Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 12 August 1939 — Page 10

> ‘Indianap olis: Times

(A anap NEWSPAPER) “ . MA RK

"Owned and publishes [EEE

gaily (except Sunday) by [= = The Indianapolis Times esteleme | cod

Price in Marion County, 3 cents a copy; deliv. ered by carrier, 12 cents . a week,

° Mail subscription rates in Indiana, $3 a vear; outside of Indiana, 65 cents a month.

bod RILEY 5551

Give: Light and the People wa Find Thetr own. Way

* Member of United Press, Scripps - Howard News‘paper - Alliance, NEA Service, and ‘Audit Bureau: ini Circulation.

SATURDAY, AUGUST 12, 1939

INSURANCE | SUPPLANTING CHARITY

HE broadened social security program, which ‘became ‘law under President Roosevelt's signature yesterday, is ‘one of utmost importance to all Americans. 1t is one ‘with which every. ¢itizen should become. familiar.

For while its immediate benefits are only for those who are needy now—the indigent, the aged, fthe blind, the. de_pendent children—its long-range benefits are for the; much larger segment of the population comprising - the families who today are self-supporting, but who some Ly may join the ranks of the needy. - °°. ; The most important part of fhe 1 new program; is that which undertakes not only to make workers in private: industry secure in their own old age, but also to extend this insuranée protection to: their families. - And .it is so. designed that these monthly benefits will be paid-in the future

‘not as a matter of charity, but as a matter of right—insur-:

ance bought by premiums’ .currently paid through payroll taxes of employers and employees.

. Every- one of the 45,000,000 workers who alteady: lave £ secounts under the old-age insurance system, and of the 1,100,000 additional workers for whom accounts will soon be established, should be eager to find out-what the broadened program means in dollars-and-cents protection to himself and his family. And in this connection, the Social Security Board faces a Jmajor, task in fusking that information accessible, to all.

GOOD NEWS

“HE week’s best news comes fsom Atlantic City. : ~ For many years the construction of buildings with ‘union labor ‘has been. hampered by jurisdictional feuds. Carpenters have walked out because metal sash was being installed by ‘metal workers. Disputes ‘between plasterers and sheet-metal men over the right ‘to install metal lath have stopped all work. - Contractors, to prevent walkouts, ‘have had to pay skilled union engineers full wages just to start-a small puinp in the morning and turn it off. at night. Union electricians have been hired at full pay to close a switch at 7 a. m. and open itat 5 p. m. Delay, expense, waste and plain silliness have multiplied. =~ - !

“"Now,- at Atlantic City, a joint statement is issued by the American Federation of Labor’s Building Trades Department and the Associated General Contractors of America, in which they agree on a formula for abolishing jurisdictional strikes.

-

. Hereafter, under the agreement, Where a jurisdictional |:

dispute DoCUrs there is to be no stoppage of work.: Which-

ever union is ‘in possession of the work” when a:dispute |

arises shall eontinue.to perform the work, pending a decision by the head of the Building Trades Department, * Difficulty may be encountered in administering the new rule. - The individual building-trades unions are jealous of ‘their independence and of -their “rights.” Orders and advice from A. F. of L. headquarters in Washington :aie not always honored with alacrity. But here is a reform so greatly needed—a reform which will help labor, help the _ builders, and help ‘the general interests of recovery. by removing a needless deterrent to construction—that even the most independent of union leaders should: see-the wisdom of co-operating. America needs millions of new homes, Money to build them is idle in the banks. “Anything that will help bring the need and the money together will-help recovery.

DEPENDENT GOVERNMENTS

S everyone knows, State governments are: becoming increasingly dependent on financial assistance from the

Federal Government, and local governments are becoming |

increasingly dependent on financial ‘assistance from the ~ States. "Prof. V. O. Key Ir, of Johns Hopkins University, has made a study of Federal grants-in-aid which reveals some facts that aren’t known to everyone about how far the process of dependency has gone. He reports that: ~ -- The:revenue of all the States in 1938 totaled 33, 165, - 000, 000. “Of - that sum, $622, 500, 000—about one-fifth—came from the Federal Treasury, whereas, in 1920, Federal _ grants-in-aid to the States totaled only. $37,600, 000. . Likewise, counties and cities in 1938 depended upon ‘State grants for about one-fifth of their total revenues.

- The Federal grants to States did not take into account WPA and other forms of Federally-ananced unemployment relief. They did inchide: * For: ‘Social Security, $266,049,000; for roads and highways, $218,637,000; for. the National Guard, $38,789,797; for employment ‘offices, $37,377,830; for vocational education and rehabilitation, $21,220,344 ; for public health services, $8,911, 624; for agricultural extension work, $17,251, “954; for agricultural experiment stations, $6,229,004; for land. grant. colleges, $4,530,000; for State soldiers and sailors’ homes, $649,884; for State marine schools, $75,000. Noting’ these. figures, the Baltimore Evening Sun concludes that they can be considered complacently only if it is good: for the States to lose freedom of judgment and action. “For that freedom,” it warns, “will inevitably be the price of grants-in-aid.” » ; ‘States which ‘rély upon. the Federal Government for : financial support have to obey orders from the Federal Government about how ‘the money shall be spent.’ The game is true of. cities and counties which rely upon their State governments for financial support. Every government which accepts financial dependence surrenders something of its. political independence. No: getting away, from

mat You, ¢ as a citizen, ‘may consider all this nothing to view ‘with alarm. But at least; with the States now 20 per cent dependent on the Federal .Government, and with the cities : gud counties now. 20 per cent dependent on the States, you'll ‘have ve to admit we're well on OUT Way. to centralized control

of all 6

. a ‘larger number of people. . ‘to married persons with $2500 -g year income and over

"of bargain.

Fair Enough

Tees | By Westbrook Pegler

Mr. Steinbeck's ‘Grapes of Wrath' May Be a Great Novel, but Some of Its Language Borders on Obscene. EW YORK, Aug. 12—Aside from the problem

which it consciously propounds and leaves unanswered, John Steinbeck’s book, “Grapes of Wrath,”

incidentally raises another which has not been men- : tioned at all by the reviewers who praised the Rove] i

for its power and sympathy. That is the question whether our newspapers and magazines and most of our authors—indeed, the whole

| American people—are prigs and sissies or Steinbeck | writes obscene literature.

This book contains the dirtiest language that I have ever seen on paper. Some of the expressions which Steinbeck permits himself are reeking filth by the common standards,

‘and it is no exaggeration to say that any newspaper or

popular magazine which published such language habitually would be annihilated by the combined anger of the clergy and. the mass of conventional citizens. ;

The restraints which the papers and magazines im- :

pose on themselves in deference to public taste and morals, as we judge them in journalism, are such that it were tempting economic tragedy and courting jail to print representative samples out of “Grapes of Wrath” even for purposes of illustration.

ENERALLY _ speaking, Americans have

two

languages, one for stag company and one for |

mixed, There is some overlap, to be sure, and of recent’ years some expressions are used in: mixed

company and even by women among themselves which.

formerly were held to be the exclusive property of men. Curiously, the use of such terms, even some that by common consent and general avoidance are deemed to be vile, may raise no question as to the morals of the individual who utters them. Not long ago a woman who used certain words would have been considered “loose,” but now only her taste, not her morals, may be questioned on that ground, and the worst that can be said of her is that she is “no. lady.” -What I- wonder 1s why the people permit book writers to employ language which is familiar to practically all of us and not resented or even avoided by most men but forbid it in their papers and magazines and ‘whether they actually do forbid us to use

4t in the popular prints.

AYBE we wouldn't be annihilated at all, for some of the picture magazines, under a pretext of realism and education, have used photographs as naked and shocking to the old convention standards ‘ds anything which Mr. Steinbeck has done. with words, and they enjoyed great popularity until the

people had ;seen about all {there is to be seen of the

human race. - But even though this be the American language, I doubt that Mr. Steinbeck or any of his public will

‘live until the day when it is used from the pulpit by

a popular preacher or in the popular prints in little, occasional,” daring single violations of the accepted code. If this is the valid American language, then Americans, for most of their reading, prefer an alien or dead one, for newspapers never -get any letters from readers demanding more profanity, blasphemy and common: filth, On the other hand, I: think it would be amusing to go through Mr. Steinbeck’s book with a pencil and substitute for ‘his authentic American. the standard

awkward: evasions which are used in'thié press and

understood and approved by the public.

Business By John T. Flynn

= Move Afoot to Broaden Tax Base Without Ending - Invisible Levies.

EW. YORK, Aug. 12.—A strange tun ;has been given to the agitation for what is called . a “broader tax base.” A.great deal is going to be heard about this phrase in the coming year. It means simply that income taxes should be assessed against Instead of being limited

and unmarried persons with $1000 and over, the tax is

"to ‘be so framed that everybody -will pay something.

The people of the United States—and particularly the. ‘working people—should make very sure that they understand what this is all about, and here is a very brief and simple outline of what is involved. First of all, there is a powerful argument for this

‘broad base for income taxes. Here it is.. Taxes are

of several kinds. One division is into visible and invisible taxes. Visible taxes are those which a man pays directly to the Government—taxes which he can see in the very act of passing out of his pocket into the pocket of the Government. Invisible taxes are those which a man pays, but is not aware of paying. Invisible taxes are great favorites with politicians because the fellow who pays them does not feel them and ‘does not realize he is-being taxed. For this reason: the politicians have imposed little or no income taxes on people with incomes under $2500. Such people are too numerous. Their votes count. And those who do not pay income taxes think that the Government is being supported by the rich.

But They Pay Plenty.

- Instead, they - are taxed—and terribly taxed— through invisible taxes, taxes on the food they eat,

-on their gasoline, on their clothes and beauty prepa-

rations, on their drinks, etc. Now a large number of men have denounced this. They have said that the invisible taxes should be abolished and instead the small income people should be subjected to income taxes only, so that they would know how much they were being soaked. The. politicians, however, have opposed it. "But now the Administration is talking about broadening the base, that is, finally imposing income taxes on millions of small-income people. That is sound. But they do not plan to abolish the invisible taxes. Those who have been clamoring for this broad base have been asking for it as a substitute for the invisible burdens. They have .not asked for it in addition to the invisible burdens. They have urged it as a means of relieving the poor from being soaked.

A Woman's Viewpoint By Mrs. Walter Ferguson ia:

“YT has been my observation,” says an eminent jurist who finds himself in legal difficulties after a love affair with his ‘erstwhile stenographer, “that no banker will ever give credit to a man who has had domestic troubles aired in court.” . Our knowledge of bankers causes us to doubt this statement. Most members of the profession whom ‘it has been our pleasure to meet, emphasized collateral rather than morals in their business dealings, even though the implication bebing the jurist’s wise words is clear.

It’s bad business for men to get sized up in love |

affairs with their own or other men’s stenographers. It’s worse. business, still, for them to divorce timetested wives ‘to ‘take’ up with younger women who may be attracted to their charms, but who are more often interested in their cash. - A - For practical souls—and. aren't men always boasting about their practical qualities?—oldish gentlemen seem particularly susceptible to flattery. Bald, fat men, grizzled, lean and wrinkled men, stupid men, intelligent men—they’re all alike about this. No matter what their mirrors tell them, they are convinced of their power to ‘fascinate and, therefore, fall a quick prey to mercenary females. | When they find themselves fleeced in the bargain they have made, no one else feels sorry. They got what they deserved, we say. the cheater finds himself chea For, in spite of our sophistication, most of us hold fast to the belief that men: who are “disloyal 3 Sod Wifes wl he uniiusiwostiy in otiér ways, 3.01 the bust colaifel fox aby, sie}

Fon Ae Ae om an

Justice still exists when : ted.

{

You AINT

SuPcRS STITIoUS

The Hoosier Forum

1 wholly disagree with what yow say, but wilt defend to the death your right to say it. ~Volgire,

DOUBTS HATCH ACT CAN BE ENFORCED By Raymond H. Stone

American politics is not anything |

but ‘American politics. ‘Whoever thinks of it in terms of other lands guesses wrong.

The ‘Hatch Act will be as unen- : forceable as prohibition. The har-|

ness may shine, but the mule won’t wear it. Between civil service and civil servitude there is a world of difference. s un SUGGESTS TENT CITY FOR

OUSTED WPA WORKERS By W. C. G. By Aug. 31 about 25,000 WPA families in the state will be removed from . the payrolls. Many ask the question: What will these people do? - ‘The public which has common. sénse knows these people cannot obtain work even if our ‘Sen-

ators and Representatives do not;

know Ait. : “As a matter of fact, these WPA people may not even be able to obtain relief from -the trustees. The trustees right now are trying to figure: where they will. get the money, to carry this additional load. I am one of these WPA people. I have -talked to many others anc there prevails an undercurrent of restlessness that borders on insurrection and may later lead to violence. ° I appeal to these fellow

| workers to be sensible—to use com-

mon, horse sense. Don’t knock at the penitentiary door. That’s not an answer to the problem at all.’ Face the facts. There is no use kidding ourselves. When we cannot pay rent we will be dispossessed. No one will carry us along for rent as they did prior to WPA. ‘When we are out in the street it will be pretty hard to figure, so I suggest that we figure right now. Some may ‘ have relatives or friends who will take them in. Several families ‘may move into one home. However this costs something and if we have nothing, how can we do ‘even this? Here’s what I suggest: Use your last pay check to buy a tent. There| will be plenty right here in Center Township to start a tent city. We have community gardens so surely someone will donate the land for this purpose. I suggest the tent city be called Economy Block. The trustees should furnish some food. Perhaps enough to live on in a fashion. This will enable us to stay alive and be a living monument to those who feel the good, old U. S. A. is not a land of plenty other than for the few who wish to discard the motto of “God Bless our Home: 2

: T imes readers are invited to express their views in these columns, religious controversies excluded. ~ Make _ your letter short, so all can have a chance. Letters must be signed, but names will be withheld on request.)

CRITICIZES ATTACK ON LABOR BOARD

By L. G. R. . Your paper seems to be a friend of labor yet on quite a few occasions Ludwell Denny has taken stands’ that lead me to wonder if the critics aren’t right in saying Scripps-Howard is out to sabotage the cause of dabor—subtly, but surely nevertheless, The friends of labor do ‘not. want a labor board investigation now or

board has had a chance to function. William Allen White of the : National Policy Board and Frank - P. Walsh both protested any change. while Scripps-Howard quotes: any “name” in favor of its pet measures, no voice at all was given to this distinguishied opposition. : Also Mr. Denny was very quick to point out that Lewis’ verbal char-

acterization of Vice President Gar-.

ner might have been “below the belt” yet failed to note that labor itself was not getting a hearing before Congress or the public.

If this attack of Lewis was ‘not

calculated, as I think it was, I still think it a very smart stroke for getting labor’s cause before the newsreading public. He didn’t say anything about Garner that wasn’t already: known anyway. Garner: always has typified that element of

‘than welcome.

| PROBLEM FOR INDUSTRY

‘By Cynie any amendments passed until the:

politics that makes secret decisions in smoke-filled back rooms which I have. always detested. If Garner can feel that he is being glamourized by Lewis’ attack, -he’s more He's the last man I'd want to see President. So, when you advocate “gerting the labor. act right” as you do, I don’t think you are a sincere friend

fore amendments are passed, let the board have its limitations outlined by the courts. “When the courts have spoken and the powers of the Board are made reasonably definite and cértain, then amendment should be considered, and to amend the

law wisely Congressional hearings then will be material and relevant.” |.

In your stand youre “yes-but-ing”

in the same way the President did].

on the Hatch bill. : 8. ® 2 "| SEES" “WPA. LAYOFFS ib

Your editorials are improving. During the session of Congress they had a tang of reaction. Today they

recognize’ more fully: the social responsibility of business as an in-

tegral ‘part of our national well-|

being. - The question of “WPA layoffs ought to be worked out with industry.. (There ought to be jobs made in industry before these people are economically ' disfranchised. These jobs should be planned by industry in conference with the relief administration.” The problem of personality and qualification is ‘a very serious matter in finding jobs for the relief workers. If business cannot find jobs and ‘accept responsibility for employment for all on relief, then its plea for reduction of Teller is worse than cruel.

New Books at the Library

ay vital facts in the case of modern. India in her “India of the Princes” (Gifford), Rosita Forbes unrolls against a brief but solid background of Indian history a view of life, thought,

land custom prevalent in the 40 per

cent of the peninsula living under the rulers of the 675 states of IQdian India. Of these many priveraliijes | which arose from the ashes of the old Moghul Empire, 73 find their princes entitled to the title “Highness,”

while the great rulers of the “Big

Side Glances—By Galbraith _

W

glamour of {bristling ‘facades of their turreted |

Five,” meluting His Exalted Highness, the Nizam of Hyderabad, who is India’s premier prince and perhaps. the world’s richest man, and the Princes of Mysore, Baroda, Gwalior and Kashmir receive the salute of 21. guns and have “unre-

strained ‘powers of life and death |

over their subjects.” The details of these many and complex states, their Chamber of

with the government of British Incommentary on the personalities of the rulers and the Arabian Nights ir courts behind the

castles.

Forbes revels, is nowhere more aptly illustrated. than in the tales of this unique land, teeming with its

" |polyglot of race, religion and cul|ture. The Oxford accent meets the

ancient dialect of the primitive tribe so low in civilization’s scale that it feels itself akin to trees. Modern feminists observe strict Purdah.

drive their own Rolls Royces or pilot planes ‘at 200 miles an hour. . Here .are stories of religious: pilgrimages to the sacred Ganges, of

the ground to elephants and take refuge above in the branches.

LIBERTY By ROBERT O. LEVELL

The: day is sweet, joy’ is complete When happy a8 can be, To know our land can be so grand ‘When we are glad and free.

y! DAILY THOUGHT

And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness;

' for a man’s life consisteth not in

the abundance of the things 2s he . ii «~=8t. Luke

water,

Gen. Says— z

‘chief a

| an absolutely necessary labor member.

industry,”

‘Mr. Rosenwald turned out to be unavailable.

simply as a dancer.

notion to which I a

Princess at Delhi, their. relations | dia, are - -combined with a colorful |

Paradox supreme, in which Rosita |

Hereditary princes tracing | their| | linedge back to mythical deities]

fabulous jewels stored for gemera- |! -{tions, deep. in guarded vaults, of .|sleges, of wars in which every man and woman perished, of tiger hunts, | {and of: tree people who surrender

“| four years; three small or yellow vegetables; two to three servings s "dried beans, peas or servings a week of other vegetables or fruits.

Johnson

Claims Vatorans. of" War Waciirios Board Slighted in - Appointment Of New National Defense Group. ASHINGTON, Aug. 12—At the beginning of the

‘World War, American industry was as far ahead of the industries of other countries as it is to-

| day. Yet, for 11 months after we entered the war, it

floundered around like a bear in a net until it had so

| entangled itself that our “industrial mobilization” was

threatened with scandalous failure. On March 4, 1918, it was given a commander-fn-a general staff—B. M. Baruch and the so-called {War Industries Board. It took that board some months merely to disentangle the mess. But, before the Armistice, it had done a job of which there never has been substantial criticism. at home or abroad. No other nation, at the end, had either so

swift oreffective an industrial mobilization.

The ‘Administration has just announced a, new copy of the War Industries Board—except that it lacks It is to be “advisory” now, but ‘it will take over industry in ihe old capacity in case of an emergency.

2 8% =

Te some esheets this} ballyhoo, Thete'ls no sais

utory authority for such a board either now or for war. But it'is a clear announcement of intent and policy. Many mistakes were made and unknown seas explored by the War Board. Several of the Phos who did/the job are still alive and active. B. M. Baruch oe the genius of the earlier effort. Yet neither ‘Mr. Baruch nor anybody else who ‘was

on the. War Industries Board is named for this one. “There is a sirupy statement that these “elder states-

men”—the old board—will be ‘‘consulted.” The

sincerity of this obvious implication may be judged

by the fact. that some of the “elder statesmen” of the war-time board are younger than some of these

.men. Delay and waste and loss of blood and billions

could be avoided if at least some of that experience had been saved. ~The new appointees’ are all inexperienced in this work, but excellent choices—at the very top in their separate’ fields. None ever criticized or opposed this Administration. Yet the industrial positions of three of them violate a fundamental principle proved ‘in the war by trial and error to be indispensible. No man can step into the dictatorial Federal direction of competitive industry who, himself, is the head of, or heavily - interested, in a competing unit of that .

UT that isn’t the point—which is that it wit can’t be done. Exactly such a case arose dur-

‘ing the war and one of these new appointees, Gen.

Wood, is the successor in an industrial company to ‘the great patriot and industrialist involved there—

‘Julius: Rosenwald. His conduct was: wholly blame-

less. Yet, because he was interested in one business he was administering, there was such protest that ‘How can the head of the U. S. Steel Corp. be named: to administer the whole steel industry in war? There is a question about my writing this. piece. I am personally involved. But the animosity against me is perfectly justified. I have no kick whatever. So, knowing exactly what goes on here and what is behind it, I am not going to keep my mouth shut

about higofed, blundering, partisan Bn bow of

of 1abor, much 6s I Tegrit 1. He.| Do ional defence in a Hm of great danger.

It Seems to Me By Heywood Broun

Sally Rand Is Big Business Now; Maybe She'll Help New York Fair.

AN FRANCISCO, Aug. 12—I had seen Miss Sally Rand on numerous occasions, but several years

| elapsed before it was my privilege to meet the young :|'lady with her clothes on. And with all due deference ‘to the dancing of the little miss, be it with fan or

bubble, I believe she gains rather than loses as

she adds attire.

Symbolically, this is the life story of Sally Rand,

‘half-calf edition, three dollars and fifty cents. Miss ‘Rand started at the foot of the ladder and worked

her way up. - She has built a bubble into a substantial institution. This Rand is also a gold mine. : Politically Miss Rand is well to the right of Gypsy Rose Lee and: Anne Corrio. ‘ Indeed, it is my distinct impression that among the nudes and semi-nudes of radio, stage and screen Miss ‘Rand is ‘the lone Republican. © ‘Of course, 1 is a mistake to think of Sally Rand She has a ranch right in the middle of the San Francisco Fair and a night club on the mainland. Indeed, it is possible that presently she will go East to lend a hand to Grover Whalen. Sally Rand in her own right is big business, naked and unashamed. But she has a gift of humor which

has been denied to Mr. Weir or Mr. Girdler. And

Sally Rand neither blushes nor goes purple if ideas are presented to her with which she is in disagreement. As the proprietor of a combined saloon and salon Miss Rand has kept her mind open. It is

‘not muffled. deep in woolens. And yet I would advise

no agitator to try to sneak up .on Sally Rand.

She’s Full of New Ideas

- Miss Rand beckoned for one of her waiters and added piously, “I always say it is an evil thing for anybody to speak ill ‘of his employer. Don’t : you

_ agree with me, Mr. Broun?”

This took me somewhat by surprise, for it 18 a e given Tittle thought one way or another. And e my mind was not made up, I gave an evasive answer, with the hope that I may

have a chance to discuss it further with Miss Rand

- when she goes to New York in the spring to save the “exposition. Her plan is entirely formulated, if only

it proves feasible. “All I want,” said the bubble dancer, “tg a tract in the center of the Fair where I can operate Sally Rand’s dog. track with mutuel betting. The. greyhounds will be led to the post by girls from my nude ranch out here.” Her eyes began to glow with all the fervor of a poet. “Sport, sex and gambling—how gan i beat that combination?” exclaimed Miss Sally an ;

Watching Your Health

By Jane Stafford restricted diet, planned by Government sci-

HE T entists for emergency use only, requires very care-

ful buying. This diet plan may not provide enough of the protective foods (milk, eggs, tomatoes and green vegetables) to insure good health over an indefinite period, so every penny must be carefully spent to get as much of these foods as possible. Following this plan a family of four could be fed for about $6.15, Government home economists found.

‘For two, the cost would be about $3.25, and for seven “it would come to $10.50. All these prices, of course, "will vary somewhat with the seasons and the size and

location of the town where you do your marketing. In this plan you allow. one pint of milk dally tor each child and one cup for each adult.

Vegetables and fruits: Eight to nine’ a.

week of potatoes and sweet potatoes per I ‘to three

servings a week of tomatoes (or of citrus fruits in season) for each adult and child over 4 years;

four to six tablespoons of tomato juice or two

spoons of orange juice daily for each. child: under gmall servings a week of leafy, green ot peanuts; three to Te Eggs: Once a week for adults; twice for childre under 4 years. Meat or Fish: Two servings a week (mire freqremly if the meat dish is often a meat and cereal combination). © = A cereal dish usually twice a day. Na Bread in some form at every m Dessert occasionally, such as cereal | pudding, io-

-gerbread, or one-egg cake, and dri ‘inexpensive kinds.

For the family of four, three pounds of i ars

allowed spaly weels iif thes atl Hiroe fours pounts T= covetous 1 man pines In| plenty, like Tantalus up to the} ; chin in and yet thirsty —T.|

-

Te 4