Indiana State Sentinel, Volume 25, Number 24, Indianapolis, Marion County, 24 January 1876 — Page 2

THE INDIANA STATE SENTINEL MONDAY JAN UAH Y 24, 1876.

2

XLIY CONGRESS.

REGULAR SESSION. HOUSE. A FRESH COSSTITimOSAL AMENDMENT TnE CENTENNIAL APPROPRIATION fPEECHKS PRO AND C TUCHER'S BTRONQ ABVKRSK ARGUMENT. Mr. Bland, ot Mo., offered a resolution calling lor Information on the subject of the transfer of lands mithin the railroad limits allowed to Union soldiers. Adopted. The speaker then called on the committees for reports, and 3r. Springer, of 111., introduced a constitutional amendment providing that congress shall not pas any special or local laws In regard to granting pensions, bounties, lands or prise money, or loroorrenm? I he recordnof any iupartmentln relation thereto, granting relief to any person or authorizing the payment ot any claim, giving to any corporation, association or Indlvidusl the light to lay jailn ad tracks or conferring anynp"Cll and exclusive privilege on such corporation, realatlDgthe practice i f curtsor conferring speclal Jurisdiction in a particular case; that In all case where a general law can be made applicable, ro upecial law shall be enacted and that the courts may determlue If any special law could be embraced In a general enactment. Ue MrTarbox, of Mass., offered a rswlntlon directing the committee on foreign affairs to consider the proper legislation necessary to carry Into effect the treaty with the Hawaiian Islands. Agre d to. The House then went Into the committee of the who:enn the Mate 01 the Union, with Air. Wood, of N.Y., in tbe chair, on IHK CENTENNIAL APPROPRIATION BILL and was address d by Mr. rhllllps, of Kan., In advocacy of the bill. Mr. Harrison, of 111., followed on the same aide. Alluding to the suggestion that the House by its oteon 21r. Ilolman's resolution on the llth of December hd committed Itself a?alnst all subsidies, h recalled the fact tht when that resolution was offered, Mr. Hoar, of Mass , had asked whether It would l otcnt ofi a centennial appropriation, and Mr. Holman dlsticctly stated that he dJd not consider the word subldy"in that resoutlon as covering the Centennial appropriation. The House, therelore, had voted for the reso utlon. with a leservation in favor ot the CenU-nuial not a mental reservation, but f outpokeu reservation. Referring to the nThu lsrn of old John Adams over the Fourth of July celebrations, and to the fact that he made orations which might be called spread-eagle, he expressed the desire tha' there were to-dy more spread-eag elsm in the land. The common eagle, he said, talcing his flight from the ex:rnn limit of eastern civilization in 177b would have made its flight to the Westrrn limit In a sing e day. But now the proudest mona'cn of the airdropping hlmselt lDto tbe Atlantic and then looking at the setting sun, evtr intent and sailing onward, take das and weens before he clones his pinIons at the broad P clflj, and he taid we are told that the people thall not be taxed st tri rte of 3l'i cents each for the celebration of the country's birth day. He honed that the bill would pasn, and he hoped that his Southern friendj would not allow this oppottunlty to pass without proving that they hd as much pride In the 4th ofJuiy as any rortnern n'an. Mr. Atkins, of Tenn , asked Mr. Hsrrifon whether he meant that these gent'emen who opposed the bill were üUüoyal to the govern xnent. Mr. Harrison Not br any menus. Mr. Atkins I hore not. I hone thf.t no such test will be made. We have heard enough of Mr. Harrison I did not fight myself, but! have read history sufficiently to know that the brave men who fight are always the first to Join hands serosa the bloody chasm. Mr. Atkins I am willing to Join hands across THE BLOODY CHASM, but I am not willing to vote for this bill. Mr. Cochrane, of Pa., spoke In opposition to the measure as unconstitutional. He said that he bad pledged his word to his constituents in Pittsburg that he would vote against every subsidy, and this was a subsidy, He should, therefore, vote against this bill and when he went home to his people he would be able to look: them lathe eyes and say: 1 ken the pledge which I made to you when I was elected. (Appiaute on menoorana intnegai lertes). Mr. Kelley, of Tenn., spoke In answer to Cochrane and in supiort of the till. Mr. Reagan, ol Texas, fpoke In favor of the bill and gave as oa of the controlling motives in his own mind this reason: A great and pro traded civil war with the long controversy which led to It and a system of reconstruction measurtB, Just as disastrous as the war, have so wrenched and distorted tbe constitution and have so obscured and pet verted the principles of civil liberty and Just government as to make a serious and earnest recurrence to the principles of the declaration of independence, of the Constitution aod of tie spirit and generosity of the government a paramount necessity.! Mr. r rye, of Me., supported the measure. Mr. Tucker, ot Va spoke in opposition to the bill, and said that the path of duty that lav before him in regard to this centennial biil was as clear as it ever was in regard to any question that had even been brought to his consideration. What was propose 1 to be celebrated In this centennial ear? Was It proposed to have a material exhibition only, or wa it to be an exhibition worthy of tbe great moral principles that were to be lllus' rated by the anniversary ot independence T In his views there were THREE GREAT PRINCIPLES that underlay the declaration of Independence. These were tbe principles of individual liberty, the principle of local government in the stiug gle against centralized power, and the principle of the exemption of Amercan destiny from the controlling Influence of European politics. He -would unite In celebrating a centennial anniversary on these three principles. Let him see that liberty of the ritisen was secure against arbitrary rower, that freedom and Independence, what Chief Justice Chase termed ' the autonomy of the states, was safe against tne arbitrary usurpation or ine federal powe", and that the American destiny was to be guided alone by its own policy and be free from tbe interference of luropean policy; then there would be Indeed a Centennial anniversary. The spirit of tue Centennial was obedience to the Constitution. The greatest Inven tion of American genius had been left out of view enureiy. ana that was tne absolute subordination of the government's power to the rigid, inflexible, unbending rule of the constitution. Mr. Tucker then proceeded to argue gainst the constitutionality of the pending measure. Mr. Hoar, of Mass., asked Mr. Tucker whether, when tbe constitution delegated to congre-s certain sational powers. Including the taking of a national attitude toward foreign nations, it did not intend that such expenses for national dignity as were nsaal to nations for wielding those powers should be made ty congress. Mr. Tucker ask td the gentleman from Massachusetts to point out to him where the word national in re pet to power or anything else occurred in the const tut on. Mr. Hoar Tbe power to levy war, to conclude peace, to establish commerce means a nation In every Hue where that power is granted. Mr. Tucker If that Is what the gentleman calls national power, I understand him. But there is no such thing In tbe constitution as a power to levy war. There is a power to declare war and to raise and support armies. Mr. Hoar And to lvy it after It is declared. Mr. Tucker That is not In the constitution The powtr to create and maintain an army and to make ru.'ej lor tbe regulation of tbe land and naval service cover the whole question of what lbe gentleman from Massachusetts means. Mr. Lawience, of O., called the attention of Mr. Tacke to a letter from George Washington transmitting the constitution to congress in which the government is called a national government. Mr. Tucker I know it. I admit it. I said that the word, national was not in the constitution, and the gentleman has not found It In It. HaflndaHouuldeoflt. That is exactly what 1 say. Mr. Lawrence It was In tbe minds of the men who made the constitution . Mr. lacker i he men did not make It. No one man made it and the federal coovention didnotroaae it. II the gentleman wishes to inowwhomad it, I 6ay with great emphasis ihattbe states made it. Sensation. In the further course of his remvrks, speaking of iorge Washington, he remarked that George Washington wa THE FIRST GREAT RFEKL n the country, and he ventured to say to the gentleman from Ohio (Uarfleld), who sp-ke the was in the view of the law a perjured rebel, for therday about perjury, that Geo. Washington h4 was an officer In bis majesty's army and be (Tucker) took it for granUd that he swore tosur Jon the crown and then went Into rebellion.

Wr rsnrflAid Did he hold a commission In the

British array ' the tla;e of the revolution? Mr.Tncker No, sir, Mr. t arne:d Then I think he did not commit pe'jury. . tr inrkor Thm Ton claim that bis oath only lasted to lor g as he be d bis commission? Mr. Garfield It ceatd when his comralsaon expired. Mr. iU'Ker liutoe reoigavu. Mr. arfleld-He did not resign. Mr. Tucker He did resign. Mr. Garfield He was net an offleerat thetlme. Mr.Tncker Wbv. tie centieman does not know tbe history of his country. Laughter. Mr. arnel.1 li d be resign to take eervlce against the crown? Mr. Tucker uu, no. mat is anotueriniug. Mr. (Jarneld-lle was trying to get Into the service of Great Britain before tne war and waited. Mr.Tncker He resigned, and then he took service iu the rebellion. When tlie gentleman was speaking of tne men or the boulh, the other day, he spoke of those who resigned and afterwards took service on the confederate tide. Mr. Garfield I dl l not spe-K or thoe wno having resigned took strvlce but I spoke of those who, being s ill under oath, contemptibly violated It and struck against the United btates. Mr. Tucker If you had so quaiinea your phrnseolrgy, I should cot have Interrupted you the other day, for I know of no such person. The reason why I in'errrpted tha gentleman tbe otbr day was t Dai I repre enton his floor a little town where Sleep tne remains or one oi iue nomtai Americans whoever troa tins sou (meaning Robert K, Lee). He deep in death and no dishonor can everbv Implication orexpression be thrown on that honorable grave that the representative from that aistrietw 11 not tle here andreitl. (Sensation and KOtne applause. Mr. Tuoker then prcet ded with his argument, In the coarse of wnicn ne quoteo ine geuuem id fr.im New York (Hewitt) a9 saying yesurday that the government was onfev-edly an educator ofthe country. Commenting on it he fatd: Confessed by whom? 1 n-.-ver conf- ssed it. I not only do not confess It. but I denvitln totn. Itfeny that this povernment can lutriirle upon the cntr 1 of the common schools of each state of the Union. I deny that this goverhuifcut can go luto our common scho'i system la the state and upturn It acv-wding to the views of members or congress here. He who knows nothing in the world about this government, and I beg my democratic iriends to remember that It tias no n.lslon except to execute its power and perform liS duty under and in subjection to the supreme Jaw of tbe land, the constitution of thecountrv. (Spoken with stiong emphasis and great effect). Show me either the power to pass t. is bill or that thi bill is e sential to carry out a power conferred, and I will vote for it. But oi her wise, before Gi and my country, I can't voteforlf. The only llnnit to tha growing corruption of the counrry 1- a Umlta lon la the power of the government. I believe that THB MISSION CF THE GOVERNMENT at this time It economy, retrenchment and reform. We have reached the time when it becomes us to put the brakes down and to call a halt on lavish expenditure. If a tax is only one cent . to carry out an unconstitutional fcherae. I will remember the adage that it Is "the last straw that breaks tri camel's back," and 1 will vote against it. If thH bcheme gets thioigh to me body will come with another like tcuerre for a big show a. Yorktown, or Bunker Uli!, or hicao, and, in ths language of the old Scotch proverb-"Many a meckle makes a rnuckle." It was the accumulation of littles that msde tbe taxes burdensome and oppressive. He declared blmt-elf oppo ed altocether to a splendid government. To obey the constitution of the country was better than to sacrifice toteutlmental patriotism. He was in his heart ol hearts in favor of th Ceuunnia appropriation. He had no cr-Jtton! to showing the propres which the United HlaU-s hadmadd otder the Impulses of free institutions, in art or tcience. In manufactures, in agricultural, in commerce, in mining, in all the industrial pursuit, alibi. ugh Li own state lagged behind in all these tu at enterpriser for reasons which he would not more than adve t to. He bad no envy of the prosperity of tbe 1st r stares himself. He and ills associates from the South kne here no motive but the patriotic oneof advancing the greatest Interests ot the Unio i in conformi:y to the constitution. Keft-rring to the fact that the legislature of Virginia bad declined to roakesn appropriation for the Centennial, be explained that one reason for it was a provision in tbe state constitution, framed in 1867 ard forced down their throat, preventing the state from making any appioprlation for anything, except to pay her debts and carry on the government. But, he said, Virginia will be there. .Her peome who are able to go will be there. She has given six daughters to the Union (referring to the states made of the territory cgded by her) who will be tütre, and another of ner daughter w.n ti mere ireierrlng to west Virginia), taken from be; by a Ctesarian operation, but bid Virginia, rent In twain, impoverished in her weeds of widowhood , with a heart breathing high, for tbe prosperity of the common country, will be there In spirit, aud when the government l? restored to lis pristine purity, when the principles of the revolution are re-established, and liberty la rroc alrred throughout tbe land to every man under the Palladium rf tbe babf as corpus, unrepeatable by an edict of the presiaoEi or Dy an act or congre-s on ac count of constructive rebellion, then shall the time come wben we shall all unite with Massachusetts in that spier did close of Webster's reat speech, forty years ago. ''institutional liberty under constitutional union. Yes, liberty and union, one and Inseparable, now and loiever." Without taking action on tbe bill, the committee rose, and the House at 4:45 adjourned. A RELIC OF THOMASSEN. SEARCHING "A TRUNK WHICH HE LEFT IN AMERICA A SUBMARINE FUSE FOUND. . The Herald of Sunday furnishes yet one more item in the dynamite horror: Recollections of Thomaqsen, tbe infamons projector oi the fiendish dynamite plot, were revived at police headquarters yesterdaj in an nnlooked lor manner. Shortly altei 1 o'clock p. M a well dressed man called at the office oi Superintendent Walling and requested a private auidence. This being granted, the stranger, took from his nocke; letter bearing the post mark "Dresden, Germany," which he said he had last received by mail. It waa written by Mrs. Thomassen, the wife of tbe suicide, at present in Dread en, and contained a request that the trunk of her late husband, which was at the Filth Avenue Hotel, in this city, be forwarded to her. The trunk was left at that hotel by Thomassen when he was last in this city. The letter also contained the baggage check lor the same. Tbe stranger explained that he was an acquaintance ol Mrs. Thomassen, but thought it his duty to notify the police before he complied with her request, in order that tbe trunk might be examined. He further said that he did not wish his name to be connected in any way with the terrible affair at tbe present time, aa he was merely a past friend cf the widow of the deceased Thomas sen, havine known her In years cone by; and, while be was anxious to do all in his power to subserve tbe interests of justice in tbe matter, be would cot, unless compelled, give his name publicity. He had hesitated abont undertaking the task, but wishing to serve his former friend be o included toset aside his prejudices and carry out her request. He also declined to have tbe letter msde public under present circumstances, but agreed, it oalled upon, to deliver it up to the proper authorities. After hearing his story Superintendant Walling summoned before him Jjetective McNantara, of the central office, and after communicating to bim full details of what he Lad learned, directed him to proceed forthwith to tbe Fifth Avenue Hotel and carefully and fully investigate all the details ofthe case, Including the searching of the trunk and tbe examination of its contents. Thus Instructed, the detective took the check and rtraigbtway proceeded to the hotel. Arriving there he PRESENTED THE CHECK to the baggage clerk, who, unconscious of the Importance of the officer's mission, and Ignorant of the terrible connections that it might have had in tbe past with the fearlnl tragedy at Bremerhaven, mechanically delivered it to tbe offleer in le urn tor tbe chrck. Having tbe trunk in his possesion MoNamara now proceeded In pursuance of bis instructions to institute a ttorougb and careful examination of It and its contents. In appearance tbe trunk was one such as is commonly used by tha ordinary traveler,

There were co extra fastenings upon it and anything about it that would in any way attract attention. It was of medium . size and bod eviiently seen terviceou steamboats and railroad tians. The detective rot having tte key broke the lock. The trurk's center, ts presented superficially aim at innocent appeaiance. Tbe trunk was a little more than half filled, apparently with clothing. The first article removed was a coat, somewhat worn. The pockets were searched and found tobe empty. Next came other arti les of outer and under wear, which, afltrc'.Ofe examination, were found, like the coat, to contain nothing suspicions about them. As layer after lajer of clothing was piled upon the floor and nothing was discovered bearing in any way upon tb horror enacted at Bremerbaven, the detective was becoming eon vinted that his visit was fruitless, when euddenly he bent Id coiled np in the bottom ot the trunk a straDge and suspicious article. In formation it r sempled a piece of small rone about tbe

diameter of an ordinary lead pencil. Taking it out the detective unrolled it and found it to be a submarine fuse ten feet in length. It was made of brownish gutta perch, hollow in the canter through its entire length, the hollow part being filled with powder. It looked like a section of insulated telegraph wire, such as is frequently scan in telegraph offices. Finding nothing else oi a fcuppicious character in tbe trunk tbe officer took bis depirture for the cen tral office, taking with bim tbe fuse. He delivered the same to Superintendent Wallicg, and it was exemir.od by many curious .ej.s. The fu?e now remains lecked up in the central office awaiting any furtht-r developments which may result from its finding. The truck and clothing were delivered ovr to the friend of Tbcmassen's widow, who agreed wilh the superintendent to ht Id himself in readiness lcr any lurther inquiries if called upon. ! STATE OF INDIANA. Marlon county, ss: In the Superior Court of Marion county, in the Kate of Indiana. February term, la 76. No. 11.670. The Franklin Insurance Company vs. James M. Ginn, Jennie M. Ulnn. Joan W. Blake, Hannah. Blake, Frederick Knetler, guardian, t c Be it known, that on the 21st day of October, 1875,the above named plaintiffs by theirattorneys filed Id the office of the clerk ct the Huperior Conrt of Marlon county, in the s jite of Indiana, a complaint against the a bow named defendants for foreclosure of mortgage, and on said 15thdyol Jauuary, 1. the said plaintiffs filed In said Court tbe affidavit of a competent person showing that aid defendants, James M. (linn and J nnie M. Ginn, axe not now residents of the state of Indiana. Now. therefore, by order of said court, bp. id defendants last above named a'e hereby notified of the filing and pendency of nald complain against tnem aud that unless they appear ail answer or demur thereto, al the calling of raid cause on the second dy ot the term of siiJ court, to be begun and held at the Court House In the city of Indianapolis, on the first Monday in April, 1S7C, said complaint, and the matters and things therein contelnei and alleged, will be heard and determined Jo their absence. AUSTIN II. URO WN, Clerk. Jones & Ryan, Attorneys Ut rialntiö. Notice to tTon-Ilosident. Whereas, a certain precept : has been duly Issued to me by the Ma5or of trie city of Indianapolis, under the corporate seal of said city, dated January 7th, 1616, shoeing that there is due the following named contractor the amount hereinafter specified for street improvement in tne city of Indianapolis, .Marion county, Indiana. Die Frederick Gausber for rradlnir and pav ing with brick the sidewalk on Fletcher avenue from Cedar to Dillon HreeU, Irom Mattle j. Ätnerton, tne sum or ceventeen aouara ana seventy cents (f 17 70) amount of assessment charged against the southta half of lot No. one bunured and teven (107) In Fletcher's et al. subuivision or ouiioijno. ninety -stvtin (i)intne cliy of Indianapolis, Marion eounty, Indiana. Now, the said defendant li hereby notified that, unless within 20 days after the publication, tor three weeks, of this notice the amount so assessed apalnst the abote described lot or parcel of land Is raid, I wil proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of sid ot or parcel ot land, or so mach thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the aove claim, an 1 all cos .8 that may accrue. i I HENRY. Wi TÜTEWILER, i I i City Treasurer. I Indianapolis, Ind.. Januarf 15th, 1S76. Notice to Non-Resident. Whereas, a 'certain precept has been duly Issued to me bv the Mavcr of the City of In dianapolis, under the corporate seal of said city, dated January 7th, 1870, showing that there is due the following named col tractor the amount hereinafter SDecioed for stret improvement in the city of Indianapolis, Xarlon county, In uana. Due Henry Clay for grading and graveling Fayette street and sidewalks from First to Third streets, from Lucius H. Rlggs, the sum of seventeen dollars and iorty-nlne cents (Ii7 49) amount of assessment charged against lot No. thirty-two (32) in square Jso. two (Ü) in Wiley and Martin'B addillou to the city of Indianapo lis, Marion county, Indiana. Now, tbe said defendant Is hereby notified that unless within (2Uj days after the publication, lor three weeks, of th's notice the amount so assessed against the above described lot or parcel of land is paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel or land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis. Ind., January 17th, 187(5. Notice to Hon-Resident. Whereas, a certain precept has been duty Issued to me by tne Mayor ot me city or Indian spoils, under the corporate seal of said city. dated January lctb, liTtJ, showing that there is due the following named contractor the amount hereinafter a reel fled for street improvement in the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, In diana. Due John Bcheler for grading and paving with brick tbe north sidewalk on Brooks! de avenue from Clifford avenue to Orange street. from uenry J. Lacy, tne sum of twenty-one dollars and sixty cents (tzi W) amount or asse;iment chareed asalnst lot No. ten (10) in TheU's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Jndl ana. Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that unless within 2u dava after the publication, for three weeks, of this notice tbe amount so assessed aealnbt tbe above describe! lot or parcel of land Is paid, 1 will pn ceed to collect the amount so aases ed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all costs mat may accrue. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 17th, 1S7Q,

Sale for Street Improvement.

By virtue of a certain urecent to me directed. by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis. Indiana, and duly attested by the cierk of said city unaer tne corporate seat oi said city, l will on SATURDAY, February 12ib, 1876, sell at public auction at the City Court Room, between the hours or 10 o'clock a. x. and 4 'clock r. x., of said day, the following described lot. or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum her In after uamed as assessed against such premises fur street improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. nine fifl in Smock's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana, owned by William C. Hmock, against which is assessed the sum ot fifteen dollars and sixty-six cents $15 6o for street improvement in favor of Johnscheler, contrac tor. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 17, 1676. Sale for street improvement. By virtue of a certain precept to me directed. by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis Indiana, and duly attested by the clet k of said city, unaer ine corporate seal oi taia city, l will on S ATUR D A Y, Febru ary 12th, 1876, sell at public auction, at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o clock A. m. and 4 o'c.ock p. h. of said day, the following described lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinalter named as assessed against such premises for street improvement, and all costs, to-wit; Lot No. twelve 1121 in Smock's subdivision of r ietcner s addition to tne city or Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana, owned by William V. Bmock.aalast which is, assessed the sum of fif teen dollars and sixty-six cents t!lo bo J for street Improvement in favor of John fcchtier, contractor. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER. City Treasurer. Indianapolls, Ind., Jan. 17th, 1876. Sale for Street Improvement. a j litt uj v a vtratsaiaA is i. v, i v j au v uu vv vj by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis, Indiniia, uu uuijr Kiicsiru ujr tu vir I a. ui bivu vuj, under the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12th, 1876, sell at public auction, at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. M. and 4 o'clock p. M. of said day. the followlrfg de scribed lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof aa may be necessary to satisfy the sum herein arty?rnarxea as assessed against sucn premises for itreet Improvement, and all costs, to-wit : Lot No. two rzi, Schnrrnan'a second addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marion county. Inoltna, owned by Bridget Macauley, against which is assessed tne sum or one hundred and five dollars and eighty cents fI105 80 for street improvement in iavor oi contractor. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind January 17th, 1876. Sale for Street Improvements Bv Irture of a certain precept to me directed. bv the Mavor of the city of Indianapolis, Indi ana, and duly attested by the clerk or said city under the corporate seal oi 6a:a city, i win on SATURDAY, February 12tb, 1876, sell at public auction at the City Court Room, W.nrAAn t K a hniir. nr III nVlrwttr A. W anil 4 o'clock p. M.,of said day, the following described luv, or parcel ui ituiu, ui ou uiucu wci dui no iu; nam ad am aaauiflMl a r a I n K f . Itlfth nrAmtdAi fOT Btreet improvement, uu 11 oumö, wmi. . . . I 1 1 A 4 . . Lot No. thirteen f 131 in Smock's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis. Marion county. Indiana, owned by William u. mock. against wnicn is assessed tne sum 01 nrteen aoiiars ana sixiv six cenis iio 001 ior street improvement in favor 01 jonn ecneier, contractor. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 17,1876. Sale for Street Improvement. By virtue of a certain precept to me directed, by the Mayor 01 me ctrjror Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city under the corporate seal 01 aaia city, 1 wui on SATURDAY, February 12tb, 1876, ell at public auction at tbe City Court Room between the hours of 10 o'clock A. M. and ' o'clock P. M.. of sa d day. the following described lot, or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for street improvement, and ail coats, to-wit: Lot No. ten 10 in Smock's subdivision of Fletcher s addition to tne city 01 inuianapoiis Marlon county. Indiana. owned by William C, smock, aealnst which la assessed the sum of fir teen dollars and sixty-six cents f 115 66 for street improvement in favor of John bcheler, contrac tor. . HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind.. January 17. liffff.' Raw iiars. Illeheat market micea Bald. Khl nmnntu bv express or otherwise will meet with prompt casn retains, oena ior price iisu OOAN Sc CO.. Fur Manufacturers, 93 Fourth (Street, Cincin nati, vmo.

Sale for Street Improvement.

Bv virtue ol a certain nrMent ty ma nr&f&i by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis, Indi an n. und milr a 1 1 pu Ki ik. lo.k r ..ij under the corporate ses.1 of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12th, 1876, sell at public auction at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock a.m. and 4 o'clock p. m., ot said day, the following described lot, or parcel or land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for street Improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. fourteen fl41 in Smock's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indiarjapoll, Marion count j, Indiana, ownei by Wil liam V. Hmock, aeatnst which Is as-tessed the sum of ntteen dollars and sixty -six cents 115 titi for street Improvement in favor of John Scheler, contractor. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind , January 17, 1876. ttaie for otreet Imcro vemea t. Ey virtue of a certain DreceDt to me directed. by the Mayor of thecitv of Indianapolis. In diana, and duly attest-d by the clerk of sail city under the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12th, 1876, sell at public auction at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. m. and 4 o'clock p. m of said day, the following described jot, or parcel or land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satls:y the sum hereinafter named as assessed against such premises for street improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. eieht fl in Smock's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis Marion county, Indiana, owned by William C. Smock, against which is assessed the sum of fifteen dollars and sixty-six cents J15 for street improvement in favor of John bcheler, contractor. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 17th, 1873. Sale for Street Improvement. uy virtue ci a certain precept to me directed by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis, Indiana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city, under the corporate seal of said city, 1 will on SATURDAY, February 12th, 1876, sell, at public auction, at the City Court Room. be-ween the hours ut 10 o'clock a. m., and 4 o'clock p. h., of said day, the following described lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy t he sum hereinafter named as afcsersea against such premises for street im provement, and an costs, to-wit: Lot No. eleven fllUn Smock's subdivision of rieicner s aoauion to tne city 01 Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana, owned by William c Hmock, against which is assessed the snm ol fif teen dollars and sixty-six cents 1815 6! for street Improvement In favor ot John bcheler, contrac tor. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 17, 1876. Sale for Street Improvement. Bv virtue of a certain precept to me directed. by tbe Mavor of the City of Indianapolis, Indi ana, and duly attested by tne ciera 01 sata city under the corporate seal of said city, I will on SATURDAY, February 12th, 1876, sell at public auction, at the City Conrt Room. o'clock P. M.,of said day, the following described lot, or parcel oi iana, or bo mucu mereui m iuij be necessary to satisfy the sum hereinafter named as assessed against sucn premises for street Improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. seven m in Hanna heirs' addition to the city of Indianapolis. Marlon county, Indiana, owned by Olive Hanna, against which Is assessed the turn of forty-seven dollars and forty-Ave cents 1147 45 for street improvement in favor of Murphy and Good, contractors. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 17ta,lS76. Sale for Street Imürovement. By virtue of a certain precept to me directed, bv ihe Mavor of the city of Indianapolis, In diana, and duly attested by the clerk of said city under the corporate seal of said city, I will, on SATURDAY, February 12th, 1876, seit at publlo auction, at the City Court Room, between the hours of 10 o'clock A. M. and 4 o'clock p. K. of said city, tbe following ce scribed lot, or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may do necessary vo sausijr iu tum ucinuafter named aa assessed against such premises for street improvement and all oosu, to-wit: Lot No. eight 8 in Hanna heirs' addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana, owned by olive Hanna, against which Is assessed the sum of f-rty -seven dollars and ;orty-nve cents S47 4-5 for street Improvement In favor ot Murphy and Good, contractors. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis. Ind., Jan yiTth.ffTfl. W ANTEDBLACK WALBDT LOOS 5.000 to 10.000 LOlJd, sound and straight, not leas man 1'- Inches In diameter. I will bay In threeear load loin, at auy railroad ration in Chio. Indiana. Kentucky or Mich igan. All having timber, either standing or made Into lours, will find It to their advantage to wr'te description of same to 0. 1IOYT, Titfiit, unto.

Not! ce to Non-Resident.

Whereat, a certain precept has seen dulr Issned to me by the Mayor of the city of Indianapolis, unaer tne corpora tesei of said city, dated January 7th, l7t, showin that there is due the following named contractor the amount berelnaf er specified for street improvement In the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. uue juua ccaeier lurgr.ujuE ana paving Wim brick the north aid jwaik on lirookstde avenue from Clifford avenue to ränge street, from Mary Cruse, the sum of twenty-one dollars and sixty cents t Jl , amount of assessment rhftlffMl fto.a1nt 1. r N cava. f71 In ft4rmnAf subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that unless within t ) days after the publication, for three weeks, of this notice the amount fcoassea-ted agtlnst the above described lot or parcel of 1? nd I paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so mtich thereof as may be nece-Rary to satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 12, 1S76. Notice to Non-Pesident. Whereas, a certain precept fcas been duly issnel to me by the Mayor oi th" city ot Indianapolis, under the corporate sel of said c.ty. dated January ;ih, 76, shewing that there Is due the foi'owiug ntmed contractor the amount hereinafter pe ifled for street Improvement in the c.ty of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana. Tue John Scheler for grading snd pi Ving with brick the north sidewalk on l;rooSside avenue from Clifford avenue to Oran zehrtet, from Don Carles Cornweil, the um of tweuty-one dollars and sixty cents (Iii CO, amount of assessment charged against lot No. eiuht l in Tbels's subdivibion of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. Now, the said defendant Is hereby notified that unless, within Ad rays after the publication, for three weeks of this notice the amount so assessed against the above described lot or parcel of land is paid, t will proceed to collect tue amount so assessed by levy and sale of (aid lot or parcel of land, or w much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TÜTEWIL1R, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ixd, January 13, 18T6. Notice to Non-Resident. Whereas, a certain precep. has been dulv Issued to me by the Mayor of th i city of IndianapoiiB, unaer tne corpora e seal or said city, dated January 7ih, ls:e, showing that taere it is due the following named contrac or the amount nereinaner specinea ror street Improvement in the city of Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana: Due Henry Clay for grading and graveling Fayette street and sidewaUs from First to Third street, from Columbus Whltesldes, the sum of seventeen dollars and forty-nine cents f 117 49, amount ol as essmnt charged against lot No. thirty-one Si in quare No one III la Wiley and Martin's ad lition to the city ot Indianapolis, Marlon county, Indiana. Now, the sid defendant is hereby notified that unless within 2n) days after the publication lor three weeks of this notice the amount so assesspd against the above desert bed lot or rarcel of land Is paid. 1 will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel ot land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and a:l costs that may accrue. HErfRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis, Ind., January 12, 1576. Notice to Non-Resident, Whereas, a certain precept has been duly Issued to me by the Mayor oi the city of Indiandated January 7th, 1876. showing that there Is due tbe following named contractor the amount ucinuaiMjr Bprtuueu iur aireet improvement in uievibjr uiixuiuuuiu, surioii county, iaaiana. Due John Scheler for grading and navlnz with brick tbe north sidewalk of Brooks! de avenue from Clifford avenue to Oranae street, from Susan V. Record, tbe sum of eighteen dollars and ninety cents f 18 WJ, amount of assessment charged against lot No. U n 10 in Beaton's subdivision of Fletcher's addition to the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana. Now. the said defendant is hereby notified that unless within Ail days after tbe publica tion, for three weeks, of this notice, the amouxtt so assessed against the above described lot or parcel of land la paid, I will proceed to collect the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may tte necessary to satisfy the above claim, (and all costs that may accrue. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer. Indianapolis. Ind., January 12, 1876. Sale for Street Improvemsnt. By virtue of a certain precept to me directed , by the Mayor of the city of Indi n a pol is, Indi ana, and daiy attested by the clerk of said city , ander the corporate seal of said city, x win on SATURDAY, February 5lb, 1876. sell at public auctloa, at th City Court Room, between the hours of 1 o'clock a. v. and 4 o'clock p. M.of satd day, the folio wine described lot or parcel of luii.or so muca thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the sam hereinafter named a4 ass ssed against huoa premises for street Improvement, and all costs, to-wit: Lot No. seven 7 In Mayhew's heirs' adlitlon to the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana, owned by Caroline Douehay, against which Is assessed the sum of thirty-two dollar $& for street improvement In favor of Anderson Ä De venish, contracture. HENRY W. TÜTEWILER, City Treasurer, Indianapolis, Ind., January I2lh, 1ST3.