Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 1 July 1938 — Page 14

PAGE 14

The Indianapolis Times

(A SCRIPPS-HOWARD NEWSPAPER)

ROY W. HOWARD LUDWELL DENNY MARK FERRER President Editor Business Manager

Price in Marion County, 3 cents a copy; delivered by carrier, 12 cents a week.

Owned and published daily (except Sunday) by The Indianapolis Times Publishing Co, 214 W. Maryland St. Mail subscription rates in Indiana, $3 a year; outside of Indiana, 65 cents a month.

Member of United Press, Scripps - Howard Newspaper Alliance, NEA Service, and Audit Bu-

reau of Circulations. Rlley 5551

Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Wap

FRIDAY, JULY 1, 1938

WHAT DO YOU MEAN—SUMMARILY? F it were just a matter of words none could be bolder or finer than these from WPA Administrator Harry L. Hopkins: “We will deal summarily with any proven charges of political coercion.” But words are one thing, actions another; and, speaking of words, what does summarily mean?

The dictionary says: “Without delay or formality: Quickly

executed.”

In two cases of admitted political coercion in Kentucky, |

what happens? One: Chief District WPA Supervisor Lee Carden circulated among WPA workers in Edmonson County registration cards to determine whether employees and members of their families were qualified voters. “We have taken steps,” says MF. Hopkins, “to see that this man minds hig own business,

being fired.”

Summarily? Well, hardly. Just don't get caught again. Two: Cleve Keeney, WPA foreman, told a WPA worker “that the fellows on the job were going to have to support Rarkley if they staved on WPA.” What happened there? “We regard this remark by Mr. Keeney as reprehensible,” said Mr. Hopkins, “and State Administrator Goodman has been instructed to take the necessary punitive action.” Without delay or formality? Again, hardly. For the Mr. Goodman to whom this buck is passed is the same Mr. Goodman who once before, having been ordered by his superiors in Washington to investigate the many charges that Mr. Goodman's administration of relief is political, gave Mr. Goodman such a certificate of cleanli-

ness as to be the envy of the Gold Dust twins.

Summarily ?

® ” »

” = 5

"THESE two incidents as vet unclosed “summarily” are the outgrowth of an investigation into relief and politics made by Thomas L. Stokes, Seripps-Howard staff cor-

respondent. Mr. Stokes as a reporter was assigned to look

situation. He was not assigned to inStokes. Anyway, of the 22 cases of WPA which he reported, along with a lot of organization

Kentucky Mr

actin

into the vestigate

political it)

activity on the part of the state

leader Barklev, 20 were chal-

political opposing Senate Majority lenged and declared null and void by a crew of self-investi-gators from the WPA. We have our own opinion about the disinterestedness of the WPA investigators as compared with Mr. Stokes. And we must admit a sense of heartening surprise at the inheard-of fact of a Governmental agency even admitting shortcomings up to nearly 10 per cent. But the important thing, as we see it, is what is being done about such political activity in relief as is admitted. To this writing it seems to be still a case of “keep your

hitherto

friends in power.”

MAKE THE FIRES BRIGHT SELDOM has President Roosevelt spoken more eloquently * than he did vesterday, before the National Education Association on the theme of America’s duty to keep “‘the torch of free thought and free learning” still burning brightly. The President's statement of the need phasis on freedom in America, at this time when the ‘clock of civilization” has been turned back in other parts of the world, was splendid: “If the fires of freedom and civil liberties burn low in other lands, they must be made brighter in our own. If in other lands the press is censored, we must redouble our efforts here to keep it free. If in other lands the eternal truths of the past are threatened by intolerance, we must provide a sate place here for their perpetuation.” toosevelt has dwelt on Yesterday, he did not name those who have burned libraries, exiled scientists, writers and teachers. dispersed universities, censored news, literature and art. It Nor did he name Mayor Hague of Jersey City in the fireside talk last Friday night, when he denounced “attempts to suppress individual liberty under the pretense of patriotism.” That pretense, also, was

Twice, in less than a week. Mr.

this theme.

was not necessary.

obvious. Taking the two speeches together, we hope to see the President make the most of one specific opportunity to brighten the fires of civil liberties in America by demanding Mayor Hague's resignation as vice chairman of the national party which Mr. Roosevelt heads.

AFTER 75 YEARS

T was chance, not design, that brought the armies of

Meade and Lee together at Gettysburg and made that | little Pennsylvania town the stage for the bloodiest and |

most fateful drama in American history. Now, after three-quarters of a century, there is a

planned meeting at Gettysburg. Two thousand who were | young soldiers of the North and of the South are tenting | jer household, cannot be expected to take much time They are old, old men, and for | them there will soon be no North, no South, but only the |

eternal peace to which so many of their comrades went |

on the old campground.

so long ago. And surely it is a happy omen for their country and ours, this anniversary which brings them together once more on what was a field of battle, and what will be for

always a field of honor. Surely there is a lesson for us | | the United States won suffrage. With the ballot, what

who will live beyond them in this visible evidence that old wounds have healed, old quarrels have been forgiven and almost forgotten, and that those who were enemies are ctasping hands as brothers and as Americans all.

He was told that any stich activity on his part in the future would result in his |

for special em- |

‘Washington

By Raymond Clapper

Attempts to Pin Slump on F. D. R. Haven't Won the Popular Support The 'Smear Hoover' Campaign Had.

(Westbrook Pegler Is on Vacation)

ASHINGTON, July 1.—You can add another broken precedent to Roosevelt's record. Up to now he has escaped the fatal rap which the American people usually have handed to any President caught in the company of a full-sized depression. That is the more remarkable because Roosevelt, in a moment of short-sighted boasting during the recovery rise a couple of years ago, told the country “we planned it that way.” Just asking for trouble.

Roosevelt has not escaped without having his Charleston boast mockingly recalled, But this far attempt to pin the depression directly on him apparently has not brought the popular support that the “smear Hoover” campaign achieved. While the evidence is not conclusive, it is reasonably indicative. Two of the most reliable checks of public opinion are the Gallup poll and Fortune magazine's poll. 8 & 4 HE Gallup investigators went around asking people what caused the depression, Three out of 10 —30 per cent—hblamed Roosevelt or some phase of New Deal policy. The other 70 per cent hlamed the depression on something else besides Roosevelt and the New Deal. Fortune's poll approaches from a slightly different angle. One question was, “Do you approve in general of Roosevelt?” To this general question, 54.8 per cent answered “Yes.” About 11 per cent said they didn't know, and nearly 34 per cent said “No.” Curiously, although a majority approved of Roosevelt “in general,” none of his policies had majority support except rearmament. In addition there are scattered indications in the primary contests—such as the outright victories of Senatorial candidates in Alabama and Florida and the defeat of the anti-New Deal Governor Martin in Oregon. In Iowa the Administration favorite for the Democratic Senatorial nomination was beaten after a bungling Administration intervention. But the significant thing about this is that Senator Gillette, knowing the White House had okayed a purge aimed at him, continued to profess that Roosevelt was not hostile and that he was loyal to most of the New Deal.

& & 4 N Kentucky, Governor Chandler, slated for extinction by the Administration, is telling the voters that he is as good a New Dealer as Senator Barkley.

It would not do to try to prove too much. There are instances, as with Senator Bennett Clark in Missouri, where Democrats are so strongly entrenched that they do not have to worry whether Roosevelt is for or against them. Without trying to strain the evidence, it does seem fair to say that in many places Roosevelt still is popular enough to justify candidates in trying to hang to his coattails. They are not running out on him as they did on Hoover in 1932, And if you look close into the cases of some Democratic candidates who are boasting of their independence of Roosevelt, vou will find that they are making a virtue of necessity—as in the case of Senator Tydings of Maryland.

Business By John T. Flynn

Evil Results of Banking Laws May Not Be Far Off.

NEV YORK, July 1.—-It is now five and a half vears since the nation was in arms against the bankers Looking back on their sins it is easy to see they fell into two categories. The first belonged to that group of practices which were flagrant violations of their fiduciary obligations. The other belonged to a group of practices which grew up little by little through the years—practices that were designed to enable banks to make more money, to speed up the speculative activities of the country, to enable state banks to compete with national banks and vice-versa. These latter evils were not positive evils, but represented rather bad thinking on banking policy, One such evil was the gradual projection of the banking system into long-term loans—loans that tended to destroy the liquidity of banks and freeze them. One instance of this was the slow extension of the powers of banks to make real estate loans. On this point the national banks were restrained within bounds. If they had not heen their losses and disasters would have been even worse than they were in 1933. During all this period there were wise and conservative bankers who strenuously opposed these socalled “liberalizations” of the bank laws, but they were not heeded. : Now, ever since 1933. there has been a continually growing tendency not merely to encourage but even to force banks to go more and more into iong-term loans. The leader in this movement has been the Administration itself.

A Deadly Blow

The new bank examination rules which have just been published represent another step in this direction. And it is safe to say that while this may bring a temporary spurt of business it is a deadly blow to the soundness of the banking system. I'here are schools of thought on banking structure which insist on 100 per cent liquidity in banks. There are banking reformers who wish to deprive commercial banks wholly of the right to make any sort of loans save strictly short-time loans. Others would even separate this function from deposit banks. These movements have grown out of the appalling series of bank disasters which have attended freezing longterm real estate and security loans in banking portfolios One thing is certain—the bad tendency in the opposite direction ought to be halted. It is difficult to get people interested in evils which will bring on their bad results in the future. But here is one whose evil results may not be so far off if the policy should be successful for the time being,

A Woman's Viewpoint

By Mrs. Walter Ferguson

RACE CALVIN, intelligent commentator of The |

Houston Press, comes to the defense of club-

women, naming me their critic because of a previous |

article finding fault with some of their programs. I think she’s right on several counts and wrong in her main contention. For example, we must concede that it is the privilege of the individual member to occupy her leisure in studying topics of a dead era if

| she chooses. But when it is argued that the meeting

and talking together that women do has no power to change events, then I am moved to disagree. Maybe I'm too optimistic. But proof has been offered many times that a few women united in a great cause can alter the course of national events,

| To say that our sex is helpless is to confess that we

do not know our history very well and that self-cul-ture is so much wasted effort. The individual clubwoman, busy with matters of

off, but club leaders in every community are betraying their trust if they concentrate their efforts only upon the past, ignoring the pressure of present events—and I regret to say that many of them do. There are groups of women who have been denied a college education, Nobody blames them for sup-

| plementing their knowledge with club programs; but | university and college graduates need hardly go over

the same ground covered in their sophomore years,

Education is supposed to fit them for an intelligent

approach to the important problems of living. Even without the ballot, women in England and

might they not do? Because they are already organized and going cone cerns, women’s clubs are the logical means of exercising our power. ; Much has already been done; but we can do more,

| fight for higher wages,”

| munistic

| the actions of

THE INDIANAPOLIS TIMES Putting It in a Bad

QUR FRIENDS IN Power!

FRIDAY, JULY 1,1938 |

Lai

we oR og A eat] py :

The Hoosier Forum

I wholly disagree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.—Voltaire.

| SCORES APPEAL BY | WPA OFFICIAL

By E. F. M. Your editorial on Aubrey Williams' dangerous and revolutionary

appeal to the members of the Work- | The appeal |

ers Alliance was fine. certainly bears the earmarks of a communistic movement to organize relief workers. His advice to them, “Keep your friends in power and is the first step on the road which led to the fall of Rome, Feeding and haranguing the mobs, the politicians of Rome created a Frankenstein monster which sapped the initiative and morality of the peopie and brought that nation to

[ destruction.

1» . ff] Liberalizing from Mr. Williams whether or not

| the

Senator Sheppard should find out

radical Workers Alliance is a creation of Government officials to perpetuate themselves in power through dispensing relief money. Mt Williams has given evidence that he is greatly interested in this revolutionary idea of encouraging peo-

| ple on relief to organize and agitate

for more relief. The Workers Alliance is purely and simply a comidea. Giving aid and comfort to such a dangerous move-

| ment ought to be sufficient grounds | for removal of any Government of- | ficial. | the man on relief. | relief workers { which will destroy their chances of | ever getting back on good jobs.

Mr. Williams is no friend of He is teaching

revolutionary ideas

All liberal, progressive and conservative newspapers should arduse themselves to immediate action to stop this march down the road to national chaos.

” ” ”

WANTS CO-OPERATION

FROM SENATOR

By N. G.

I am John the Public. As I pay the bills and benefit or suffer from my paid public servant I should be permitted to voice

| my opinion of what Kind he should

be. I want an intelligent Senator who realizes this fact.

{ If a nation faces a serious problem { and in council of a good majority | approve a certain olan,

it is the

democratic duty of the dissenting

| minority to try to make this plan

successful if it is possible. Certainly

| it is not their duty to do all they | can to make it fail, for thus the ma-

jority must fight not only the common enemy, but the minority also Democracy =

common enemy. being independent and statesman. It is on these charges that I indict

{ our senior Senator. In 1932 and 1936,

the American people spoke plainly

(Times readers are invited to express their in these columns, religious controversies excluded. Make your letter short, so all can have a chance. Letters must be signed, but names will be withheld on request.)

views

about what they wanted done. He jumped on the band wagon as a liberal but since '36, he has done much to obstruct the very things we wanted done, For this “Brutus” action he has been loudly acclaimed by the defeated minority, an idol of the conservatives. A small barking dog in a barnyard may create a great commotion, but that does not mean admiring approval. I want my Senator to know the meaning of the word teamwork. There was too much truth in Nazi Goering's remark that in a democracy the people spend most of their energy fighting each other. Must this be so? Therefore I am in favor of giving our senior Senator a long vacation in order to study co-operation and the theory of representative democracy. ” ” . ASSISTANCE ASKED | FOR ROOSEVELT | By Hal Rhodes From the building in which I am writing this article I can see a large number of men. They are waiting to be admitted so that they may | participate in the distribution of | benefits accruing from the jobless

[contend since time began, ignor- | | ance.

As a matter of record, we all

| know that the person who applied

| solutely correct and the

the term tories to the traitors of the Revolutionary period was absame is

| true of the one who used the term copperneads to describe the traitors | of the Civil war period. I descended |

| from

a line of English, Irish and

| Scotch ancestors who landed on the | shores of this great continent many |

| tling in the Southern states.

| man ignora

generations back, most of them sel-

though they had fled from the intolerable oppgession of their native lands, such hs the power of old that they were per-

Al- |

suaded to take up the sword in de- |

fense of the mistaken conviction

that it was right to establish a so- |

ciety based upon the labor of the slave. One of the greatest men of all history fought a sublime battle and finally gave his life in defense of the proposition that all men were created equal. Roosevelt is going to win, so why do not his opponents get behind him and forget their selfish inter- | ests. If we do not fully agree with his methods, we can take up the details later, but right now this man has cried out for assistance and we

| must answer with everything we | have. {

» o ”

| JOBLESS INSURANCE

| insurance which was inspired by our |

great President, Franklin | Roosevelt. Roosevelt uses the terms “copper- | heads” and

expressing his contempt for an indi-

Delano | | office, where it is made so disagree- |

“tories,” not as words | | not leave and are lucky

| vidual who criticizes his views, but |

|as an expression of his impatience | and hatred of the most terrible enemy with whom man has had to

FOREVER OURS By KEN HUGHES

Today is but an interlude; Tomorrow is timed the same! But memory keeps the scenes Better than a golden frame.

DAILY THOUGHT He that believeth and is baptised shall be saved; but he that believeth not | Mark 16:16.

AITH is to believe, on the word

of God, what we do not see, | get it.

dearest |

shall be damned.— |

| PROCEDURE SCORED

| By John Johnson

I am one of the unfortunates who | applied for the so-called unemployment insurance. My case is a sam- | ple of the inefficiency and injustice that an applicant has to contend | with. First you get a separation re- | port from your place of work and then you report over to the U. I. |

able that you feel like leaving be- | fore filing your report. If you do | in filing |

your report, then comes a waiting | period of five to 10 weeks, in which |

you must report in person to the |

board every week. There is so much |

red tape to go through that you are | lucky if you ever receive anything. I filed my report in April, made | three trips upstairs to be interviewed, standing in line for a half day at a time. After the three weeks, I signed a paper saying I was entitled to $10 a week. Now I have reported back there every week since April, still signing papers, but have no{ received a cent. You are sup-

posed to get a pink slip of some kind |

before you get a check, and so far |

after more than 10 weeks I haven't even received a pink slip. This isn't charity, it is something that is due us and we should not have to wait three or four months to A man can starve before

and its reward is to see and enjoy getting through the first mile of red |

| what we believe.~Augustine.

tape.

LET'S EXPLORE YOUR MIND

By DR. ALBERT EDWARD WIGGAM

THE STORY OF HEREDITY.

MO, rs Ah

"THATS

[1 SOPyR GT SBE SOW BaP OS

EXPERIMENTS have shown that women have as keen a sense of time, say the passage of 10 minutes, as men. But apparently more women than men have le appreciation of the value of ti

THE SMITHS

MeN 71a 0 ARE MUCH LESS PUNCTUAL THAN MEN IN KEEPING THEIR ENGAGEMENTS 16 THI& DUE TO A FAULTY SENGE OF TIME? YES ORNO

Agy(cEIfFOb

MAN pT ‘I MADE MY O WAY AND EVERY OTHER MAN CAN DO THE SAME" you Opn —

MOTHER WOW CAN 15ABEL BE THE PRETTIEST GML IN HOOL WHEN MER FATHER AND MOIHER AQE 50 HOMELY ° BECAUSE MER MOTHER MAS GIVEN

HER BVEQY BEAUTY TREATMENT. SINCE CHILDHOOD * YOUR OPINION

especially the other fellow's time. Furthermore, it takes a woman longer to dress and prepare for an engagement than a man. I think these are probably the main factors to explain “the late Mrs, Jones.”

FALSE—absolutely. The biggest |

discovery in modern psychology is the enormous differences among

| people—their range, number and

| permanence.

One man glories in |

pushing ahead-—obstacles only rouse |

his fighting blood.

community. men, if encouraged in their early,

ven 1 fArS—— he big- | UF Sven Jnter yenryeiighe tHe big | and occasionally in a material swallowed in the form

gest successes.

#" » ” 3 ON THE AVERAGE, beautiful -J parents have children above the average in beauty. But I know a case just like Dot tells about. Two sisters—the beautiful one married a handsome man and had seven quite homely children, The homely |

Another man | just can't take it—without help— | | help from parents,

teachers and | And some of these

sister married a rather homely man |

and had three homely daughters, |

| three daughters who were famous

| beauties and one son noted as “the

| states.”

handsomest man in the Southern Nearly all this was due to heredity. The homely mother and father carried the elements that made for beauty in a portion of their germ-cells and those for home- | liness in the other. The beautiful mother and father carried much the same, but the homely father and | mother just had a better “run of | luck” in that the beautiful children happened to be born from the cells | carrying beauty from both sides,

Gen. Johnson Says—

This Columnist Is Shocked by a Quoted Statement of Norris Until He Finds It Was Made Back in '23.

ETHANY BEACH, Del, July 1.—The Baltimore °

Sun’s editorial page for June 28 pulled a prize that is so much better than anything the column has to offer today that it will be shamelessly rehashed here, The editorial begins talking quietly about the cure rent misuse of patronage to coerce votes and then startlingly begins quoting the veteran Senator Norris of Nebraska—the cannonized saint of the third New Deal whom the President says should be elected for life—as follows: “He proposes that the people ‘elect a President who will proclaim from the moment'of his election that he will not attempt to dictate a single measure of legislation; that he will not make a single appointment, from Supreme Court down. to White House Janitor, for any reason other than honesty and efficiency, and that he proposes to abolish the old rotten system of patronage. . . Today the President has become more powerful than all the rest of Governe ment combined. The Administration lays down a cer= tain course and demands that Congress shall follow it. The legislators who show their independence are punished and those that obey are rewarded.

” ” ” i HE punishments are calculated and refined, ‘First his patronage is taken away and his cone stituents are led to believe he is without weight or prestige in Washington, . . . If his wife and daughter have social proclivities, he is made to feel the Admine istration’s displeasure in still subtler ways.' Here fol lows, in words such as only Senator Norris can write, a description of the tactics the White House even now Is using on those who, like Senator Tydings, have ver= tured to show a will of their own, All this . ly more than anything else to make a dictatorship out of a democracy.’ ” Can anybody read this far and not doubt either his own eyesight or the Sun's accuracy? In the next line the editorial knocks the stilts out from under admiration and hope. Senator Norris wasn't writing that this year about Franklin Roosevelt's Administration, He wrote that in 1923 about Cal Coolidge's soda-mint dictation, Nobody has pronged more patronage or been more intimately aligned with the present party of political purging than the plumed knight. No Senator has received more political benefits from it. Yet the record will be searched without finding any repetition of the 1923 philippic against such political racke eteering, © nn EVER in the history of this country have the practices he then so searchingly condemned heen more brazenly and shamelessly pursued, as each day's news reveals more copiously and clearly. Apart from being hypocritical and sinister, all this is unnecessary. Mr. Roosevelt's prestige and over=whelming majorities in Congress are not threatened with destruction, Something more must he intended. There are only two possible purposes. One is over= weening personal power, dictatorial in effect if not in name, The other is petty, spiteful, vicious, personal punishment and vengeance, Either is in violation of American traditions and principles and should be ine dignantly repudiated in the elections,

It Seems to Me

By Heywood Broun

Definite Separation of Liberals

And Conservatives Is Necessary.

EW YORK, July 1.—Nobody will ever get Franke lin Roosevelt mad by calling him. a politician, His newspaper friends say he takes great pride and makes off-the-record boasts that when it comes to that game he is both Culbertson and Sims combined. It seems to me that Mr. Roosevelt has made rather more mistakes than he confessed in the recent ice= box oration. And yet I do not see how either his [riends or his foes can deny his aptitude in the te:hnique of putting forward his policies. I read that Andrew Jackson was equally adroit, but in modern times the President's only White House rival for tne position of Expert No. 1 would be the other Roosevelt. The word “politician” has curious connotations. To some extent the President has taken the sting out of the word by accepting it as a compliment instead of an epithet, no matter from what quarter it comes. If a rank amateur may be permitted to make a suggestion, I think he should act in similar fashion about the word “purge.” For various reasons it is not a popular word at the present time, but when anybody says in anger or alarm that the President is “trying to purge the Democratic Party” he should reply, “Oh, yes, indeed.” He indicated his desire to separate the sheep from the goats in his radio chat, but he did not go quite the length of saying that he wants to split the Demo= cratic Party. I think that is his desire. I certainly hope it is.

Where T. R. Pioneered

By one of the curious and ironical twists of history Franklin D. Roosevelt in this respect is following into regions where his fifth cousin pioneered. Col. Roose= velt failed because no logical division between the two major parties can be attained unless both are split wide open at the same time, Already Mr, Roosevelt has made deeper inroads into the Republican ranks than T. R. ever did into the Democrats. Profiting by the experience of T. R., President Roosevelt has no intentions of sacrificing the great political value of the name and local machinery of the Democratic Party, It would be said that Franke lin D. Roosevelt has no personal claim to ownership of the Democratic Party. But neither has Carter Glass, and obviously the two men do not belong on the same team, Nor do La Guardia and Vandenberg, It puzzles me that sincere conservatives should be so irate at any suggestion of a purge. If democracy is to function successfully, there should be no cong fusion. We ought to have a liberal and a conservative party. The Virginia Reel has gone on so long that we are all mixed up. Let somebody blow a whistle and say, “Choose your partners.”

Watching Your Health

By Dr. Morris Fishbein

ARIHUANA has recently become a problem of exceeding importance throughout the United States. In various places all sorts of queer names aio used to describe this drug. In some places marihuana cigarets are called reefers, Other names are grifas, greefas, muggles, miggles, mooters, Indian hay, joy smecke and loco weed. The plant is known scientifically as ~annabis indica; a drug derived from cannabis Indica Is called hashish, In ancient times hashish was used as an anesthetic and sometimes was known as bhang, For many years bhang has been smoked in cigarets

of tablets, In some foreign countries this drug is mixed with sugar and eaten exactly as candy is eaten, Since, however, the drug has been introduced into the United States, it is used primarily in the form of cigarets, and considerable numbers of addicts assem ble in selected places to indulge in marihuana-smoke ing orgies. During the last 10 years the excessive use of marie huana has become prevalent that all states except North Carolina and Tennessee have passed legislation against its distribution. The National Government has put a special tax on the use of this product and on the growth of the plant, However, the plant grows so widely that in many places it is found along the roadsides and in vacant lots. In a previous generation cannabis indica was free quently prescribed for migraine headaches, and also to produce a sense of well-being in people who were inclined to be melancholy or nervous. More recently" the drug has fallen into disuse and it is not included in the list of “Useful Drugs” which is published by the Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry of the American Medical Association,

whic AY

* *