name the day; but I will ssy to your Honor it will be very soon. Judge Woods Then I will say to counsel that it is my impression beforehand that this is the course I shall take, viz: leave the question open and not decide it; leave your interrogatories on file as they stand; but if you desire to press the matter and argue it as a law question I will not refuse to hear you, but I shall be very much disinclined to depart from what I understand to have been the established practice in this court, until I can consult with the incoming Circuit Judge. Mr. Jones, of counsel for plaintiff, read Section 35!, Revised Statutes. 1831, as follows. "Interrogatories to parties: Either party may propound interrogatories, to be tiled with the pleadings, relevant to the matter in controversy, and require the opposite party to answer the same under oath. And corporations, through their proper officers, agent or agents, shall be required to answer' interrogatories a3 natural persons. All interrogatories must; be answered in the time limited, positively and without evasion, and the Court may enforce the answer by attachment or otherwise; and the Earty may, in addition thereto, set forth in is answer all relevant matter in avoidance. The answer to the interrogatories mar be used on the trial or not, at the option of the party requiring it," as governing the practice in this State. He then read Section 911 of the United States Statutes of 173, which reads as follows: "The practice, pleadings and forms and modes 01 proceeding in civil causes, othsr than equity and admiralty cases, in the Circuit and District Courts, shall conform as near as nay be to the practice, pleadings, and forms and mout-s of proceeding existing at tbe time in like causes in the Courts of lleocrd of the State within which such Circuit or District Courts are held, any rule to the contrary notwithstanding." Claiming that section Oil, last read, was imperative in it3 commands upon the cause of practice in the Circuit and District Courts of the United Ftabss. And that section 3.V. of the Revised Statutes of 1S31 was in force in this State, and should govern in cases in the United States Court. Senator Harrison, following Mr. Janes, submitted several authorities, but dwelt most on a citation from one of Judge Clatchford's decisions, reading: "There is nothing in the Constitution or statntes of tbe United States which sanctions any other mode of trial. in a common law action, than atrial by a-jury in the presence of the Court, unless such a trial is waived." Judge Turpie I do not know, if your Ilonor please, aud I do not care whether the plaintiff ever intends to appear here as a witness. He has a right to oCer himself, but te has not a right to compel us to bring him here. We are not compelled to make him a witness, and it was to supercede the necea3ity of our making him a witnes3 tbat we proposed these Interrogatories. I do not know exactly what the learned counsel meant by saying in substance that the filing of three interrozatories was not taken in earnest on the other side. Certainly the most name s t language is put in them. Thos interrogatories were filed nine days ago, aud the Court was to fix a time in which he was to answer them nine days ago. There has been time to answer them, and they are not answered yet. They were asked with all earnestness and ail seriousness, and not with any knowledge on our part that the request was contrary to tbe practice of the Court. Whiia I am on that subject I may say that I do not think a record can be found in the Court since the.Tadoption of the statue of In") 2, in which it has been held that in terrceatories filed here are not to be answered. I know that interrogatories filed here have been answered. That has occurred once or twice in my practice where the parties have not objected and had come in and answered tbem, just as the plaintiff in this case might have answered them even be fere this argument is heard if he had seen tit to give us the i forma tion contained in them, and if he bad seen tit to give the Court the very ordinary information which the family Bible of every gentleman who has contracted iratiliucnial alliances contains. It is very true, as alluded to, tbat Judge Grts.l.iu refused to make a rule where

dr. tuities objected, but that was B"f 'i j ears ago, and prior to the revision of 1-7S. Ti at waj very much prior to the o of Jnd-.'e liOA'ell referred to by my col'eague. As far as I know there has been no acquiescence in that decision. There was no ecquieBcenca in it tbat i certain, because i '1 tt j rogatories had been filed by me since then and answered. I think on three or four weeks ago with a complaint attached to wh' h were in terrogatone. There his never been an acquiescence, tnere has never been a general understanding, there ha been no understanding of the rule because there has Leen no rule. There has been nothingdecided, and tlie question is entireiy open to-day as to whit the practice of this Court shall be. The practice heretofore has not been established. It has gone both ways. It has never been ruled against an objection, nevertheless the validity of the objection has never been acquiesced in. .Judge Lowell savs it would be foolish to tile a bill of dicowry when there is an obvious aud easy method made by act of Congress of 137$ in the room of that without lisablins it. We therefore think there ou?ht to be arulinsj and a lule well known aud established. We are not asking for an oral examination; we are iot asking for anything covered with the ca-es cited by the learned counsel on the ctberside. We are asking draply of compliance with the provision of the statute Eccording to the rale given to the Court in ni( h cases. Tbe statute of the State regulating and including the mode of production, inspection and competency and credibility cf a witness was adopted by this Court in ru-e n'ne. There is an absolute, nacontrolicd, entire adoption. I wish to call your Honor's attention to the term "production." What is the term "production?" The manufacture, the creation, the formation of testimony. Pro and duco. to lead or draw out the extraction of testimony. Piessing the conscience of the party, tbat we may discover what is peculiarly in his knowledce when and where he was married, and the birth of the first child. The rccde of producing that testimony is the Fame here as it is in the Marion or any otner Circuit Conrt of the State. Yet I do not think a more forcible word could have been used. This rule is elastic. It covers the mode of the production of testimony in the State Court, no matter what that mode may be at the time, and may be one thing this year and another thing the next. But I think there has been no substantial change since However that may be we haye a right to file interrogatories with our pleadings, and we have a right to require an answer. We had 0 quirrel with the cases alluded to Neighhors.Gibwn.or the Life Insurance Company vs. fScbailer or Beardsley vs. Little et al or in the Dwyer case, none at all. They touch the point where tbe act of Congress makes a ditferent provision, one conilicting with tne State Court in regulating testimony and its production. The general provision regulates only oral testimony. That is the Jar Eruage used. It may never be testimony at all. ' It is not testimony at all, except in a certain contingency. Now, your Honor, is there any act of Conres upon that subject, npon discoveries of that kind? Not in the mat remote manner, not in the most distant manner is there any Congressional legislation on this subject. Certainly theprovision in relation to oral testimony does not cover it, for it is not oral testimony. It is a method of reaching the foundation of testimony the source of testimony; the dates, names and places from which testimony mav be procured. It is a beneficent method. It is one which we think ought not to be disregarded. 1 might 1 notice the other cases cited by the learned

CARTER'S H IVR PI11.S.

Flrk TTeadarhe end relievo aü the troubles hidc'.';nt to a l ilious f-tatc of tiic pystrm, Fach as Uiarbess, Nausea, Drowsir;'3, Distrcä after eatiji! ia tho fiJo, .5. Whila their moatremarkilMo Bucccaa hsa beca ebovra ia curing Ilearlirl. yr-t Carter's Little Lirrr riÜ3 arc pqnaüy valuable in Constipation, cr.rin' and prewentin tis annoying complaict, whilo tbry 10 corrttt iildi.-iordi-niiuf tlie Ptooach, stimulate the liver aqJ regulate the bowels. Uvea if ihey only curvd Afhfl they woald bo n'mwt prieelecs tothöwIio BtuuT from this dtrcssing complaint ; but fortaXiately t In ir goodnt m docs notcad here, and thoca vho onco try them v.-ill find t!ico ItUlo pi!!s vnloctle la co many ways that tbty will not tw willing t j do without thcia. Lut alter Utsick haod Li Li Is ie baro of k many live tbat hcra wtier ire cuke oar great boadt. Our pills curg it wiiiia tthrrs do not. Carter's Little Livor Pill ara very wnall and vTy easy to take. One er two pUJs inake a los. They are Ftrictly Tcjrct&blo and donutgripooc purg, but by th--r pyntla action plcaw all who use them, la vialo tt 25 cents ; five for ft. So4 by üruiwta eve-rywheru, or bent by mail. - CAKIEli miOICINB CO., Hsvt York City counsel, but they do not come in my judgment within a thousand leagues ot the question here. In regard to the ruling by Justice Davis I am very certain that he made no ruling on the question. His ruling was with reference to interrogatories to be put to a jury. This Question was never before Justice Davis. There is no tradition of its ever being before Justice Davis. That was a case to which the term "conundrums" was apulied. AVe think we are entitled to a ruling upon this question for the reasons that we are as anxious as the gentlemen on the other side for an early trial, and that is one of the reasons for obtaining an answer to tbe interrogatories tiled with the pleadings. It might eipedite it very much. The cnarges made in this libel suit are very serious, and tbe tacts to which these interrogatories relate are of the most serious character, and there is one person's evidence we are undeniably entitled to in advance, if this trial is to be expedited, and if it is to occur at an early date. The name of that witness is conscience the conscience of the plaintiif. We are seeking an answer from that the facts. Tbe deliberate attempt to suppress such answers and to prevent such answers and delay such ifnswers is almost as criminating General Harrison I do not think the gentleman should go so far. The Court I do not believe I will interrupt the argument. Judge Turpie We are entitled to the thing we have alluded to, so that we may produce the elements of testimony. The gentleman might have twenty or thirty days. We should n otobject to any reasonable delay, but the attempt not to answer at all, the refusal to answer, and the long unbroken silence is almost as criminating as confession itself. Judge Woods These views of the case have no connection with the matter now under consideration. It does not apply to the discusbion of a law question, however much it may bear upon the duty of the plaintiff to the country. Mr. Turpie I thought it applicable or I would not have presented iL Judge Woods This discussion, gentlemen, baa not changed my views in reference to this question. It is conceded now that motions have several times been madeia this Court, and tbat the rule has never been granted. Judge Lowell's decision is cited as to the propriety of granting such rules. My own personal desire is, when I shall ÜLally pass upon tbe question, as I probab'y mutt some time, to reach the same conclusion that Judge Lowell did. Judge Lowell says that, in his opinion, the question is a very doubtful one. He concedes the conflict between his reasoning and that of Judge Dyer upon the Bubject. The reasoning cf Judge Dyer in the case decided by him, es recorded in 7 Bliss, would be eetirst the granting of a rule to have these interrogations answered. The reasoning ot Judee Ulatcbford. as I understand it (I have not rujself examined the case), 6eemstobe in the same direction. Tbat reasoning, if trx-d. breaks the force of the rules ot this Court. . These rules are general in their terms, and, or coarse, would not impart into the practices of the Court anything inconsistent with the laws of the United States on a subject relevant to practice. Judge Dyer and Judge Illatchforc reason that in reference to the obtaining of testimony the statutes of the United States are already explicit. Judge Lowell takes tbe opposite view of that questiou. The judges of this Court have themselves interpreted the rules which they have adopted tbus far by refusing to grant motions asking lor answers to interrogations. I, therefore, in view of all these decisions, still regard the question as a doubtful one. I still think it would be improper for me to decide It until I can consult with the Circuit Court I do not repard it as important in this case or in any other case, because there are other modes of accomplishing the same result which I suppose are open to the parties; therefore, I do not feel compelled to reach a conclusion now on the subject. I do not see that any interest is imperiled. I therefore refuse to enter any rule requiring these interrogatories to be answered, reiterating my desire that when the question shall come to be determined that we shall reach the same conclusion Judge Lowell did on the subject. An earnest, Intelligent body of men is the Itoadmasters' Association, in session for two days in this city. Some of the members have grown gray in arduous service which, more than any other, contributes to the safety of railway travel. Some, by exceptional capacity, diligence and opportunity, have risen to the responsible offices of masters of important roadways while still young. All appear to be zealous in tbe study of whatever pertains totfceir pursuit deep'y interested io the discussions and appliances which have come before their meeting for consideration and observation. Of the millions who travel yearly by rail, how many retlect upon their indebtedness to thes9 men for comparative immunity from accident while speeding as on wings of the wind from starting point to destination? What watchful eyes must theirs be upon road-bed and crosstie and rail; upon culvert and trestle aud bridge! The more irregular the weather the more exacting their work. They are surjeons of their lines. Like the latter professionals, they are liable to be called out by day or night. A collision, a derailed train, a bridge burned or washed away, prospective danger to track or trestle from high water any ot these will take the roadmaster from his bed and mav bap expose him to rough weather and exact unremitting work for scores of Xours in succession. A nervy, resolute and intrepid class ot men are tbe railway road masters, deserving the heartiest good will and admiration of all people who go for pleasure or business by raiL Indianapolis is pleased to hay been the place of their annual meeting for 18SI, and will be delighted to welcome then again at say tixe.

ÄG

v

OUR SHOWY DE3IAG0GUE.

Puck's Chisel Illustrating; the "illusterer aa4 Braggart" Blaine. Tie Delirium Known the Blaine Boom Impudence is Not Brilliancy There Can Be No AggresnlTe Campaign. iPuck. We have received the following letter: To the Editor otPuck: Eir Notwithstanding your opposition to James G. Blaine, don't you really believe he will be elected next President of the United States? Come now, give us an honett opinion of thoughts, as they occur to you during your momenta of Bobcr second thoughts, ana you will greatly oblige A RF.I'UBMCAN Rkadek of who will vote for Blaine and Logan. No. We do not believe that the American Nation will disgrace itself by electing Mr. Llaiae I'resident. And if he were elected what then? Would he be any the les a tricky and dishonorable politician? Would John A. Logan be anything but a turncoat slavecather? Would dishonesty be honesty; would unprincipled smartness be wise integrity; would a demagogue's tricks be statesmanship? Would a lie be the truth? V We publish the above communication because it is a fair example of the desperate tactics of Mr. Blaine's followers. They have had from tbe beginning but this one argument: He will be elected. Yes, he is a dishonorable man; he has proved himself unfaithful to his public trust; he is not a statesman at the best but a smart and showy demagogue; he is utterly unlit to be President of the United States but he will be elected ; therefore, let us support him. This had been their one solitary plea. And at the first, we will admit, we thought it might be to some extent effective among the people. We saw that it was possible that a sustained effort of brilliant impudence might carry the delirium known as the "Blaine loom" through to a successful conclusion. But new two months have passed since Mr. Blaine's nomination, and the sustained effort of brilliant impudence, which the Blaine managers would call an "aggressive campaign," is not seen. Impudence enough there has been in all the conduct of the Blaine campaign, but it has been stupid impudence. Ve have had tbe dull and futile lyin of the Tribune; the fatuous misrepresentation of the country press such part of it as still clings to the difgraced party; the blatant extravagance of the campaign orator; the contemptible apologies of the few respectable llepublicans who have been whipped in to support the man they denounced ten weeks ago, and we have had the base and brutal slander of Mr. Cleveland, for which the Boston Journal and an unnamable paper in this State must bear the responsibility. Here and there excited offise-. holders have gathered together the unwilling citizens and hune across the highways the Hag of their country, and Imarred its sacred stripes with tbe portrait of a man whose greedy heart never knew one patriotic tbrob. And the hired brass-bands play, ana the hired orators spout, and the hungry politicians yell, and the Tribune misquotes tbe Post, and Hon. Mr. Hoar's "defense" of Blaine is carefully hidden from the eyes of Mr. Blaine's supporters, and Mr. WiliiRm Walter Phelps declines to earn $10,000 for Yale College by proving his candidate to be an honorable man, and Vermont, the stronghold of the party, gives a reduced Republican majority in the local election. -if There is impudence here; but where is tho brilliancy? We were to have an "aggressive campaign." Blaine was to sweep the country like a whirlwind. He was to go into the White House on a great billow of popular enthusiasm. His opponents were to be "kept on the run." And what do we tind alter two months? Mr. Blaine, cast off and condemned by the best men and tbe best papers of his own party, conducting a halting, hesitating campaign of trickery, evasion, shifts and lies, the only "asgresaivenesa" of which is seen in infamous and indecent methods of unmanly warfare. Why is this? . it Because the man is a coward at bottom. He always has been a blusterer and a braggart; a swashing fellow, of great martial promise and no performance. V hen it comes to tbe crucial moment, when the point of trial is leached, he turns weakly; he runs; he pleads for safety. He is the loudest to bid dehame to danger; in tbe face of danger he slips away. Such he was when he all but went on his knees to Mulligan to get back tbe letters that damned his fair fame before all the world. Su-h he was when he pleaded with Ixt M. Morrill, "with tears and entreaties," to use influence in his behalf. Such he was when b took refuse ia a sudden and mysterious illness, as he saw the hour ot coudninstion close at hand. Such he wa when, unvindicated, his name tainted with dishonor, he slipped into the United States Senate, to escape being branded by the House cf representatives. Such he is now, when he brings a perfunctory suit against a paper that, if it has libeled him at all, has libeled him crim inally. Such he is now, when he countenances an infamously elanderous assault on Governor Cleveland; and stabs his adversary in tn back with a weapon that no other politician would touch. Such he is no v, when man after man, newspaper after newspaper, rises up to tell him that he has been an unfaithful public servant and to thrust the proofs of his dishonor in his face, and ne remains silent. m Such he is now, when he forms au alliance with the cheapest charlatan of American politics on the mere chance of stealing a few votes from the Democracy. This is surely the last resort of cowardice. To pick up this clown, who for years has been tbe despicable butt of the Nation a sort of disgraceful living jest; settled at, yet feared for his capacity for mischief why, what selfrespect can be left in the man or the party tbat will consent to such association? A pleasant reflection it must be for respectable llepublicans, that the nominee of their party has joined forces with a man whose only claim to public recognition is his hold on the cupidity and credulity of that float ing communistic element which calls itself a "working class," and does not know the meaning of a day's work! No, there will be no aggressive campaign. If his supporters had begun h campaign of aggression, and his opponents had responded with a campaign of retaliation, Mr. Blaine would have retired from the canvass long before this. He is the last man in the world who can afford to go into an aggressive campaign, and he knows it. If by underhand means, in crooked ways, he can steal into the White House, he will do iL Honestly and fairly to fight a way there he leaves to the man whose watch ward is, "Tell the truth." "BILL SYKES" IX BEAL LIFE. A Youns Philadelphlaii Illustrates the Tragic Act and Hangs Himself. Philadelphia Special. One of the most singular cases of involuntary self-destruction ever recorded came to light here to-day through an inquest held to determine the cause of the death of J. H. Barry, aged twenty-four years, who was found suspended by a rope from his bedroom door. Mr. Barry was a scholar of unusual promise and also possessed considerable means. It was his intention to study medicine during the coming winter. Yesterday afternoon Miss Hoag and Mr. Barry entered into a discussion of Dickeria writings. The tragic Lnale of Bill Sykes' career was the main topic. It will be remembered that after the murder of Nancy Sykes the criminal is in a rnnstmit ttA rt tarrnr and 1 Ttnrvnad from I place to place by the police. They close

X'v"-

LYDIA PINKHAtWS TTTflTT AT3TT7 P H T.T"D rt TTÄTT r , IS A POSITIVE CURE For all of those Talnfal Complaints and YVkn-Be" m common to oar bet . FEMALE POPULATION. Ir Wilt. CTRK FN TI KELT THR WOKST TOT.M OP 'ru.i Comit-aint. am. Ovarian tiwibi.es, !- n-AHKATION 1SD UUCF.RATIOX. FALLING A.VI Ils. FLACEMEVrs, AKD THE COXsEQUEXT irPISAU WlTAKke?s, axd h rABrirfLAra.r adapted to tub Change er Lirs. It wax dissolve and exptu Tcmoks rnoM the iTFRITS IX AX EARLY STAGE Of DEVELOPMENT. TllS TEXDEXCTToCAXCEROrs II UM Oil THERE 15 CHECKED VERT SrEEMLY BV ITS VSE. It removes FArxTXEs, Fxattxexct, petuots' ALLCRAVrSG TOS. STIMULAXT, AJJD RELIEVES WjSAK.KEssor the Stomach. It cures Bloatix, IIkabacue, Kervocs Prostration, Generau Deeii.it r,', DEIMtESSIoX AXD IXDIGEeTIOX. , r . That feeltko op Deariko Dows," CArsiXfj Paix,' (Weioht axd Kackache, is always termaxextly Cl RED TITSl-g. , p r ITWTLU AT AM, TIMES AXD UNDER ALLCIRCDM TAXC-ES ACT IX HAR.MOXT WITH TKB LAWS TUAT 60VEBX THE FEMALE SYSTEM. t.J f i-Prs rrRPosE ia SOLELY portoe legitimate' HT..U.IXO OP DISEASE AXD THE HELLE P OP TAIV, AXD ,TUAT IT DOR ALL IT C LAIMS TO DO, THOUSANDS OP LADIKS CAS .LADLYTETIPY. a , For" the cure op Kidney Comtlaints iv either sex t(ih remedt is rspukpased. , LYDIA E. riNKILAM'S VEGETABLE COMPOUND is prepared at Lvnn, Mm. Price $L fcix bottlm for $5. Iii hi all drryjiHts. S nt ly mail, postare paid, la form of TilU or lx'.-Bifi oa recv!pt of price as tbove. llr rinkbam!! ' liuiiie t n. allh" will be mailed free to nr Lady scn.litig stamp. Letters confMrnitially answered. No familr slionli b without LYDIA F. PISKnAM'S T.IYLU I'lJ.LS. Th-y ran On-tiputi'in, LUi'-iiLsntT-and Torpidity of the Liver. 2i cents per bvx. cpon him finally in tight quarters, and the murderer ties one end of a rope in a loopknot abont his body, and makes the other fat t to the'rafter aUerapts to lower himsalf to tbe floor below. The rope slips from his body to his neck, and he Is suddenly confronted with the fact that he is his own executioner. Jliss Hong did not think such an accident pcssible, and Mr. Barry said, he would demonstrate that it was perfectly feasible. Shortly after this discussion the two young folks parted. Mr. Barry retired to his room. He was next found by his father hanging from a rope dead. The supposition is that Älr. Barry, after leaving Miss none, concluded to test tbe feasibility of Syke's accident with the view of illustrating it to his friend as he had promised to do. With this end in yiew, he took with him to his room an inch rope. One end he made fast to the knob on one side of the door by a Bimple cross-hitch and threw the other over the top of the door. Thi3 end contained a loop-knot. It is thought that he placed this about his waist and let himself down from the top of the door, adjusting the loop so that it could have easily slipped to his neck. It ia thought tbat he fell from the door, or that the rope tightened npon his neck unexpectedly. In such an emergency an atlliction of one leg which he had sustained would have made the chances of freeing himself desperate. Tbe jury concluded that death was purely accidental. The lilg Brewery, Mr. J. Hirsch, College Point Brewery, I I., N. Y-, writes that he employs a large number of horces and hands, and having tried SL Jacobs Oil, the great pain-cure, for rheumatism, aches and pains of his men, and for galls, splints, thrush, wind-galls and other affections of his horses, finds it superior to all remedies, and would not be without it. Ladies f heuld wear a Hop Blaster oyer the sciall of the back, as it cures all pains and aches. Twenty-five cents at any drug store. All ready to apply. If you are low-spirited and haye no appetite get a bottle of Nichols Bark and Iron. It is the safest and most effective Iron Tonic ever presented to the public Advice to Mother. MRS, WEJSLOWS BOOTBJKQ SYRUP should always be used when children are cutting teeth. It relieves the little uCerer at once, It rosacea natural, quiet sleep, by reUevlnz tne child from patn, and Uie little Cherub awakes as "bright as a button, it Is very pleasant te taste. It soothes the child, softeas tae auma, allays all pain, relieves wind. resjulRt.es tue boweis. and la tne best known remedy for tflar,ea. whether arte inn from teething or Other causrhea Twenty-five cents a botUe. mm IV-ftft, feil Absolutely Jure. Z This powder never vanes. A, marvel or purity, strength and wholesomenen. More economical than tbe ordinary kinds, and can not be sold In competition with the multitude of low test, snort weight, alum or phosphate powders. Bold only in cans. Royal B Alisa Fowosa Co., 10 Wall Street. New York. STATE OF INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY, 8. In the Floyd Circuit Court. To November Term, 13S4 Clara Rauck ts, William Alles. On complaint for administration on estate of absentee. Whereas Clara Rauck, the plaintiff in the aboe entitled cause, by Jacob lierter. her attorney, on fed complaint in the Floyd Circuit Court, or Floyd County, Indiana,from which it appears that . i i . .1.. . u';ii;M a IIa . TAc1Ha.it rS on A State of Indiana, has absented himself from hn usnal plara of residence in Floyd County, In id Btate, and gone lo parts unknown, for the space of ovej-flve years, leaving personal property wit&out bavins made any sufficient provision lor the management of tbe Käme, that said property is suffering waste for the want of proper care, aud that part thereof 1 nece-viry for the payment of the debts ot said defendant, and that said p'alntiff is a aistrr and one of the heirs at law of Raid defendant. The aald defendant, William Alles, is therefore hereby notified ol the pendency ot aid complaint, and tbat the Fame will be heard iu the Floyd circuit Court, at the Court Uonse, In New Albaay, on the first day of the November term, 1881, taer-of. JOHN B. MITOHKLU Clerk. teyUQwSw rioji circuit Court.

ROYAL JS x.s

r

. mm

The presence of Lime in Baking Powders results from the use of inferior Cream of Tartar in their manufacture. The Cream of Tartar of the market, from which they are made, contains Lime in amounts varying from 6 to 20 per cent., and hence these powders contain this impurity as a foreign substance to a corresponding extent, which is of n value, but a positive detriment to any powder in which it is found. In order that the public may fally understand the extent to which impurities may exist even in so-called Cream Tartar Powders, this Company has procured from some of the most noted chemists in the country, analyses showing the amount of Lime contained in different samples ef Price's Balcirg Powder. The result is as follows:

Prof. Schedler's Analysis, Prof. Chandler's Analysis Prof. Laidlow's Analysis, Prof. Mott's Analysis, -Prof, Habirshaw's Analysis, in

1

Lie

Boyal

The Royal Baking Powder is made from Cream of Tartar specially refined and prepared for its use by patent processes by which the Tartrate of Lime is totally eliminated. This highly important result has been attained only with great care, labor, and expense. In money alone a quarter of a million dollar has been invested in patents, machinery, and appliances by which the crude Cream of Tartar, being procured direct from the wine districts of Europe and subjected in this country to these exclusive processes, is rendered entirely free, not only from the objectionable Tartrate of Lime, but from other foreign substances. This adds greatly to the cost of manufacturing Royal Biking Powder; but, as all its other ingredients are selected and prepared witk the same precise care, and regardless of labor or expense, an article i produced that is entirely free from any extraneous substance, and chemically pure in all respects. No lime, earth, alum, or impurity of any kind can, by inadvertence or by the use of adulterated articles or otherwise, be introduced into the "Royal," and it contains no ingredients except those certified by th most eminent chemists necessary to make a pure, wholesome, and perfect Baking Powder. It costs more to manufacture the Royal Baking Powder than ay other, but it is, as shown by chemical analysis, the only "absolutely pure'' Baking Powder made. ROYAL BAKING POWDER CO., New York. Columbus Buggy Company,

v lAn;Exact View of Our Factory.! ' MANUFACTURERS OF STRICTLY FIRST-CLASS Buggies, Phaetons, Surroys and Carriages The Juatly celebrated BREWSTER ciwe-epring !rtde-har being osr greatest r?peclalty, wa bufl only one grade of work, and that of the best In quality and style. We do not make the lowest prlea vehicle, but claim that ours Is the cheapest In tne world whan quality Is considered. Wense th finest material obtainable, employ only expert and competent mechanics, an a from time to time adopt all really valuab!e Improvements that oScr. aud end-avor to conform to the latest style. To lnsui the bert and most uniform result", we now manufacture our own wheels from finest timber (sawed by our own mills) that can be obtained from the hills of Southern Ohio famous as the Second GrowUi Hickory DiBtrlct. We have the largest and most complete factory in the world for t he manufacture of liht vehicles. Our facilities, machinery and capital are unsurpassed, which enab le ns to f ornUh tt an Finest Vehicles, at prices within the reach of all. The reoiUtion of the COLCMBCS BL GO Y COMPANY Is unexcelled. Their work ts known and sold throughout the en tire united State and Terrttoriea. Well Introduced In England, Germany. Australia and Soutn A raerlca. Address us torOau. logue and Price, and we will send name of nearest dealer; or call at oar Expository, o. M West vTs. ington Street, Indianapolis. Ind. COLUMBUS BUGGY CO.

1

FAIRBANKS1 STANDARD SCALES CBW-TheEanoock Inspirator. The Eclipse Wind MÜ1. FAIRBANKS COMPANY. 23 EoutJi SrerfdUa Street, Indianapolis -i .

r"TT tiära rran u ftwir ir

. I ivUfjtinj tJ UttsüiWM U tne ravonte numuci, suj,-

ii Sff Eggr SSIS.o . , ow throughout th wen J

G POWDER SHALL AVE BUY?

Lima ( Price's Rafciug Towdar. - 3.02 per cent. 4 97 6.72 6.0S U.S5 u K n r. 3, Cold Medal. Paris, 1878. tl. r- ... it I OrtO A VI IW

Mm

Pora

V':-: ' ,'iLil-'

h v . ti r- 7