Indiana Republican, Volume 1, Number 24, Madison, Jefferson County, 7 June 1817 — Page 1

teiDiiMlca mm 111 ! "where liber'? dwells, there is my country. It

TTO

lie

r

70L. I.

MADISON, (INDIANA) -SATURDAY, JUNE 7, 1817

No 24.

r ! PUBLISHED BY MUEL L';;LHAM, EVERY SATURDAY.

1

in . . .

ot this treat v, until tie decision property; they are incontestibiy gmahy taptu.cd :,m .euirespecting the title to lie said is- placed on the same footing, and tones of the Umrcd states ; and 1,0 oK.ii i,, ,k J mde in whatever stipulations in this arti- such property, so capim- !. is-st

iaui

I CONDITIONS. I "Republican" will be delivered ojjicef r (lO't d dl'trs per annum, In advance; if pat d w tint t:c I after subscribing, i w-il be c n )n advance ; fw ddlars and fifty f paid within six mo nths ; lav I and seventy five cents tj pmd nine m m k; three dollars tf paid twelve mouths ; or three dollars fty cents if not paid until the year I. tv two numbers will be a year fu'we subscriptions taken for the 5c f the year. paper mill be discontinued until tearages are paid ALb casts a subscriber must, give punctually at the cud of he year t in'".nthm to discontinue, or he I ht hl responsible fur another year's 'pption V It Sf-men 's not exceeding a square, t inserted three tlnie.sfor a dollar ; J ones in. proportion, and if the tr uf insertions desired are wt ed, they will be continued at. the ,te. of the advertiser, until ordered

formiry withtheiourth arti- cleapply to slaves as one descnp- not be carried away at r , i;, t.x. of this ticaty. tion of private property, must of change of the ratijicr -ns, nor

con

cle

trea

Isla bot

1

wnatso

. La u.r nrpQ;tv annlv pnuallv tn all oth- Tom any place within

mnn Jiduc w v iiu wk rfj i j

1 I r - d ' , -, 1 I

tl: U.

' ' r.i : ,ar0.ra m in Si whf t her t ."K niiv.i:. nio-

tvas to such ((session or tne ci pivditpiutu; , t,, tv, , - - , t

nds aiwevritos claimed by the article. 1 he question then is, petty oe ar u at peaoa u, i.m.. h pani- sh Jl, any manner, under what conditions is it stipu- can ports or British ship, of war,

article

relat

inclusive) is to be restored ! If it fiist article provide to: all rh'esc

f ll A t- i ait liff

" . ' c c. k mnt-nHpH thtjt hv thf nnition stipulations, one or thriii piauiiff

1 ne main pnrpwii ui mc uisl ....w - j - ide in thinner part of it, of the words in this article, pri- private property on the same h.ot-

es to the federal pacification, vate property is released trom all mg as, uui on wmu , uic san e,

and the latter part of it to some me conaiuons unaer which u K.wrw.., of the direct consequences on the admitted that public property is others establishing disimiiar co.n territorial pfebsions of the two to be restored, the restitution be cJiuons, it is impossible to ook countries, irA the property with- comes in that case unconditional, at those: passages in .lie first artiin such possessions. As to the But Mr. Monroe does not contend cle whidi can alone be made to ,,. rLi.... ' fnr:m iinrnnriitinnal ritirtlfmn apply IO SUCll provision S. and ;.Ot

rnrn nrn n iv 1 1 1 liic 1 j 1 j .-1 l a jl -w" 7 ,

1'Vuiv K r y 1 , .

t: uted,

1 inter-

t

n oiginally captured therein, substantial stipulation, indepen- l,:c,um,C! 1S

ofremaininff theran when uciu or prcceaing worus, uui - - : rflications are exchanged, that that the words " carrying won ot the American govern.

IU CilC AD'

I ? CONCLUDED. ' vthe first article of lie treaty . ' stipulated that there shall I firm and universal p-ace Ik;n his Britanic maj siy and U. States, and between th?ir rctive countries, territories, 3 towns and people of every fee, without exception of plaor persons. All hostilities ) by land and s i shall cease bon as this treity shall have ratified by both parties ai inafter mentioned. All terriplaces, an 1 possessions whater, taken by either party from 'other during the war, or ch may be taken after the ung of this treaty, excepting tiie islands hereinafter menled, shall be restored without ly, and without causing any de el. Jction or carrying away any of l!.e artillery, or other public property originally captured in the caid forts and places and which shall remain therein upon the exchange of the ratifications of this treaty ; or any slaves or other -ivate property. And all ar--ires, records, deeds, and pa- , either of a public nature or v Onging to private persons, ..:ich in the course of the war l;: y have fallen into the li-nds of the ollicers of either party shall be, as tar as may be practical, forthwith restored and delivered to the proper authorities and persons to whom they repectively belong. Such of the iJands in the Bay of Passamauoddy as are claimed by both irties, shall remain in the posssion of the party in whose occupation they be ,at the time of t-c exchange of the ratifications

lu LlJrArnrer it nrnvide and, rhcrefore, seem s to admit be at once satwuci! u , f c,c i-

that if k shall have the double that the stipulation respecting pi i lmtanons cannot oe t t conditin annexed to it of having vate property is not a new and without such omisins aiic

bee

and thp

.1 .' ' l : a;av." vrliirh. in rh nrrrpeWnv ILeilt to mailltajll.

tllCn ftiCU uiwuciiy ia iu uc ili;u' j j " 1 ti ,. . . . , red ,'nd it is not to be destroyed part of the sentence, apply to tho plication of this article to private o-cari-d away. It would sure- restitution of public property ap- property on ship board, n,-:ther lv W been unusual and unrea- ply equally to the restitution of does die first article itse.r, nor did sorabU to h .ve stipulated for the private, property. But if the any discussion respecting it, ex-r-ifvtion of any property which words carrying away," apply press o. retei to any such . estitunevW had belonged to the fort or to private as wtll as public pro- "on or property, remaining m nla or hi:h ever had belong- perty, how entirely arbitrary is Bruii ships of war or British cd to thfort rr place, or which it to say that the intervening vesscR lucre arc not on 'y 'no had Ue;. dr-ady destroyed or car- words do apply to the one and words m in. article which s-.pu-

humsn nn nnirer in rair- uu uui auuiy 10 inc ouicr, isuiu - r

nvu"; n - , - ' .

een considered as worus - carrying away gram-

ne to have been

a provision in the second ani-

1 1 1. 1 .

cie, wnicii supuiaces t'.- contrary. By the second, the iO"diti ins are stipulated on which and ti'itit effects are to be re&to ..d they are to be restored it the vessels ue not captured untii after a

.. . . r : - ..U ,r-. mstirallv rrnvprn hnth ?

to have no connexion with the Admitting, however, this arbisubject matter of that part of the trary construction, still it would article in which the stipulation be more extensive than that for concerning it must be supposed to which Mr. Monroe contends. For nrrnr. a! tn nuhlic .nroDsrtv it i that case, there would be no

appears quite plain that carrying limitation assigned as to the place given time from the exchange of

away

fort

and

Atnn xrhirU ir -vlmittpd tn annlv

to that would otherwise have no not to be carried away. All mer- wheiever such vessels with iheir application at all: and no sound chant vessels therefore, captured eilects may ac, altlu.uga they reason can be given why the con- on the high seas, and their effects, should be within the limns ot :,ie

dition might not, in both its must according to this construebranches, apply as well to private tion, be restored, even if they as to public property provided should not be within the limits of the construction would fairly ad the United State., at the time of mit of it. Both parties appear the exchange of the ratifications, tourer the conditions which Neither would there be any limi-

1 . ... . t .- n MiirinniK ir tins ran.ni

here spoken ot is from the wnerc uie private property was

or place to which it belonged, onginany capturea, nor any n- w.w rt.wU3

from no other ; for the con- nutation as to the place trom time nmiiea, neuncr tncy nor

whence the private property was teir cii-cis a. . iu oe lcsroiea,

United biaics, yei accorJi'ig tu

the stipulation of the second article, wnich have a dirc application to private p op.r y 0:1 si ipoai d, it tliey have ben captur .d

within a hunted tune, they may

1

relate to public property. But tation as to the time subsequent be earned away atany subsequent then immediately follow in the to which the carrying away is not period without reference to the same sentence the words "or any to take place. It might from the exchinge oi the ratih,ati n, to slaves or other private property." commencement of the war-or Mr. Monroes observation, that And here the question is whether from tne signature of the treaty 'destruction m the hrst ar.i.e 1 r 1 C .! -innif aiirl ti c 'n-.m it iiwonf

slaves, and other private proper- or trom tne exenange or ran- - ,,a,v,, - ty are to be restored under the tifications : whereas, Mr. Monroe be sufiicient to anir, that the same limitation provided in th contends, that the places where expression may certan.ly, apply to

same article, and in that part of it they had been originally c iptured, otner private proper: , an, .nac which immediately precedes the the places from whence they must the stipulations which apply to words in question, or whether not be carried away, and the pe- one must apply to the other ; but 1 . .1.:., I,m:..:n ,r- the rhiHrv.itinii is. in tlUttl. UOt

terent provisions? In the first plies, are well ascertained by the material to the question at i,3ue; ti'.v.nrd, do not admit of. first article. According to the because the point in dispute is :,ot

IJICIV .v " - . Ill . I

: c -ii!7 irnVlp vLit h rpfpi-etice to private pro:uT-

. . 'a. A. mr f t- T A fft- M I II I I III I l.ll.Xk&k& L'V TV M. ft I

tv that there is, any distinction the American government, the ty destroyed, but t.. M.yau. p -whatever made in this article be- private pioperty in contemplation perty carried avvay j , nch as. tween slaves and other private is limited to such as had been on. it is admitted, do apply to tUvc