Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 28 October 1938 — Page 20

~The

Indianapolis Times — EAR SCRIPPS-HOWARD NEWSPAFLE) hs :

a W. HOWARD - LUDWELL DENNY * + MARK FERREE ~ President = 5 ‘+ © Business Manager .- Owned. and published daily (except Sunday) by : The Indianapolis Times Publishing - Co.,, 214 W, * Maryland ‘ St. ~ E

. Member of United Press, Scripps = Howard Newspaper Alliance. NEA . Service, and Audit Bureau of - ations,

- ty, 8 dents a copy; delivered by carrier, 12 cents a week.

in Indiana, $3 a year: outside of Indiana, 65 - cents 8 month.

Rlley 5851

Give IAght and the People Wilt Find Their Own Way

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1938

MAYOR HAGUE REBUKED

‘NAAYOR “I-AM-THE-LAW” HAGUE received a deserved rebuke yesterday from Federal Judge William Clark. Judge Clark, ruling on a suit brought by the American “Civil Liberties Union and the C. L O., ordered Jersey City officials to stop’ violating the constitutional rights of union organizers and union sympathizers. Specifically, Mayor Hague and his police were told not to deport from Jersey City people whom they consider undesirable; not to inter_fere with the right to carry placards and distribute leaflets and circulars; not to interfere with the right to speak-in ‘ public places wher permits have been sought. And is Mayor Hague’s face red? Not very, we fear. The rest of the country should be grateful 16 Judge Clark for asserting that the Constitution - of the:United States still stands superior to the will of : Jersey City’s - dictator. But Mayor Hague, having just cemented a new political alliance with the President of the

ho +

United States, is hardly likely tobe impressed as he ought

to be:by the disapproval of a Federal judge. - ‘JAPAN SLAMS THE DOOR =~ = :

BEHIND Uncle Sam’s note to Tokyo protesting against

slamming‘ the open door in China is. something far ‘bigger and more important than the right of an American ‘businessman to sell American products to the Chinese. And that is this: Has any nation the right, moral or

- otherwise, to hold up the general welfare bx building a

wall around portions of the earth and keeping out the rest ‘of the world? a : , That question was answered some 40 years ago, cate.gorically and in the negative. Then, as now, China was in turmoil. For a time she was in danger of partition. But ‘thanks largely to an American Secretary: of State, John Hay, she was saved. He insisted that no nation had the right to destroy the sovereignty of China but “that all ‘nations should have simple equality of opportunity there in the customary ways of trade. And other nations agreed. The Hay doctrine was the doctrine of the open door. Under it China would have a chance to develop in her own way. ‘menaced, the United States rededicated the doctrine by including it in the Nine Power Treaty of Washington. That treaty formally pledged all signatories to respect the sovereignty, territorial and administrative integrity of China, to maintain the principle of equal opportunity for the commerce and industry of all nations, and to refrain

from taking advantage of conditions there to seek special

privileges that would abridge the rights -of citizens of friendly states. ! . Japan signed that pact of her own free will, along with the United States and other powers. Yet today, as the American protest reveals, she is tearing to pieces ‘what little remains of that understanding. The Japanese have already driven American and other foreign enterprise out of . Manchuria, and today aré in process of doing the same south of the great wall, As fast as their troops gain control of Chinese territory, they set up puppet governments and through them organize monopolies to drive American and other businessmen from the field. To say that this is dishonest is to express it mildly. Yet to protest will probably prove futile. Japan knows she is violating solemn pledges, but doesn’t care. She knows she wants the 450,000,000 people of China for her own exclusive customers, and thinks she can get away with-it. So let the protests fly. : What Japan is doing in Asia rivals what Germany is doing in Europe. Principle and decency have been thrown to the winds by the outlaw states, and force is the only thing that counts. Germany, Japan and the other dictator states are out to take what they can, and the weak are simply out of luck. : : ; The moral is that any nation that expects to hold its own and survive must be strong. : :

CARL R. VONNEGUT

FoR almost 90 years the name of Vonnegut has been

." intimately associated with the business and cultural life of this community. The Fifties saw the founding of this widely known hardware company, the Nineties saw the sons of. Clemens: Vonnegut Sr. enter the business and carry on, and the Twenties still another generation beginning to carry om. : Carl R. Vonnegut, whose untimely death at 36 was recorded in these columns yesterday, represented the third generation associated in this family’s enterprises. As general manager of one of the company’s major departments and as manager of one of the branch stores, he had already assumed responsible duties. We share with the family the sorrow they must feel at his death, a sorrow doubly keen

because it ends so promising a career.

AMERICANS ALL | T the recent German Day celebration in San Francisco the president of the United German Societies, Herman Luft, quoted the following statement: “This is our land. Its welfare is our welfare. Its honor is our honor. Its greatness is our -greatness. Its future is our future. Our freedom originates in the freedom of all. In this Republic there is no German politics . . and I believe that I represent the opinion of my comrades of German descent when I say that in this Republic there shall be no German nor any other foreign politics—no politics that seeks to serve foreign interests, at the same time placing American interests in the background.” Those were the words, first spoken at Cincinnati in 1897, of that fine German-American, Carl Schurz, who commanded a Union Army Corps in the Civil War, served in Lincoln’s. Cabinet as friend and adviser, and lived for many: years thereafter as an exemplar of the best in Americanism. We wish those words might be read and reread to all those who attend meetings of the German-American “bunds” and other organizations which seek American support for

foreign ideologies—which threaten to transplant to this

hates and intolerances of pe.

Price iri Marion Coun-

‘Mail subscription rates’

.are appalled by the graff and crime as though no-

Some two decades later, when she was again

‘wife who seemed eager to submit her will to-mine,

By Westbrook Pegler

‘He Would Stop This Knocking’ of |” New York by Out-of-Staters Who

Are Making a Good ‘Living There.

EW YORK, Oct. 28.—Yes, I know what the Constitution says. But, still and all, they come piling in here in hordes with a cardboard suitcase and a letter of introduction to someone who has preceded them to take advantage of the opportunities, und yet you will find thousands of them who never do come to feel that they belong here. Instead they send our good

money back home and cling together to keep alive the | . 58

old traditions and avoid being assimilated. And all

the time they are knocking and yearning for the day |

when they have made a pile here so that they.can go home again and live like kings. sd

You do a little nosing around in New York and jou | §

will find little groups and state societies—Hoosiers

talking about the frost on the pumpkin and singing |

about the banks of the Wabash, Southerners talking ‘about their old colored mammies and singing about the fields of snowy white, Californians who were starving to death when they left home, yelling “Cali-. fornia, Here I Come!” and even Kansans, giving themselves a buildup about the. joys and kind fraternity of life on the steppes. ee nw HAT I say is, if they loved it so well back where they came from why didn’t they stay there? And if they are so fastened to the simple honesty and charm of life back home, well, the trains and busses still keep regular schedules. But ‘can you picture a Hoosier going back to the candlelight which gleams through the sycamores in the song they l6ve to sing and unclutching a swell job in New York at 10 times the most he ever made back .liome? Candlelight! That is a hot one! Let the power go off for one night in New York on account of some labor trouble, for in-. stance, and give them just a little dose of that candlelight stuff and listen to the squawks. :

And clannish! One comes to town, hustles around |

for a few years, makes a nice little spot for himself, meanwhile sending New York dough home, and pretty soon he has got his nephew or his fraternity brother from old Siwash, or Spearfish, planted in the office while New York boys walk the streets with nothing in their pockets and nothing to do. Then there comes along his deceased sister’s daughter just out of college and he sends her in for a job with another backhomer up the street, and the first thing anybody knows there is a regular hatch of them earning a living in New York—constantly knocking New York and treating the regular New Yorkers like dirt under their feet.

s 2 =

oO" moves into & neighborhood and pretty soon there is a regular island of them. One throws his business orders to the other and vice versa, and if there comes ga little squeeze from one of, the natives to obtain some business or a job, why, that only goes to prove what a lousy town New York is. And they

body ever used the squeeze or stuck up a jug back home. In Oklahoma or Ohio, for instance. Yes, I know what the Constitution says, but I say if this town is good enough to make a living in they ought to have to make up their mind whether they are going t0 be New Yorkers or not, and if not go back where they came from. Or, anyway, quit hollering about how they wish they were back there when everybody knows you couldn’t bribe them to give up the soft living and big money they get here.

Business By John T. Flynn

Wallace's Dumping Plan Appears To Be an Extension of the FSCC.

EW YORK, Oct. 28.—Secretary Wallace continues to play with the idea of dumping food in America Instead of abroad.- But as hé develops that idea it grows thinner and, apparently, completely disassociates itself from the problems of the wheat and corn and such basic crop producers. It becomes, in fact, little more than an extension of the present Commodity Surplus Corp. This is liable to be a major issue in the next Presidential election, so it is just as well to: get it cleared up now. . The Republicans are playing with the idea of what is called the two-price system for the great basic crops—wheat, corn, tobacco, cotton and one or two others. The essence of this system is to divide the harvested crop into two parts—one part to be sold in America, the other part to be sold abroad. On ihe part to be sold in America the producers would be guaranteed a satisfactory price. On the part to be Sod abroad the farmers would have to take the world price. : : Now to counter this, stories were printed to the effect that the Secretary and the President were convinced that if there were to be any dumping of American crops on the market at a low price, they snould be dumped on the market of the American poor. But as the discussion develops it now turns out that Mr. Wallace is thinking about dumping on the American market, not wheat and corn and cotton and tobacco, but™oranges, lemons, apples, cabbage and other such crops. The plan does not compete with the two-price plan at all in relation to the great basic crops.

A Different Purpose

Mr. Wallace is talking about something that has been going on already for sometime. The Commodity

Surplus Corp. has been buying up various kinds of |

crop surpluses and distributing them free to the poor on relief. : This, of course, sounds like a beautiful thing and whenever it is discussed by the Triple A it is discussed as a great relief measure. But that is not its object. Its object is primarily to keep the prices of these crops up to American consumers. They select the crops the farmers want to have price-raised, Hence we find them buying up sweet potatoes, eggs, applesauce, cabbages, rutabagas, cauliflowers, onions, etc. They may not buy a great deal—though it sounds like a lot in pounds—and it does not go very far in relief. But it tends to keep the prices of these articles up to those not on relief. After all, this is the Government of the people who work for small wages and who are not on relief and who find the prices of the foods they buy raised by this process. It is the extension of this system which the President is talking about. :

A Woman's Viewpoint By Mrs. Walter Ferguson

1 59 per cent of American women object to the word “obey” in the marriage service. Although the figure may sound encouraging, I hope the men won't feel too set up, since there's no sire

proof that the remaining 41 per cent would keep the Vow, no matter how willing they may have been to repeat the silky sounding word. : - Wives heve never obeyed their husbands, except when such obedience served their purpose. Sometimes to do so meant economic security and often their daily bread, but in that case. they could make their spouses so uncomfortable that out-and-out rebellion would have been pleasanter to live with, It's senseless to say that a mature woman should obey a8 man, even if she is married to him, although many. of us believe she is wise to be guided by his Judgment. And I've known instances when it would

have been well for all concerned if the man had

obeyed the wife, : Marriage, in every respect, is & healthier, happier state with the objectionable word deleted from the vows. In spite of our many divorces, this is true. Genuine obedience comes from the heart and for that reason genuine obedience was something ihe oldfashioned, domineering Lord of the Household did not have, even though his women answered him with

butter-soft: words. For marriage is essentially a work |:

of art, not a state of slavery for either partner. . Nobody realizes this more than the average boy. and girl of this generation, whose efforts in its behalf are truly admirable, ; re If I were a man I would immediately suspect a

for I would think she was lacking in character or d deceive me at the first opportunity. In marriage as in ther always to

een !—By Talburt =

"Me. Hopes to See His Team Win ~~ Tomorrow, but if It Is Beaten, ~sHe's Glad It'll Be by the Irish.

| XXTASHINGTON, Oct. 26.~There is a lot that

V should be written about today, the President's lecturing of a Congressional committee, Mr.” Aubrey Williams’ whitewash of himself in WPA, the proposed 7000 airplane program, the fall of Hankow. But I am going to write about the Army-Notre Dame game. I am going, but I ought not to go. All the news about middle-aged grads dying of football heart faile

ure warns me. of that. My heart has just been gone “by the medicos. 1t is all right for ordinary pur-

poses... But this is no ordinary purpose,

- Except for the Navy game, the Army-Notre Dame

game 4s °the thriller of the year for many Army. folk.

“i £ don't even except the Navy. I like this game better.

“@ = &/4

8 eZ)

V2NYOERACIES J

I wholly

The Hoosier Forum disagree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.—Voltaire.

MINIMUM PRICE SCALES FOR FARM PRODUCTS SOUGHT By Edward F. Maddox I am not a scientific economist, but I was farming in 1920 when the bottom dropped out of farm prices

the only hope for stability in farm prices was for the Government to regulate farm prices in the same way that weights and measures are fixed by law. - The law says that a farmer must

_ {give 60 pounds for a bushel of wheat.

Sometimes the price for that wheat is $2.30 and at other times 35 cents. Such wide fluctuations in prices of commodities are ruinous to farmers and eventually cause economic chaos and depressions.: The . so-called Hoover depression started, for the farmer, in 1920. The cities were enJoying a sort of false prosperity brought about by & building boom, but the depression finally overtook

them in 1929, Well, we all know that old story,

of our économijc confusion I think it would be traced to the wide fluctuation in farm prices, loss of farm income, lack of farm purchasing power for manufactured articles, unemployment, cutting of wages, loss of sales in the cities and so—depression, Since 1922 I have been writing articles favoring Government regulation of the prices of our basic farm commodities, such as wheat, corn, cotton, cattle and hogs. We now have minimum wage scales and it is high time we had minimum price scales for our basic farm products. One is just as necessary as the other. We must have American prices for American markets or we will never achieve national economic stability. The price of wheat in Russia or Hungary should not be allowed to control, or affect, the price of wheat in Indianapolis, Chicago or New York City. My idea is that the farmer should be guaranteed a minimum price of $1.20 a bushel for his No. 1 wheat. He should be taxed the 20 cents to provide a fund to take care .of the surplus. That leaves him $1 a bushel for his wheat. The Government can buy, store or sell the surplus and the 20-cent export surplus tax will take care of the loss. 15 cents a pound with a 3-cent tax for that part consumed in this country. The 3 cents would probably take care of export losses. I think this plan will give the farmer a fair price for his products

and I soon became convinced that|:

but if we ¢ould find the redl cause|

Cotton prices should be about|

(Times readers are invited to express their views in these columns, religious cone troversies excluded. Make your letter short, so all can have a chance. Lstters must : be signed, but names will be. withheld on request.) |

without regimentation. I know that is what he wants. The political party that adopts this plan is a friend to the farmer, Se . ® 8 » URGES THAT VOTERS BE INDEPENDENT By G. W. Sharkey The bugaboo of every politician today is the bloc of independent voters that cannot be held to one party. “My party, right or wrong, my party,” is the motto that all the politicians would like to instill into any and all who do not think for themselves. It is self-evident that anyone who would make such a declaration is not capable of exercising his right to vote. It would imply that that voter would vote for something or someone when he knew it or they were wrong. If this is the attitude the politician wants us to have toward his party, is this not evidence that he hopes to gain the office through subterfuge? The more ignorant the voter the better the politician likes him. He can be dictated to and blindly led, with a lot of party phrases and meaningless political “hog wash.” It is no wonder that we have the shameful conditions and political

QUERY By VIRGINIA POTTER What was the reason we met and parted— Why was our romance ever started? What will the end be, I just wonder, Fulfillment of dreams or another blunder?

Could it have been we're both to . blame— And will go on caring just the same? Why do I spend my leisure time Writing this sentimental rhyme?

DAILY THOUGHT

So shall ye divide this land unto you according to the tribes of Israel.—Ezekiel 48:21,

NE is never more on trial than in the moment of excessive

good fortune.~Lew Wallace,

crookedness evident on every hand with so many spineless and unthinking blind sheep for voters. Let the mass of voters show they

are not tied to any class or party and then the office seekers will try really to merit support and be of

{useful service toward honest govern-

ment, instead of depending on blind partyism-to make it possible for wholesale graft. - : ‘'® 8 =

A REPLY TO THOSE WHO DEFENDED THE DOGS By M. I. Lee : I must have been neglecting the Forum lately, for I did not see F. S. E.'s defense of dogs, nor, for that matter, my own letter, satirizing “Dog Week,” (and I wonder how much blue penciling the Editor did to samel), : Dear Mrs. T. T. C., you may save your pity, for I reared three boys, and for 15 or 20 years knew the “love and devotion” of dogs, and many of their less winning traits. I am quite happy to feel myself no longer bound to share my living quarters with animals, I am familiar with the Vest tribute to dogs, and I enjoy Terhune’s stories, just as I read fairy stories, jungle tales, ete., without the least desire to own a leprechaun or a baboon. R.'M. Rs letter, though she (he?) condemns and pities me, is much more convincing, and I willl confess to her I really like dogs, in their propér place, on a farm. As for town dogs, ask the postman what he thinks of them; he may be too polite to tell you, but to me he voices his detestation of the yapping curs which wait till his back is turned, then tear his trousers, or worse, his calves. Yesterday © heard & chorus of

barks, and looking out, saw & blind|

man tapping his way along, followed the entire block by two fairly large dogs, their vicious barks probably making his flesh quiver with anticipated teeth. Yes, I prefer cats. Hm A BOOST FOR SULLIVAN By William Lemon Ex-Mayor Sullivan who served us so faithfully for five years was given credit for being one of the best

mayors the city ever had. 8o excels

lent was his record that this time he was drafted as candidate by his many friends. = ~ It would be foolish at this stage of the game to take a chance on some one else, ETE

LET'S

"EXPLORE YOUR MIND

—By DR. ALBERT EDWARD WIGGAM.-

TOWARD TH

rs So 1 YES. A lot of wives start out by being nursemaids to their husbands and, once a husband gets the habit of being waited on and. all his whims are satisfied, nothing short of a battle ax or a charge of dynamite will him loose from

it. - reasonable amount of waiting

EG 75 BE 700 UNGELFiGH UST POGSIBLE FOR WI eh BETO0 U 4

3 WOULD WE PROGRESS FASTER OMEN LTE

band and get him housebroken, but, beyond that, it is the part of. wisdom for wives to watch their steps or they will soon be doing nothing else but stepping for them, : ” =

" : “IT IS very doubtful. Of course, |born one

mathematics teaches

able than do detective stories, but

that it teaches one to think better| about problems of finance or govern-|

ment in ‘which mathematics is. not

involved is still a- matter of dispute tracts, ad the skin, and syphilis.

among psychologists with most © them leaning to the negative side. As Thorndike, peychologist, . points out, we had great thinkers when

we taught youth mathematics; also

when we taught them Latin and Greek, and also when we did not teach them anything. What education does or should do is to teach people to organize their thinking ins to useful bodies of knowledge—té link facts together so they have something worthwhile to about. : eS > 8 2 8

in a brilliant recent essay, that we would progress faster if women ran the world. Following are some

#” T= is especially true

| sportsmanship higher for the whole country.

INEZ HAYNES IRWIN argues,| New ‘York City to control infections spread BD

of the charges she brings against mere man. He does not know how to spend money. Salesnien—especially saleswomen-—can palm off ‘any old shop-worn goods on him. Men know nothing about management or organization or how to p the world—even the city streets——clean. It was a Chicago woman who showed them how to do this. Men don't

liked Notre Dame When Army was

a getting Theo tk stride as a first flight team and Notre

Dame was just another college, Army took her on as a breather. The forward pass had heen invented but not exploited, that is not by anybody except a couple of klucks on the Irish team, Rockne and Dorals, re 8 » 8. . / J HEY came/to West Point and made a monkey out of Army with this new offense. . Then they stayed over to coach Army, a service which enabled

| West Point: to finish that season brilliantly.

It is a curious result that most of the old-time foothall giants who used to mother struggling waifs for One reason ‘or another are now being regularly licked by them. > “on > For example, West Point football was largely nure tured by Yale. Dr. Bull, who coached Yale, ‘used to spend a day or a two a week on Army when Yals was at the top in the old Big Four. Princeton did a similar thing for Navy. These pupils now, as & rule, outstrip their masters. : i between Notre Dame and Army. There is a story in which I have forgottén the names of the actors but it is a tradition’ which continues to help this extraordinary friendship. ‘An Army player had a bad knee. His direct Notre Dame opponent at the first lineup asked him which leg it was. The usual stunt would have been”to name the one it wasn't. This boy was too simple and direct for that. He told—and was not roughed on that side throughout the game, , This sounds like a little Rollo story but it is “most surely believed among us” and, whether trus or not, it typifies the feeling of robust good-will and friendship that exists between these two colleges. As Qwen Young once said at Notre Dame about Knute Rockne in a model of & graduating address, there the very spirit of sportsmanship came to dwell awhile on earth and to lift the measures of all

’

Yes, I'm going to the Army-Notre Dame game and, according to all the dopesters, see my team get licked, If I do, one thing is sure, it will be by a better team and only after 8 model of good, clean fight. I don't want it to get licked but if that must be done, I would rather it be by the Irish than any team,

It Seems to Me By Heywood Broun :

Opinions Given Before Dies Group Should Be Plainly Tagged as Such.

EW YORK, Oct, 28.—I think that President Roosevelt spoke clearly and correctly in his erite fcism of the methods of the Dies committee. He chose the proper word in asserting that the committes has permitted itself to be used as a “forum” for politically minded persons seeking headlines. v Chairman Dies himself has been far from accurate in saying in a number of radio broadcasts that cere tain “facts” have been testified to under oath. Very few facts have been presented. The greater part of the testimony has consisted of the offering of opinion, It is probably useful that Congressional committees allow more latitude in testimony than would be ade missible in a court of law. .But opinion, suspicion and twice-told tales should be plainly labeled as such, I think that in the light of future events the course of Governor Murphy of Michigan proved core rect. But even those who disagreed with the strategy which he pursued ought to admit that his decisions during the sitdown strikes were difficult. Certainly an entirely one-sided picture was presented at. the hearing, in which only one ear was functioning. And while I am no partisan of American Fascists or Nazi agitators, it seems to me that the case agains the men on the extreme fight was developed in just as sloppy and sleazy a manner. Take a specific instance of testimony heard by the Dies committee on the same date President Roosevelt voiced his criticism of the body’s tactics. I find in the bank of a newspaper headline, “Dies Committe; Witnesses Cite Stanford University’s ‘Subversi Teachers. The newspaper does give the m accused the benefit of the slight protection of an inside quote, but what is there in the text of the story to support that “Cite”?

Is Unlonism Unpatriotic? ‘

I read that Harper Knowles, chairman of the American Legion's radical research committee, accused Leland Stanford of fostering “subversive” ace tivities, because in the case of summer school once sponsored by the university workers are propagan=-

_dized in favor of a union organization. What is

there in the law of thé United States which holds that trades unionism is unpatriotic? Tee Mr. Knowles, indeed, goes well beyond most of the

“alarm-viewers. In his charge against Leland Stanford. for its

he said that the university was “notorious liberal and subversive professors.” i] Since when has it become criminal or. even uns ethical for institutions of learning to seek men of liberal views as teachers? Zh, And while this went on in Washington, Martin Dies ‘boldly exposed himself to subversive influences at the Herald Tribune Forum, where he heard Rexfor®

Tugwell ‘and Raymond Moley—both liberals, I have

heard—expound their doctrines. He was even exposed to the address of Mrs. Maurice L. Goldman, who spoke of the debt which America owes to the foreign born, Mr. Dies may well have been jealous. The Herald Tribune Forum seems a rather more useful institution than his own. S

GET

Watching Your Health =:

By Dr. Morris Fishbein

HE diseases that can be spread by food handlers . are not peculiar to the food industry. They ine clude such communicable diseases as the common cold, varigus infections of the nose, throat, respiratory While’ these diseases are not limited to sprea® through ‘the food - industry, this industry comes sa closely: to the lives of so many people that fo

“handlefs’ particularly must be concerned with wha

they can ‘do to help prevent the spread of these ditions &s much as they can. : i What part should the food handler play in preve: ing the spread of syphilis? Some have:recomm that every. food handler should have a Wasserman test, that food handlers.should be given periodic ¢ aminations. Routihe examinations are costly. cates that an individual is free from infectious d

{ simply ‘mean that the individual was free at the time

of the examination, as judged by the results of th tests that were used, a Attempts were made by the Board of Health 2

food handlers as early as 1916. In 1023 annual med examinations of food handlers were required. In 1934 compulsory examination and certification of all food handlers was discontinued in the light of modern knowledge, and only the dairy industry ‘is now sube

Jeet to such control.

The Board of Health decided that ‘the piblle

‘would-be more adequately protected by elimination of the certification scheme. They have concluded that

the prompt reporting of communicable diseases: by private physicians, giving the occupation of the pa-

tient, enables the authorities to exclude the infected

persons from work in. the food industries uptil 4 safe for him to return. wn Tn This plan has also the advantage that it main the proper confidential relationship between and patient, which is ‘edpecially

MDO

‘ ~

- 3