Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 23 April 1946 — Page 12

Indianapol is Times

Ys

, 12 Tuesday, Apri 28, 1946 HOWARD . WALTER LECKRONE t- "Editor A SCRIPPS-HOWARD NEWSPAPER

Indianapolis Times Publishing Co, 214 W. Maryland #t. Postal Zone 9. _ Member of United Press, Scripps-Howard Newspaper Alliance, NEA Service, and Audit Bureau of - Circulations. Price in Marion County, 8 cents a copy; delivered by carrief, 20 cents a week. ‘Mail rates in Indiana, $5 a year; all other states, ‘U. 8.rpossessions, Canada and Mexico, 87 cents a month, : RI-8551.

Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Way -

HIEF JUSTICE’ STONE LJOLMES, Brandeis and Stone, JJ, dissenting”’—that *& became a familiar line on decision days in the U. S. Supreme Court, through the last years of Coolidge and the Hoover term. Justice Holmes left the bench, then through the early years of the Roosevelt New Deal it was “Brandeis, Stone and Cardozo, JJ, dissenting.” : ~The nation’s highest court was ruled by a majority of ‘stiff-necked conservatives, whose judgments, as Justice Stone once charged, rested too often on their “own personal economic predilections.” But in time the humane and persuasive opinions of the minority became accepted: as the philisophy of the court. Justices Brandeis and Cardozo passed on. The last of the great dissenters, Harlan Fiske Stone, became chief justice.

, » » n ~ ” » JUSTICE STONE'S service embraced the most turbulent “ years in the Supreme Court's history. The court, in form, rode out the constitutiqnal crisis precipitated when President Roosevelt, impatient with judicial sabotage of his reforms, tried to persuade congress to authorize him to pack the court with men of his own choosing. We say “in form” because in substance Mr. Roosevelt finally got what he wanted, as death and retirement created vacanties. So resolved was the President that the high court again should not give him trouble that, in picking new justices, he seemed to give more weight to political loyalty than judicial experience and capacity, In these latter years, Chief Justice Stone was more than ever alone. The new “liberals,” with what might be called their personal ideological predilections, soon started disagreeing among themselves, veering this way and that to the point of promoting confusion in the lower courts. Chief Justice Stone continued to form his judgments in the even tenor of the broad and responsible liberalism he had developed with Justices Holmes, Brandeis and Cardozo. He was a wise and great judge. His death leaves more than a vacancy on the bench. President Truman’ will not find it easy to fill his chair.

POLLARD AND POLITICS AIS to be deplored that the elements of politics and pub“licity seem to have entered the handling of the Pollard case. It is not a confidence-inspiring spectacle to find the county sheriff, a candidate in the May primaries, interfering with the taking of Pollard's confession. And it verges on the ridiculous when city detectives and state police, with their primary interest in a case which occurred within the city, seek to interview the prisoner unsuccessfully, First, they were told Pollard was in criminal

HENRY W. MANZ Business Manager |

“ Owned and published daily (except Sunday) by

If's Off fo Work We Go

"| do not say, but

Hoosier Forum

your right to say it." — Voltaire.

agree with a word that you | will defend to the death

"We Should Keep the OPA, With Little Change, for Another Year"

By Mrs. Wood L. Wilson, Marott Hotel

I think I speak for millions of Americans who maintain no lobbies in Washington, but who are dismayed at the attempt to wreck OPA. Perhaps price control has to an extent limited production, but except in a few lines it is probably at an all-time high. TI quote from a business letter published April 19: “Retail sales in February were running at the rate of $90,000,000,000 a year, versus $50,500,000,000 in 1941. Although this shows that production is high, store shelves are bare in many spots. Some of this may be due to OPA policies, but much is due to the well-heeled John Q. Public.” It is doubtful if any government agency could curb completely the greed which provides our black markets, or the selfishness of consumers who patronize them. There is ‘rising sentiment in favor of a

but why limit a man’s earning power by a maximum bracket? Some day labor will realize that

buyers’ strike, as evidenced by the organization of Housewives’ leagues. We should keep OPA with little

union management is no different from industrial management. They're both out to get all they can

change, for another year. from the common man. But there #8 8 is a middle road. Why not take it? “LABOR MANAGEMENT TALK s =x = BETTER THAN STRIKING” “ONE YEAR IN ARMY IS By Gene Engle, 4163 8. Otterbein ave. | BETTER AT 18 THAN 30” Why is it necessary for union|By Gene Hacker, 2252 Pierson st. supporters to belittle everyone who| Since being discharged from the disagrees or finds fault in the way|army I have been sitting here at unions are conducting themselves? |home reading the Forum and get-

court on another and minor matter. And next, they were told when they returned that he was at lunch and, it appears, could not be disturbed at that time. - Yesterday afternoon, the police finally obtained a “proper” confession from Pollard, so the case now may proceed in channels, Li The law enforcing authorities, including the judges who handled Pollard’s previous 18 charges on which he escaped with total punishment of a $3 fine; have made a poor showing already in the Pollard case. In seven short years, he advanced from juvenile delinquent to confessed murderer, and is an outstanding example of how we grow our own criminals in Marion county. _ Handling a criminal case should be no vehicle for playing politics, or for getting publicity. If it if, the only kind it will get will be “bad” publicity.

rie esa

AN AUTOMOBILE “RECORD”

HE automobile plants of the United States and Canada | have just produced 57,565 passenger cars, trucks and | busses in a week; says Ward's automotive reports.

That is something of a landmark. It’s the first time | output has passed 50,000 a week since war stopped the making of cars for civilians early in 1942. But don’t cheer yet. This record post-war week saw production reach a rate of about 3,000,000 cars, trucks and busses a year. And that, in the light of the automobile in- | dustry’s opportunities, is a miserable performance. - In 1929—the best year ever—automobile plants ‘of the United States alone turned out 5,358,420 cars, trucks and | busses. In each of 13 other prewar years, they produced | more than 3,000,000 units. But in the eight months since |

the war ended they have made only about 500,000. The market demand is almost unlimited. Never has there been anything like it. There is little doubt that 10.- | 000,000 new passenger cars could be sold in 1946, if they | could be manufactured. In 1929, the United States plants produced 4,587,400 passenger cars, and never since have they .come within shooting distance of that prosperous year’s record. But we believe it is conservative to say that for at least the next five years, and probably for more than that, there can be an eager market for at least 6,000,000 cars a year. There can be such a market, that is, if the automobile | industry and other great industries can move quickly up to

full and unimpeded production and so avert the danger of disastrous price inflation.

. " . » UT the automobile industry, although its helical re- | conversion from war work proved faster and easier | than many had expected, has been held back by strikes and |

other troubles. Its output of cars and truck trickle instead of a flood. And now that it is Re ok : TAS af last now that it has produced for one week at a | which still isn’t half as high as it ought to be—a ; e is getting bigger and blacker daily, ‘Secretary Schwellenbach took John L. Lewis to 3b Juan Sedey. We read that there were ve results,” but that the two caller ! they left the White House, Grasping a | that means’ Bop Svorabls break in the soft-coal today entering ering its fourth week. For if that stri on much longer, the automobile-industry and tee industries soon be Pproddcing nothing at all,

e—a new |

will

3 Ml ey

I disagree with some of Mr. Tay-|ting hotter every day. Guess it is lor's forum statements. For in- about time for me to put in my two stance, there were no major labor cents worth. disputes in Indianapolis until after| First, I would like to say that I the CIO introduced their type of am very much in favor of the draft labor handling into our local plants.|1aw. I know I should have much Time after time I have seen dissen- rather put in one year here in the sion stirred up among the em- States when I was 18 than three ployees of Allison by trained rabble-| years and a half when I was past rousers. Then I have seen our 30. A year isn't going to hurt these WAEW representatives settle these kids and the mothers who are crypseudo grievances without printing|ing about it should be much happier pages and pages of propaganda to hanging a blue star in their winbring- the morale of the men up to such a point that one word would mean a walkout. A strike is not the only “weapon labor possesses.” A quiet discussion between management and a group of level-headed labor representatives will accomplish as much good as the loss of time and money wasted in a prolonged strike such as the one you are so proud to have participated in. It seems to me that the near standardization of prices on allied products is the re-| sult of competition and not “price fixing.” . It is human nature to buy what we want at the cheapest pos- t¥ts sible . price. So if Mr. Joe In- of Ray Johnson and William Rogdependent Grocer sees Mr. Jack|ers in regards to the D. S. StephenChain Store selling an article at a|son case. And will add my personal certain low price, Joe is going t0| opinion. Why should D. C. Stephencut a price as far as he can 10 gon pe imprisoned for life because meet that competition. * he belonged to the Klu Klux Klan And speaking of competition,| or any other secret order. At one what chance. does an old, eX- time Capt. Dryfus of the French perienced employee” have of re- army was arrested and put in prisceiving proper. compensation for his on on Devils Island. He was torpersonal ability under a system] tured for two years before he could which sets a limit on the maximum, prove his innocence. At that time he may earn. A minimum is okay, our country and a number of others

later on. Next, I hope that all the Joes read the list of congressmen who voted for this latest bill to wipe out OPA. We who have been in France have seen what inflation can do to a country. In closing I would like to add, let the foreign brides alone. Those kids earned the right to marry whomever they want. s » 1 4 “AS MINISTER, I BELIEVE IN STEPHENSON REHEARING” By Rev. Bert Greeson, 614 8. Meridian st. I fully indorse the recent letters

Carnival —By Dick Turner

LO FM orn, sus wen aemce me v0 nee 0. 0 our or. g.o% “Enderby always studies both sides of every itis su he can dis. as agree with anybody!" . +

bg Sor "= -

Ch

dows now, rather than a gold star]

appealed to the French authorities to give him justice. Why don’t the citizens take up this case. We are living in a Christian country and believe in justice for all, regardless of race, creed or color. Then let. us put it into practice by demanding justice for Stephenson. Twenty-five years is much too long for a crime he did not commit. A few who have the power to put him in prison and keep him there. What for? That is a question we all would like to have answered. God is a God of love, mercy and justice. That which you sow you shall also reap. As a member of the ministerial association, I say give Stephenson justice and let him out of prison. I am not acquainted with him but have followed this case from the beginning and feel he should not be in prison. I cafl not understand why the ministers of our churches who preach brotherly love and justice have not made an appeal in behalf of one so long unjustly persecuted.

Editor's Note: No more letters favoring or opposing a rehearing of (the Stephenson case will be printed |in the Forum unless there is some {mew development justifying this use tof space intepded for discussion of | timely questions.

$8 8 “18-YEAR-OLDS BELONG

IN SCHOOL NOW, NOT ARMY” By A Silver Star Mother, Indianapolis

ae > @ &

IT'S OUR BUSINESS, because of the American stake in the Philippines, to realize that Communists will exert an influence in ‘the election there today

counted. In addition to the presidential race between the interim incumbent, phlegmatic Sergio Osmena, and the flashy senate president, Manuel Roxas, members of congress will be chosen. Letters J have received from Manila in the past several days contain several significant comments, among them the unsubstantiated report that High Commissioner Paul V. McNutt favors Roxas. ; One letter, from a Chinese, said that there was much opposition to Osmena on the ground he permitted Chinese merchants to control 76 per cent of the retail business in the islands, to the detriment of the Filipino businessman. And another conjectured on possible dishonest counting of the votes, since a write-in ballot is used and, the voters speak 87 dialects, ranging from the official Tagalog to the Arabic of the Moros. ; Today's election has all the aspects of a stateside contest. °

Big Difference Is Hukbalahaps ONE FACTOR which we do not find in American elections, however, is the real threat of communism which is present in the Hukbalahap, or people's army. The Huks, a strong.factor in the democratic alliance, includes former guerillas, peasants, labor groups and others . . . and there is a strong anti-American feeling in their ranks. In fact, it has been said that they have changed, or considered changing, their name from “people's army to fight against Japan” to “people’s army to fight against America,” and adopting the néw name of Hukbalaam. I do know that one of our fears when I was in the Philippines was that the heavily-armed Huks, with their arsenals of captured Jap weapons and guns bought from American soldiers, would attempt to

Russian and U.S.

WASHINGTON, April 23.—The American Society of Newspaper Editors, at its meeting here last week showed by a little venture in good will how simple it might be to bring an understanding by the people of the United States and Russia, each of the other. That is, if the idea is pursued and expanded, which would require co-operation by Russia. ; Such an understanding is the surest guarantee of friendship between the two foremost world powers.

Return Visit of U.S. Journalists AT THE INVITATION of A.S.N.E, three Russian newspapermen and writers came here to let our editors look at them, listen to them and ask questions, and to enjoy that camaraderie of a common profession that is the same the world over. This was, in effect, the return of a visit made some time ago by three American newspapermen—Wilbur Forrest, New York Herald-Tribune, Ralph McGill, Atlanta Constitution, and Dean Carl Ackerman, Hoosier head of Columbia university school of journalism —to Russia as part of a trip around the world in the interest of broadening channels of communication and promoting international press freedom. It is hoped that this exchange of visits may have its influence in the general movement, carried on now on the diplomatic level, to open up Russia to many more, American newspapermen with freedom to travel about as they wish and write as they please to interpret Russia to our people. This, of course, is something beyond the three newspaper visitors, as was made plain, But one of

them pledged on their behalf as soon as they got back

to Russia they would raise. the question of getting American correspondents to Russia on a broader sense. This was Ilya G. Ehrenburg, novelist and member of the editorial staff of Izvestia, who was engagingly frank and witty in what he said about newspapers in Russia and newspapers here. He explained that he

I am against drafting 18-year-old | boys. I am a mother who had| three boys out of my four in the armed forces. There is no heartbreak that can compare with taking an 18-year-old boy away from his mother. It is as bad as taking a baby out of your arms and bashing its head against a stone. I have géen them cry like babies when they: came out on a few days’ furlough gnd beg me to pray for them and 'try to get them out. It is horrible. I had one almost killed in battle with Japs and had one taken prisoner in Germany for seven months. Now the other 18-year-old boy is in and is begging to get out, but that is out, they won't let him out, He should still be in school and at home with me. I know no mother has any more right to write this letter than I have, My heart bled while my boys were gone and I don't like to see any 18-year-old boy taken away from home. If this letter will help keep the 18-year-old kids home, I hope it is published in the paper. n » » “EXCISE MEN ‘INVADE’ SOUTHERN MANSION!” E | M. M., Indianapolis

| My husband and I, my husband's father and mother, also my parents, | are regular patrons of the Southern Mansion, We are not drunks, drug addicts, nor are we insane. But {we go there for a nice, quiet; re- | spectable evening of dinner and dancing. We have yet to see that | first bit of trouble in that “Den lof Iniquity,” except what was caused last week by the excise men. | We were there when the so-called | excise men “walked” in with their| badges shining, their hats on, and| with flashlights in hand. Eh, those brave men, with such staunch hearts. If there had been a few more like them when the war was declared, there would have been little need ‘for our army and navy. If they had been there and my husband and a few other servicemen home, things might have been different. Thank heavens, we can vote in the next election. But as it now stands, we have a very fine “gestapo” in the state of Indiana. They have invaded respectable places, they pick you up on the street4nd you had better be careful while driving a car, there may be one in the back seat. What I can’t understand is, after a person buys a bottle of liquor, pays every kind of tax on it; including state tax, why they can’t drink it anywhere and any time they choose. ?

DAILY THOUGHT

See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise. ~Ephesians 5:15. » . ». i

-How ‘prone to doubt, how cau-| tious are the wise.~Homer,

il — : . : Le. Ls, :

WASHINGTON, April 23.—The panel of four physicians from the American Medical association, called to Washington for consultation on the condition of senate bill 1606, alias the Wagner-Murray-Dingell national health bill, didn't make too good a diagnosis. This particular clinic from the A. M. A. doesn’t like old bill 8. 1606 in the first place. What they recommended was a major operation to cut out its heart. If the patient dies, it will apparently be all right with the A. M. A. The advice of competent medical authorities should always be listened to, and the A. M. A. group, under its president, Dr. R. L. Sensenich of South Bend, -Ind., arrived with a whole sheaf of prepared fever charts in its pill bags. Senator Forrest C. Donnell of Missouri, who also doesn’t like bill 8, 1606, asked Dr. Sensenich to sum up what was wrong, the best he could do- was come up with a list of symptoms something like this: First, said Dr. Sensenich, there was nothing in the bill which had anything to do with preventive medicine.

No 'Free Choice’ of Physicians THE SPECTATORS in the senate education and labor committee operating room, where bill 8. 1606 was laid out on the table to be opened up, gasped at that a little, because the whole idea of the" bill is to find ways to provide more medical care for more people at less average cost. Furthermore, the voluntary health insurance plan which the A. M, A. recommends -as a substitute would, naturally, provide less preventive medicine than a compulsory health insurance plan providing regular examination for everyone in the country. 2 Second, Dr. Sensenich-said he thought bill S. 1606 would prevent a free choice of his physician by the patient. ; Well, the bill specifies there shall be free choice by

IT'S OUR BUSINESS . . . 8y - Communism Is Factor-in- Philippines

that cannot be determined until the ballots are

But when Republican -

Donald D. Hosvir

sieze the government whenever an election

{ was held. It also Was established that the Huks were “levying” taxes to terch communistic doctrines. They fre-

bo ME

i : : 4 i i i

3 $ 8

.quently cited Russia as an ideal of government, So | far'as I know, the Huks still have their arms, and -

have staged a reign of"terror in some provinces -o and they appear to be backing the Osmena candidacy, Should Osmena win, with the support of the party organization of his predecessor and backer, Manuel Quezon, it probably will be with the backing of this communistic element in an otherwise close race. Among the Communists are many who do not like the United States. Our policy of neglect of the prostrate Filipinos, while at the same time making such a fuss over the European .countries, has been used to fan discontent among people who were our devoted allies in the shooting days. "2

Two Candidates Compared

IF, SERGIO OSMENA wins today’s election, the first president of the commonwealth . . ., which achieves independence status July 4 of this year... will be a conservative. If Manuel Roxas wins, the first president will be & man of action, who stayed in the islands during the Jap occupation . . . at Gen. MacArthur's request, his supporters say, to minimize the harm the Japs might do to our cause. Osmena 1s a compromiser, whose Chinese background gives him the ability to give up on little things. He is old, and tired ... and out of touch with what went on during the war days he spent in Washington with Quezon. Still, he is the heir apparent and has the Natlonalista party machinery «+. and he has tolerated the Huks.

Roxas has the get-things-done attributes of a good |

executive, and had strong support of the monied classes. Of Spanish descent, he has many ties among the rich landowners. However, so does Osmena. Whoever is elected, he will have a tough job bate tling growing Communist sentiment, ;

IN WASHINGTON . . . By Thomas L. Stokes :

Editors Swap Views

did not have anything to do with visas for American newspapermen, which is a police function, but that if he did he would be liberal, adding with a twinkling smile: “Perhaps that's why I would not be allowed to give visas.” It was his feeling that the more American news papermen went to Russia, the better it would be for his country. The other two visitors were Gen. Mikhail Galak

tionov, military editor of Pravda, resplendent in his |

uniform, and Konstantine M. Simonov, of Red Star, author of “Days and Nights,” a novel about the siege of Stalingrad, in which he participated. It was salutary for American editors to get the Russian viewpoint on American newspapers. The Rus sians think some of our newspapers present a dis-

torted idea of Russia and the Russians, and think

perhaps that's something that our editors should take up among themselves. Mr. Ehrenburg assured the American editors that there is no malice in Russian newspapers toward the United States, though there may be mistakes. He would like to say the same thing for American newspapers. He did not include the whole American press in his criticism, Some, he said, made honest mistakes. But others made mistakes on purpose.

Free Movement Essential

THE RUSSIANS ALSO emphasized that they like their country, even as we like ours, with the plain inference that Americans will just have to accept the fact of a difference in forms of government. An understanding of differences, and an acceptance of them at the outset, is perhaps the beginning of a sound approach of each nation to the other—differences in form of government, the people, newspapers and other institutions. For us to do our part properly, it is essential that our reporters move and write freely in Russia. ’

REFLECTIONS . . . By Peter Edson Health Bill Goes Through a Clinic

free to consult any doctor he chose. Any doctor could take or refuse any patient he chose, or could boycott national health insurance patients completely, remaining a private practice physician exclusively. Third, Dr. Sensenich claimed that under national health plans, medical service would deteriorate. By regimentation of both patients and doctors, it would be standardized at low levels of quality, because doc tors would have to treat so many more patients, Would it? The complaint of good doctors now is that they are so overworked they can't give as much attention to patients as they should. Doctors with not enough practice can’t make & good enough living to keep up with advances in their profession. Spreading the work might improve the quality of the serve ice. It's debatable. Next, it was claimed that national health insure ance would destroy the incentive of the physician, by putting the government between the physician and his patient—by making doctors. civil servants.

Clinics Offer Hope ONLY ACTUAL EXPERIENCE under the plan is going to prove that. It might work out that the doctors would find they had more incentive. If there were national health insurance, every doctor would know he would be paid for his services. The doctor's embarrassment at having to collect bills and dun deadbeats would end, and charity cases would be largely eliminated. Dr. Sensenich then claimed that national health insurance would tend to resume treatment of patients in clinics, and that too often in clinics the patients didn’t get well. The fact is that the practice of medicine has now become so specialized that no one doctor can know it all, and the hope of better medical care may come, through more clinics, not through less. Also, the clinic may offer the best hope of elimi nating one of the most serious abuses of private prac

| both patient and physician. Any patient would be tics—splitting of fees.

"TODAY IN EUROPE . . . By Randolph Churchill

Tito Now Expects Most From Russia

LONDON, April 23. —It is widely believed that the British government's decision, at the beginning of 1044, to withdraw their support from Gen. Draja Mikhailovitch’s forces in Yugoslavia and switch it entirely to the forces. of Marshal Tito was due to a desire to appease the Russians. There is no basis whatever for this belief. It is, of course, “true that Tito was trained in Moscow for five years. But the strange fact is that the Russians never did much -to help him in -Yugoslavia. They were too busy fighting their own battles to worry about him. ,

British Gave: First Help FIRST BRITISH MILITARY MISSION" at Tito's headquarters was established 11 months before the first Russian officers appeared in April, 1944. By this time, there were more than 20 British and American military missions serving with various units of Tito’s army, and many hundreds of -tons. of British and American food, clothiiig and military equipment were being dropped or landed every week. Subsequent to the arrival of the Russian: mission, small quantities of food and weapons were occasionally dropped from DC-3s which Had been supplied to the Russians under 1énd-lease. The food ‘that was dropped by the Russlans was invariably of American origin. "Far from the ‘Russians having: urged the British government to abandon Mikhailovitch in favor of Tito,. Foreign Commissar Molotov,. late in 1043, actually asked Anthony Eden, who was then British foreign secretary, whether the British would mind if: the Russians sent a mission to Mikhallovitch. Eden replied that the British government had just -decided to wing their missions from Mikhailoviteh’ and concentrat their support entirely on Tito. In these Circumstances, Eden. suggested it would be more

appropriate if the Russians sent a mission to Tito, This, a few months later, they did. rhe. British decision to withdraw their support from Mikhailovitch was based upon the following considerations: 1. The Tito movement had at least twice the popu=lar backing that was enjoyed by Mikhailovitch. 2. To continue to support both movements would only have meant ensuring a major civil war, once the Germans were driven out. 3. Tito’s Partisans had shown themselves capable of fighting in the most determined fashion against the German occupiers and were, in fact, holding down as many as 14 German divisions,

4. Though there was no evidence that Mikhail-

ovitch personally had ever collaborated with the Gere

mans, there was overwhelming evidence that nearly, - !

al his immediately subordinate commanders had done so. 1 These officers did not collaborate out of love of

the Germans, but out of fear of Tito's Partisans,

Tito Switch Militarily Correct THE BRITISH DECISION was in line, in general, with the pronouncement of Prime Minister Churchill in favor of helping anyone who would ‘fight the Hun.” There is no ‘doubt that, from the point of

view of winning the war as quickly as possible and |

with a minimum loss of life, the decision was correct. It is true it has yielded none since the war ended. lito. has manifested an »astonishing' ingratitude to those who helped him most. But, as Sir. Robert Walpole ‘once said, “Gratitude. is a lively sense of futiire favors.” Though .in the past Tito has owed more to Britain and America than he has to Soviet

Rusia, if, 1s plain that,” for the future, he expects

these roledhto be reversed,

». -

wy

Eels abe ey

oe

Mss

&

eo . Citi 3 akan sy ra . . ‘ 4 uy .

oa

Se

TUESD!

LIONE|

FILM

British-Bor In ‘H HOLLYWO! British-born trayer of mai died last n Palisades ho had followed monia. . With him x his fourth wi mother of his Atwill was: 61 Mr. Atwill whom he w: 1943, was Gen first wife, It was wl former Mrs, fatherly-appe: accused of wi He was plas bation after perjury charg tioning by a 1941. Witnes ‘ported thems a tiger skin In April, against Mr, / enable him Two months in Washingt Cromwell Ma of former U. ada James C( Mr. Atwill England, and school, Londo theatrical apy years ago. Coming ‘to 1916, he appe productions Grace George arine’ Corne! then signed h became a lor Cesses,

REPORT ARMY A

CHUNGKI! Vanguards of alist 1st an and equipped to have reac gateway to ( They were miles southw capital. Ther 80.000 Commi reported. The Natio reporting tl northward ti fighting was Nationalist vancing fro Changchun road between

Keép hir a Fisher | 8 inches tors mak In nature No-.draft proof Cl blue, 5.0

gui