Indianapolis Times, Volume 47, Number 256, Indianapolis, Marion County, 3 January 1936 — Page 16

PAGE 16

The Indianapolis Times (A BCKIPPS.HOWARD NEWSPAPER) ROT W, HOWARD Preitdent LUDWILL DEN NT Editor RAUL D. BAKER Burine** Manager

Glut lAoht and the Propl* Will yinft Their Oven Way

Member of United Press, ScrlppsHoward Newspaper Alliance, Newapaper Enterprise Association, Newspaper Information Service and Audit Bureau of Circulations. Owned sod published daily (ex* cept Sunday) by The Indianapolis Times Publishing Cos.. 214-220 W. Maryland-at. Indianapolis, Ind. Price in Marlon County, 3 cent# e copy: delivered by carrier. 12 cents a week. Mall subscription rates In Indiana, 33 a year: outride of Indiana. 6fi cents a month. Fh4M RMey 8481

FRIDAY, JANUARY J, I#3

MR. GREENLEE’S CASE pOV. PAUL V. M’NUTT took the right stand in causing the withdrawal of Pleas Greenlee from his administration. The principle—that a state officer should not draw salary from the state and ! the same time devote himself to a campaign for nomination—is a sound one. Besides, in Mr. Greenlee’s position, patronage secretary, it would have been inevitable that persons enjoying patronage would have been active In lining up state convention delegates. The result would be a convention In which the will of the Democratic party might easily be thwarted. This is nothing against Mr, Greenlee. He must see as clearly as any one that when he decided to be an active candidate lor the governorship nomination he would have to give up his Statehouse job to avoid embairassing his party. TWILIGHT A S we -.nderstand it, the crime of which Re--CA- pub’.jan Chairman Fletcher accuses the President of the United States is undertaking to address the Congress of the United States at an hour when the largest, number of people of the United States may listen to what he says. And this knavish plot takes on an even darker h.ie by the coincidence that the hour chosen arrives after sundown. Apparently the hour also arrives in the twilight of the Republican leader's sense of humor. JUDGE BALTZELL IS RIGHT JUDGE ROBERT C. BALTZELL is making it plain that if George W. Barrett is hanged the execution will not be a public spectacle. Denying requests for admittance, he states that the only persons present will be those with a legal right. This new Federal statute may force hanging Into communities where it was long ago abolished. It makes a disagreeable situation. However, there Is nothing the community of Indianapolis can do but accept It. So If Barrett must hang, the morbid should be excluded and the Job should be dune with as much quiet, businesslike skill as the district court can muster. HARRY B. SMITH HARRY B. SMITH’S death should be noted by millions of Americans to whom he gave pleasure. He wrote the book for 14 of Victor Herbert’s operettas. Smith and Herbert were the Gilbert and Sullivan of an America that has vanished. More sophisticated entertainment has taken the place of the romantic musical comedies of their time but the music of Herbert and the lyrics of Smith live on. Mr. Smith’s greatest contribution, perhaps, was the book he wrote for Reginald DeKoven’s “Robin Hood.” The newspaper profession Is especially proud of him because he was once a member of it. WOULD THEY GO TO ETHIOPIA? r T'HE argument that pressure of population juatifles imperial expansion Is “debunked” by Nathaniel Peffer In the current Harpers’, under the caption “The Fallacy of Conquest.” Mr. Peffer predicts that if Ethiopia were conquered, and at the same time the United States lifted its restrictions on immigration, within the next year 500 Italians would emigrate to the United States for every one who went to Ethiopia. Pointing to Italy's previous experience, he says: “For 50 years Italy has strained such resources as it had in order to win an empire, ostensibly to relieve the pressure of population. . . . “In 1914, when the war to which it had committed Itself broke out, there were in all the colonies which it had won in Africa some 8000 Italians. There were more than that number within a radius of a quarter of a mile of Cherry-st, New York City. There were 50 times as many in New York State.” The argument based on pressure of population, says Mr. Peffer, “makes good propaganda for bigger armies and navies. It has a plausible ring. But it is empty.” He asserts that those who leave their homeland go not to the virtually uninhabited new lands taken by conquest, but to “independent countries already settled,” for “nearly all of the territories that constitute colonial empires are almost uninhabitable by white men.” Os the argument that nations expand by seizing territory as an outlet for manufactured products, Mr. Ppffer says: “There is Great Britain. No empire could be more farflung or more securely established. No nation could have more, bigger and richer colonies. What markets could be more idyllic economic promises? And what nation is now capturing that market? Not England, but Japan. n x x •'T'HE Malay Peninsula is a British possession. Not England but Japan is selling goods there now. For Great Britain the fruits of victory in 1919, after a war in which it had spent itself, were the dispossession of Germany from its colonies, especially in Africa, and the consummation of the old British dream of an all-British route from Cairo to Cape Town. The former German colonies are now British. But 99 per cent of the artificial silk Imported into Tanganyika is Japanese, and for every yard of British textiles imported into Kenya, there are six yards of Japanese textiles. “In a word, possession of colonial territory no longer guarantees enjoyment of the economic perquisites thereof. Trade no longer follows the flag. . . . Trade roes to the most efficient producer regardlebo of nationality; to the producer, that is, who can layydown goods of quality equal to others, at a lower price and on easier credit conditions.” In discussing expansion to secure access to raw materials, Mr. Peffer holds that even here success In the long run is by no means certain. "All the colonies,” he says, “still extant or subject to conquest will do Italy and Germany little good. Japan is in a somewhat special case, since if it conquers China it conquers a continent, not a colony. But even for Japan there are important reservations. The price of conquering China and perhaps fighting other countries for the right to do so may be •o much higher than Japan would have to pay for

China’s raw materials in the normal process of trade that Japan will bankrupt itself. “In so far as access to raw materials is necessary to an industrial economy, their purchase is not excluded. In fact, purchase is in the long run the surest means of access, if not also the cheapest. Colonial conquest is not only more expensive, but not sure. The benefits will go to the industrially most efficient country in any case.” Mr. Peffer concludes by saying that “the outlet must be found by reorganization at home—by making it possible for the disinherited at home to buy the goods we have hitherto counted on the heathen in the backward parts to pay for.” WILL HISTORY REPEAT? J> ECENTLY we quoted from warnings of three Supreme Court justices against the Federal judiciary’s encroachment on the rights of Congress and of state Legislatures. There is nothing new about the lamentations of these modem Jeremiah jurists—Brandeis, Stone and Cardozo. Down through American history have come warnings just as ominious, and not always from the lips of dissenting justices. Sometimes these denunciations of judicial usurpation have issued from victorious political leaders, and have contributed to the shaping of history. As dd as the republic are the struggles for power between the Federal judiciary and Congress and between the Federal judiciary and state Legislatures. Every time a citizen or a corporation scurries into a Federal court, invoking state sovereignty or national sovereignty—as suits his purpose—to escape a Federal law or a state law, it is but another skirmish in those unceasing conflicts. nun 'T'HOMAS JEFFERSON, founder of the statesrights Republican party, once warned that “the germ of dissolution of our Federal government is in the judiciary—an irresponsible body working like gravity, by day and by night, gaining a little today and gaining a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction until all shall be usurped.” James Madison, “father of the Constitution,’’ said in his declining years that the process of making the judiciary paramount over legislation “was never intended and can never be proper.” The doughty Andrew Jackson, under whose leadership the Jeffersonian party was reborn as the Democratic party, defied a Supreme Court ruling against the state of Georgia. ‘‘John Marshall (then chief justice) has made his decision,” Jackson snapped, “now let him enforce it.” Abraham Lincoln carried the new Republican party to its first lational victory in a campaign in which defiance of the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision was his chief issue. “If the policy of the government on vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by the Supreme Court the instant they are made,” said Lincoln in his first inaugural address, “the people will have ceased to be their own rulers.” He ignored the court while waging the Civil War to settle the issue which the court’s decision had brought to a head. Ulysses S. Grant, whose party leadership sealed T°nublican dominance for many years, packed the Supreme Court with new members to get it to reverse its greenback decision against his money policy. Theodore Roosevelt, whose “Square Deal” revitalized the Republican party early in the century, undertook to clip the powers of Federal judges after their decisions had frustrated some of his anti-trust reforms. He urged a referendum of the people on laws which the courts held unconstitutional. “The highest right of a free people is the right to make their own laws .. .” he said. “I hold that the peop'e should say finally whether these decisions are or are not to stand as the laws of the land.” n n n D. ROOSEVELT, whose New Deal -*■ reforms today are under attack in the courts, has not yet spoken out as harshly against judicial frustration as did Jefferson, Madison, Jackson, Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, and as have recently the three minority justices, Brandeis, Stone and Cardozo. Nor has he, as did Grant, attempt to force judicial acquiescence by packing the tribunal. But if the courts throw many more of his reforms into the waste-basket, there may come a time when Franklin Roosevelt, to save his program, will have to take a stand similar to those taken by so many of his illustrious predecessors. BANKERS’ POLITICS J ATEST testimony on how much political strength President Roosevelt has lost in financial circles is given by J. Frederick Essary, in the current Atlantic Monthly. Mr. Essary reports: “I appeared recently before a meeting of nearly a thousand bankers in a Midwestern state. When they had finished interrogating me at the conclusion of my address, I requested the privilege of asking them two questions. ’ “I asked how many men present were in sympathy with the New Deal. Not more than ten hands were raised. I then asked how many of those not now in sympathy with the New Deal had voted for Mr. Roosevelt. “Exactly two hands were raised.” A WOMAN’S VIEWPOINT By Mrs. Walter Ferguson qpHE style magazine Vogue has hit upon the sen- -*• sible plan of consulting masculine taste about 1936 feminine fashions. The college seniors of America have had their say on the subject. None of their ideas are surprising when we remember that men, as a class, lean toward convenience and sanity. Perhaps that’s why they demand pockets for women. We hasten to send them our compliments. As the collegians point out, they are tired of going out loaded down with rouge pots, lipsticks, evening bags, extra handkerchiefs, etc. Every time they ram their hands into what should be the privacy of their own pockets, they pull out some feminine leftover, with what may be embarrassing results. We feel sorry for the boys. Besides that, we’re Rretty tired ourselves of having no place to bestow the multitude of accessories which are made imperative by cigaret smoking and putting on one’s complexion after every dance. The innovation as we can see would lift another of the white man’s burden, as well as give women more freedom and independence. It would do something else. It would help traffic congestion. For it’s one thing to slip your hand easily into a pocket, as a man does, and run down a dime for bus sere, but it’s quite another to get the handbag into proper position, open it—and it always sticks when you’re in a hurry—fish about amid the debris for the coin purse, drag it to the surface, and finally capture the elusive nickel, dime or token. Such an ordeal is woman’s daily experience. Packages drop from your arms; hurrying pedestrians tread on your toes; those behind scowl and mutter at you. At that time, any one of us has a right to feel aggrieved and to envy men their nooks and crannies for carrying matches, notebooks, parcels and coins. The truth Is, we blush at the sight of our upstrmding, cigaret-smoking gals having to resort to tlieir glorified Victorian reticules.

THE INDIANAPOLIS TIMES

Squaring The Circle With McCEEADY HUSTON

TIT'ADING to work, I beat my * * breast for having praised the city administration for good work in street cleaning during the recent blizzard. Clearing away the drifts was one thing, but coping with the remaining slush Is quite another. An honest confession being good for the soul, this department candidly admits it spoke too soon, and If its readers will forgive it for pontificating on the spur of the moment it will try not to commit the error again. x x n TtiJY agents tell me that the hotels and clubs reminded them after New Year’s celebrations of the aftermath of football games before the panic. Those were the days when it was considered good form to rip open pillows in hotel rooms and scatter the feathers Into the streets. They were the days when wary hotel managers removed the furniture from the lobbies and saw to It that all valuable vases and other breakables were placed in storage for the week-end. It was the coon-skin coat era. May it never return! x x x JN Hartford City is one half of the bell clapper of the Princeton University chapel of some years ago. It is the property of J. R. Johnston, president of the Johnston Glass Cos. It is always a pleasure to meet Princetonians, of whom Indiana has a large number. The other half of the clapper belongs to H. C. Friesell, who is by way of being the country’s outstanding football referee. Mr. Johnston and “Red” Friesell were roommates at Princeton, so when they removed the clapper, as a college prank about 20 years ago, they gravely had it sawed in two so that each might have his rightful share. n x n /’"GRADUATES of Princeton must be proud of short, light, redheaded Friesell, who never played football but who, by sheer force of personality, gets the best schedule of all the accredited referees. He works In the East, getting his assignments from Walter Okeson, of Lehigh, who runs the officiating in the Eastern states. Top flight officials receive $75 a game and their railroad fare. Considering that many of them have to leave their businesses or professions from Thursday to Monday in order to keep their engagements the remuneration is not high. Some of them lose money during the season. # # u J - NOTICE my friend Ralph Cannon, of the Chicago Daily News, is in Esquire with a rattling article showing why professional football can not compete with the college variety. And in the author's notes he confesses that his ambition is to write literary stories and novels, as distinguished from those based on sports. The leading sports writers are an ambitious, hard-v orklng crew. Considering the distances they travel, 'the long hours they put In and the fact that their writings are scrucinized by a public 'Veady to find fault, their outside writing is amazing. Francis Wallace of the New York World-Telegram, Is good for a book a year In addition to many short stories and articles. Paul Galileo, of the New York Daily News, is a prolific writer for the magazines. Rud Rennie and Richards Vidmer, of the Herald-Trib-une, are steady producers. x x x CONTRARY to a popular belief, leaders in the business of sports reporting are not dissipated. They can not be and hold their rank. Constantly exposed to temptation, they keep themselves in condition corresponding to that of the athletes whose doings they report. It is a hard life but It has its rewards. Sports writers are among the most respected men in Journalism. OTHER OPINION On the G. O. P. [Robert H. Jackson] Has the Republican Party gained, out of power, the cohesion which it lacked, in power? Is it now a party united on any major issue before the country? Its old leaders who were turned out for lack of coherent policy now come back and say, “There has come to us, out of office, wisdom we did not have while in. We can reveal it only after election. But if you only knew what our secrets are you would want us back.” I believe in a strong party of opposition and believe that an unwieldy majority for any governing party is a blow to its prudence. But a party that has failed pathetically in every function of opposition can not be prepared to assume the responsibility of governing under z coherent and clear alternative policy. XXX The Alien Problem [Utijrsite Journal and Courier] How many aliens today are on relief in this country? How many aliens in this country at this time are drawing pay in Job 6 that citizens would be glad to occupy? How many citizens are idle or unwillingly on relief because of the usurpation of industrial fields by unreconstructed, foreign-minded outsiders?.

THE CITY SLICKER MEETS THE TRAIN

The Hoosier Forum

(Timet readers are invited to express their views in these columns, relinlous controversies excluded. Make t/our letters short, so all can have a chance. Limit them to too words or less. Your letter must be sUined. but names will be withheld on reauest.) xxx SAYS MANUFACTURERS CUT OWN THROATS By Leon O. Martin Among the many causes contributing to our economic ills, it is surprising to note how little attention is paid to the greatest cause of them all—the labor-saving machine. Perhaps the reason for this is because those adversely affected by labor-saving machinery are for the most part inarticulate. As originally intended, labor-sav-ing machinery was meant to aid labor so that production could keep pace with consumption. That was in the good old days. But when labor began to demand a just share of the profits produced by the machine, the employer retaliated by using the machines as a weapon to defeat those demands—and with what excellent results! Today the manufacturer is no longer wholly dependent upon labor to produce his product. By the use of labor-saving machinery he can, in a few months and with half his former help, turn out what in the past was a full year’s work. And for the rest of the year his employes are layed off. Thus, it would seem that the employer won the battle on all fronts. And this would be true if it were not for the fact that by trie use of labor-saving machines and the layoff system, he killed the goose that laid the golden egg. The manufacturer may not be dependent upon the laborer to produce his product, but he is dependent upon the laborer to consume his product. And here is a strange paradox. While the government is bending its every effort to create purchasing power through the use of madework projects, on which machinery is not used, the manufacturer is doing everything he can to destroy purchasing power by adopting just the opposite tactics. The machine is a non-consuming element in our economic organization. When used to assist labor, when there Is shortage of labor, the machine is a boon to civilization. But when used to defeat the demands of the workers for a just and living wage, it becomes a metal monstrosity that will destroy our entire economic system. Mr. Employer, have you ever seen a machine consume a bowl of soup, drive an automobile, wear a pair of pants, or do any of the other things commonly done by the people who purchase your products? Just as long as you deny this basic fact there can be no such thing as recovery. Furthermore, it is Idle to prate about our great unexplored markets. Os course there is a demand for all kinds of products. But without money in the hands of prospective purchasers, the demand does not rise to the status of a market. The employers might as well ad-

Questions and Answers

Inclose * 3-eent stamp for reply when addressing any qaestlen of fact or information to The Indianapolis Time* Home Service Bureau, 1018 Thlrtcenth'St, N. W., Washington, D. 0. L*l and medical advice can not he riven, nor can extended research he undertaken, Q —Give the total number of suicides and homicides in the United States In 1925, 1930 and 1934. A —ln 1925, homicides, 8893; suicides, 12,495. 1930, homicides, 10,617; suicides, 18,551. 1934, homicides, 12,055; suicides, 18,828. Q—Under which President was Garret A. Hobart the Vice President of the United States? Did he serve his full term £ A—He was Vice President in McKinley’s first Administration, and died in office Nov. 21, 1889. Q —What is the legal weight for a bushel of poptpm? A—ln states which prescribe a legal weight for popcorn, 70 pounds is the legal weight for a bushel in the ear, and 56 pounds per bushel for shelled popcorn. (

/ wholly disapprove of what you say—and will defend to the death your right to say it. — Voltaire.

mit that there never will be markets until the laborer Is given a just and living wage the year around. Os course it is difficult for some of our labor-saving employers to understand this. But if they will just take time to glance at the trend of recent Federal legislation, they will realize that the worker must be put to work at a job where he can support himself and his dependents or the government will do the job through taxation. If the government must do the job, the employer will foot the bill, because the workers have no money. This puts the matter squarely up to the employers. In the one case they will receive a direct benefit in useful labor and increased purchasing power. In the other they will receive no benefit and at the same time increase their own burdens. XXX DENOUNCES UNINFORMED TOWNSEND OPPONENTS By A. J. Colt It is astonishing to learn In reading the papers, how many are ready to denounce the Townsend Plan without first learning what it contemplates. You contact one of them and inquire, “Have you attended any of the Townsend meetings?” He replies, “No.” “Have you tried to inform yourself as to its plan of procedure?” He replies, “No.” “Are you a financial statistician?” He replies, “No.” “Then you are not in position to offer to the reading public through the columns of the daily press or other publications a real constructive and convincing criticism as to the real merit of such plan?” “No, I just know it will not work. My head is not big enough to take it all in. But I ao know it won’t work.” In other words he or she is Just another plain uninformed egotist who has undertaken to inform the public about something upon which they are not at all informed. I also have read with a great deal of amusement the recent prophecy of our senior United States Senator, also made by two or three other statesmen of the Daniel Webster, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson type (?). Would it not havfj been much more appropriate for these statesmen to have waited until they had studied the Townsend plan and then be guided by tne wishes of their constituents, Instead of rushing into print to say that the plan Is unsound, impracticable and unworkable. After thorough Investigation I learn not one of these statesmen has had much experience In large financial or commercial activities. Each has been largely identified with local affairs in his home town. With this background they appear as representatives of the people to decide off-hand and through the press that there is no merit to one of the biggest financial problems confronting Congress since signing the Declaration of Independence. They assume it can not be done.

Q—Were any prisoners of war brought from Europe and interned in the United States during the World War? A—No. Q—How did Wealthy apples get their name? A—The origin of the name is commemorated on the monument erected to the memory of Peter M. Gideon, of Excelsior, Minn. It bears a bronze tablet with the inscription: “This* tablet commemorates Peter M. Gideon who grew the original WEALTHY APPLE TREE from seed on this, his homestead, in 1864. Erected by the Native Sons of Minnesota, June, 1912.” The triangular piece of ground on which this is placed, containing approximately half za acre, is surrounded by a chain and post fence. It lies on a boulevard between Excelsior and Minnetonka Beach, Minn. Q —How many American troops participated in the World War? A—lncluding the Army, Navy and Marine Corps the armed forces of the United States numbered 4,727,-

They are much like the old mountaineer who was induced to visit a railroad station to see a train come in. When he observed it approaching, he said, “Boys, they will never stop her.” After looking over the engine for a moment, he said, “Boys, they will never start her.” ■When Abraham Lincoln said he intended to free the slaves, he was roundly abused by many newspapers in the North and South. His predictions came true. When automobiles were first Introduced on the public highway, they were cussed and discussed by the farmers. But today four of five farmers own a car. Automobiles are here to stay. The pioneers, the outstanding giants in commerce and statesmanship who were the founders of our republic, were incapable of doing or being identified with any cheap transaction to gain some temporary advantage. Such men did not say offhand the building of the Erie Canal was the idea of an insane person. The Townsend Plan is much more practical in every way, and will bring far more prosperous times to the distressed people of this nation than all the money that has been appropriated by Congress during the past two years, A WISH BY JOSEPHINE DUKE MOTLEY Night holds a thousand eyes, and I but two. May I use mine well, For on the smooth highway, waits death to rue With wild, grewsome knell. May I forever cheat that terror bold Which haunts each paved road. Precaution let me take an hundred fold E’er grief my heart goad. If I could have one wish, I think 'twould be To drive with great care And always steer my car most cautiously. Such talent is rare. DAILY THOUGHTS I was not in safety, neither had I rest, neither was I quiet; yet trouble came.—Job 3:26. TROUBLE is the next best thing to enjoyment; there is no fate in the world so horrible as to have no share in either its joys or sorrows.—Longfellow.

SIDE GLANCES By George Clark

Cm* srM soviet, mar r.mitaatwT.<s:

“He’s my daughter’s youngest. We used to be great pals, but I’ve sort of stopped going around till things break a little better.”

-JAN. 8, 1936

Your... Health By DR. MORRIS FISHBEIN

AT least 10 important minerals are Involved In the nutrition of your body. Among those known to be essential to human life ara sodium and potassium. Calcium and magnesium are found In human tissue, and it is known that an animal will die immediately if deprived of magnesium. Sulphur, too, has been mentioned as an important element. Other metals, as cobalt, nickel, and aluminum, are found regularly In human tissues. So are zinc, copper, and manganese. Occasionally even lead, silver, arsenic, tin. cadmium, and vanadium have been found, on chemical analysis, in the human body. When a child is born, its body already contains some of these essential minerals. As life goes on they are passed out of the body and it is necessary for you to get additional minerals from the food that you eat and the drink that you consume. tt u gr AS I have already said In discussing other basic food substances and water, the body also requires oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen, which come particularly in the proteins, carbohydrates, fats and water. At least 99 per cent of the calcium which the body contains is found in the bones and in the teeth. These structures also contain more than two-thirds of the phosphorus in the human body. From the point of view of chemistry, it is interesting to note that the percentages of various chemical substances which the body regularlv contains. These are shown in the following table: Chemical Element Percentage Oxygen 65. Carbon 18. Hydrogen 10. Nitrogen 3.0 Calcium 1.5 Phosphorus 1.0 Potassium 0.35 Sulphur 0.25 Chlorine 0.15 Sodium 0.15 Magnesium 0.05 Iron 0.004 Manganese 0.0003 lodine 0.00004

TODAY’S SCIENCE ‘ BY SCIENCE SERVICE I

ONE of the major afflictions of the scientific research worker’s life is the constant pressure from so-called practical men to get results. This observation is made by Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace, writing in the current Scientific Monthly. By “results,” Secretary Wallace says, the practical man usually means something that pays an immedate profit. He explains that it takes a considerable acquaintance with the scientific viewpoint and with the actual achievements ol science to realize that the same standards can not possibly be made to apply here as are applied in business. “A familiar example is the development of the airplane by the Wrights,” Secretary Wallace writes. “The dramatic and sensational character of the achievement was far more obvious in that case than in mo6t scientific research; but even so, there was a widespread feeling that while the contraption invented by the Wrights was interesting, it never could amount to anything from a practical standpoint. "Judged by ordinary standards, the Wrights were Just a pair of brilliant nuts who might have put their talents to much more practical use than loafing around for days at a time watching buzzards sail gracefully through the air. Out of this watching, however, the Wrights got facts and principles; and these facts and principles not only served as the foundation for a great new industry, but led to the conquest of anew element by man. “That could not have been done except by Just apparently dreamy and slightly insane goings-on. The Wrights were not practical in the same sense that a man is when he puts anew gadget on the market and brings in a million dollars. They were merely super-practical.” So, Secretary Wallace says, the research worker often feels like saying: "For heaven's sake, go away and don’t bother me! Maybe what I am dong doesn’t look to you as thougi r, t were leading anywhere—but U/ years from now you may have a different idea about it!”