Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 22 December 1942 — Page 22
ADAPT] TRAVEL IN oF ‘THE SNAKE LITERALLY ROLLS | ALONG, WITH ITS BODY LEAVING DISCONNECTED '§-SHAPED | IMPRINTS IN THE SAND.
40 So SoH ; pe = 0’
T. M. REG. U. S. PAT. OFF, ] 2, = Ze. | A JAPANESE ARE LATING SOME OF THE SILK THAT i THEY USED TO IMPORT/ THEY ARE EXTRACTING ‘VITAMIN B
| EROM SILKWORM COCOONS TO IMPROVE THEIR DIET. -
hoy
SSRRSSY
ANSWER—New"’ Guinea.
ee
QUAKE RUINS TURK TOWN [said today that it was feared thou#LONDON, Dec. 22 (U. P.).—Axis sands of persons had been killed by
PISTOLS AND CLAPPED // HOOPLE" LIK NUTS!
rt
{ LIKE ONT EGAD/! ALL THE
YEG HE POLICE F { HAD TODO WAS PICK H-XTASHE “UP THE BOOTLEG COFFEE \\ #2 WHICH WAS STREWN ABOUT
ELTE!
AW
AFTER THE POLICE PUT THE HI-
“a
he
“Nou 1
5 IN ESCROW, THEY FOUND IN BEHIND AN ALLEY WN {+ BUT YOU GET Tt JUST AS GOOD AS TOP AIR
IN THES Ps BILLING! MELEE ¢ rR mp Eo :
Ve see Tee
Anatolia area of Turkey yesterday which completely destroyed the town Erba.
at Emrich’s Famous Lower Prices
SUITES
“IDEAL FOR "CHRISTMAS GIVING!
Here's the answer to that. "gift for the family" problem. -Emeich's offers ... a huge selection of bedroom suites’ in every style . . . Period,” Modern, Colonial, Earl mare, ‘in the finishes our location save you money!
Lovely authentic heirloom and mahogany.
COCKTAIL
TABLES ~Cocktall ¢g
Lamp,
sional, Tier, %
“Drum,
American and many ou want, Let
$75 10
ANCES, Eh
v
SECRETARIES styling. Walnut
$40.50 to $79.50
Occa~
'the same decision. as the majority
and §
Sewing Cabine
+ of Occasional, = Lounge, ‘Rocker "and Tilt-Back is, “'$8:7510/$68100 $9.85 10:$2250
ny Taxi Downtown, R
(ED ITOR ABOUT ™ NT = COPR. 1942 BY NEA SERVICE, INC. T. u. REG v. 3! PAT. OFF. ~
RENO DIVORCES GET COURT 0. K.
Supreme Tribunal Upholds Nevada Action in Case Of N. Carolinians.
WASHINGTON, Dec. 22 (U. P.). —Nevada divorces today. have the inferential support of the United States supreme court, but only after one of the most vigorous disagreements of recent court history. = The court yesterday by a 6-t0-2 decision set aside a bigamy conviction of a North ‘Carolina couple— Mr: and Mrs. O. B. Williams of Pineola—who had divorced their former mates in Nevada. _ Bach of the defendants had divorced his former spouse in Nevada in 1940. The. North Carolina supreme court held the Nevada proceedings invalid ‘because one of the parties in each divorce was not served with the process in the state granting . the decree and was not present for the frial.
. Douglas Writes Opinion
the majority opinion,?Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone and Associate Justices Owen J. Roberts, Hugo I. Black, and Stanley F. Reed concurred. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote a separate opinion reaching
but for different reasons. Mr. Justice Douglas said that while North Carolina could “within the limits of her political power enforce her own marriage policy—an institution more basic in our civilization than any other’—society also
polygamous marriages: and in the protection of innocent offspring of marriages deemed legitimate in other jurisdictions.” " “Mr. Justice Douglas said that the
mitted that there was “probably enough evidence in the record to require that petitioners be considered ‘to have been actually domiciled in Nevada.” | 46%
State Power Involved
‘man to have two wives and a wife two husbands, should the North Carolina decision be upheld. Mr. Justice Douglas said the question involved was: the power of a state to alter the martial status of people domiciled within its pérders, “We see no reason,” he said, “and nonethas here been advanced, for making the existence of state“Bower depend on an inquiry as fo where the fault in each domestic dispute lies.” wits . Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr, Justice Jackson contended that the Williamses ‘had not had bona fide domiciles in" Nevada, and therefore were not properly divorced ‘from their previous spouses.
larly emphatic dissent, contended that although Nevada might make its own. divorce rules there was nothing in the constitution which
mestic policy of public morality.” There is an .¢lement of tragic
conceded. t, he t government results in a number of such incongruities, © ' Mr. Justice Murphy added that since marriage and the family are
the solution of problems connected
Justice William O. Douglas wrote|-
ima
raed
A
=
—
LI'L ABNER
ORNNNN
Ae
THE }|
S— 2-22
YOUR TRIF> OT MINERSTO \ | V - TO TH' RAILROAD \ \ OUR. CATTLE--WELL
{ RUINEC WHEN I
AKE A LOOK AT
THAT OUTFIT!
as. Yori 42-22 —FEy Al Capp
( \-WHO 18 TH’ L-LUCKY G-GAL Y-YO'
OH, HOW 6LAD AM T° SEE Mi MY SWEET! &! PLEASE NOY =| CALL ME THA S50 ll | NAME...OVER HER | 1 AM KNOWN : MO SO 1° MO GATHER
CMY JIM?
has an interest in the “avoidance of |.
North Carolina supreme court ad- |:
WELL --- WHY AREN'T YOU
\ » vt m
3
i
|
J
BUT MY SIM! WHAT
(AR. MY. JA! ALWAYS YoU E SUSPICIONS BECAUSE | A OF THE UGLY
SUPPOSE WE GET TO ENGLAND?
HAS HAPPEN
COPR. 1942 BY NEA SEF ' - .
SL
“He said it would be possible for a | HN
BOOTS AND HER BUDDIES.
Mr. Justice Murphy, in a particu- ||
TC a
3
“compels North Carolina to accept |] them.” Both states; he said, should be allowed to choose their own “do- |
incongruity in the fact that an in-|b dividual may be validly divorced in: ‘one state but not in another,” hel}.
added, our dual system of |{’
the basis of our national life and 5
with marriage had been left to.the|{ Et sta nflict arises be-{|
WEN THIS 46 TL WORERE. | oS SRCTORN LTE |
-
ax TARE NO
ELITE BUN 4 - ARRAD THE FOREMAN
ISNT GOWG TO V\WEL o 4
YOUR CHECKING NS AR (0:201 Te SAFT ARTS AT 7 0'aldCK
WAS A CLOSE ‘CALL! T DOWN SOW HOW-T 1
“MIND TO JAM M COAX IN HIS MOUTH
<\ z KNOW AD “TH PRESENCE OF |
-
SENEM |
STOP 1T,Y0L) LUNK= HEADED ROMEOS’ LET RED HAVE HEM!
OKAY, DUCH HE GETS’ EM!
MOU 1 DONT GET, ROME THIS MORWWNIG WY. 6:30
2
