Indiana State Sentinel, Volume 28, Number 48, Indianapolis, Marion County, 3 December 1879 — Page 7

THE INDIANA STATE SENTINEIi, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1879.

7

TURPIE'S TALK

An Eloquent and Brilliant Address by the fix.Senator to the . Hendricks Club.

Age and Origin of the Bights tind Dignity of the States and People.1

Rational Intervention in Elections Sever

'. Buffered, by the People of the ' States or Colonies.

The Forced Immigration or the Nagro-An Outrage Upon the Legal and Const. tuj tlonal B'ghts of Indiana.

ITbursday's Daily.

The Hendricks club last evening bad its

regular semi-monthly meeting.. Captain J.

W. Dodd presided, and the meeting was

called to order promptly at 7:30 o'clock p

m., and the minutes of the previous meet

ing were read and approved. At the con

elusion of the reading of the minutes, the

president announced that the club had as sembled tjhear an address from the Hon.

David Turpie, of this city. By 8 o'clock

quite a fair audience had come io, notwith

standing the miserable state of the weather.

Among the distinguished gentlemen present

were the Hon. T. A. Hendricks, General

M. D. Manson, Colonel B C. Shaw, Hon John J. Cooper, Oo'onel Johnson, James M.

Cropsey,. Huk:hfs Etst, R. C. J.Pendleton, and Hon. J. G Sbanklin. The announcement of the address was re

ceived witn rpiJauee, and wnili ic con

tlnutd Mr. Turpie stepped forward and was

introduced in a few oleasant lemarks by the

president, Hon. J. w. Dodd. Mr. Turpie spoke from note?, but the principal portion of the address was an extern

poraneous effort. Bslow is given the full

text of JIJDGE TGKPIK'S ADDRKS8: ,.

Mb. Pkemidknt asd Gkstlemes-Hiiu

government is said fn-qu-ntly li tie a dlllicu t tbing. Yet I tnlnic a closer view will show that it Is not sucn. Mankind naturally Inclines toward government, if civilized men are thrown into a locality where there is

no government the first ta;-K is to organize one. Tbe instinct or civilization is toward

government thesrjpport ana malntainanceof

government. Merely 10 govern is imiuinicim; to govern justly is so. To control the administration 01 the aflairs of a great people, to do eqnal and exact Justice to all men, that is a

aillicuil taK, a great wort, ana as goo las 11 Is great. The ordinary purposes oi govern

ment, as they are usually spoat-n or, I lie pres-

ervatlou ol pn one peace ana oraer, me secur itv of life and Droiertv are subserved by al

most any form of political institutional' Life and property are as secure, oidlnarlly speak

ing, in 1st. r6tnburgas tuey.are iu iew York. Tbat city is strictly policed. Ho lndeea is tbe

wbole em mre. Civil rigbts are tbere to some extent recognized freedom rt the press, freedom of speecu not at all. Political right axe not known, religious toleration very fm perfectly understood or admin

istered. They spell nation with a large M ovr

there people witn an mnniiesiniauy sn.au P. Liberty Is not written at all excepting in Invisible ink. It will have to be held very

ciosely to tbe fiery wnite heat or levoluilon before it becomes legible at all. But It is

nevertheless, a government. It Is sometimes called a strong government. Ithasa standing army of halt a million men, a corps of luu.O-u

police, ana nas&u,uuo lniormersaistriDutea in every oro- luce and portion of tne country

' It is a military government. The ruler in the chief magistrate. He Is a so the cominanderin chief of tbe army. The soldier role. We have not, in this country, bitberto preferred that system of government. We have thought

any approach to it was a disparagement ol onr ancient liberties and of fiee ins Kutlous. Toere is something, however, vey attractive about a military lorm of administration; the pom p. the pageantry, the rutnless rapidity of

decision anu action. We had recently in- this

country a great war. It is now almost a gen eration since the commencement of in1

contest. The boy of that time Is

now a voter. - Many young men

went into tbe army, and are now inladle-'ge men. A large mass of the voters iu this rountry are. indeed, dating their political informa

tion and notions of our political ssslem from tbe period of tbe war. Tbe war was only an eplsodo In the history of tbe United States a grand em-ode great tor the exhibition of tbe patriotism of the nation aud valo. of the peo pie in the defense of tbe Union and the con- , stitution, bnt merely a span in tbe national existence four years of civil war in a century. Very few nations have had less, es-

PiiCially in the commencement ot tneir career.

? Tint we must to niacn iartner oaca in oraer ic

get tlQS DUUOUH Ul i lit) tnu I'umwjwr uiu iixr tare of our institutions. This nation, like many others which bave grown great in tiro", bad very small beginnings. You mast know, ' then, that mere were in the beginning tin t, tlements commonly called the original colonies, settled in 13 different parts of the countiy along tbe Atlantic coast, or contiguous to it. They were settled under what were called chatters from the British crown. These charters w.re simply conveyances of land named in certain get graphical limits. It controlled and defined no political relations. The settlers were subjects of tbe British crown, but they did, from the very begl nlng, bave the entire management and administration of their local affairs. Every colony had Its own legislature aud its own code ef laws, and no interference was suffered by one colony with a .ot her. Massachusetts Old not attempt to dictate to Soul h Carolina what ber local institutions stiou.cl be, nor did Pennsylvania attempt to enforce : upon New Yoik her ideas, nor did any or the colonies, nor 'all ot tue colonies together, grant the right to any third power, not even to tbe crown of ret -britain, to dictate in any way In respect -to the management ot their local affairs and - Interpol cr.tvArnmotit ' Th - em if nrtlniititl

history is oixt of entire freedomjtnd liberty as far as tbe domestic inst nation were concerned. ' - a very elegant scho.ar of Indiana, the-historian of the Stale, lately deceased, ' bas collected iu a book what he calls tbe cuiiosiu, s of. colonial trg)tltion. Each colony bad a code of laws or its own. You will fin i a vry complete code upon every possible subject; .upon tbe snhji-ct of roads, highways; upon the snbjrct of schools; upon tbe subject ol

- mines ana niunuiacttires; upon iae iuijv oi military power; upon tbe subject of taxation,

- ana upon luvwiuitsn vi eieouuiitf. tuu uuu hu not to bd .a ereat cariosity. It Is verv

C J curious now to lo ik into Ihi- ancient cob nlal '- 'legislation, borne of these tnlng are very , - uriou'. They woold be absura now. but

who wished them, who nacted them lino las. Toere were the blue laws of Connecti-

V - ent. There were tne oanaay laws ot tuna

ebusetta. Tbere wa a law of

. Virginia maamg tuoacco a legai-

tender. There wa a statute of - tbe same State making It a misdemeanor -" to change tbe mark on an unmarked nog rnn- " ninf slid in tne woods. There was a statnLe

of South Carolina providing for tbe Holding tif . court some w nere on a certain Tuesday In fcvbmaTV. nrnvlded 1 he ftame did not Coins unoo

' ' Sunday. These are svme of tbe absurd I t'.t s. I dont know that legislation is deficient In those tlalog now. I recollect tbat we bad in Indkana ttot long ag a law which provides - an mri . ) T.lklf M 4. 1 1 mhl.l I A I thlnb Mil Mil.

'f 'turfnre tie - comes to a eroasine. and whlnle

u.tlnnniu V II I) 1 1 1 na frMWfl lr. IIWHeklk.

B(frlU esand roitosUles of coioolal legislation, 1 tbey donythiog, mark the abeomle freedom and nnlKiaiKled liberty of eolonlalnrtion

tores were fllled y the very beat men The ; . men of tbe very best talent aud sbllilyof tbe

Colonies oceupiea nemtswiiaiu tmse nouses. - Tbey were sometimes called assemblymen, delegates, brirges-s Tbey answered then to

' the mate - legislatures now. They . were . Usually comixvKd of -two Houses, answering

to our rvaie senators ana na e representa

tives. Eaci colony- bad a military code

.nwhfliK for tbe armament of a military

force. ' In Virginia tbey were called tbe troops,

of the ilnet lnrcner woutn mey were can ia ranimii. -la Mancba!tt they were ealled

' . minute men. In Mew York they were ca led

volunteers. These troops were raised; they

-.mre mud. t.hev were nmnerea. Dy colonial

autborliy.ann they could not betaken ont of

tne CO'oaiea in wnicn ioer wb raiseu. swu nrt offiaeivd. except by tbe consent of the

Colonial Iieglalatnre. Maoy of the greaust

victories, best saecesses, of in uruisn crown urKinat tne French and Indiana, tbe early

ocenpante of Ibis territory, were made witn

the aid of the folonlal troops. Washington. Ueorge Rogers Clarke, servea first in tbe Vir

ginia line, ana ineregaineu iuu experience

wbicn tney aiterwara oaeo so eiucienuy in

be war of independence, iacn colony naa a

separate and perfect e jde with respect to taxation. They described what property should

be taxed, ho w It atioma De taxed, wnat amount

sbould be levied! They appointed or elected officers to co.lec ibe taxes. It was wholly done under authority of local legislation.

and it was never auoweu or sanerea mat tne

B itisb Parliament or any otner power suouia irrterlere with the question ot taxes in tbe col

onies. Each Colony bad also an election sys

tem, separate and indepenaent, wnony independent rom royal Intervention, which prescribed tbe qvml.tica lonsor electors, in many Colonies tbere were at first property qualifica

tions. The best a.gu ment ever maue attains a property qualification was made by Benjamin Franklin against tbe Colonial legislation of Pennsylvania upon tbat question. The Co onial Legislature of Pennsylvania had en

acted that in voting lor certain onicers m mn

should have property to the amount of sou.

Franklin put the case: When a man naa a

donkey worth foo the night .before the elec

tion, ana tne aonaey uiea, wuiuu, miu mo,

neui tne vote, me man or toe uoimev . nu-

ever, universal sunrsge prevanea in raosi 01

the Colonle. ' L nlverai sun rage was me gen ersl rule, but some of the Colonies had a rellalona test for holding office. Tbe negro,

even in Massachusetts, in those eariv davs. if be was f ee. voted

the same as a wane man. inese imuufti Leglslatutes were paramount and supreme wl U resnect to the regulation of aomentlc allalrs.

Tbey were composed of the ablest men whom their rnnsiltueiicv couid Drodtice. t-alrlck

Henry and the Lees were In the Colonial Legislature of Vliglnla; New York had Livingston And .lav; MassanhuHBtts had Adams and Han

cock, and so with respect to every Colony. The Colon! l Legislatnte or Assembly was composed of lis oest, wisest and purest men. This system of entire political freedom In tbe Col

onies existed nnaer a long line oi pnuctaur i alers of the English crown. Maoy kings, many queens, two Stewarts, one or two of the Tudonstwo of the Oeorges; and not one of then, ventured to inleriere with these local regulations and laws of the Colonies. There

was one rnier, too, in mat time who waa uu king. You know he wss only Oliver Cromwell. He ruled, bnt he never reigned. He baled kings, yet I am afraid he was not the friend of liberty, but be

did not venture to interfere with the domestic regulations aud . local . laws of the Colonies upon the sub

jects which I have named At

last mere arose a mug uixroge in. no talked much about the royal prerogative.

About his right to enforce that prerogative udoii and aa-aint the people of the Colonies,

and to take awy lrom I hem this rlghtof local

legislation and these iraucnises ot uomrsuc liberty and freedom, which they bd for

centuries enjoyed. He said that his Parlia

ment had a right to tax ine people winioui

representation. If you look Into the Dtclaratloa of Independence, published the 4th day of July, 1776, von will Una there the measure ol Colonial rights, ns well as the accusation of loyal tyrrauy. You will find there that tbe Colonies bad er joyed free elections of all local i fticers. You wui fiod there that the Colonies

regulated and controlled these elections, each for itself. You will find there that each of the

Colouies bad a legislative body and a military

force. oa win nna mat an me

Colonies together denied tbe rignt ot the king of tireat Britain the natioual Uovernment hi tc lr case to Interfere with auy of these regulations. They denied the

right oi tne King 10 quarter uis soiuiers among the people without the consent of tne local Colonial Iegls aiurc. They said the king had

abused the sovereign power lu surrounding

the Legislature with troops, anu compeuiug them, dragoou log I hem, into ooucessiou of the rights of the people to the military power ot the crown. Tney said that KJngUeoige ill. had sent bis officers mere, and bad iiffecied to matte the military superior to and independent of the civil power. They said tbat these powers ol the Legislature, these rights of local freedom which tlitry so long enjoyed, were inalienable they were tbe brthrgbtsof free men only. Much was the Declaration of Independence. When the Colonies found tbat tbe

king still persisted In pressing tbe notlou of

the national interference ana armed intervention to control legislation, tbey made the issue. They declared that lor these abuses and outrages the kins had forfeited any authority

which he had, and instead of

enjoying aud emorcing bis prerogatives bisiory will tell yon tbe story. He lost both prerogative and the Colonies. Tne people

gathered in convention by their delegates

and declared tbat those Colonies were, ana from that time ought to oe, free and inde

pendent States. That is t.'ie first lim- that tbe

word States is used in tbe official history of tbe country. These States met aud they declared bat they would hold the British people enemies in war. In peace friends, as they would the balance of nianfci id; and that they had tbe poorer to levy war: contract alliance, to conclude peace, and every othr power belonging to a free and independent people. Where were then tbe powers of the geneial Government?' Where was then what Is claimed to- be the jurisdiction of Federal authority? -Tbey were iu the Slates and people. For 11 j ears tbe States existed free and independent, and iu that way they went through the revolutionary war and conducted it to a success! ul conclusion, and fcur years afterward they met to lay the foundation of the piesent Uovernment, and for that purpose they did form trie present constitution. For what purpose? To repel foreign invasion? It was said by the statesmen if Europe of that time, and has been said ever since, that tbe Declaration ot Independence was tbe most sublime political document ever published to tbe world. And it was said by the statesmen of that period, and no one bas since com radicted tbem, that the cousil- ' tntion of the United States was tbe most per feet model and pattern of human government ever submitted to a people for their ai proval.

A pattern an model for all m inkiua in the establishment of political institutions. What, then, was tne object of tiiat Government; this Government our Government- so established? Was it to repel foreign invasion? All Governments have ibat power. Is tbat the thing which made it a model and a pireut lor posterity? Switzerland repelled the Anstr aus centuries ago The House of Haps-t-T4 has never set his foot on the m nntaln sloe since. England repelled the Spauish invasion and destroyed the armada. Kussia repetted ' the first Napoleon. There is no Government of any form that has not had the bower and the tie rleht to rebel In

vasion. That certainly was not the object of

.roimiirg tnis pattern and model of political institutions. vVas it to supress insurrection? That Is a power which a so belongs to all Gov. ernments under every tot in china, even, not. many years ago, suppressed an insurrection at a greater cost of b.oodsbed than even ours.- K 'gland. In India, suppressed an iusuriection. we supresed ati Insurrection. It was the only one we have ever had in the country ; we had the rignt to do it; we had the power to do it. The Govern. (lent exercised that power. But was tbat the -hecl In the foriuatl. n of th a Government? Dt es ai.y oue suppiwe mat the Uovei iinmut was formed for tbe purpose of carrying tne malls, col

lecting tbe duties on foreign imports or the sale or public! lands? Look into the constitution Itself and read its preamble. Tuat

will disclose its purpose. The great and prin cipal object of tbe formation of this Govern

ment wait not lor these things, although tbey are necessary powers In all Goveri. merits. Tne

pi lnclpal object was to perpetuate tbe blessing of liberty to ourselves and to our posterity. It was to Insure to the States and people those

rights wnicn centuries oeiorfe tne revolution the people had enjoyed. Tbe war which

closed in Istft was that war waged merely lor

tne saae oi wsr. uiu any man go to it inr

sucn a pnrposeT uia anyone pay taxes in

support of the Government for sucb a pur

pose t it was oecause tnere was something bet'er.bigber.bolier iban war llself.or than any military ruccess In It; tbat waa tbe preservation of tbe rigbts ana liberties of the people nnder the constitution of the United States

The states made the Government, Tbe States

saved tbe Government. Tbey made and

saved it, because In tbe Union under tbe Govt r .uieui the lights ot tbe people would be

tier, a they thought, aud more secure than

without n. It Isnisntiesii ora tne very textol

the constitution ltseii mat whatever the pur

pose of the revolution against U eat Britain

was, It was not lor the purpose of destroying the rights of tbe people. Those very rights

wnicn naa oeen pre erveu ana en)oyexi lor generations before the -evolution, and whatever thr purp tse or object of ihn formatlou of tn constitution afte ward, nude1' which we now dve. It was not to the purpose of destroying ordispsragluv tbrse same rigbts of which l bave spoken. There are two sections of the constitution especially designed for this purpose. One or tbem savs tne enumeration of certain tlghialntbe constitution snail not be taken asadenlal ot others wb'cb are re alned by tue people ret -1 ied by the people never granted aa-ay. Af.o ber of these sections 0' the oonstitu.lon eats, that tbe rlabls-not granted to the Government are reserved to the M ates acd to tbe people, so that It is evident from the text, ot the. Instrument which Is signed tiy Washington and his compatriots man who, tn the camp and In tbe cabinet, am, lVnd Independence and American

freedom. Tnat there was a large clas of rights reserved to the States and the people with -which the general Uovernment was ever eloi tied, over which tbe general Government had no control whatever. Tbey bad notonlv been free aud independent States before this constitution was adopted, in which perU Kl im-jr hud enjoyed -thse rigbts, but for honii.edH of years biore. The people of the Colonies before the revolatlon. and tbe peoole of the Htates after tbe revolution, tbe people of tbe States at the time of the adoption of the

constitution, claimed the enjoyment of these

rights of wnicn i nave rpoaen. last right was perfectly oefluea in one of the enactments of Congress, the rlghtof every Slate in this Union to form and regulate its own domestic institutions perfectly and freely, subject only to the constitution of the United States. This Union

was formed in coniviupration oi law perpetual. The constitution nude provision for the admission ol new States: but it made no provision for tbe withdrawal of old ones. It was, as Mr. Lincoln said, not a free love affair, but a Union permanent In contemplation ol lawperpetual never to be dissolved, and tne constitution of the United States was made supreme law of tbat Union the supreme law or tills Government. Secession the right of withdrawal was never a right. I'- was always acrlm. Secessit n beaten was a crime. Sencdnn accomplished wonld have been a

crime, becausa it was a violation of a constitutional obligation a eonsti nttonal con pact between tbe States, Secession accomplished, what becomes of the common credit, tbe national fame, tbe national faith, the national flag? The secession of a State was suicide. The victim may well rejoice that it has escaped, restrained by a strong hand, the consequences or so absurd and foolb-h a self-destruction. Tbat the -Democratic party bas, at any time, any where, favoied this as a right of the States is a self-evident lie. Applause. 1 I appeal to the memory and name of those great Democrats whose bones have mouldered In dust for years, but wbose spirit still, I bope, with unchanging sympathy, look down npinus In nurefiorts lor tne preservation oi the Uovernment just as Ihey feltlt Jefferson and Jackson. Where will you bud a Democratic president or statesman that has advocated this doctrine There is no one anywhere. Tbe moment a man dirt i, whatever else he was. be ceased to be a Is.mocrat.

There were a class of men in tbe Noun, tbat said tbe Union was a cove

nant witn nen ana a league with death. Tbey were not Democrats. There was a class of men in tbe South tbat said the Union was not compensatory ; that it was a burden, and that tbey would fiee themselves from tt and thrust it away. Tbey were not Democrats. They were enemies of 'lie country, and they bave received the fate or enemies. 1 know it is a lime

now to speak ot these iraraers ot tne uovernment. the lounders of onr Institutions, as old

fashioned. You will bear a certain class f

politicians talking as if tbe Government bad outgrown tbe constitution. They say tbe constitution of tS7 is no more fit for the government ot the United Suites than toe suit which fits the boy is fitted for Ibe man. Th.ey say, look at tbe Increase of the population, ol

wealth, of power, t ormeiiy we were ia mate-.

nowSM. Formerly we bad 3,t0,UU0of people, now 4n,i Oi.utO. At that time we had so many thousand sou are miles ot territory, now au

In cease of a hundred, lold, until the great

oceans of me feast ana west constitute

the national boundaries. Hey say, look at tbe advancement In the arts and sciences, the railroad, tbe teleeranb. the telenboue Will you tell us that

there is danger of civil liberty in a people wbo cherish such Improvements who bave made

sucb progress? I tell 50a that I put no faith In material machinery. Tbere Is no skill In

science, tbere Is no mystery iu art, wblcb will

preserve civil and political irjeootu ror a people who bave made up thei- minds to lose It

wbo prefer the glistening fetters of a newforged chain to lhjr ancient traditions of libel ty. You will find many of these things under the most absolute Governments in tbe world ten Hue Instrumentalities in the hands

of despotism. We can not trust, them to pre serve onr Institutions We must be old-fash

loned. 11 you wish to call it so. We must have

olu-lashioned virtue, va or and knowledge. In order to be tree and remain free (applause knowledge ot the true nature and cuaracler ot

the Government the relations betweeu the

statts and national Government -virtue not to snriender, not to be purchased, in reierence to tneee rights That virtue which made the member ot the first Colonial Congress say, when lie was approached by a bribe to vacate hlsst-at, and to lt-ave his neonie without representation."! am

a poor man, but tbe king 01 Great Britain bas not got money enough to buy me " Valor

like that of Patrick Henry, when be arose In the House or Burgesses. In Virsiola, and said.

"Give me liberty or death." We must huve a

return ot those old fashions before we will have security for the perpetuity of our insti

tutions, which the name and fame of tbe

great foundersand framersot the Government deserve. Tbat these rights aud powers of tbe State the right 01 property, tbe right of Inheritance and desceut.the right to control that property after death, the disposition of a man's estate, the right or life, tbe right or liberty aud the elective franchise, freedom of speech, the freedom of the press all these

rignia, near, near, previous, eiiiuruviua tbe whoe civil aud social relations among

mankind. Tbat these are rights reserved to tne States, that tbey are paramount. Is evi

dent; also from reading the constitution of

your state or any otner state. i ney are not

distant and remote. 11 you look at me twentyeighth section or the first article of the con

stitution of iDdlauaall States bave slmlliar constitutions. You will find tbat treason

against tbe State is defin'Ht and lis punishment awarded. It is said that treason against the state of Indiana shall cons st In levying war gainst it, or I u giving d and comfort its ceinies. Can treason be committed

against a power less than paramount? Can

yu comrp it treason against cny, aguinst

town. airalnst a township, against a country

let inese communities nave an governments.

It Is not so wrllteu. But the State belongs to

that grade of government against which

treason can be committed. So It Is wlui the government ot all the Stales. I know the inhabitants of a State may commit treasou airalnst the United States, and it iseauaily

as clear tbat the olllci ils of tbe Federal Uov

ernment may commit treason against the State. lAoolaase.l There are a number ot

crimes, however, against tbe rights of tbe peo

ple and against tne dignity 01 mates, wnicn tall short of treason, and are misdemeanors.

grave o (lenses, low groveling frauds, cowardly, contemptible impositions, as fatal to the rights of people and 10 the dignity ot States as treason itself! One of these ci imes agaiusl the

rights of tbe states and or the people in them is the deportation into a State or a population

not desired, and of a population not suitable

to tboe wbo Inhabit the Siate, those wbo bave Invested tbeir capital in the State, who have

cast their lives and fortunes in tbe State,

who bave reared tbeir families in the

State. It is a very serious disparagement of the dignity of the r-tale and of the riehtsof the oeoole who Inhabit it. Indiana

nas never repeuea emigration, ine emigrant who comes here in good taitb with means for bis support and maintenance, or with labor provided to earn those means and support, is now welcome and has a ways been welcome, without distinction or race or color; bnt Indiana, in my judgment. Is not nnder auy legal or constitutional obligation to welcome r even to receive the units of a population which Is not needed, not wanted, which must displace our home labor and wblcb is distasteful to those who already inhabit tbe soil We bave an article In the constitution of our State (Art. M) tbat no negr or mulatto shall come

into this state atu-r tne adoption 01 tins constitution. That is the first provision. The sec

ond provision is tbat any person biinelng a negro or mulatto into this State shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and be fined and pun

ished, aud tbat the amount and snm of these

that shall be collected, shall be applied for the purpose of helping those negroes and mula'-

toes in the Slate to go out of It if they are willing to emigrate. This is tbe written constitution or toe State ot Indlaua. I know it Is notalaw. I don't read it as a law. 1 know It bas been superseded by tbe constitutional amendments a part or the constitution or toe Union the supreme law of the land. I read it as a decla aiion of the pob'lo sentiment on tbat subject, I still think It is the public opinion on tbe

subject of negro emigration in Indiana. At tbe time of the adoption of tbe present constitution tbe whole instrument was submitted to the people at once a- d together. The present constitution took tbe place of tbe constitution of lain, and was adopted by tbe average

majority ot zt.tou votes. This, tne thirteenth amcle, with respect to negro and mulatto Im

migration, was submitted separately t that time to tne people ot Indiana,and was adopted by a majority or 80,000 billots, cast at that election. It was no parly or political question ; It was simply a question witn respect "O the desirableness of a certain class of immigration.

These people, as 1 understand it, don t come they aie sent. Tbey bave not tbe means to come: tbey have not the money to even pay for tbeir passage. Tbey land opon our soil' as paupers. Could tbere be any

thing wrong if tbe people of the localities where this African invasion Is threatened sbould call meetings and at least take an expr.ssiou olpubde sentiment with regard to it?

Any Htate bas the right to protect Itself

against the deportation or importation of psupers into iu sew York, Pennsylvania and Maryiaud has sucb a law, and in the three great cities or those sta es the enforcement of

mat law isoi oauy occurrence They not only don't rec tve the pauper Immigrants, but t-.iey

compel the parties wbo bring them hereto take tbem back, tbey send tbem back, it Is

an exercise of the ordinary police power of

ine mate 10 protect use it against an invasion of pauper-and of mendicants. which must be a

burden upon the tax-pavl g portion of the community wblcb tbey in haul . I think ills

a sut j. ct worthy or couslderai ton for tbe Legislature and the chief executive of oar St.te.

It Is a great deal better to undeceive them

now to do that than to do as the v have done in

Kansas. Il is a great deal better for these poor deluded immigrants themselves. There ought

to pe some sina 01 panne expression ofopin-

IUD, HU14 HUU lMU ftUU Cier IUIU UieV KUU their advlsois may bear and be governed by It.

Tbat tbeir presenee heie Is not wanted ; that tbey mast enter into competition with our

own white labor, and, not finding employment, tbey must be a tax upon tbat same labor for their support and maintenance. And I do believe also thoroughly in tbat one power still, perhaps, left us lu popular rebnke at tha ballot-box, and that political parly wblcb. is now directing this Afrlau colonization, and wbich is hau-tilng rcuemes to further it aud to bring this population upon Indiana that party will not escape tbe consequences, and you will see tills black hurricane met and borne down by tbe whirlwind or bsllotsor white men. Tbere is anoiher method of disparaging tbe rlgli s ol the people and the dignity of the states, aud that is by Federal Interference with the elections In the States. Tbe people may not suffer tbat. The people of tbe Colonies would not bave suffered that iuu years be tore the Declaration of Independence. The people of the Colonies, afterward the peo-

o e ot tbe Stat s. now tbe oeoo'e of tbe Un ion.

control and regulate Ibe.rown elections. Yet,

it Is now claimed that the National uovernment has the ngbt and isiwer to supervise.

control and direct, in matters fbe prerogative

wnicn was deuieo 10 me rtntisn crown, anu wblcb noteven a British ruler lor two centuries attempted, until Ueoige III., toexeicise.

it is claimed the people or tne states nave

erected a Natioual Uovernment which bas

powers wblcb tbey never ackDOWle lged to belong to any national authority, has l:ieu

lrom them powers wnicn they never parted with, and which tbey brooked not tbe disparment or. Even wbeu a despot, an absolute monarch, demanded tbem, they refused lo

sarrender. Under the Federal election laws.

It is claimed, aud tbe argument of the presidential veto last winter was that tbe National Uovernment could use either its mi ltary or civil arm either the puise or the sword to control, sopervlse aud regulate tne elections

111 tue stales.' jueie is a plan provision in the present constitution, jatt as tbere was in tbe Colonial system, tbat wbich was recognised in the whole history of tbls conn try from its-first settlement that the military force of tbe Government shall not be used in any State to suppress domestic violence, tbat is to Keep the peace, except with the consent of its Legislature, If

in session, or tue request 01 tne governor 11 it be not. Bat the present party, dominant la

Washington, say tbat that consent isunueces

sary;we will tot ask your governorwe will

t.ol ask our Legislature, we win send the soldier in the Slates where we wish to. He

shall be at the pol.s. He shall stay there; or.

If we don 1 exercise tuis power, we snaiL retain the right to do it. We sav, on oir part, the Government shall not retain the right.

Wnat is the use of the right if Ills not st some

time and place to be exercised? The right

Itself ia wholly indefensible and Inconsistent wlthlree Institutions, nd tbe right whether It be used or not is a m seal ne of despotism foreign to American liberty. I will call your attention briefly to the lite congressional electoral laws, because I believe that tbe enforcement and existence el these laws constitute the dt

viding line between civil liberty and centralization of power; between borne government, a free control or elections and tbe Insiltall tus of the State and a central, absolute authority, in a free government the voter should control a)'. things; bat suppose you control tt e vol er, what folio ws ? Kit her tbe sold ler or

voter must go; tbey can not ontu stay at tne poiis; either the bayonet or the ballot must yield. If tbe bayouet confronts the billot what liberty have yon leu? Tbe consequences are no far to see. Tbe consequences ol such actions 011 the part of tne central authority are iliat it draws to itself and absorbs 10 Itself tbe dignity and rights of tbe Stales and of the people. Your state government

would be simply a pro-consulate, and your

State Legislature would be simply a board ol

ounty commissioners. Your United states senators tbe nominees ot tbe military chief

tain in power at Washington, and your mem

bers of Congress named and chosen uoderthe direction of the faction which happen to be

doiuinaul at tne capital. 1 tniuK 1 can see 20 years from now some daughter

or child of a lawyer in this city, calling at the office to get the

portion or ner lather s estate inatacetsen

titled tn, anu she is tbere to d the old Si ate law

Is abolished, lou have got to write to toe

minister o? tbe Interior, or some min

lsler who bas cbaige 01 wills and

probate, and she will have lo sign

this paper and cause t bls paper to be sent to

that depararaent or mat bureau, ana pay a tax

to tbe central Government aud a duty to

the prince p estilent and lo tbe minis

ters at Washington. Then she can

get her money. 1 think 1 hear that applicant sav what in tne name or General Jackson bas

tne unitea n tales to do witn a cnua s inneriiance in Indiana. But a class of men will have

come into power who know not Jackson aud

regard nothing ot nis principles, wnninju months from now you may see a man

rested tn this cl.y lor distributing

jLiemoc ratio or isationai tickets; ar

rested bv the United states marshal on

view, without writ or process, and tae en be

fore the temporary tribunal, the United Slaves

coram -ssioner. wny.the deputy marshal will

say, ne was peoilllng these tickets People

would take ineiu ana wouia votetnem, aua

there was no keeping the peace, or keep-

lug my place or- pay witbout arrest

ing nira. Some man may run arouud

aud say, what in the name of Rutherford

B. Wheeler has the United States to do with

the elections In Indianapolis. It has just us much to do with the election in Indianapolis

as it nas to do with ine law 01 descent aua in

heritance in Indiana. Just as much to do

witn one as the other. I sbould think that if

there wasany right inalienable, unquestiona

ble, undeniable, it is tbe rlgln, 01 a Slate

not ouly lo cast its electoral vote, but to bave it counted as it was

cost. I should think that would be I a right guaranteed wllb 2o0 years of freedom

before tue revolution, ana a nuudreu years or freedom since. Yet there bae been States wbo bave not been allowed lo have tbeir electoral vote counted as lats as November, 1X7K The electoral vote was not counted by thereturning board of Lou slana, Tbe canvassing

board there nave very - great power, lu

mis State tbey have very - little power. Here tbey count up and certify such a man has received so many votes and the number that.tbe other man has received, and be who has received the roost voles is commissioned. Hsrdiy any power; it is simply a calculation. Tbere was a law in

lioulsuuia that in any parisn wnere lninnida

Hon had been used In which an election bad

been held, aud it wss so certified by the officer holding tbe e ectlon at tbe time of the elec

tion, they could throw ont the whole vote of tbe precinct. That is a remarkable power. We don't complain ot tbat II Is ttie abu-e and violation of tbose poweis tbat we com

plain ot. This board did not meet in building of tbe State, on any grounds of tbe (state.

Tbey met at the Custom House iu the city of

New Orleans, under federal auspices ana authority, surrounded by the military and

civil ollicets ot tbe National Government at

Washington. Thev knew all abont the eltc-

tion long before the official retnrn was made. They knew tbat the Democratic State officers had been elected by 7,lUl' msjorlty. They

knew that tbe Democratic electoral ticket bad received about 9.100 majority. The State

returns were delivered to tbem in sealed packages. They knew tbat only two of tbose packages contained protests of lntlmldailou, and

inese two wouia not cnange tne result, out simply decrease the Democratic majority. What did tbey do? In violation of the statutes and of tbeir oaths, tbey allowed these sealed packages to be opened and protests of intimi

dation forged and false that were never signed

by the parties purporting to bave signed them. They were all executed In tbe city of New Orleans, miles away from tbe places where tbe elections were held. They allowed these forged certificates of intimidation to be thrust Into tbe sealed packages alter tbe count bad ben proceeded with; they found, after throwing away precinct after precinct, that tbe S ate officers and electoral ticket si ill had some 2,0oo majority. What, then, did they do? They allowed these sealed packages to be broken open again, and farther and additional fotged certificates to be Inserted, and throwing out 7,000 voles tbey declared Mr. Packard elected governor, and throwing oat 8,000 voles tbey declared tbat the present executive bad received the electoral vote for president, and so published their report in a sub cellar in be Custom House at New Orleans, and tbey ordered refreshments in the room alter they bad finished the count I bave no doubt tbat tbey needed them. What a singular bsnquetl The people o the Stale paid no attention to that declaration as to who had been elected when the time came to inaugurate tbe governor tbey met In Lafayette square, tbe city, tbe country, tbe courts all recognized Nlcholl as elected. There were 8,0".0 under arms and they declared tbat Nlcholl must be Inaugurated, but before they proceeded they waited upon tbe commanding officer of tbe United States troops. If you Interfere witn ns we suall not Inaugurate Nlcholl. We know be was elected. We don't want any flu lit witb the Government. We bave bad war enough with tbe Untied States. We will dlspei se; we will go home. The officer telegraphed to Washington for inst nciioos, and the answer was, "Dont interfere," end Mr. Nlcholl and the Slate office! s were inaugurated in obedience to those instructions and uy per mission of tbe military foroes of the Government.

Tbev said, "Ton may tke your State nffloers : we have tbe fraudulent electoral certificates."

I think there might have been some men In Washington or In the Custom House In New

Orleans, with some glimmer of conscience left.

Who sav Is it right, is tt just t can we let In

tbe governor and State officers and exclude

tre preaiaeni ana vice presioeutT wnat

was the answer? Is tbe Infantry

stationed around the Custom Honse square? Is the artillery within striking dlstanoe? la

the gnn boat lying at tbe levee? Are the gun shotted? Are tbe decks cleared? At ten tion! Aeadyt Aim! Count I . Count

1

in thA men not elected, and count I

out the men wbo are elected. Tbe people of tbe United states say they bave cbosen tbeir president and vice president. But tbe com-mander-ln chier or tbe army says tbat others shall be Inaugurated and shall serve. Ihns tbe army and navy chose tbe last presideqt, and tbey will choose tbe next one unless tbe people arise in tbeir majesty and rebuke this wrong. What was tbe constitution of tbe United States during the electoral connt In Louisiana? A battered blackened, worthless paicbmeut, through which tbe military president tbrust his sword to mutilate, end tnen cast It fortb to to be trodden under foot of men. Tbe constitution of the United States, yonr constitution. It was simply a roll of drums snare and tenor drums. The law It was only a file of fixed bayonets. The guarantees of the constitution! Wbat do they amount to In the presence of a president wbo is not a chief magistrate only a military commander wbo bas never governed at Washington, bnt wbo bas only been encamped tbere, as at headquarters. They are without efficiency. Gentlemen, bright and fair will be tbe future or the country if we can restore the Government to its ancient landmarks. We need not expect to

do it witbout determined effort; perhaps, not wltbont tbat extterae effort 01 patriotism and of patience that was employed in its formation. 1 trust to see, bowev.-r, tbe peaceful

restoration of tne Government to iisconsti

tullonal limits and order. I trnat to see a benign administration nnder the distin

guished citizen or Indiana wnose name you bear. Applause.l An administration of tbe United States Government wbich

shall respect all tbe rights of the States and all the rights and franchises of tbe neonie. A

government under which eve-y Htate

aall nlwavs respect and obey the

authority oi the Federal constitution. Sucb a

Government may not bave a standing army.

nor myriads of police and constanulary, bnt It will be a strong Government: strong with

tbe si rength which exceeds tbat of armies and navies. It will be strong in tbe love and af

fection or a free people for their free lnslltu tions. (Continued applause.

1880 the 1880

MDIAIIA WEEKLY

Etate Sentinel.

EWINO THINKS

Enlarged and Improved.

S1.00

Per Annnm.

A Paper for the People and Friend to

the Farmer aid all Other Classsp.

Prospectus for 1880.

Tbat Joel Parker, of Xew Jersey, Would

Blake an Kxcellent President.

New York, Nov. 24 The Tribune to-5y

has tbe following interview with General

Ewine: .

'Wbat are you .Democrats Rome to do in

Washington this witter 7'

-The session preccdicg tbe presidential

election is usually occupied wit making

candidates and sharpening up issues."

'What issues will JJeniosrats devote tbem

selves tosbarpeniDR?"

'We shall bave only one, il yon nominate

Grant tbe third trm; we will need no

other issue. Oj tbat we D mocrats can all

agree."

Have yon made up yonr mtna as to

whom yon want for your candidal?''

'.t fully. I thlur. however. Joel far

ker, of New Jeney, would be an excelleL

man, Ue wss a' war eovrroor, and bas a

good record. Probably we shell bave to

t tke a candtdt te from one of tae mt tropoli

tin Elates."

General Ewing made no a'losiOD to Til

Can.

"It ail onr catty wonld come op solidly

tj the soppott of Judge David Davis, 1

sbould regard him as an exceeding y desli

able candidal 4; but I fear tiey. would riot

He bas never been a pronounced Democrat

and his preteLt position is net tl-sily de

fined. However, il ynn nominal: Grsnt

will net be to Smpoitatit woo tie Dmo-

erst c oandiflhts may be. We shsll give you

a lively hgtt oo tie tiird t;rm qu-ttion.

"doppose MraDt suouia net oa nom

cstd?" "O", I think it's already as good as se

tlfd that ba will be. He eviden-lv want

tbe nomination, and you can't gtt rid of I

him."

The Bayards. An admirer of Senator Bayard wants to know how old he la. He was" 51 on tae 29th of last month. No other family in tbe United States is so largely, and, we may add. so honorably con oecttd with fie Government of the United 8 tat a especially the 8entU, as that i f tbe Bayards. Its bead in tbis country, James Asbeton Baysrd, wbo was born in Poilsdelphia. Peon.. 1707, and died in Wilmington, Uiii., 1815, was a lawyer and statesman of his day. His ancestor, Nicbolss Bayard, a Frencbmar, arrived in tils country in 1647 in company witb bis brotbei-in law, Peter Stoyvissnt, ibe last Dutch governor of New York. James A Bayard, after graduating at Princeton and studying law st Philadelphia, took up his residence in Delaware and tbere rsct!ced his profession. In 17(J0 he was eleoted a representative in Cinra In ISO I he was appointed minister to Fiance, but dtclined. Io tbat year he was a leader in the policy wbich resulted in ibeelic.iun o' J -Hereon ss president by tbe House. In 1S)1 be wss elected to the 8o a'e as the successor of his fatber-it -law. Governor Bissett, and remained there until selected by Madiaon as one of tbe commissioners fur negoliatii.g the treaty of Ghent in 1813 He was afterward appointed m.nlster to R iisis, bat declined. Ricbard Bassett Biytrd, sin of tbe prtcedit g, bora in Delaware iu 170G graduated a' Pino too, aDd bred to tbe law, was chosen Uniti d Stsies senate r liom Drlam are from

1836 to 1839.- and seain from IS I to 1845:

and in 1850 was appointed charge d'affaires

to Belgium. D.ed in 1'hliaut lpaia, March

4 1868.

James Asheton Bixard. brother of tbs pre

ceding, wss born in Delaware in 1799; was

elected to tbe United Sta'es Senate from that

Sta'e lu 1851. and wss rc-?licted in 1H57 and

18i;3. In 18H4 be res'gned, and in 1867 was

appointed to succeed Saaator George K Riddle, deceased. In 1809 he was elected again, but soon afterward n signed on account of ill

heel b. Thomas K. Bayard, son of tbe preceding

and present seua'or, was bnrn at Wilming

ton, Del., Uctiber SJ. 1828. He is a lawyer and came to tbe bar in 1851. In 1853 he was appointed by P erce Uni ed 8 ates district st orney for Dataware, but reef gt ed io 1854 He was first rl-cted to tbe United Stat Smate for the term ommenrIrir in 1869 and ending in 1875 and then re-elected for the term expiring March 3, 1881. On tbe same day of his first elec tion bis father, James A., received bis list r election to tbe Senate from the same State tbe only instance ot the kind that ever occurred. . Hen. William Heilman. The following address to tbe Republicans of Indiana, will explain Iteelf : TO the Republicans of Indiana: Inasmuch as some of. my Republican friends throughout tbe Stats are sti l iu-isi-ing on the tue of my name in oonneo ko with tbe Domination for governor. I desire to itite again, explicitly and unequivoca ly, that nnder no circumstances will 1 be a candidate, nor wonld I accept the nomination if tendered. Iain moved to make tbis announcement because io accepting ruch a position, I would be doing ir justice to myself, as my business would not allow me to make the proper canvass of tbe Elite, - and It would be a aaorfice for me to ettnrt to tbe duties of ibe office if eWced I would also decline to accent bscausa I

would be doing an io justice to my friends

ol tbis district who have so kindly ravored

me with tbeir suSrages io tbe past. Fina ly, I would not accept, because I bave person

al'y pledged my word to Grnersl tibackelford and his friends tbat I woul I not bo tn

tbe rsoe and I bave no desire to equivocate

in this or ar y (.tier matter. B sides Geneial 8hackelford. tbere are a number of other

good name suggmted for the nomination.

and I do not tbink there will be any trouble

in selecting a sniubl- csndida'r; and I have no hesitancy io pledging niyselt for tbe nominee of toe Republican H ate conven

tion, whoever be may be. Witb a united

Republican vote tbere will be no doubt that

we will sweep tbe Stat. William Hulxar,

The coming presidential year promises to

be the mast eventful and thrilling in a political sense that we bave passed through since

1860.

Tbe secret of the Sentinel's success is its

steadfast adherence to tbe principles of tha

Democratic pirty. The duty of tbe Sentinel is tbe dissemination of political truth, and to that end, we ask Democrats every

where to assist in scattering tbe good seed broadcast over the state. Let en ry family

in Indiana have a copy, and specially daring a year eo important to the coming political harvest 4 . Its columns will be faun full of the latest state and general news. Its editorials will present able and strong argumen's in favor of economy and against class legislation. The Agricultural and Commercial departments are nnder the supervision of practical and intelligent editors, making paper of 56 columns, complete In all its appointments.

Every one wbo baa onoe need Dr. Bull's

Cough 8f ran invariably resorts to it in sub

sequent attacks of Colds, Coughs, eto. Price

zo cents.

OUR INDUCEMENTS. . Every subscriber to the Weekly State Sentinel, at 1 25 per year, wKI receive a copy f the

Sentinel') very able law treatise, by lames B. Bf cCrellls, Etq., en-tilled

THE L1W OF TOE FARM,

Just the book that will Bare any farmer hundreds of dollars by having the Information contained In this valuable Utile work.

In lien thereof, for ftl 33, we

will send the

EE

DARNER AND NAME WHITER.

valuable device that rtailt

for $1 50, for attaching to sew Ing machines, by which yoa can

readily write yonr name or mon ogram on any woolen, silk or cotton article, or yon can darn

hole. In table and bed linens.

underclothing, handkerchiefs, etcJ, neatly and expedllienaly.

lor 91 SO both THE LAW OF THE FARM

and the Darner and Writer will be sent.

Name

WB ALSO OFFER

"ROPP'S EASY CALCULATOR"

... . In connection with the Weekly Sentinel. It embodies a n-.wsyo (em of calculation, by .which a vavt amount figures and mwntal labor required by the ordinary methods and fractions with ihelr complexities are absolutely avoided In practical calculations. .

SINGLE SUBSCRIPTIONS,

Wltboat Fmalani,

ONE DOLLAR PER ANNUEL Poatitffe Paid. j . o BajrCaah com as lsalons lo agents. Send for Pa I vale Circular. For a club of 20 the sender la entitled to free copy ef the paper.

Address all letters to

SENTINEL CO.

Indianapolis, Ind.