Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 8 September 1938 — Page 15
a
PAGE 14
J rs A SAR
The Indianapolis Times
(A SCRIPPS-HOWARD NEWSPAPER)
ROY W. HOWARD LUDWELL DENNY MARK FERREE President Editor Business Manage®
Price {in Marion County, 3 eents a copy; delivered by carrier, 12 cents a week.
Owned and published daily (except Sunday) by The Indianapolis Times Publishing Co, 214 W Maryland St. Mail subscription rates in Indiana, $3 a year; outside of Indiana, 65 cents a month.
Member of United Press, Scripps - Howard NewsPaper Alliance, NEA Service, and Audit Bu-
reau of Circulations. Rlley 5551
Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Way
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1938
WHITHER MEXICO? HE abortive rebellion of a small group of so-called Nazis in Chile seems to have been put down without much difficulty. But it should not be dismissed as something without importance. Not =o long ago there was a Brazilian coup d'etat in which rightists and leftists were liquidated, at least for the moment. These events, plus others of a similar nature, indicate that the cyclonic disturbances which clashing ideologies have produced in Europe are not without effect in the Western Hemisphere. For that reason, the growing friction between the United States and Mexico has more than the usual significance. [Ever since President Lazaro Cardenas sent exPresident Calles into exile a couple of years ago because the latter was not taking over foreign holdings fast enough to suit him, Mexico has been trending more and more leftward. Today, apparently taking a leaf out of Soviet Russia's 1917 notebook the Cardenas Government seems determined to go the limit in confiscation of foreign property, Anvhow, it is very difficult to escape that impression after reading
the reply to Secretary Hull's note asking payment for |
American-owned farm lands. The United States has never questioned Mexico's right to expropriate any American property within her borders. It has merely demanded effective compensation for the properties taken, indicating a willingness to accept arbitra-
tion by an inter-American agency. In all the history of
Fair Enough
By Westbrook Pegler
When It Comes to a Tough Life, Professional Golfers Have Nothing
EW YORK, Sept. 8.—One is tempted to agree with Gene Sarazen that the professional golfers are | the most put-upon class of artists, for great are the impositions and wrongs which they suffer. They travel thousands of miles at much personal expense to play in great and secondary tournaments, knowing that they are bucking a brace game whose rewards are hardly comparable to the miserable pay-off handed down by the policy racketeers. The capital prize of the United States Open championship is only $1000 and that of the British Open £100, and there can be only one winner each year of each of these paltry tips, though hundreds of good men compete. Mr. Sarazen's lament is a sad story of a crying shame, but less pathetic, on the whole, than that of the ill-used hundreds of professional writers who buck the chancy whims and tastes of the magazines. Here is a large class of more or less qualified performers who not only gamble their time and ability in a highly speculative field but often, when they have turned in first-class work, find their copy tossed back to be tinkered over to suit an editor's arbitrary formula or | personal taste.
# # # N fiction the leading magazines have adopted patterns as rigid as linoleum cuts. Boy and girl must | be brought together or left in peril at certain intervals of the serial to mark the installment endings, | regardless of the natural history development of the | story at the hands of a skilled narrator. So back goes the writer to his desk to do it over. This means, of course, that the continuity, even the plot, must be | twisted out of shape and rebuilt, with no certainty | that even when it has been changed to the editor's | specifications he will not finally ttirn it down—just because. Natural writing is almost impossible in the field of magazine fiction, what with taboos and house policies and the demand for text to be wrapped around the razor blades and heating systems in the rear of the book.
® 2 »
DITING is an inexact business at best, but it has been complicated by a terrifying jumble of changing and unpredictable house rules and forms and mere personal whims of men who have power to accept or reject copy representing months of work. Undistinguished editors whose absolute limit is $250 or as little as $150 assume the right to instruct skilled
men and women to tear apart and rewrite, not once
but repeatedly, fiction stories and presentations of |
| fact or opinion and to reject work in the end which,
international relations it would be difficult to find a fairer or |
a more neighborly proposition. To the American proposals, however, Mexico replied in effect that she was now unable to pay. Whereupon Secretary Hull quite naturally suggested the postponement of further expropriations. Meanwhile, he also proposed, she might set aside funds with which to assure payment of whatever sum might eventually be agreed upon. Mexico accepts arbitration, but makes it clear that expropriations will continue and seems entirely to disregard the principle of “effective compensation.” = =
= 5
POLITICIANS everywhere always have found it easy to stir up a following by promising something for nothing. California, for example! has just nominated for the Senate For the
4 »
’
one such whose slogan was “830 every Thursday.’
past two vears President Cardenas has been promising the
having now been done to their particular orders, is hopelessly unsalable anywhere else. Writers of this unhappy class console themselves
| with the not very nourishing thought that editors
|
{ i
Mexican masses elysium by turning over to them the nation- |
Now he must make good or he will be in trouble. in the dispute between the United States and
al wealth, Thus, Mexico, things are not entirely what they seem, recently made pretty clear by Vicente Lombardo Toledano, head of Mexico's leftist labor organization, of which President Cardenas is in a sense an instrument.
oil properties, the companies’ final offer to the workers “would have been a victory for labor over capital within the
This was |
He admitted | { go to war the President will not be able to say there
that just before the seizure of the British and American | io ,q war
Mexican oil industry. But, by refusing the offer (and seiz- | ing the property), it was a great victory of the Mexican |
people against foreign imperialism The issue thus raised is of immense importance to the United Not only is policy involved but also the Monroe Doctrine.
States.
For should
this country’s good neighbor |
are but thwarted writers in more or less human form. However true this thought might be, it buys no pork
chops or shoes for the baby, nor does it mitigate |
the cruelty with which writers are kept dangling All that Mr. Sarazen says of golf is true, but there are excellent writers bucking the magazine trade who on reading this piece might be tempted to break out their clubs and try the tournaments. True, they might starve, but that would be no novelty, and golf does keep one out in the open air
Business
By John T. Flynn
If War Comes President Must Put Neutrality Act in Effect at Once.
EW YORK, Sept. 8 —The nearness of war reminds us that we have on our statute books a Neutrality Act. And it imposes on us certain ar-
rangements which must be made in the event two or |
more foreign nations go to war. Up to now foreign nations have gone to war. Japan has invaded China, Italy has invaded Spain. But the President has defled this law. He has done so by adopting the astonishing plea that Japan is not at war with China and Italy is not at war with Spain. But if Germany and France and Russia and Great Britain
He will have to accept that as a fact and he will have to accept the Neutrality Act and proclaim our neutrality with all that goes with that That being so, this is a good time to ask what the Neutrality Act means. Obviously it is a plan to insure our neutrality. Therefore, as the war is declared, the President cannot ask himself: What side are we on? Who do we want to help? He may ask himself who he sympathizes with and who he would like to help. But he is an officer of the people and must obey
| the law.
Mexico confiscate foreign property and the idea spread to |
other Latin American countries, strong powers across the Atlantic might not take it lying down. Today, says a United Press dispatch, Mexico “is in
He has no alternative but to put the law into operation. Now when that law goes into oneration it will have effects upon the belligerent powers.
| may help England and France and hurt Germany.
the throes of the worst depression it has ever known in |
modern peace time . .. foreign trade has fallen off 30 to . + + thousands are unemployed . .
are having a hard time trying to make ends meet
of) per cent hay e inhg . many concerns and people make no attempt to meet
And S0 on.
their various financial obligations.” The United States, when younger, had to depend largeIv upon foreign capital to get started. Ditto Mexico. One of these davs the poor Mexican masses may wake up to find they have been exploited and betrayed less by “foreign imperialism’ —disgraceful as that has been at
that
times—than by their own short-sighted leaders.
ECONOMY WITH RESERVATIONS "RR EASSERTING his independence of the National Administration on Federal taxing and spending,” reads a dispatch from Jackson, Miss, Senator Pat Harrison “served warning that the time had come to stop excessive Governmental spending.” The Senator made it clear he would direct his efforts in that direction at the next Congress, “even if some people don't like it.” Those are noble sentiments and spoken like a man,
Other members of Congress no doubt share Senator Harri-
son's feeling. The obstacle in the way of execution of the laudable economy enterprise is that too many others may
have the same reservations as the Senator from Mississippi.
Only a week before, the President wrote Senator Har- |
prison that Mississippi had only $2,600,000 remaining of its PWA quota, with 51 approved projects requiring 85,000,000. In view of that situation, the President wrote, it would be impossible to accede to the request for a grant of 826,000,000 additional for Mississippi highways, The Senator was not downhearted. He announced he still had hopes that the money would be forthcoming and promised hig eon gtituents his best efforts to obtain the grant, No doubt most Senators and Representatives from the 48 states would be equally determined to put an end to excessive Governmental spending, conditioned upon each gtate receiving a grant for 829,000,000 in excess of its
quota, Economy, like some of the other virtues, beging at
home, Until members of Congress are willing to apply the |
rule of economy to their own states, statements to the
. many who |
{ and help whichever belligerent we wish.
It may hurt England and France and help Germany. To put it into effect, therefore, will be to hurt one and help another warrior nation,
People Will Have to Decide
This does not that {fake sides It means
that before we can do that the people of the coun-
mean we cannot
{ try, speaking through their Congress, will have to decide the point,
|
| action under the law,
{ the country with agitation
i
There is, however, danger that the President may usurp this power by attempting to put us on some side which he favors. This he can do by refusing to obey the law The great danger will come if the President delavs If he does, this &vill give the warring camps time to gather their forces and fil The supporters of Gere many may insist that the law should be applied, because Germany will be cut off from American help by her lack of merchant veseels to haul goods, and therefore to fail to enforce the law will permit Enegland and France to benefit. The supporters of France and England will cry out against the law, The longer this goes on the more difficult it will be for the President to apply the law without being accused of siding with one group or the other. The wav to escape this is to put the law into effect instantly
A Woman's Viewpoint By Mere. Walter Ferguson
EAVEN help us, what next? An ambitious couple
in an Ohio city have armed themselves with candid cameras, and all for the good of matrimony, Each will take snaps of the other in the act of come mitting a minor offense. For example, when Hubby flicks his ashes on the front-room rug. Wifie ean prove his misdemeanor by showing him in the act: and Hubby, sneaking up on the Little Woman while she's
| snitching his last razor blade, will have a camera ree. | ord of the theft,
It is expected that this will prove a fine method for cementing matrimonial bonds. Frankly, I'm due
| bious about the whole thing, Few of ug really want
to see ourselves ag others see us. vanity, According to the modern version, no good hushand flicks ashes on the rug, or leaves the bathroom and dresser drawers in a mess, or scatters newspapers over the house. He hag too much consideration for others and colleges today are instructing young men to spare
It's too hard on our
| the wife such trouble.
Yes, my lads, spare the wife and spoil the mar. riage! Thats what will happen. Few and far between are the women who want mates they can't pick up after. Why? Because nothing makes a female feel so virtuous or put upon or overworked as a man who comes in like a zephyt and goes out like a cyvelone, She enjors the belief that without her he would exist in a weiter of untidiness; that his digestion would be
ruined and his character disintegrated if he wets left |
| to his own devices for 50 much as a fortnight,
contrary are hut sounding brass and tinkling cymbals. With |
but slight stretch of
=« demagogic. A
iivahitetion they might be described
It has been my misfortune to know well several women who had orderly husbands, They are among the most unhappy creatures I've ever met. They felt rated - * invariably became embittered mans
in . Ns hs A, Bn ie ia
On Writers of Magazine Stories. |
THE INDIANAPOLIS TIMES One Family Out of Ever
TT ro) Thin. ¥ PURE
a ]
coir: ge mei nS ES SY
gene
THURSDAY, SEPT. 8, 1938
SEN
| busy
1% |
| Government { ment was made that “the President
| tion and can't get out.” | Mrs,
| Johnson, Walter Lippman, Dorothy | Thompson, George Peek, Jay Frank- |
The Hoosier Forum
I wholly disagree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.—Voltaire.
NEW PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE NEEDED, READER SAYS Br Mrs. K. H. A new philosophy of life is need-
| ed, which can be outlined in four
words: “Stop lying to yourself.” We only deceive ourselves without reals izing it; we accept what others tell us, as to the value of what we hear, not appraise properly the things that fill our days. We are making a living, when the real object of life is “living itself.” To live is the real problem before us. Not by watching others and not by will imposed upon us from without. No other individual has the vight to force upon us a given way of life; the way to happiness is only through a will of our own effort. = ” ”
WANTS TRUTH ON ALLEGED
| "ISMS” IN GOVERNMENT
Br E. F M
Gen. Johnson column that the Dies
proposes in his Committee
| call in Frances Perkins, Harry Hop-
king, Tommy Corcoran, Henry Wal-
| lace, Harold Ickes and the President
himself to tell “how far away from our political and economic moorings they really purpose to take us.” “I think I know,” he adds, “just as far toward collectivism
government as they can go and get
away wtih it.” Mr. Johnson has also stated that the Roosevelt Administration is “controlled by a group of inexperienced young Socialists,” and also
that the “third New Deal legislative | program is taken almost verbatim |
from the Communist proposals.” All right, General, I second the motion to call in the known radicals
{ in the Cabinet and other high Gov- | ernment posts—but let's axempt the
President. Long ago, during the Wirt testimony against the Reds in positions, the state-
is in the stream of revolutionary acGive the President the benefit of the doubt and call in Rexford G. Tugwell and Roosevelt, Then call Gen.
lin, Senators, Congressmen and labor leaders who have charged the New Dealers with communistic cons nections or activities and let the aecused meet their accusers face to face before the committee and have
| it out.
Charges, denials, hypocrisy are causing chaos, cone fusion, fear and loss of confidence and are a hindrance to economic stability and business recovery. If
| the New Dealers are leading us into { communism, let us know the truth;
and one-man |
whitewash and |
(Times readers are invited to express their these columns, religious con. troversies excluded. Make your letter short, so all can have a chance. Letters must ba signed, but names will be withheld on request)
views in
(if not, let's find out where the | trouble is located. To charge the | present administration with communism as Gen, Johnson and others ( have on one hand, and with fascism as Glenn Frank and others have done on the other, is ridiculous. | Or is it? Some say that both of { these dictatorships are so like peas in a pod that it is hard to tell which one is red and which black. Any- | way, the Dies Commitiee is investi- | gating un-American activities and (that includes both communism and | fascism. | Kick both kinds out of our gov- | embroil us in another World War. ¥ ¥ #
| CRITICIZES RAILROAD ' LABOR'S POLICIES | Br Voice in the Crowd
I cannot understand why The | Times continually points to rail- | road labor procedure as a asset, If these editorials referred | to a healthy, progressive industry { that was Kept in health by such | procedure, a great social lesson could
SEPTEMBER SHINES By M. P. D, September shines Through light and shade; It sparkles where the roses fade, It glimmers in the autumn leaves Where color of the rainbow cleaves; It shines in harvest of the vear, In ripened apple, peach and peay,; Again it glows in goldenrod And corn stalks rising from the sod: Through all the hues of autumn light. September bright.
shines in radiance
He delivered me from my strong enemy, and from them that hated | me; for they were too strong for me —II Samuel 22:18,
| © INCE nothing is settled until it WF? is settled right, no matter how unlimited power a man may have, unless he exercises it fairly and justly his actions will return to | plague him. —Frank A. Vanderlip.
| ernment because they will eventually |
social |
be gleaned from them. However, the railroads are not in a healthy condition and they are not allowed to progress in a natural manner. The railroads have been exploited by financiers, by every political division of government and by labor, They do not stand as a monument to good political leadership, nor to good labor leadership, nor good financial practice. Railroad labor is high class, well skilled, intelligent labor, and no | one can deny their sense of duty ‘and their obedience to operating | discipline, However, railroad labor may rue the day if they do not [ Join with the management in con- | trolling operating costs and in se- | curing profitable rates that per- | mit modern development and the expansion of employment. The long {range view of railroad labor should be to forget the present and save the railroads for their own posterity. If the cost and income relationship is not corrected, the railroads will be laid on the taxpavers' backs along with the other subsidies made | hecessary by tampering with natural processes. The public would be better off paving visible freight rates than invisible taxes to a subsidized railroad system, and (destiny of railroad labor would be | brighter if the railroads’ operated at a profit. But please do not hold up a half | dead horse and brag about its pRseetdl manner of trying to stay alive.
” oy » URGES CONSOLIDATION OF RAIL COMPANTES, UNIONS By Railroad Patron
The threatening railway strike over wage reductions has two factors that should be eliminated. Twenty-one railroad unions to deal with, instead of one railway workers union, make negotiations almost impossible. Wage reductions without corresponding reductions in railway watered stock and blue sky (bonds, on property that vanished | years ago, are not in order, | Consolidation of railway unions fehould be paralleled by railroad | company consolidations, One company, one union—save all the waste
| of keeping useless jobs and overhead |
| to be paid for out of revenue from | patrons, Refinance all good railroad bonds at 3 per cent interest. Wring out | the debt that has no earning ca- | pacity now. Pub railway workers on | straight salary commensurate with fair return to investors. Get the workers to buy a 50 per cent interest
in the business instead of pensions. |
| Give workers a 50 per cent representation in management,
NON! \F E AT pe &
YES, Doctors’ offices, especially,
TRUTH A TRERNHER NE AF a nuove
LET'S EXPLORE YOUR MIND
By DR. ALBERT EDWARD WIGGAM
——— LEADING BUSINESS MAN | BAYS "TUE DESIRE FOR PRAISE |S ONE OF THE GREATEST | WEAKNESSES OF HUMAN NATURE", 18 THIS TRUE?
Ny LEARN®
ARE VERY TALL OR MORE LIKELY Ta LT NAY THER LIKE THAN PEO = OF Avedret TURE? YES ORNO....
delayed surgery”
powers and keeps us from living | contentedly within our mental and | physical means. | ¥ F #
NO. The very reason this busi- | nessman publishes this statement is that he desires and expects people to praise him for it, Desire for praise is our strongest incentive to achievement. We measure our “success” largely by the amount | of praise we receive for our deeds. |Our dress, our manners, even our | heroisms are largely due to our de- | sire for praise. Without this "weakness” for praise in both himself and | his employees this businessman | would probably have been a pauper. wy 8
THIS MATTER was studied ex-
the |
| | | { | | {
|
{
tensively by the late Dr. Fan- |
[tham, a Canadian anthropologist, {and he found that in some old communities the families have zeparated their strains out by this very vrocess into the talls, shorts and averages. The shorts and the talls each marry persons of their own
| |
stature which leaves the interme- |
|diates to marry among their type. | | Very tall men are sensitive in ecourtIn many other ing a woman of short stature and
are filled with people who were | wave fear of learning the truth |men of short stature are even more afraid to be examined long ago about ourselves handicaps us, makes | sensitive About esurting tall women,
and learn the truth about their us bores to others, when we thought | So there is a tendency in old, we were “the goods,” leads us inte develop these
su p0 :
Th
health. As a t "
want
bag
cdomMIC
Lin
Gen. Johnson Says—
Roosevelt's Foes Do Not Resist His Goals, but the Governmental Changes He Has Attached to Them,
ETHANY BEACH, Del, Sept. 8.—Now we know the difference between a “liberal” and a “cone servative.” A “conservative” is one who admits that thers are abuses in interest rates, the stock exchange, labor conditions, care of the aged and in economies conditions generally, but who doesn't want govern ment to do anything about it. A “liberal” 5 a lad who also sees these things but puts his shoulders to the wheel to correct, them.
This is highly important because Mr. Roosevelt announces a purpose to keep the Democratic Party “liberal” even if he has to elect “liberal” Republicans to do it. : If what Mr. Roosevelt defined as a conservative at Denton is all that he objects to, there aren't enough conservatives in this country to dust a flute.
” ” ”
VERYBODY who is familiar with Mr. Roosevelt's differences with leaders th his own party knows that the issues he presented at Denton are not the causes for disagreement at all,
The main, if not the single issue, is not the reform of such evils as he mentioned. It is whether, on the excuse that it is necessary to reach those evils, the Courts, the Congress and the State and local governments shall lose to the President a large part of their independence. It is whether to reach those evils, it is necessary to pile up unheard-of burdens of debt and taxes and to attempt to confiscate and redistribute existing property. It is whether by these and other methods we shall be pushed further and further toward a collectivist society ruled by a single leader, The goals, on both sides, are precisely the same and, on the Denton definition, equally “liberal.” They are re-employment, greater production more evenly distributed, better protection of groups which are at an economic disadvantage. These are the common “objectives.” The only real question is whether to reach them we must change the essence of our form of government and economics and rely on the wisdom of one dominating figure, or whether we can do the same thing by corrective legislation through popular participation in the affairs of government,
» ”
F only that issue could be made clear enough, quickly enough, and to enough people, Mr, Roose~ velt's miscalled liberalism could not live hecause cole lectivist government under personalized direction is not “liberal” at all, , His opponents within his own party resist not his ohjectives, but the change in government that he has attached to his objectives. They oppose that, not only in principle but because they believe that what neces sarily goes with it has offset his reforms by bringing far more harm than all the constructive legislation has cured. But there is further question: Can the opponents of the move toward collectivism and one-man rule convince the country that they can and will eliminate those abuses without moving in the same direction? The future trend of business and government depends on that alone,
It Seems to Me
By Heywood Broun
Hush-Hush Policy on Anti-Semitism In U. S. Has Failed, He Believes.
EW YORK, Sept. 8.—I was talking about the theater with a well known composer the other evening and I happened to mention my enthusiasm for “The Cradle Will Rock.” His face clouded and he zaid, “I hated it.” “Maybe the music isn't as good as I thought it was,” I ventured. “The music was all right,” my friend admitted, “and I have nothing against the show artistically, but it was a radical play and the author's name is Blitzstein, That's why I'm against it.” This just puzzled me, and so he went on and explained. “I'm Jewish, and I think that any Jew who takes a radical attitude on anything whether he’s right or wrong, simply foments anti-Semitism in America.” ! Of course, I've heard of this attitude before, It is very much in the picture at present. Washington correspondents and commentators have written that if Roosevelt sends the name of Felix Frankfurter to the Senate as Cardozo's successor to the Supreme Court there will be a wave of anti-Jewish feeling from groups and communities where just now that sentiment merely smolders, I disagree thoroughly with this attitude. There is no health in hidden lesions, and maladies which ars allowed to lie dormant are more dangerous than those which can be whipped into the open, : Of course, the argument may be made that under certain conditions, either medical or political, it i& better to temporize. Here in America there has beet a great deal of hush-hush about anti-Semitism. Man have thought it best to avoid the subject save in cases where it came to a head in flagrant form.
Light Must Be Turned On
It is my contention that the hush-hush policy in regard to anti-Semitism in America has failed dise mally. I think that this policy has fostered prejudice instead of abating it. Indeed, TI think that the out+ right anti-Semitism of the German-American Bund is less dangerous than that of those who say piously, “I have no prejudice,” but keep their fingers crossed. , Before a proper fight for American freedom and folerance can be made we must turn on the light. I have spoken of Felix Frankfurter as a man who may become a symbol. In many ways this is tragic. Frankfurter is one of our greatest jurists. I am under the impression that he would hate it desperately he were to become the center of a controversy wholl irrelevant to his abilities and his political opinions. >} But no one can accuse him of courting that issuds His appointment would be just and logical. And sg I hope the President submits his name and thak Frankfurter will consent to face the arrows. Thé issue which already has been raised, even in antici« pation, is extraneous, But it also happens to be (ng of the vital problems which America must solve ou# in the open if we are to stand as a citadel against the tide of fascism. "3
Watching Your Health
By Dr. Morris Fishbein
ITHOUT any doubt the spread of disease ig. fostered by bad housing. Indeed, if any one of. the fundamentals of human living, including foody: fuel, clothing, and housing, is lacking to any cons, siderable extent, there is bound to be a deleterious’ 2
dee aTelee ve
| effect on health, x
Perhaps the most important factors from the point:
of view of health in relationship to housing are tha: factors of plumbing and sanitation, lack of light anc sunshine, and overcrowding, Polluted water coming into a dwelling, improper plumbing, and unsanitary; § toilets are unquestionably associated with menaces ta health. ER However, it is not always the slum dwelling inv = which such factors are present, Sometimes faulty _ plumbing which permits the siphoning or leakage of sewer waste into water supplies may be found if places devoted almost wholly to those of wealth, . Overcrowding is particularly a menace. The mord tightly people are packed together, the more certainty; there is that those diseases which are spread py cone tact of one person with another will be disseminated; throughout: the group. % Of course poor housing is also associated witly. other factors, such as the presence of flies, when¢ there is a, lack of screening of windows, accumulatiore. of filth, and stagnant waters when the premises are® not kept in good order. There is a hazard to healtit from buildings in which porches and stairs are no kept in a good state of repair, There is always the. danger of loss of life from fires when construction does not promote protection against the fire hazard. Finally, overcrowding in the home is almost ine’
variably associated with mental disturbances w