Indiana State Sentinel, Volume 25, Number 25, Indianapolis, Marion County, 31 January 1876 — Page 2

THE INDIANA STATTE SENTINEL MONDAY JANUABY 31, 1876.

2

ILNDEii WAY AGAIN.

M'KSE'S CASE CONTINUED. MORE DAMAGING) EVIDENCE. JCIGE EILIJJj'S DECIf ION TEaTIMOXY OF BARTON, CONCAXNON AND FBAZKK THK r.CaSED PAPÜR3. Br. Locis, Jan. 25. Judge Dillon rendered a decision upon the opeslDg of the trial of Wm. McKee this morning, ruling mat tue case must go oa. Tbe conspiracy had been one of numerous act) and exteudlng ovr a lonz period of time, and the declarations of the co-cccspira torstr accomplices must te teard. If. however, wnen the cw-e should be all in and the connection of McKee wl h the conspiracy should rest ao'ely oa the testimony of the accomplices, then the court would Instruct the Jury how Utile weight w& to be attached to tDelr evidence. The iutimatlon wns mat the evidence of therkgacd McKee' connection with teem would not be alone sufficient, following the decision of the Judse, the testimony of Sauford M. B.rion. the manager of ihe liiognam Hros.'s St Louis distillery, was tasten. He t.-fctiüd to the general operations of the ri tf, the amounts of crooned made bj tteir houf-e, the suras of money paid to the rlDg fund ana the sptcial assessments for the alleged purpose of buying off the revenue oülcers and to prevent seizure. One of the sums raised In this way, the wllness was toid by Joyce, was to g to ilabcoek. The witness hai a conversion with Engelke atouttheln urview ihe latter had with McK.ee at the Globe cince, t ut he ecu d not recollect it distinctly enough to repeat It. The cross-examination of ihewit.ts b. ought cu' nothing new. John H. Concaunon, deyuiy collector uuder Charles W. Ford, and for snort time under Constantlne Mrguire.WRS th next witness. He lest tied to having anown McKee twtniy ytar?, end that tnelHU r was a gHd friend of his. Jie faw McKeeln Ford's office a dozen times, perhaps. He s iv him there during the visit hereof lien. Jewell, a revenue agent, in ls71 or 172. He said tbat he wlhed to we Fnzroy, that he had an important communication to make to him. Fitzrey was rot in bis tflloe, and McKee sid that Fiuley Iljbb a storekeeper at Bevis S Frazer" oistil'erv, won d do nd he wrote a note to him, which the witness had delivered by ayrung man in theotllce. McKee then told the witness that Oen. Jewell was in town and he wished Kobb to know it. Bub quently Kobb told the witness tha", the know.edge of Jewell presence in the city had caused ihem to lose several tubs of mash. The witness then recounted the manner in which John Leavenworth tried to get him to Join ihe ring and proceeded : 1 had A BRIEF TALK WITH M'KEE on the start and told him that Dragier, the revenue agent, had arrived. At another time, I told him In pursuance of general orders from Mr. Ford when three other agents came, and at another time I told him when soma were expected who did not come. Mr. Ford was not at the office at the time. I could not find him and I went to see McKee. One day McKee came to see Ford and subsequently Ford calied me to lilm aud tolil me that in all confidential masters, where an exercise of prudence or Judgment was required, I should consult McKee. In lact, his instructions were so specific as to put me actually under McKee's directions. While For J was absent in Colorado I consulted with McKee on several occasions. When he started away for a lengthy trip he wrote me a letter relative to McKee. That letter was afterwards abstracted from my desk, but lean give t tie substance of It, The defense objected to the witness's stating what was in the letter unless its etct words could be given. A discuion followed and the objection was withdrawn. The witness continued: The note was about thus: 1 have Just heard that po-lblv some detectives will come here, if they do, make them show their credential and then see McKee. The witness new S mon Kay, a nephew of McKee. Ray was appointed gc-ger after McKee sold tbe Democrat. Jast befor-j the Globe was started I had a conversion wi;h McKeeaoui the pay of Ray as gause. He said that he would need Ray ' serv ices In the Gk.be oflice and Ray's brother would preform the duties of ganger. Ray was willing to take part of the salary himself and give a pait to his brother and let me have the remainder. I spoke to Ford about it and he said that if there was no dishonest purpose in the anangemeut it was all right. Ihn defense objected to thi kind of testimony, and held that before It was admissible the govcramentshould prove that at the time it was a violation of the rtvtnne law tor a ganger to do bis crk by proxy. Judge Di lou, to the witness If Ray was entitled to this compensation, and if you did no part of the work, why was It that you were to receive a pa tor the pay? Witness 1 don't know, excert as I said bevre, McKee was my very good triend, and he ado. ted tnls plan to assist me. The cro'8-exa ruination of this witness brought out long statements CONCERTINO MR. FÖT.D, the manner iu which he conducted the office of collecter, etc., which was quite favorable to that gentleman. In the main he was described as a careful, cautious man and in the matter of a seizure he never took any action until he had thoroughly investigated and found sufficient grounds to proceed. The witness staUd. however, that the office was virtua'ly run by McDonald, the supervisor, and Joj ce, his revenue agent. Joyce would write out a memoranda, and if the witness fid not carry them out ne (Jojce) would go io Ford and get him to instruct the witness to do as Joyce requester!. .McKee was on Ford's bond. This relations were intimate and c nfidentiul. The witness was in charge of the office wneuever Ford was away, and was nnder instructions to consult McKee at such time about any! hin that came up. After Ford's death, on Oc ober 34, 173, to the time Maguire too charge, on November lth, Mcixma'd took the direct charge of the office, and ti e witness acted u.der his Instruction, the witness then gave a loag account of the burting of a large part of the records of the ccl.ector's office, on Sunda-, Novetütir 1 th. Joyce and F.tzroy said that they waMtd to look over tome dumping papeis esp daily those of tsevlsajd F-azer. Although these recordi were in tae witness's cha.'go Jove washissnrKriorofficerandhada rlgt to examine them. Ihe witness therefore told him that he could look at intra at any time. Joyce, titzroy iieVis went to the office together and although they did not give the witness even a him that they desired to do auz-1 but examine them, he felt cenain that they had another purpose aud after shoeing them where the papers weie h left so that he should not see what was doue. Th witness knew that he was doing wiong, aud felt that he waa moraiiy responsible lor the aaetj of those papers. He felt certain tnat these persons designed re moving the papers but he had no Idea that they intended to turn them. The papers rtinovtd were not especially Bovis & Frizer's but all tbe recuneis' paper were taken. The witness made two reports to the commisMoue: of the Internal revenue that these document! were missing, one from memoranda given him by Joyce and the other from data furnished by Magaire. He old not unde. take an explanation to Maguiie about TH MI5SI5Q PAPERS and for the reason thai he did not deem it necessary. Maguire made certain remarks to him after he came Into the (flleethat Invited the witness's confidence and privileged hlmtoaay what he plea.c d to him. The witness, therefore spoke to him about a great many things. Maguire told him that he was familiar with the ring business, and, therefore, he did not propose that it should go any further. The witnets then told him that with his knowledge of the revenue Dusluesa be couldn't ran Lhe district honestly and pquarely with tbe force on hand . He also told him aCoui the parpers that were mlssl eg, ttl lng hfm all the circumstances of their til 'appearance. The witness had been before all the grand Juries since the whisky investigations began. lie did not know that he had been Indicted, and he had no reason to believe that the government would treat him any diSerently from any one cUa. The witness deu ed ever having fceionged lo th ring. They took particular r ains, ne said, to keep him out, for had he been in it it would Lave reduce t their weekly shares. He received money, howevtr, from Fitzroy and Lavnwortri. possibly l,u0 in ail. m his redirect examinatlonSthe witness, said that he met NfrKeeby sccidtnt on his way to New York in 173, and t.d him all about Magatre'n affair, the desiroctlo:i of the records of tue collector's office, and o"her matters connected with, that office. Alfrei Bevls, of the firm of llevls & Fraxer, was tie next witness, and testified to receiving luformation of Gen. Jenen' arrival here In is7J from Flnley Itobb, who was then a storekeeper la thtlr distillery. They had several tubs of CROOKED HASH that mornlnz which were run Into their beer sink. Borne unstamped which was In their warehouse waa disposed of. Their house straightened up generally and when Jewell reached their distillery two hours after they were Informed ofbla arrival, he found It all right. Bevls then recited some general opera tlons of -the ring and repeated hU testimony in Iba McDonald and Avery trlaia about assess

ments made on and paid by the distillers for revenue agents, brasher and Hoag aud someody in Washington. The witness continued: I hsd a conversation with McKee, either In or near the Uit.be office. I spoke about Joyce's rtmovlnethe Harda ways and several others and said that I thought it unwise to remove them, as tbey kiew what was going on acd would certainly cause a deal ot trouble. They were rllter againxt McDonald and Joyce and were bound to raisnafus. McKee said that he would talk to Joyce and McDonald about the matter or somethiug of that aini. 1 don't think he made any reply to the remark that tbe Hardaways would make trouble. 1 also had a conversation with MclC'e while tbe May grand Jury was in session. I asked him how be was getting along. He said "Fretty rough." tasked him It he was indicted and he said he had not heard of it If he waa. He said If he was not he cou'd help us very much. We had not then entered our pleas of guilty. He said that he had seen Alegrue, but did not say what egrue had sa'. d to him. tie said nothing about Megrue'a roing betöre the grand Jury. This closed Bevls' direct examination , and tbe court adjourned.

A BÜEOLARIOU3 BONANZA. TOE NOItT HAMPTON BANK ROBBERY. NO t.F.:-8 THAI 670,000 WORTH OF BONDS TAKKN BoW IHLY EFFECTED IT LIST OF THK MfSalNO PROPERTY TUB PRINCIPAL, 8CKFERKKS. BPRiNGFiELD, Mass., Jan. 27.-The burglars whoentered the Northampton Bank Wednesday night, nrät securing tbe cashier In his home and taking from him the keys of the vault, took large amount of Btcivitles, a considerable portion not being negotiable. EobTos, Jan. 27. l.ster details of tbe robbery at Northampton Tuesday eight by masked ro'Jb rs state the result as something appa'llng. The table of securities taken shows a total of 8070 OU J. Of course ,muca of this is cot negot lable, so that Iiis difficult to estimate the reu loss to the bank and depositors. Toe bank officers offer a reward of fi'i.UOu for the return of tbe property and the conviction of the burglars, ihe loss falls comparatively lightly upon the hank, the greater part of tbe securities belonging to special depositors. The robbers entered the house of Cashier Whlttleray and bound, ga.-g.d and gnsrded for hours seven people. They compelled him to give them a combination of thesf6 vautl, waited until they knew tbenigbt watchman had gone home, and then, getting into the safe with only one of the four keys needed, they took a large amount of securities. An expert had to be ummon ed from New York and toe lock was not opened until an early hour this morning. The cashier, w hlttlesay, when asked to give tue tin ee combinations to the vault for the outer, inner and chest doors, gave them wrong twice and thrice, but the burglars wrot them down and made him repeat them. Of course they caught him In the attempt to mislead and the exhibition of a plitol com pe.led him to tell the truth, though he told them that fonr keys were nectssary to open the patent lock, tbrre o! which were at the honse of tbe other bank officers. At 4 o'clock am, Whittlesay was taken to a down stairs bedroom . The whole family were gagged, and lour of the burglars withdrew to operate on the Dank, ibree nours after, Ars. vvhiuicsay succeeded In freeing herself and giving an alarm from a window. The whole party were speedily liberated, aud the cashier, idili wearing the handcuffs, went to the bank. At the house a workman soon after fitted a key and all the persons handcuff l were released. An examination of the bank showed that the cracksmen had unlocked the outer door, but were apparently balked by tbe safe lock, lacking three of the requisite four keys. They tried to get off the door with bars and wrenched ff t ue dial, which served as an index for the working combination. They were entirely unmolested, tbe watch Laving gone home. There is every indication that six and perhaps all of them left on the tf o'clock train. Vive of them had tickets previously bought and onepald his fare. Many of the appliances, it was remarked, were homemade. The gags were chl.dren's rubber balls pierced with a stiff wire. Tbe masks were drawers legs, some with one hole and some with two for tteeyes. When the robbers saw Whittlesay was watching them carefully for some marks of identification, they blindfolded him. But he observed that one of them was of very commanding stature. The twoor three robbers P it to guard the prisoners at the house took their departure In season to catch the Srrlngfleld train. At tbe latest advices no in formation had been received of the robbers. The " TABLE OF FÜSD3 TAKEN Is as follows: Missouri s' ate bonds, Siö.OCO; Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific railroad. 3,0 0; Lake Shore & Michigan Southern shares, f3,0 0; Chicag.Rurilngton A Qu'ncy eights, 11,100; Cleveland, Columbus &. Cincinnati, 2,000; Union Pac'.nc, Hl.CCt); Ohio &. Mlssi&sij pi second mortgages, J 160,0(0; United States bonds, föj.OOO; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe, 15,000; Foit Wayne, Jackson & Baglnaw, $12,000; Ordensburg &. Lake Champlain, 10 (00; Missouri Facitic, S ).ia0, registered stock and bonds of the United Htates and various corporations, from J $o,OX) to Siou,0t; green Darks and national bank bilis, J 10,00; Detroit. Lansing s Lake Michigan, 7.0U); New York & Erie bonds. $7,000; Marine hta'.e bonds, $h),ooo; Hudson River railroad bonds, $i,O0U. The following are the numbers of the securities abstracted: Missouri Faciffc railroad, No. 3,7:19, due l&ri, and No. 3,879, due UH6; Northern Missouri railroad, AO. l,8;fl, dee 18., and No 2,263. due lSti; Cairo & Fulton bonds, No. 540, due lfc&; consolidaJed Cairo A Fulton, No. IVSyo, due issd; No. 3,59, aue lss ; No. 8,000, due 18-, and No. 3,')1, due J8; five Chicago, Rock Island A l'ac.nc bonds, Noa. tsT2, 1 ,328, bis, 6-j9and fctf; two C, C, C. & I. bonds, fo. HI and 115; two Ohio A Mississippi bends, Nos. 3,393 and 3.391 : three Lake Share A Michigan Southern sinking funds. No. tiO, Ul and 2:1, and iZJuOO Union Pacific sinking fund coupon bonds of f 1iO each, Nos. 6,113 to f,Si, Inclusive. O.'the total amount stolen, a loss of only $12,000 falls on the batik, the heaviest Individ al sufferers are as follows: ExJudge C. KForbess, SIlO.OX) United Stales six per cent. bonds registered, 8,'00 five per cents. registered, and $7o,000 nail' nal Btock-; Henry Hinckley, JÖJ,0 0 la United States bonds; Eenry Bright a largo amount f negotiable bon?s; J. S Lathrop, J.tu.Ou) in Georgia bonds: Joseph Warren. $li,0t0 in negotiate bonds; O.G. Spillman, $1,'U) in negotiable bonds; Wm. Oaviord, ?'j0,'0 1q United States boids. Mrs. Im M. Turner, Dr. S. A. Fiske, Richard Kirgham and Horace O. Collins are also among the principal sntlerers. A small safe in the vau.t, which the burglars considered too Insignificant to touch, contained tiv,w deposited by Harvey Kirkland, and (2j,000 in Lor ds belong ng to the Hopkina Academy, and much other valuable property. By locking tbe doors of the vault the burglars got twenty-four hours start of the detectives, besides having time to negotiate much of the stolen property before the fact of the burglary was known. Sprikgfield, Mass., Jan. 27, Of the from $70,(XK) to $;7J,CW taken by the bnrglars from the Northampton Bank, from $45C,0CO to 00,000 are la registered oonds and certificates of stock and so not negotiable. Sale for b treat improvement. By virtue of a certtin precept lo me directed, by the Mayor of thect-yof Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city ui der the corporate seal of said city, I will ou SATURDAY, February 12th, 1876, sell at pub'lo auction at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. M. and 4 o'clock p. M., of sa d day, the following described iQt, or parcel of land , cr so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinafter namt-ria.! nxsessed airalnst such Dremises for street improvement, aud all costs, to-wit: Lot No. ten 10 in Smock's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon eounty, Indiana, owned by William C Smock, against which Is a-sestd the sum of fifteen dollars and sixty-six cents 115 6 for street improvement in favor of John scheier, contractor. HENRY W'.TUTEWLLER, City Treasurer, Indianapolis. IndM Jannary 17, 1S78. Adhisistbatob's KOTICE. Notice la hereby given that the undersigned has been appointed administratrix of the estate of Thomas Morley, late of Marlon county, deceased. Haid estate is supposed to be solvent. XIAJSNAli MOBLEY, Administratrix

Notice to JSon-Fesidenfc-

Whereas, a certain prec?pt has been duly issued to me by the Major of the city of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said city, dated January lcth, 1-Ctf, showing that there Is due the following named contractor the amount hereinafter specified for street improvement In the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. Due John Scheier for grading and paving with brick the north Fldewalk on Brookside avenue from Clifford avenue to Orange street, from Henry J. Lacy, thesamof twenty-one dollars and sixty cents (21 (iu) amount of assessment charged against lot No. ten (10) in Iheis's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marien county, .Indiana. Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that unless within dava after the pnbllca tion, for three weeks, of this notice the amount so assessed against tbe above describe! lot or parcel of land is paid, 1 will pr ceed to collect tbe amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or bo much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TUTEW1LER City Treasurer. Indianapolis iDd., January 17th, 1S76. Sale for Street Improvemoat. Byvirtaeof a certain precept to me directed, by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city under the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 121b, 1S7G, sell at public auction at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. m. and i o'clock p. m., of said day, the following described lot, or parcel of land, or so mach thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum herlnafter earned as assessed against such premises lor street Improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. nine 9 in Smock's subdivision Of Fleteher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana, owned by William C. Smock, against which Is assessed the sum of fifteen dollars and sixty-six cents S15 W for street improvement In favor of John cheier, contractor. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolls, Ind., January 17, 1876. Sale for Street Improvement. By vlrtne of a certain precept to me directed, by the Mayor of the city of ladlanapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city under the corporate seal of eaid city, I will on SATURDAY IFebruary 12tb, 1376, seil at public auction, at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. M. and 4 o'clock P. sr. of said day, the following described lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinalter named as assessed against such premises for street improvement, and all cosls, to-wit; Lot No. twelve 112 in Smock's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana, owned by William C Smock, aj;alQSt which is, assessed tbe sum of fifteen dollars and sixty-six cents S 15 6ti for street lmj Mveineut in iavor of John tchtier, contractor. HENRY W. TUTEWILER. City Treasurer. Indianapolls, Ind., Jan. 17th, 1876. Sale for Street Improvement. By virtue of a certain precept to me directed, by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city, under the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12tb, 1376, sell at public auction, at the City Court Room, be' ween the hours or 10 o'clock A. sc. and 4 o'clock p.m. of said dy, the following described lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for street Improvement, and all costs, to-wit : Lot No. two 7, Schurman'a second addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marion county. InaUna, owned by Bridget Macauley, against which Is asjjesed the sum of one hundred and five dollars and eighty cents $106 80 for street Improvement In favor of contractor. HENRY W. TUTEWILER. City .Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., Jannary 17th, 1876. Sale for Street Improvement i Bytrtttre of a certain precept to me directed, by theMyorof thecltyof Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city under the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12tb, 1876, sell at public auction at tbe City Court Room, Sotarun tha hnnnnf III rVlnrtr A. If. and 4 o'clock F. m., of said day, the following described iOt, or parcel ui iuu, w iu uiucu tuertwi h ui.j be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for street improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. thirteen 131 lo Smock's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana, owned by William C. Smock, against which is assessed the sum of fifteen dollars and sixty six cents 15 6J for st seet improvement In favor of John Scheier, contractor. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 17,1878. Raw Inrs. Highest market prices paid. Shipments by express or otherwise will meet with prompt cash returns. Send for price list. OOAN c CO., For Manufacturers, jiFourta Street, Cincinnati, Ohio,

Sale for Street ijnprovementi

By virtne of a certain precept to me directed by the Mayor of the city of Indianapoll, Indiana, and duly attested br the clerk of said city, under the corporate sea of asid city, 1 will on SATURDAY, February 12tb, 1876, sell, at public auction, at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. m., and 4 o'clock p. St., of said day. tbe following described lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy tbe sum hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for street improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. eleven 11 in Smock's snbiivjslon of Fletcher's addition to the city ot Indianapolis, Marloa county, Indiana, owned by William O. Smock, against which is assessed the sum of fifteen dollars and sixty-six cent?15 6ti) for street Improvement in favor of John Scheier, contractor, HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapoll?, Ind., Jannary 17, 1876. Sale fcr Street Improvement. By virtue of a certain precept lo me directed, bytheMavor of the City of Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city uuder the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12tb, 1S76, sell at public auction, at tbe City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. m. and 4 o'clock p.m., of ald day, tbe following described lot, or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sura hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for Street Improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. seven 7 In Hanna belt s' addition id the city of Indianapolis. Marlon county, Indi ana, owned by Olive Hanna, against which is assessed the turn of forty-seven dollars and fortv-flve cen a 1517 451 for street improvement in favor of Murphy and Uood, contractors. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January Uta, 1S76. Sale for Street IniDrovemeiit. Bv virtue of a certain nrtcent to me directed. by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis. In diana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city under the corporate seal of said city, 1 will, on SATURDAY, February 12:b, 1S76, sell at public auction, at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o click a. m. and 4 o'clock p. x. of said city, the following described lot. or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy tue sum hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for strtet improvement and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. eizht 81 In Hanna heirs' addition to the city of Indianapolis. Marion county. Indi ana, owned by Olive Hanna, against which is assessed the sum of forty-seven dollars and ,orty-nve cents 47 45 for street improvement in favor of Murphy and Uood, contractors. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., Jan y 17th, 1876. Notice to Non-Resident. Whereas, a certain precept has been duly is sued to me by the Mayor of tbe city of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said city. dated January 7tb, 1ST6, showing that there is due the following named contractor the amount hereinafter specified for street improvement in the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, In diana. Due Frederick Oausberz for grading and pav ing with brick the sidewalks ou Fletcher avenue from Cedar to Dillon streets, from Maltie J. Atherton, the sum of teventeen dollars and seventy cents ($17 70) amount of assessment charged against the southeast half of lot No. one hunured ana seven (iu) in r letcner s er ai. buodivlsion of outlot No. ninety-seven (97) In the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. Now. the said defendant Is hereby notified that, unless within 20) days after the publication, for three weeks, of this notice the amount so assessed against the above described lot or parcel of land is paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel ot land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all coats that may accrue. HENRY. W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 15th, 1376. Notice to Non-Reaidont. issued to me by the Mayor of tbe City of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said city, dated January 7th, 1876 showing that there is due the following named contractor the amount hereinafter specified for street improvement In n Cliy Ol AUluauapuus, luaiuxt wuuij, dlana. Due Henry Clay for grading and graveling Fayette street and sidewalks from First to Third streets, from Lucius 11. Xiggs, the sum of seventeen dollars and iorty-nlne cents (8l7 41) amount of assessment charged against lot No. thirty-two (3i) in square No. two 2) in Wiley and Martin's addillon to the eity ol Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that unless within I2ui days after the publication, lor three weeks, of this notice the Rmnnnt to uwssed sealnst the above described lot or parcel of land la paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so mucn tnereoi as may bo necessary t3 satisfy the above claim. and ail costs tnat may accrue. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer, Indianapolis Ind.t January 17tn, 1378,

No'Ie9to Non-Raeldent.

Wberea, a certain precept has been duly Is' sue.i to me bv ihe Mavor of the cllr of Indianapolf, nnder the corporate sekl of tald city, datedJanuary 19th, 1676, showing tha', there is due tbe following named contractor (he amount hereinafter specified for street Improvement In the city of Indianapolis, Marlon co.rnty, Indi ana. Due John Scheier for er ad 1ns: and paving with brick tbe north sidewalk on Brookside avenue Irom Clifford avenue to Orange street, from T. M. Itobblns, the sum of one hundred and twenty-four dollars and sixty cents (5124 6)), amount of assessment charped against lot o. eighteen (18) in Albert E. Fletcher s first addition to the city of Indianapolis, Mai ion county, Indiana. Now, the said de'endant Is hereby notified that uulers within (I5i) days after the publication for three weeks of this notice the amount Foasessed agalDst the above described lot or parcel of land Js paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said l'-t or parcel of land, or to much thereof a mav be necessary toiatisfy the the above claim, and all costs tha may accrue. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, In!., January 21, 1S76. Notice to Non-Seeident, Whereas, a certc-in precept has been duly issued to me by the Mayor of the city of Indian apolis, under the corporate seal of said city, da'ed January PJth, 176. showing that there is due tbe following named contractor the amount nereina'ter specified Tor street Improvement in the ci;y of Indians polls, Marion county, Indiana. Due John Scheier for grading and paving with brick the north sldewaik on brookside avenue from Clifford avenue to Oraueo street, from John Larirjcore, the sum of twenty dollars and miy-iwo cents (ZM . amount of assessment charged against lot No. ten (10) in York's sub division or Albert K. Fletcher's nrst addition 'o the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. 20W, the fald defendant is herebv notified that unless within () day s after the publication for three weeks of this notice the amount so assessed against the above descr ibed lot or parcel of land is paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolls, Ind., January 24, 1876. Notioa to Non-Resident. Whereas, a wrtain precept has been duly is sued to me by the Myor of the City of Indian apolis, under the corporate seal or said city, dated January 19th, 187Ö, showing that there is due tbe following named contractor tbe amount hereinafter specified for street improvement in tbe city of ind anapolls, Marlon county, In diana. Due John Scheier. for (trading snd paving with brick tbe north sidewalk on Brookside avenue, from Clifford avenue to Orance street, from Hamuei Fisher, the sum of twenty dollars and nfty-two cents (JJJoJ), amount or assessment charged against lot No. seven (7) in York's subdivision of Albert Fletcher's first addition to the city of Indianapolis. Marion county. In diana. ' Now, the said defendant Is hereby notified that unless within (20) cays a:ter the publica tion for three weeks of this no Ice the amount so assessed against the above described lot or parcel of land is paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may accrue . HENRY W. TUTKVILERr City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 24. 1376. Notice to Non-Reaident. Whereas, a certain nreceDt has been: dulv is sued to me by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said city. dated January lyin. 13Tb, showing that there 19 due the lollowlng named contractor the amount herelnaiter specified for street improvement in the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indi ana. Due John Scheier for grading and paving with brick Ihe north sidewalk on Brookside avenne from Cl id or I avenue to Orange street, from Samuel Fisher, the sum of twenty dollars and fifty-two cents (SJ0 52), amount of assessment charged against lot No. eight (8) In York's sub division of Albert E. Fletcher's first addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. Now. the said defendant is hereby notified that unless withla twenty Al davs after the publication, for three weeks, of this notice the amount so assessed against the above described lot or parcel of' land Is naid. I will rrceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so ranch thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above-claim, ana ait oosts mai. may accrue. HI2NRY W. TUT3W1LER. City- Treasurer. Indianapolis, Indj, January 21, 187V. Notice to Non-Resident. Whereas, a certain DreceDt has een duly is sued to me by the Mayor ot tae city of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said city, dated January 19th, 187, showing that lhe is due the following nma contractor tne amvum hereinafter s peoiaed for street improvement in the city of lndianapol is, Marion county, Indiana. Tin John Soheler Tor eroding and paving with brick the north, sidf ;wa.k on ifc-oolaide avenue from Clifford avenuie to Orange Street, from Jcshna Kiiason. th. sum of twenty-one dollars and sixty cents (92). ou), amount of assessment charged against Jot No. eight (8) in Seaton's subdivision or Ainert t;. letcner s arei auiuou to the city e Indianapolis, Marion county, In diana. that unless wlt'hln (20) days aftar the publication for three veeks of this notice tbe amount bo assessed agrdnst the arove described lot or parcel o! land, is paid, I will proceed to collect tne amount tAt ansesseu uy icvjr nuu wio lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to aatisry tne auuvv ouuiu, uu tu costs luafc may accrue. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer! Indianapolis, Ind., January 21, 1575,

ItOtioe to Non-Resident.

W hereas, a certain precept has been duly Issued to me by the Mayor of the cltv of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said clty dated January 19th, 187Ö, showing that there is due the following named contractor the amount hereinafter specified for street improvement In the city ol Ladlanapolis, Ma; ion county. Indiana. " Due John Rchelt r for grading and paving with brick the north Bidewaik of Brookside avenne from Clifford avenue to Orange street, from Joshua Kiiason, the sum of twenty-one dollars and sixty cents (J21 m), amount of assessment charged against lot No. six (ti) In Beaton's subdivision of Albert E. Fletcher's first addition to the city ol Indianapolis, Marlon county. Indiana. .Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that unless within (:au) days after ihe publication for three weeks of this notice the amount to assessed against the above described lot or parcel or rand is paid. 1 will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and aale of sa'd lot or parcel of land, or bo much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, ann ill costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TCTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolls, Ind., January 21, 176. Notice to Noa-Rasidsnt. Whereas, a certain precept has been dulr is sued tome by the Mayor ot the city of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said citr, dattd January lyth. Ib76. show ine that there U due the following named contractor tha amount hereinafter specified for treet Im provement in tbe city of IndianaDolls. .Marion county, Indiana. Due John Scheier for grading and navln with brics: the north sldewaik on Brookside avennn from Clifford avenue to Orange street, from Joshua Eliason, the sum of twenty-one dollars and sixty cents ($2160), amount of assessment charged against lot No. seven (7) in Sea ton 'a subdivision of Albert E. Fletcher's first addition to the city ol Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana, Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that nn ess within (2ii) days after the publica tion iortnree weeasorims notice tne amount so assessed against the above cescribed lot or parcel of land is paid, 1 will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to tailsfy the above claim, and all costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TUTEWILER. City Treasurer. Indianapolis Ind., January 24, 1870. Notice to N on -Resident. Whereas, a certain precept bas been duly Is sued to me by the Mayor of the City of Indianapol's, under tbe corporate seal of said city, dated January lbth, 1876, showinathat there Is dne the following named contractor the amount hereinafter specineu for stieet improvement in tbe City of Inuianatolis. Maiion eonnty, In diana. Due John Scheier for Tradlns and raving with brick the north sidewalk on Brookskie avenue, from Cli fiord avenue to Orange street, from John Larimore the sum 4 twenty detlars and fifty-two cents (5-0 6:), amount of assessment charged against lot o.nme() in iors subdivision cf Albert E. Klttcher's first addition to the city of Indianapolis,- Marlon coraty, Indiana. Now, the said defendant is hereby cotifled that unless within (A)) daye-after the publication, lor three weeks, ot this notice the amount so assessed' azainst the a"ov described lot or par cel of land is paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so musu thereof as may be necessary V satisfy tbe abve claim, and ail costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis . lud-, January 2U 1873. Sale for Street Improvement. By virtue of a certain prec?pt to me directed,, by tbe Mayor of thecltyof Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerii of said city nnder the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12tb, 1876, sell at public auction at the City Court Room, Sidnitn Ika hnnt nf 10 oVIOCtC A.M. Ind 4 o'clock P. Jf- ot said day, the following described lot, or parcel or ranet, or o uiucu i-Mrrou oa uiBjr be necessary to satisfy the sura hereinafter named as assessed against such, premises for street improvement, and all costs, to-wit: IrfitNo. fourteen fill in Smocks subdivision ot Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marion count j, Indiana, owned by Wllllara C, emocK, against wnicn is asessea me sum of fifteen dollar and sixty-six cents 115 66 i for street Improvement In favor of Jfan Scheier, . contractor. HLWRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer, Indianapolis, led . January 17, ISX. Sale for Street Improvements Rv virtue of a certain nrecest to me dlraoted. by the Mayor o the city of Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by tbe clerk cl sail city under the corporate seal of. said city, 1 will on SATURDAY, Februar? 12:b, 1833. sell at public auction at tloClty Coxrt Row, Deiween me nours ui i o-ciocik. - o'clock P. at ., of said day, tha following described lot, or parcel ot iana, or so mucn luerwui m be necessary to satisty the sum reinafter named as assessed agalaat such premises for street improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. eight S in Smock's subdivision ot Fletcher's addition to t ie city of Indianapolis Marlon county, Indiana, owned by William Ü. Bmock, against which Is assessed the sum of fifteen dollars and sixty-six cents 115 t6 for street improvement in Iavor of John scheier, contrao? tor. HENRY W. TUTEWILER, City Treasurer Indianapolis, Ind., January 17tb, 1876,