Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 1 June 1938 — Page 11
dor SA AR, ASA
PAGE 10
The Indianapolis Times
(A SCRIPPS-HOWARD NEWSPAPER)
ROY W. HOWARD LUDWELL DENNY MARK FERREE President Editor Business Manager
Price in Marion County, 3 cents a copy; delivered by carrier, 12 cents a week.
Owned and published daily (except Sunday) by The Indianapolis Times Publishing Co., 214 W. Maryland St. Mail subscription rates in Indiana, $3 a year; outside of Indiana, 55 cents a month.
Fe
Give Light and the People Wili Fina Their Own Way
Member of United Press, Scripps - Howard Newspaper Alliance, NEA Service, and Audit Bu-
reau of Circulations. RIley 5551
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1, 1938
A POSSIBLE COMPROMISE
EF all the compromises yet proposed on the matter of differentials in the wage-hour controversy, the one suggested in the last few days impresses us as the simplest and best, if a compromise should prove the only way. The reason being that it leaves undebatable the $11-a-week base. And thereby it would settle that question of whether $11 for 44 hours work is too much for the nation that brags about being the richest in the world. It would limit discussion to figures above $11 a week; would permit any employer to demand a hearing on the “escalator” clause which starts operating with the second year of the act, when the minimum rises 5 cents an hour. After 25 cents (or $11 for a 44-hour week) had been definitely set by law as the “floor,” then for anyone who could prove that paying more would put him out of business or cause large reduction in his employment the wage rise would be arrested. We believe it would be better that such a compromise be worked out than that the whole effort to establish a floor under wages and a ceiling on hours be allowed to fail. How such a compromise, if finally deemed necessary, could be made operative involves an issue basic to the whole long wage-hours dispute. If to regulate the escalator, to adjudicate the exceptions beyond 11-and-44, a horde of bureaucrats had to be added to the public payroll and
| |
|
turned loose on every community in the land, it would be | better to fix $11 as the minimum, cut out the escalator, and try out 11-and-44 for a year; then, out of the year’s experi- |
ence, legislate beyond that. The ominous bureaucratic
probability in the Wage-Hour Bill first proposed was that |
what helped kill the original effort. be devised by which authorities already constituted and
But if some way could |
paid for (the Labor Department, or a Congressional Com- | mitte assigned to specialize on the subject) could “follow | the ball” and report on the effectseof the 1l-and-44, the |
compromise might work well.
The vital thing is for the U. S. A. to declare by statute | that $11 a week is not too much, North, South, East or | West, for anyone in industry who is willing to put up in |
return for that sum 44 hours of labor.
THE GARDEN TOUR
SCHEDULED several weeks later than in previous years
the annual Garden Tour on Saturday and Sunday will | show for the first time outstanding Indianapolis gardens |
in summer blossom.
The 12 gardens to be visited have been selected on | the basis of variety, size, color and character, with a logi- |
cal itinerary not too difficult to follow.
Guides are to be |
on duty at all gardens, which are to be open from 11 a. m. |
to 6 p. m. both days.
The tour is sponsored by the Mothers’ Club of Park | School with the aim of stimulating pride in Indianapolis |
as a city of beautiful homes and gardens. to be used for scholarships at the school.
WISE DECISION
Proceeds are |
RESIDENT ROOSEVELT and his leaders in Congress |
made a wise decision yesterday.
They decided not to attempt to pass the Government |
Reorganization Bill at this session.
Early in the next ses- |
sion, Senator Barkley and Rep. Rayburn said, they will press | for “some kind of effective reorganization of our Govern- | ment in the interest of greater efficiency and practical econ- |
omy”’—economy not having been stressed in the first bill.
Two months ago the country was torn by controversy |
over this measure, which became a symbol of executive en-
croachment on the legislative, just as the Supreme Court | Bill had been a symbol of executive encroachment on the |
judiciary. As such, it was beaten.
Congress into passing it at this time—would have been
a tragic mistake. The country, in grave economic trouble, |
would have suffered too much from another bitter fight.
A VIEW OF GERMANY
10 - ~ — r . ~ | MISS LIESEL WOLF, 37, Jewish refugee from Germany
| up to the present time.
who had entered this country on a six-week tourist's
visa and faced the prospect of having to return to the | Fatherland, leaped to her death the other morning from a |
fifth-floor club window in New York City. It was a profoundly saddening occurrence. But the
point that most impressed us was the light it cast upon
conditions in Germany.
Looking down upon a concrete pavement five floors !
below is no pleasant experience. isn’t an attractive sight.
The hard surface there | It doesn’t promise enjoyment.
But to Miss Liesel Wolf it looked better than going back |
to the land of her birth. she couldn’t face the Nazis again. That tells a good deal, we suspect, of what has happened to Germany.
FISHING BY EAR
ONE of the most interesting treatises on the habits of fish since the Book of Jonah, in the Old Testament, to judge by press reviews, must be the new work of" Dr. Maurice Klein, retired Newark physician, entitled “The Stimulating and Depressive Influences of Musical Vibrations on Ichthyopsida.” Dr. Klein, in collaboration with G. Howard Scott, organ-
ist of the Convention Hall in Ashbury Park, N. J., has been |
engaged for several years in elaborating and verifying his theory. It is, in brief, that fish prefer music with their meals. They like classical music. They swim inshore when
Beethoven and Bach agitate the waters around Convention |
Hall pier. They nibble to the music at Dr. Klein's minnows
and lures. It opens up new avenues of invention. technique certainly would come later. Perhaps some varieties of fish would like the army mess call; others would yield only to a lush vocalist’s “Come up 'n’ see me sometime.” But now that Dr. Klein has given us the idea, all that can be worked out.
She could leap to her death, but |
«. 1 Refinements in
Fair Enough
By Westbrook Pegler
It's All Right for a President to Be Partial in State Elections, But Not While Using Public Funds.
EW YORK, June 1.—Nobody can seriously object to a President’s expression of a desire for Senators and Congressmen who will do as he orders. If the President is a man who considers himself to be all-knowing, then he is only being consistent and, in a queer way, honest, when he asks for a purely nominal legislature, committed beforehand to every proposal which he may present, If a President has that opinion of himself, it is
his right to address the voters through his stooges, or |
even directly under his own name, with an.appeal that he be made supreme, Other dictators abolish legislatures entirely, but each to his own whim, and an American President-dictator might prefer to preserve the form. If he were 100 per cent successful in his appeal, however, the preservation of the form would represent a great unnecessary expense. Knowing that any White House bill would have the effect of a decree, he might, in the interests of economy, efficiency and speed, devise a bank check “aye” to be autegraphed by each member at the start of each session, and then send them all home and apply that indorsement to all his commands.
” ” » T is idle to argue that a President does wrong to ask the people to give him such_powers, disguising the appeal in the form of White House indorsement in support of individual candidates. He is within his right, but it is then up to the people to analyze his request and his motives, weigh the effects and decide whether they want to abandon their ac-
customed form of government and yield to the will of one man, augmented, perhaps, by schemes purred in his ear by members of a secret political household. There is legitimate objections, however, against the use of Government money, the people's own money, to get this power from them at the polls. This is the point that is purposely ignored in all the arguments in favor of President Roosevelt's interference in state politics. There were those who, in the beginning of the New Deal, were cynical enough to suggest that a President with billions at his disposal would yield to the temptation to use it to get further authority. That seemed utterly unthinkable then. Nevertheless, this was predicted, and the predictions have been borne out. ® zn ”
A then, succor has become a political work,
THE INDIANAPOLIS TIMES
and Harry Hopkins, the greatest individual em- |
ployer in the country, has dropped a hint to the dependent voters of Iowa, which may be interpreted as an admonition to vote right. A similar hint from
Henry Ford to his employees would be considered out-
rageous, and might cause him to be yanked up. It is the sort of hint which has been denounced by New
Dealers as vicious arrogance in the case of private employers. But Senators and Congressmen who do not obey the President's decrees will be fought by a campaign fund taken out of the puhklic treasury. That is what all the shouting is for. It isn't that a President must keep a still tongue in his head and pretend to be impartial in state elections. But no man ever should have been given such vote-getting power and the power should never be placed in any man’s hands agaire That money can never buy the people anything one-half so precious as what they are asked to sell.
Business
By John T. Flynn
The Government Is Needing Expert Economists, Not an Advisory Body.
Nv YORK, June 1—Senator Bulkley of Ohio wants a national council to advise the Govern= ment on matters of policy. He wants leaders of industry and labor to unite in an advisory body to tell the Government what it should do to get out of the depression. Secretary Roper had an idea like this when he came into office. He created an advisory council of leading businessmen inside the Department of Commerce. In the early days it exercised some influence. It favored the NRA. And then in 1934 it made a great contribution. It urged that the Government should continue the NRA but that the Government should step out of it and let business run it. It got no response to this and so it has kept up a kind of murmur ever since without getting anywhere. Now Senator Bulkley wants to do pretty much the same thing save that he would add a few labor people to the council. Senator Bulkley runs on the principle that these business and labor leaders know what can be done about our economic troubles. Business ought to have the right at all times to present its case fully to the proper Government authority. But Senator Bulkley wants to erect a small business group into a body with semisovereign powers, with the right to give its views to the President and Congress. Business has made up its mind about this depression. It believes that the depression can be ended by ending control by the Government of economic factors in our life. It has persistently preached that ‘all that is necessary is for the Government to let it alone. To create a council made up of businessmen is merely to give a kind of Government sanction to such recommendations.
To have revived it now—to have attempted to whip = Serious Adjustments Necessary
It is becoming more and more clear that the business situation has gotten to a point where it can= not be improved save by certain very serious and difficult adjustments in the economic system. It would be far more intelligent to summon not an ad-
visory council of businessmen, but an advisory council |
of experts who are really familiar with eccnomic law. This is something which has not been done Economists have been called to Washington. Economists have been sent to Washington by private interests. But for the most part they are men quite incompetent to deal with the problems confronting the Government. The Government should summon a small council of the greatest economists in the country. Senator Bulkley’s plan may have the appearance of doing something but it will really get us nowhere.
A Woman's Viewpoint By Mrs. Walter Ferguson
S the American boy handicapped because his early training is almost wholly in women’s hands? Many people believe and say so, but fortunately that doesn’t establish the truth of the assertion. I'd like some proof along with all the surmising about our lack of stamina, courage and sanity; for
it seems to me that women have just about twice as
much practical sense as men. Our sex, we often hear, is having difficulty shaking itself free from narrow views and old sex antagonisms. Prune juice! What women are really doing is much harder. They're trying to pry the old sex prejudices out of men’s minds, as they inch their way into positions of authority in a society which they help to create and support but about whose management they have, as yet, very little to say. If the American boy is retarded by all this mama stuff, I suppose you're going to tell me he'd be better off in a country dominated wholly by the so-called masculine idealism—Germany for instance, or Italy, or Japan. Over there he wouldn’t be handicapped— dear me, no! Hed be too unimportant for consideration. All this talk about the dreadful results of the feminine influence is refuted by a swift glance around the globe. Every nation which allows women a share of control is a comfortable place compared to those where the government lets Papa do all the thinking for the family. These father-complex folk are engaged in building ideals which are a definite menace to civilization —and do I hear anybody say that women have contributed nothing to the making of what little we have? Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Switzerland, Holland, England, Canada, America, even modern Russia— look them over. Where women speak their minds and act upon their convictions, there only can boys be sure of a secure and reasonably happy future,
| | | | | |
|
|
| |
| not the industries, | people of this city should be pro- | tected from invasion of unwanted
| other cities have led to bloodshed ;
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1, 1938]
A Prime Idea! —By Talburt
WHATAYA SAY
WE Pe THIS ON FIRST
I wholly disagree with what you soy,
The Hoosier Forum
defend to the death your right to say it.—Voltaire.
but will
HAGUE GIVES REASONS FOR PROHIBITING MEETINGS By Frank Hague, Mayor of Jersey City
We are opposing the granting of outdoor meeting permits to the Communists who are leading the C. I. C. attacks upon the industries, business and property of our city, and to radicals who seek to pave the way for the entry of the C. I. O. into Jersey City by taking up the cudgels in their behalf. Jersey City has, until the present | her tiny neighbor, provided no controversy, never refused a permit [other nation went to Czechoslofor outdoor meetings. Our present | VaKia's rescue. In other words, the refusal does not raise the question of | Kellogg Pact, which Secretary Hull the right of free speech, but clearly | invoked, is at absolute variance
presents the issue as to whether Or nd Vice. versa business and | : WY Usiness | Should Germany go to war Po her small neighbor, in di- | rect violation of the Kellogg Pact
groups whose destructive tactics In|. voked by Secretary Hull, the to
(Times readers are invited to express their views in these columns, religious controversies excluded. Make your letter short, so all can have a chance. Letters must be signed, but names will be withheld on request.)
with the American Neutrality Act, |
and destruction of property, and made a mockery of law and order. | The people of Jersey, City demand | that the Mayor and city officials protect the city against such tactics. That, and that alone, is the reason | why permits are now being refused. | The independent newspapers of | our city have fearlessly presented | the true facts of this controversy. | As much, however, cannot be said for the press outside this city. I am seeking only to preserve to | our citizens the enjoyment of their | industries, their business and their | property, and to safeguard to the | many thousands of workmen residing here the right peacefully to earn a livelihood without molesta- | tion from radical, Red elements | who are seeking to destroy American ideals and American institutions. : My every act during the 25 years in the government of Jersey City has been in keeping with my present attitude. I have never permitted labor violence or disorder in this city, regardless of who sought to initiate it, and as long as I am the responsible head of the gov- | ernment of our city my purpose to | maintain law and order will remain | unchanged.
” » ” | U. S. FOREIGN POLICY | TERMED INCONSISTENT {By W. P. 8S. Trying to figure Uncle Sam's paradoxical foreign policy has got { the world dizzy. Secretary Hull's warning to Ger- | many and Czechoslovakia that the | United States expects them to settle their quarrel without recourse | to war carried with it the implication that this country will do some- | thing about it unless heeded. Yet, in case of conflict, the United States would be bound by law to { make _a dash for cover and remain there until Germany had swallowed '
United States would be bound apply its neutrality law. And that would range this country on the side of Germany against CzechosloPresumably all commerce between us and the belligerents woul cease on the President's order, save what they could pay for in cash and carry back across the Atlantic in their own or foreign bottoms.
Czechoslovakia has no ships. She |
is landlocked, and most of her land approaches are controlled by Germany. Germany, on the other hand, not only has the necessary bottoms in which to carry her purchases, but
MY FRIEND
By NORMAN ROBINSON From Erin's Isle I once did come, To tread new paths on Hoosier sod; And down one road of this new world, I met my friend, and I call him Bob.
As many gems within him lay As shamrocks on Irish ground; And Ireland's charm could ne'er surpass The sunshine that in Bob I've found.
Missouri's hills he once did leave, To also tread on Hoosier sod, Yet, now at last, I must reveal, An Irish heart I've found in Bob.
DAILY THOUGHT
And she made haste, and let down her pitches from her shoulder, and said, Drink, and I will give thy camels drink also: so I drank, and she made the camels drink also.—Genesis 24:46.
O cultivate kindness is a valuable part of the business of life.~Johnson.
also a certain amount of cash—gold
from Austria in violation of the Kellogg Pact. All of which is amazingly inconsistent. The Kellogg Pact, apparently, expounds a basic American doctrine. So, it would seem, does the neutral act. Yet they tend to pull the nation in opposite directions at the same time, ” ” o SAYS ROOSEVELTS REALLY RUGGED
By J. O'R. | You have to hand it to those | Roosevelts. Did you read Mrs. R.'s column telling how, it being a rainy day in Romney, W. Va., she walked
| great. | invested to make money. ( and lift up the average income,
| man who labors.” | of wealth is a fake. | local, state and Federal, are nowhere near as high in { this country as they are in any other great nation
which for the most part, she stoie |
into the New Century Hotel and
her picnic lunch there?
(ate with knife and fork, the sissy. The rest used fingers. | All those who march on the side |of Rugged Individualism vs. the Rugged Roosevelts had better put their ruggedness to that acid test: | Let them march into a hotel, carrying their own grub, and eat it there with their fingers. un » ” SPARE WHIP, PLEA | OF READER By M. M.
The recent news story of the two fathers who balked when a judge sentenced their boys to a public horsewhipping should be commented upon. Both boys, in their ’teens, are said to have admitted a theft of wire “for the deviltry of it.” The fathers objected to the publicity feature, as was their right. One of them stated that because of a heart ailment his boy wasn’t going to be horsewhipped. The fathers are right. One of them declared tnat the theft was his boy's first offense; being caught and sent to jail has probably frightened him enough. Then, too, if judges would sentence adults to horsewhipping if the crime deserved it—such as wife or child beating—they would be better judges. Why horsewhip kids? Let the fathers severely punish the boys but without the whip. The whip is needed in law today; but it is not needed against youngsters who are not criminals and have no previous record of criminality. No boy of mine shall ever be horsewhipped, judge or no juage; and if either of my boys ever get into trouble they will be severely punished, but not that wey. It is about time that we, in America, made the punishment fit the crime—and the age of crimi-
asked (and got) permission to eat |
Only one member of her party |
nals.
GOOD CONVERSATIONAL ST MUST BE A GOOD LISTENER. NUE... FASE
le LONELINESS CHIEFLY THE RESULT OF FE, AR 2
TO SAY." YOUR OPINION
IT IS ONE of the surest ways to make yourself be considered a good taiker. Why? Simply because real listening is a very active, entertaining, energetic process. Even if you don't speak a word, yoy nod
"DAD I DON'T SEE WHY WOMEN INHERIT TALKATIVENES® 50 MUCH MORE > THAN MEN THE MEN REALLY NEED TO TALK MORE." HUH - WOMEN DON'T INHERIT IT, DICK, = iT'5 BECAUSE THEY HAVE MORE
COPVRIGNT IPB SONN DILLE OB
and gesture and show your interest. Nothing will draw the speaker out as this does. He'll go away thinking you are a fine talker, having failed to observe that he did nearly all the actual talking.
LET'S EXPLORE YOUR MIND
By DR. ALBERT EDWARD WIGGAM | SO THAT most helpful minis- |
| & ter, Joseph Fort Newton, St.|
James Church, Philadelphia, says in | his fine article in a recent Atlantic, | “A Minister's Mail.” Like myself | he receives thousands of letters from broken, lonely and fear-rid-den people, and I agree with him that never were so many human souls so lonely and so afraid as they are today. Especially in the cities, where they are trampled on and where apparently nobody cares what becomes of them. Solitude, as he says, is one thing—a thing of quiet and peace — but loneliness is the fearful sense of being helpless in a world where we are surrounded with other human beings with whom we can not overcome our inhibitions, shyness, and fear. ” ” ”
WOMEN are more talkative
than men, as research shows, | but why—ah, the eternal question! It is probably due to something in their inherited constitution, but | whether it is more thyroid or what William James called a “hair trigger nervous constitution,” or greater natural interest in the immediate surroundings which is the subject of most conversations—well, we just don’t know. We do know it is not because they have more general knowledge because the sexes run about neck and neck on this point.
Gen. Johnson Says
In View of F. D. R's Tax Speech
It Is Hard to Escape Idea That His Advisers Don't Want Recovery.
NNAPOLIS, Md. June 1.—A gentle criticism of the President's radio speech from Arthurdale on taxes is that several of its statements of fact were incorrect. As Senator Harrison tenderly suggested, the President was perhaps misinformed by Treasury officials. A new phrase appeared—taxes on “increase of wealth” as though, under the Constitution, that is taxe able. Such is not the fact. Income only is taxable, If a man owns a herd, its natural increase is not taxable until he sells it and changes his “increase in wealth” into “income.” ” HE inequity in principle of any capital gains tax is that a man may work for years on a book, a ‘herd, a business—and receive no income. sells it at a profit, that may be “increase in wealth,” but if not distinguished from “income” he has to pay a tax counted as though it were income in a single vear instead of the deferred income of several years of effort. The fear of that chills business and delays sales—the swift and constant turnover of what we call “good business.” It is neither accurate, logical nor fair and it is one cause retarding recovery. The Pres= ident didn’t tell his hearers about that. His illustra« tions were misleading and needlessly provocative of envy and class hatred. Opening with references to human misery at Scott's Run, the speech attacked the new tax bill as a device to prevent a Huey Long—"share-our-wealth" program. Unless we are to change our economic syse= tem to a form of communism, there can be no recovs ery unless money can be invested to make money, That is the economic system under which we became The old tax law prevented money from being It didn't share-our-wealth It shared our poverty and degraded the average income. » o » HE speech suggested that the old tax structures “soaked the rich.” The truth is that our tax system soaked and still soaks everybody and the poor more than the rich, There is hardly an article of common consumption from bread ta brandy, in which
the tax element of cost 1s not about 20 per cent. In some, it is much higher, “Taxes,” as the President, himself once said, “are paid in the sweat of every The third New Deal distribution The speech said outright “taxes,
” n
that pretends to be up-to-date.” That statement is simply not true. In Britain, the tax is higher on peo= ple of little income. It is lower only on larger ine comes and there is no capital gains tax at all. In view of the whole speech it is hard to escape the idea that the President's advisers don’t want to see recovery, Some of them have said “not until we get our program through.” Whatever effect these tax changes might have had to stimulate business recovery was the hope that idle capital could invest itself to earn. That is a long-pull process. That hope is dimmed by the President's threat to revive his busie ness-Killing taxes.
The Liberal View
By Harry Elmer Barnes
Writer Claims U. S., Through Its Exports, Is Giving Aid to Japan.
EW YORK, June 1.—The Roosevelt Administrae tion has been accused of many contradictions, For example, while we were paying farmers under the AAA to cultivate land we were proceeding under the CCC and other agencies to reclaim more land for cultivation, But there is a far more serious contradiction, and one which is not at all necessary or inevitable. It is something which Mr. Roosevelt and Mr. Hull could and should correct at once. It is dealt with by Eliot Janeway in an article on “Japan's Partner” in Harper's Magazine, Through our present exports to Japan we are not only making possible the Japanese conquests in China today but are preparing Japan for greater conquests, And at the same time we are planning to spend billions of dollars to protect ourselves against these future Japanese conquests. As Mr. Janeway makes evident: “We are helping Japan to conquer North China by selling her the vital raw materials she needs for armaments.” Without our sales of scrap iron, steel and oil to Japan she literally could not proceed with her war against China. Even more colossal and momentous is our folly in helping Japan to carry through a second industrial revolution which will thoroughly mechanize her steel, armament and motor industries and render her largely independent of American oil. When this is accomplished Japan can proceed fo attempt to cone quer Siberia or to defy the United States in Far Easte ern waters.
Arms Costs Exceed Export Values
In the meantime our rearmament expenditures, which are directed almost exclusively at Japan, will amount to a much greater figure than the value of the Japanese imports from the United States. The absurdity of all this is thus summarized by Mr, Janeway: “Well, there is the story—a very simple one. Japan is the one nation in the world whose aggression we fear. Japan is the unashamed attacker of a country with whom we sympathize, whose magnificent defensive stand we admire heartily. In this attack have occurred atrocities—the bombing of universities, for example—which shock the world. “American industry is selling Japan the goods which permit her to do this and to rear grandiose schemes for continuing to do this on a scale so huge that all western Asia will be reduced to the level of the Japanese subjects in Koroa. “Here, then, is the paradox. The Japanese menace is made possible by American exports. Because of the Japanese menace our Government is building bat« tleships with money which might otherwise go for housing or to ease the tax burden of our people. What is to be done about this situation is up to the Amer« ican people. Here are the facts.”
Watching Your Health
By Dr. Morris Fishbein
HERE are few people without birthmarks or other skin blemishes of one type or another. The so-called strawberry birthmark is a mass of blood vessels collected in a knot near the surface, Sometimes they are flat, but in other cases they are elevated. According to the distance from the surface, they are either brilliant scarlet in color or blue. Another type of birthmark contains more cellular
tissue and less fluid. This type appears to be pale blue or gray in color and is not as spongy as the strawberry birthmark. Usually immediately after birth these spots may seem insignificant and small. Thereafter they may grow, reaching a fairly good size by the time the child is 3 weeks or several months old. Then they may stop growing and, in fact, may sometimes disappear. Another type of skin growth is called the port wine birthmark. These marks are collections of small blood vessels with various amounts of pigment deposited from the blood into the skin. They seldom get larger and there is not much that can be done for them, although occasionally they disappear aftee suitable medical treatment with ultraviolet rays. In the past it has been customary to treat skin lesions of this type with the electric needle, to freeze them with carbon dioxide snow, to cauterize them with heat or various chemicals like carbolic acid or nitrig acid, to cut them out or to treat them with radium. A more recent method is to inject the blood vessels in such growths with various chemical substances that cause a slight inflammatory reaction inside the blood vessels, eventually resulting in scarring with oblitera« tion or disappearance of the birthmark. Such methods are exceedingly delicate, but when carried out under proper conditions by a physician who has been suitably trained in the method, the results are in most instances exeelient,
1
rr ————————
NS oH ” SO
A SAS TA Ml
£
|
8
Tom
It he then .