Indianapolis Times, Indianapolis, Marion County, 1 June 1937 — Page 2

Text of President Roosevelt's Income Tax Message

By United Press WASHINGTON, June 1, — Following is the text of President Roosevelt's message to Congress asking that income

tax loopholes be plugged:

To the Congress of the United States: A condition has been developing during the past few months so serious to the nation that the Congress and ‘the people are entitled to " information ahout it. The | Secretary of the Treasury has given me a report of a preliminary study of income tax returns for the calendar year 1936. This report ‘reveals efforts at avoiding and evasion of tax-liability, so widespread and so amazing both in’ their boldness and their ingenuity, that further action without delay seems imperative. ~ We face a challenge to the power of the Government to collect, uniformally, fairly and without discrimination, taxes based on statutes adopted by the Congress. ad

CITES TAX AVOIDANCE

: Mr. Justice Holmes said “taxes are what we pay ety.” Too many individuals; however, want the civilization at a discount.

~ Methods of escape or intended escape from tax liability are? many. Some are instances of avoidance which appear to have the color of legality; others are on the borderline of legality; others are plainly contrary even te the letter of the law. All are. alike in. that they are defiinitely contrary to the spirit of the law. All are alike in that they represent a determined effort on the part of those who use them to dodge the payment of taxes which Congress based on ability to pay. All are alike in that failure to pay results in shifting the tax load to the shoulders of others less able to pay, and in mulcting tae Treasury Qf the Government's just due.

LETTER FROM TREASURY

1 commend to your attention the following letter from the Secretary of the Treasury. . “The Secretary of the Treasurys “Washington,” or “May 29, 1937. “My Dear Mr. President: “AS you know, the Treasury was surprised and disturbed by the failure of the receipts from the income tax on. March 15 to /measure up to the budget estimates. Therefore, we undertook an immediate investiga-| tion. Only a preliminary report ‘can be made at this tHis time because - the complete investigation covering all the income tax returns filed will require the balance of this year. Furthermore, since many of the returns of large manufacturing corporations have not yet been filed, the present report is confined almost’ wholly to data. disclosed by the individual tax returns.« - “But =ven this preliminary report discloses conditions so serious that immediate action is called for. More than ithe usual examination and audit by the Treasury is needed. Ir seems clear that if tax evasion aud tax avoidance can je promptly stopped throtigh legislation and regulations resulting from a special investig=tion a very large portion . of the d=ficiency in revenues will be restored to the Treasury.

MEANS OF EVASION

“I herewith enumerate some of the prircipal devices now being employed by taxpayers with large incomes for the purpose of defeating the income taxes which would normally be payable by them. As we continue our preliminary examination, other devices are -being disclosed. “1, The device of evading taxes by . setting up foreign personal holding ", corporations in the Bahamas, Pana- | ma, Newfoundland and other places where taxes are low and corporation: laws lax. : “Americans have fornied 64 such companies in the Bahamas alone in 1935 and 1936, and 22 more were organized by Americans in the Ba- | hamas during the past two months. Panama and Newfound- | land seem to be even more fertile territory since their corporation laws make it more difficult to ascértain who the actual stockholders are. Moreover, the stockholders .have resorted’ to all manner of devices to prevémt-the acquisition of . information regarding their companies. The “companies are frequently organized through foreign lawyers, with dummy incorporators and dummy directors, so that the names of the real parties in interest do not appear. “One American citizen with a $3,000,000 Bahamas corporation has apparently attempted to prevent the Bureau of Internal Revenue from catching up with him by filing his individual tax returns in successive years from towns in New Brunswick, British Columbia and Jamaica.

DEFIES TREASURY

“Another ‘individual believes that he has been so successful in removing his assets from the United States to the Bahamas that he is defying the Treasury to collect a

tax upon a $250,000. fee he has re- |

ceived; and by way of insult, he

has offered to compromise his ad- |

mitted tax liability of $33,000 for past years by a payment of $1700. “Still another individual showed a large net loss on his. personal return, for 1936. In considerable part, the loss was due to the large deduction. he claims for interest on a loan made to him by his personal holding company. But the man in question is no object of charity, for his personal holding company, organized in Canada, had an income of over $1,500,000 from ‘American dividends in 1936, though it has not yet filed a return. “Perhaps the most flagrant | case of this character is that of .

BARGAIN PERMANENTS

Croquignole Seam ion air g Frum, Shapes Set and glet ends, Roberts Bea Mass, Ave,

{ surance policies.

a retired American Army officer with a large income from valuable American securities which he desires to sell at a very large profit. To escape our income and inheritance tax laws, he used the device of becoming a naturalized Canadian citizen, and six days later organized four Bahamas corporations to hold his securities. He and his lawyers apparently think that he can now sell his securities: free from. any taxes on his profits, since there are no income taxes in the Bahamas, and that he has adroitly escaped American taxes.

FOREIGN INSURANCE

“2, The device of foreign insurance companies. * » “Two New York insurance agents have caused the organization of insurance companies in the Bahamas with a view to enabling taxpayers to secure spurious deductions for interest through an ingenious scheme for the issuance of life inAmericans - who went into the scheme purported to pay a large single premium for their policies, but immediately borrowed

for civilized soci- | nolders sought, to obtain a large de-

back practically the entire sum. | Under the plan the so-called policy-

| duction for interest on this loan,

{ although the fact was that no in-|

terest was really paid. By this

means five prominent Americans

sought to evade nearly $550,000 in

‘income taxes in the years 1932 to

| 1936. | the Treasury's investigators and all ‘of ‘the taxpayers have now submitted offers to pay the full amount

This fraud was discovered by

of taxes evaded, plus interest. Until our investigation is completed we do not know how many similar companies may have been organized in other countries, and utilized by our citizens; nor do we yet know whether this newly invented type of fraud has other ramifications.

the yacht, and an annual depreciation allowance. None of these items would be deductible if this individual owned the yacht 'personally.

©

HOME CORPORATIONS

“A grest many wealthy taxpayers are utilizing a similar arrangement for the operation of their country places and town houses.

“One man has placed his five-million-dollar city residence in such a, corporation; another his racing stable whose losses last year were nearly $200,000. The tax savings he thus sought to obtain through the

use of the holding company were

$140,000. “One wealthy woman has improved on the general plan of evasion by causing her personal holding company, which owns her country place, to employ her husband at a salary to manage it. She can thereby supply him with pocket money, and

in effect claims a tax deduction for

the expense of maintaining him. “3. The device of artificial deductions for ‘interest, losses, etc. “Paxpayers are seeking greatly. to reduce their. personal income taxes by claiming deductions for interest on loans to them by their personal holding companies, or on loans to them by their family trusts. These transactions normally have no business purpose, but are merely an artificial means of shifting income from one meémber of the family subject to high surtax rates to another member of the family subject to lower rates. “Thus; one woman claims a large annual deduction for interest on a loan made to her by her husband as trustee of a trust which she created for their children. The mother thereby seeks to secure a deduction for her contribution to the children’s support, and since the trust is revocable by her husband, the parents still have the desired confrol over the property and its income,

. HOLDING COMPANIES

“3. The device. of domestic personal holding companies:

. “The rates™®f tax .applicable to personal holding companies were reduced in 1936 at the time of the enactment of the [undistributed profits tax. It was believed at that time that the combined rates of the two taxes would be| sufficient -to insure the distribution of the entire ine comes of these| companies, and the consequent. imposition of surtaxes upon their owners. This expectation has not been realized. “Thus, the single stockholder of one large personal holding company saved himself $322,000 by causing his company to distribute none of its income tp him. , “In another case, a man and his wife saved $791,000 through the use of personal holding companies in 1936. “In a third case, the personal holding | company reported over $500,000 of net income, but the total taxes paid by the two stockholders, husband and wife, were. less than $6000, due principally to credits for payments on indebtedness the holding company prudently incurred in accumulating . properties for its owners. If the personal holding company had not been in existence, the stockholders would have paid over $200,000 additional income taxes.

AUDITING DIFFICULTY

“Another favorite device is to organize a considerable number of personal holding companies, not only for the sake of reducing the tax, but of increasing the Treasury’'s difficulties in auditing transactions between companies. "At last accounts one man had caused be|set up some 96 companies scajtered all over the country. Two other individuals were utilizing 23 personal holding companies. 44, The device of imeorporting yachts and country estates. | “Many wealthy taxpayers toda are dodging the express prov of the law denying deductions fo rsonal expenles by incerporate ing their yachts or their country tates, turning over to the yacht or to the estate securities yielding an income just sufficient to pay the entire expenses of operation. Hundreds of thousands of dollars in income taxes are annually avoided in-‘this way. “Thus, one man’s yacht is owned by his personal holding company, along with three million dollars in securities. He rents the yacht from his company for a sum far less than the cost of upkeep, and the. company uses its income from the s:curities to pay the wages of the captain and crew, the expenses of operating

| interests:

¢ HOBBY LOSSES

“In the same category are losses deducted by taxpayers who. claim

that their racing stable or hobby

farms were operated for profit, even though a profit is never realized. Thus, a prominent manufacturer seeks a deduction of over $125,000 against his income from his busi-

ness, on account of his losses in:

operating a chicken farm. “6. The device of the creation of multiple trusts for | relatives and dependents. “Splitting income two ways, betweén husband and wife, reduces income taxes and leaves the family income’ intact. Splitting the family income many ways by means of many trusts, all for the same beneficiaries, may effect a much greater /save ing, while leaving the money aetually in the same hands, fer the creator of the trust often comnstitutes himself or his wife as trustee, and thus retains full

control over the investment and ;

disposition of the fund itself and of its income. }

“One thrifty taxpayer | has

formed 64. trusts for. the benefit of:

four members of his immediate family; and: thereby claims to have saved them over $485,000 in one year in taxes. “Another thrifty pair have e¢onstituted 40 trusts for their relatives, and a prominent lawyer and his wife utilize 16 trusts for the same purpose. The first pair maintains numbered brokerage

‘accounts, and only at the end of

the year are the beneficial owners identified: In this way innumer= able transactions are carried on, often between accounts, which do not actually affect the beneficial of their owners, but which- are designéd solely to reduce tax liability.

FAMILY PARTNERSHIPS

“7. The device of husband and wife or father and children partnerships. “The; purpose of these partnerships, like the multiple trusts, is to split the family income artificially into two parts: or, if the children are taken in, into still smaller frac tions. “There are many instances of this kind; but to illustrate the point, it is sufficient to cite the case of a New York brokerage firm which late in 1935 admitted into partnership the four minor children, two | boys and two girls, of one of the partners. The tax saving he- sought thereby in 1936 amounted to over $50,000. “8. The device of pension trusts.

“For 10 years the revenue acts have sought to encourage pension trusts for aged employees by providing corporations with a special deduction on account of contributions thereto, and exempu§ the trust itself from tax. Recently this exemption has been twisted into a means of tax avoidance by the creation of pension trusts which include as beneficiaries only small groups of officers and directors who are in the high income brackets. In this fashion high salaried officers seek to provide themselves with generous allowances, while at the same time

the corporation ctims a deduction therefore, in the hope that the fund may accumulate income free from

tax.

PENSION TRUSTS

“Thus, in one case $43,000 is annually appropriated by the corporation to a pension trust for the benefit of its two chief owners. One of

‘the co-owners will retire at the age

of ‘66 with a monthly pension. of $1725, and the other will retire at 60 with a monthly pension of $1425. “These eight types of tax avoidance are sufficient to, show that there is a well-defined purpose. and practice on the part of some taxpayers to defeat the intent of Congress to tax incomes in accordance with ability to pay. In some cases, the bureau of internal revenue under existing law can establish a liability or indeed ‘proceed .on the ground of fraud; but many of these cases fall in the category of a legal though highly immoral avoidance of the intent of the law. It ‘seems, therefore, that legislation should be passed at this session of the Congress in order to eliminate these loopholes which our preliminary investigation has proved; and that as a result of the further investigation this summer and autumn the next session of the Congress should finally close -any further loopholes which may be discovered.

LEGAL EVASIONS

“In addition ‘to these cases of moral fraud, there are three other major instances in which the law itself permits individuals and corporations to avoid their equitable share of the tax burdén. “1. Percentage depletion: “This is perhaps the most glaring loophole in our present revenue law. Since 1928, large oil and mining corporations have been entitled to deduct from 5 to 274 per cent of their gross income as an allowance for the depletion of

their mines or. wells, and the de- -

duction may be taken even though the cost of the property has been completely recovered. “Thus, in 1936, one mining com-

pany deduced nearly three million

doHars under this provision, although it had already completely recovered the cost of its property. The amount of the deduction was & sheer gift from the United States to this taxpayer and its stockholders, and the revenue that we lost thereby was $818,000, Similar annual losses of revenue in the cases of a few other typical. companies are $584,000; $557,000; $512,000; $272,000; $267,000; $202,000, and $152,000. The estimated annual loss of revenue due to this source alone ifs about $75,000,000. I recommended in 1933 that this provision be eliminated but nothing was done at that time; and it has since remained unchanged.

INCOME DIVISION

“2. Tax division of income between husband and wife in the eight community property states.

“This is another major cause of

revenue loss, which is unjustifiabl because obtained at the expense of taxpayers in the 40 states which do not have community property laws. A New York resident with a salary of $100,000 pays about $32,526 Federal income tax; a Californian with the same salary may cause one-half to be reported by his wife and the Federal income taxes payable by

the two will be only $18,626. The

total loss of revenue due to this unjustifiable discrimination against the residents of 40 states runs into the millions. “3. Taxation of nonresident aliens. “The 1936 act eliminated the re quirement that a nonresident alien (without United \:States office or business), should) fille & return;

PEN AND PENCIL SETS $1.95 TO $15

Cenklins - Sheaffers ° Parkers 500 A WEEK ;

THE PEN HOSPITAL

141 B. Wash. St. RI. 1888,

al ic

oo

3

REMEMBER . ... FOOD STORES CLOSE

WEDNESDAYS AT 1 P. M.

Inasmuch as the move of food sidrex owners to give their employees a half ‘holiday each week has been so successful, it is agreed that there will be no change this week. The majority of independents and all chain food stores will close tomorrow, Wednesday, at one o clack. p. m.

SHOP TOMORROW BEFORE 1 P.M.

Help Your Friends Behind the Counter

THE. INDIANAPOLIS TIMES

fixed the withholding rate for in-

dividuals at 10 per cent; and freed the nonresident alien from taxation |

on American capital gains. Since the total Federal tax upon a citizen or resident amounts to 10 per cent of his total net income at about $25,000 (in the case of a married individual with no dependents), the withholding rate has proved in practice to be too low as applied to wealthy nonresident alien individuals. There are a number of cases of nonresident aliens with large incomes from American trusts or with large American investments

third or one-fifth of what they paid under the prior act.

WOMEN EVADERS

“Thus, one American woman who married an englishman had an income form this country in 1835 of nearly $300,000. Her tax for 1936 will, therefore, be approximately $30,000 as against over $160,000 under the prior law. “Another American woman who married a Frenchman has an income of over $150,000 from Ameri-

an trusts, on which she paid a

tax of about $55,000 in 1935. Her tax is reduced to about $15,000 by the 1936 law. Although the tightening of the withholding provisions in. 1936 will tend to insure more revenue ‘from nonresident aliens in the lower income brackets, the present, taxing provisions are not satisfactory as applied nonresident aliens- with incomes in the higher brackets. “The problem of tax avoidance is not new. The Congress devoted particular attention to it in 1933 and 1934, and by legislation effectively put a stop to many evasive devices discovered then as having been ‘in use. The practices outlined above can and should be stopped in the same way. ‘In conclusion, I have two observations to make from the evidence before me. In the first place, the instances I have given above are disclosed by a quick check of comparatively few individual returns. As I have said before, most of the large corporation returns have not yet been filed. The general audit of 1936 returns is just beginning. . Nevertheless, it is likely that the cases I have digested above are symptomatic of a large number

the usual careful audit. .

BURDEN ON CITIZENS

®

“In the second place, the ordinary salaried man and the small merchant does not resort to these or similar devices. The great bulk of our 5,500,000 returns are honestly made. Legalized avoidance or evasion by the so-called leaders of the business community is not ‘only demoralizing to the revenues; it is demoralizing to those who practice it as well. burden of taxation upon the other members of the community who are less able to bear it, and who are already cheerfully bearing their fair share. The success of our revenue system depends equally upon fair administration by the Treasury, and upon completely honest returns by the taxpayer. ] “The disclosures are so serious that I recommend that authority be given the Treasury Department with an 2dsguaie appropriation in order

whose taxes have been cut to one-.

of others, which will be disclosed by |

It throws an additional |

EEE EEE EEE EEE EE EEE EE EEE EERE

* that a complete and immediate in-

“vestigation may be conducted. The

cost of such an investigation will be returned many times over to the Treasury of the United States. “Faithfully,

“HENRY MORGENTHAU JR.” “The President, . The White House.”

FEELS INDIGNANT

A feeling of indignation on reading this letter will, I am confident, be yours, as it was mine. What the facts set forth mean to me is that we have reached another major difficulty in the maintenance

TUESDAY, JUNE 1,,1037

of the normal processes of our Gove ernment. We are trying harder than ever before to relieve suffering and want, to protect the weak, to curb avarice, to. prevent booms gd depressions—and to balance t ie budget. Taxation necessary to these ends is the foundation of sound gov= ernmental finance. When our legite

(Turn to Page Eight)

Lifebuoy or Lux Soaps

20 bars $1 |

1000 bars while quantity lasts. Limit 20 bars.

EST

a 5. BUY ON OUR TEN- RT. PLAN

BLE

aiulicaied f 7

DOLLAR DAY

* * TOMORROW, aa * *

For Wednesday's selling we are offering unusual values in spite of rapidly rising prices. every item carefully and be down early Wednesday for best selections..

no layaway, telephone, C. O. D. or mail orders, please. We reserve the right to limit quantities.

~ Women’s White Shoe $1 oo (Sandals, ties jor

oxfords. Sizes 4 to 8. Special, |

Check Some quantities limited, .

(Women’s Overalls)

Stripes. plain. colors and dark shades. Fast colors. Union Made. Sizes 12 to 20.

600 Pairs Regular $1.00

Farmerettes

Star Store, Second Floor.

chambray

choice.

Men’s C. B. Cones Union Made

Work Pants or Shirts

Heavy blue or grey shirts. Grey or tan covert pants. Sizes 28 to 31 and 36 to 352.

Star Store, Street Floor.

51

Your

Women’s Full-Fashioned Silk Hose____ Women’s $1.00 Blouses Stamped Pepperell Pillowcases Women’s Cotton Union Suits

Seconds of 89¢ Qualities

, Odds and Ends

Girls’ Sheer Summer Dresses. Girls’ Navy or Brown a Tto 4 Girls’ and Women’s Cotton Sports Shirts Women’s Regular $1.00 Uniforms Sturdy, Colorful Folding Lawn Chairs____________ nil a he 27-In. Stair or Hall Carpets

; Figured Patterns

12Vse and 15c ‘CURTAIN MATERIALS 36 & 3%-Inch Widths

2 to ‘10-yard lengths of colorful fancy dots, figures, ete.

Star Store, Basement.

C

Yd.

Wall Paper ROOM LOTS

10 Sidewall 18 Yds. Border,

Patterns

Basement.

Star Store,

Men’s $17.95 to $25

SUITS

$ 1 20 : : * Broken lots of men’s better

suits. All wool cassimeres. in mediwm. shades. Sizes ad

Men’s Sanforized Wash Slacks... Men’s Summer Shorts and Shirts Men’s $1.39 Broadcloth Dress Shirts_2___ Boys’ Cotton or Rayon Polo Shirts_____ i re Em ee fe men $1.29 81x90 Mohawk Sheets_.___________________________ Each 19¢ 36-In. 80 Square Dress Prints (full bolts). 36-In. Hope Bleached Muslin 15¢ 42x36 Bleached Pillowcases __..._..... 29¢ Fancy Awning Materials_____________. $1.29 Knitted Rayon Panels_.___. bam -

BOYS’ $8.95 LONG PANTS SUITS.

oo ha St rn ft AO A fhe fete fee 0 Se fo ae.

Wi Store, Street Floor.

Free Parking

9x12-Ft. Jute Moth Proof Rug Phas

Store Hours: 9:30 A. M. to 5:00 P. M.

o Fine Quality

o Ideal for Home or Office Use

. Smart Marbleized | Designs |

I :

-

Thursday — Saturday,

9:00 A. M. to 9:00 P. M.

19

Sq. Yd.

Cemented over felt in quantity of 8 yards or

more, laid com- 1.69 plete— Sq. Yd.

You can count on this fine Tinolaam for years of oiballott service. Rich colors go through to heavy burlap back and designs won't wear off. In tans, greens or black and white in smart marbleized designs; also attractive blue tiles. -

Beautiful 2x3 Ft. Numdah Rugs

eo Hand

® Decorated ‘Designs

129

The loveliest designs that the patient artisans ot Belgium could conceive. On purest White, black

and camel hangings an N | ail

arkandi felt. serviceable bedroom rugs.

Use them for wall

20

Lengthens life and gives your rug a luxe urious “feel.” Sterilized jute fibers. Firm and pliable. Moth and vermin proof, 9x12-ft, size. Bound

Easy Terms on Purchases

of $20 or More

edges.

9.98

Imported from China. Long, straight soft fur on large properly cured skins. White, black, dark brown or gray. Grand for lounge, bedroom or sunroom.

RUG DEPT., SECOND FLOOR

ALABAMA AT VERMONT

Large Luxurious

Bearlike Fur Rugs

SEARS. ROEBUCK AND C0]

Free Bus 3