Indianapolis Times, Volume 46, Number 48, Indianapolis, Marion County, 6 July 1934 — Page 16

PAGE 16

The Indianapolis Times (A SCRirpS-HOWARO SEWSPAPFSI *or K HotVAKD Pr^sM^nt TALOOTT POWELL Editor EAKL D. BAKER ...... B.;*lr.*n Minifr Phono 111 l*jr KVM

.v|-njtwr of (.'nit**! S ripp - Howard \-w*paper AlUaur*. .N-W*jp*r Enter* |.r • a**o< tation. .s*wm>*pr Information Serving ami Au•l** ISiinau of Ciretilationn. Owned and published daily f< irept Sunday) by The Indianatmii* Tinir-a I’uMiahtng O-mpany. 2M-22R Went Maryland utreet. Indianapolis. lad l*rl*n in Marion tnnnfy. 2 rr nfa a ropy; elsewhere. S rr: f—drlltrryd hjr •••Trier. 12 cents a *v**k. Mail *!ib**Tipti..n rat* in Indiana. $t a v< ir; <>uf*ld. of Indiana. 85 rent* a month.

~ I=.- * ##•'##* *** * Mt> Give lAght and the People tT 111 find Their Gw n Wo*

mtUAY. Jl :.v • 1334 LITTLE MAN, WHAT NOW? A DOLF HITLER no longer is boss in Ger- "*• *■ many. Like Frankenstein and his monster. Hitler has created a situation with a capital S. and this situation now holds him in the hollow of its hands. For him the future holds a triple pienace. One is the domestic political crisis, now simmering but still unsettled Another is Germany* international isolation. The third is her financial and economic plight which now threatens to throw her into chaos as terrible as anything experienced since the World war. The firing squad has liquidated temporarily some of Hitler’s political worries at home, but bullets will not help him much when he comes to deal with the others. Hitler rose to power bv limbing upon the shoulders of his Brown Shirt.;, whom he created and used to “win the streets.” Having reached his goal, lie now kicks his Brown Shirt props from under. Today he must depend upon the regular army, the magnificently trained and equipped reichswehr. the police, and the war veterans, or Steel Helmets, to whom he turned a few days ago to save him from his own followers. The reichswehr. therefore, now is master In Germany, not Hitler. And to the reichswehr. the police and the veterans Field Marshal Von Hindenburg is God—as Hitler was aware when he dealt with the case of Hindenburg's protege. Vice-Chancellor Von Papen. It may suit the reichswehr very well to use Hitler for some time to come. When he ceases to be useful, however, he in turn may be "liquidated.” * • • How long Hitler will continue to play Der Fuhrer would seem to depend a good deal on German financial and economic developments. The mark is tottering. The world boycott is tightening. For lack of foreign exchange, necessary raw materials and foodstuffs are not obtainable in sufficient quantity. Hence industry is suffering, prices are rising, unemployment threatens to mount, and the masses are increasingly uneasy. Abroad Hitler’s policies have played similar havoc. Europe is so frightened by his gestures that a circle of alliances has formed about him. Even the Soviet Union, once Germany’s warmest friend, has joined hands with France and the French coalition against the Hitler menace. • • • Hitler's peril, however, is Europe’s peril. Already the uneasy Nazi chieftain has begun to accuse “a certain foreign power” of plotting against the German state. And that is dangerous business. There always is a chance that, to save himself. Hitler may go a step further and start trouble with “a certain foreign power” and rally the German people once more to his standard. • * * “Men are the sport of circumstance when circumstances seem the sport of men.” So says th® poet. For fifteen years. Adolf Hitler, humble Austrian house painter, bent circumstances to his own ends. Now circumstance, in turn, seems destined to use him as its pawn. WHY RE DISTURBED? IF the reports now being received at Washington are correct. Great Britain is about to try to reclaim her old position as undisputed mistress of the seas. The British admiralty, it is said, has concocted a plan for naval expansion under which Great Britain would add very materially to its fleet, especially in light cruiser strength. There are several reasons for this. To begin with, the British are worried by developments in the Far East. The European situation, likewise, is far from reassuring. Looking on a troubled international horizon, the British are beginning to feel that they need more ships, and it is hard to blame them. In addition, the nation now ts in better shape financially than has been the case for years. It could support the cost of an expanded naval program: indeed, it could take thousands of men off the dole and put them to work in the shipyards, making that cost less than it would appear on paper. Now* the part of this which especially touches readers in the United States is the effect that anew naval program might have on American naval policy. If Britain builds anew fleet, what do we do? Do we build ship for ship with her—thereby, because our requirements are so different from hers, acquiring a lot of light cruiser strength that we don't especially need? Do we let the naval treaties lapse and go ahead with a free hand, building what we choose? Or da we simply give up the idea of naval parity, let England build whatever she wishes, and eo along very much as we are now? Before answering those questions, we ought to look at the international, situation with extreme care and ask ourselves just what we expect to do with our navy. Have we any reason to suspect that we may want to use it against Great Britain? Is there any indication that such differences as may arise between the two nations can’t be settled peaceably? Is it. in short, a vitally important thing for u to have a fl®et able to meet the British fleet on even terms? Unless the answer to each of these questions Is a nemphatic “Yes,” there is small sense In getting disturbed about England’s decision to expand her navy.

HE JESTS AT SCARS .. 'T'HE supreme tragedy of the world is that nobody really learns anything except by experience—and then it is too late. John Killeen, state commander of the Michigan G. A. R . was talking about the longproposed but never-accomplished Joint convention between Union and Confederate veterans. “It’s not that we veterans hold any grudge against each other,” Killeen said. “But the younger generation and the womm folk never would stand for it. They think we lought in the old days, and still should feel like fighting.” Kiilcen, who bears the scar of a saber wound received at Cedar Creek, adds, “I’d like to shake the hand of the fellow who wounded me, and tell him I respect him as a good soldier and a better hand with the saber than I was . ..” And there you have it. The younger generation. it seems, can not know until it finds it out itself, the mutual respect and common feeling of adversaries who have fought well and buried bitterness. THE FALL CAMPAIGN PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT is reported quietly to have admonished cabinet officers and other administration high officials not to make partisan political speeches this summer. Thus does the man in the White House aeain display his extraordinary skill as a politician and public leader. He has gauged accurately the temper of the people. The Literary Digest's nation-wide poll discloses that the people are behind the New Deal in tile ratio of 3 to 2. But it is important to understand that the poll Ls on the New Deal. It is not a poll of the Democratic party. Reactionary Democrats in congress and in state affairs will not like the President’s nonpartisanship. They want the political benefit of what the administration has accomplished in spite of their opposition. But apparently the President, like the voters, is disposed to ignore party labels. PUBLIC WORKS T AST year the emergency congress launched *- 1 a big public works program, appropriating for relief and public works a grand total of 53.800.000.000. This year’s total emergency work and relief appropriation is to be only $300,000,000 less. The new policy, however, shows a decided shift away from public works as a relief measure. Although a portion of the $1,400,000,000 voted for FERA may be available for work relief projects next winter, about $800,000,000 is the maximum available for strictly public works projects. In view of this shift of policy critics are asking whether the great public works experiment of last year has failed. A report, just issued by PWA Administrator Ickes, indicates that it has not. More than $1,000,000,000 actually has been paid out and the entire sum has been allotted. Already, Mr. Ickes says, 1,418.000,000 hours of work at fair wages on federal and nonfederal projects have been provided. Approximately that many more hours will be the results in the months to come from allotted funds. For every hour of direct employment tw’o hours of “behind-the-line” work Is expected. More than 16.000 separate projects are being financed. What these are paying out in social dividends can not be assayed with any exactness, but schools, bridges, libraries, roads, irrigation, power and other works are arising as monuments to this adventure. Like the ripples made by stones tossed into a pool, the benefits spread in widening circles. Public works have not re-employed all the jobless, but tens of thousands of families today owe to these government dollars salvation from humiliating recourse to charity. This is in addition to 4,000,000 families supported under CWA work projects last winter. The greatest disappointment has come from PWA's attempts at slum abatement. Its low-cost housing allotments totaled only $171,000.000. But even in this failure the government is not altogether to blame, since its refusal to pour more money into rehousing was due to the schemes of private speculators and the inability of cities and states to co-operate in public ventures. It is to be hoped that private capital will be encouraged under the new housing act to take up where the government has left off. The biggest stimulus to recovery is hoped for in a great national rehousing movement this summer and fall. There are about 10.000,000 people still unemployed. Much if not most of our partial recovery has come from public spending through the AAA. CWA and PWA. John Maynard Keynes, the British economist, agrees with Senator La Follette and many others that we have not spent too much, but too little. After all, the treasury deficit is less important than the human deficit. Public works have been carried on with a minimum of graft and politics and the results are beginning to be felt. As Secretary Ickes says. PWA has proved a wheel-horse to recovery and it is pulling its weight. SACRIFICE TO PROGRESS \ LONG, long time ago, when people were going to erect a great public building, they would begin by killing a slave or a prisoner of war and sealing his body in the foundations. This was supposed to bring good luck, prosperity, or something equally desirable. We don't do things like that any more; but we might remember that almost every large building project, even now, costs at least one life—and sometimes a good many more than one—before it gets completed. Witness, for example, figures just released by the Nevada Industrial Insurance Commission. which show that no fewer than forty-five workmen have been killed accidentally while at work on the Boulder Dam project since March. 1931. This job is a stupendous one and its difficulties are vast; the toll of deaths probably isn’t any sign of carelessness or improper procedure. It’s just a reminder that a great construction project, now. as in the old days, requires its sacrifice of human life. The father of quintuplet daughters in Ontario is worried. Well he might be. Imagine five sons-in-law coining on, all fct about the same timel

Liberal Viewpoint BY DK. HARRY ELMER BARNES JULY, 1&34, ls the twentieth anniversary of that tragic combination of confusion and , malevolence which ended by throwing the world into the most costly military calamity of human history. Already the newspapers have begun to comment upon the anniversary and to drawlessons therefrom. Interpretations of the significance and im!.port of the tragic days of July, 1914. must of necessity vary according to the personal opinions of the writers. But we are in a position to set forth the facts after twenty years in precisand dependable form. This is the first and chief obligation of any one who ventures to comment on the diplomatic crisis of twenty years ago. Yet we find even so excellent and eminent a journal as the New York Times setting forth editorially the same old buncombe which misled the world fer a decade after Serajevo. In the issue of June 28 it states: “The coolest and most impartial judgment on the basis of all the documentary evidence yet brought to light, is that the Austrian government, artfully dragging Germany with it, was chiefly responsible for the war that followed . . There is perhaps less excuse for such a statement in the New York Times today, than in almost any other journal in the country. It was the New York Times Current History Magazine, under the able and courageous editorship of George W. Ochs-Oakes, which played the leading role in popularizing the facts about the responsibility for the World war. tt e tt WE new have the actual facts about 1914. They represent a complete reversal of the entente picture, though nobody of sense regards Germany as a snow white and guiltless lamb in the midst of a pack of howling and badly smeared woives. In the decade before the war, Germany had made vigorous efforts to arrive at an understanding with Russia, England and Fiance, but had failed. This was due partially to the French determination to obtain Alsace-Lorraine, to the British Jealousy of German naval, mercantile and colonial power and to the Russian desire for the Straits. It was in part the result of the maladroit diplomacy of Chancellor von Bulow and his evil genius, Baron von Holstein. From 1912 to 1914, Izvolski, Russian ambassador to Paris, and President Poincare of France carried through a diplomatic revolution which placed France and Russia in readiness for any favorable diplomatic crisis which would bring in England on their side, make possible the recapture of Alsace-Lorraine and assure the seizure of the Straits. This opportunity came after the assassination of the archduke on June 28, 1914. Germany accepted all the important diplomatic proposals of 1914, save one. For this she substituted one which England admitted was far superior. She tried to hold Austria in check. u tt u BUT France and Russia refused to be conciliatory. In the midst of promising diplomatic negotiations, Russia arbitrarily ordered a general mobilization on the German frontier. France had given her prior approval. Such a mobilization long had been admitted to be tantamount to a declaration of war on Germany. After vainly exhorting the Russians to cancel their mobilization, Germany finally set her forces in action against the numerous Russian hordes. France informed Russia that she had decided on war a day before Germany declared war on Russia and three days before Germany declared war on France. England came in to check the growth of German naval, rolonial, ancl mercantile power. The Belgian gesture was a pure subterfuge used by Grey to inflame the British populace. He himself has admitted that he would have resigned if England had not entered the war, even though I Germany had respected Belgian neutrality. Bel- i gium had not yet figured in the British cabinet discussions when war was decided upon. In the light of the well-established facts about 1914, it now is clear that, under existing circumstances, Serbia, Russia and France wished a European war in the summer of 1914; that Austria-Hungary desired a local punitive war but not a European war; and that Germany, Great Britain and Italy would have preferred no war at all, but were too dilatory, stupid or in voived to act with sufficient expedition and decisiveness to avert the calamity.

Capital Capers BY GEORGE ABELL

ONE of Washington’s most placid and suave diplomats—courteous Dr. Don Fabio Lozano of Colombia—is quitting his post in this country and will depart within two or three weeks. Dr. Lozano has been elected to the senate of Colombia and wants to enter upon his new duties as soon as possible. Mild, unpretentious and always dignified, the Colombian envoy never has taken a part in the gayer activities of the diplomatic corps. He prefers law books and quiet dinners with seriousminded friends. Although he likes Washington, he has long wanted to enter the senate. “My wish is to have a share in legislating reciprocal trade agreements with other countries,” said Dr. Lozano. One reason he wishes to go soon is that the Lozano-Salomon pact which lie helped to frame may be called into question in the course of any future negotiations with Peru about Leticia). Dr. Lozano would have left Washington before this, but as he was about to resign he learned of the coming visit of President-Elect Lopez. So he waited. As soon as Lopez departs, Lozano resigns. “What are your future plans, Mr. Minister?” queried a friend. Envoy Fabio arched his eyebrows, shrugged, exclaimed: “Man proposes, fate disposes.” At all events, he will start with the senate. a tt tt J REUBEN CLARK, financial expert and for- . mer ambassador to Mexico, is going to New York to talk about finances with PresidentElect Lopez of Colombia. A friend accosted Reuben in the corridor of the state department, inquired: Do you expect the Colombians to resume payment on their bonded indebtedness?” Smiling broadly, Reuben replied: “That reminds me of a story.” The story, not exactly new, was about a boy named Isaac Goldstein, who disappeared from home for two nights and a day. His family was naturally much upset. When the boy finally returned, his father held a long conservation with him. (Reuben gave the conversation at length and in dialect—but here is a shortened version): “Isaac, where have you been?” “Well—father . . . I’ve been in jail.” “In jail? Why were you put in jail?” “Well, I saw an accident in the street and they took me along to testify.” They put you in jail for seeing an accident?” “Well, no, father. But the judge put me on the witness stand. He asked me how old I was and I said T4.’ He asked me if I saw the accident and I said, ‘Yes.’ He asked if my name was Isaac Goldstein and I said, ’Yes.’ Then he said, What’s your nationality?’ and I said. Don’t be a damn fool, judge—and so they put me in jail.” London police got excited recently by a false report that Dillinger was over there. Wait, he isn’t' through with the United States yet. A specialist says it’s perfectly possible to sleep with your eyes open. That’s what Europe has been doing for several years. The Irish Free State has taken a step closer toward being a republic by abolishing the senate. There’s an idea for us, only here we'd have to abolish the house, too. Strange that everybody should list what congress did during its recent sess.on, and then blame it all on the President.

THE INDIANAPOLIS TIMES

(Times readers are invited to express their views in these columns. Make your letters short, so all can have a chance, limit them to 250 words or less.) tt tt tt INQUIRES ABOUT KLAN AND ROBINSON By a Viter. What are Senator Arthur Robinson’s actual connections with the Ku-Klux Klan? Every one speaks of him as “former Kluxer and some persons say that Stephenson had Jackson appoint him to the senate in the first place. All this talk seems to be merely hearsay. Not that I doubt that he was a Kluxer. When people who are for him tell me that he never has been connected with the Klan and that all the talk is merely mud slinging by his enemies, I don’t know the answer. Perhaps if you print this in your Message center, some of your Klan readers will give me the facts. tt a tt WHAT WE DON’T KNOW WOULD C OOL US By Heat Wave. May I offer a suggestion that might possibly mitigate the suffering of the majority of Indianapolis citizens during these ninety-degree-plus days? I recommend an ordinance be introduced at the next meeting of the city council that would prohibit the weather bureau from issuing bulletins stating hourly temperatures. The hot weather is bad enough, but I have an idea that many of us become even more overcome when we read in the newspapers that “the temperature neared the century mark shortly after noon today.” If we were kept in ignorance of the exact temperature, we probably wouldn’t worry and sigh and complain nearly so much. I am not a believer in suppression of news, but in this instance I recommend it, for our own good. a tt tt CAN'T SEE MINTON AS “LOGICAL MAN” By a Reader This is in response to letters headed. “Sings Praises of McNutt Regime,” and “Minton Considered Logical Man.” With strained voices and floats and banners of eveery kind, we all greeted R. Earl Peters, state chairman, as the logical man, and Minton was not in the picture, except in the background. Did the President stand by the national chairman, and didn't all the state chairmen assist the national chairman? Didn't our Republican citizenry make use of one of the most destructive assertions that letters and figures could create to defeat Mr. Peters, and didn't the wise leaders in the Democratic party select him as the logical man for state chairman? Where does Mr. Minton’s logical work come in? Was he in favor of a 2 per cent assessment for campaign funds, on the salary of appointees to state positions? This was one of the gag rules objected to by Mr. Peters. Let this be logical if you so say. I condemn a rule which causes the taxpayers must foot thr bill. My taxes this spring were around $7 more than usual. My property was assessed for $2,000 more than will buy it. This, I presume will help those appointees who were dele- j gates, to pay their assessment. Yes. l I have applied lor labor time and 1

\. K .i ./> / ■ • v U 1 ■ \ : - ■ ' L L :/ H| . fell ; ! i . iUfi 3 ' P V C ; n ■ I , ' - : }l . j.i • -I ' ' -J £.s i •. vi ' ’ . i U " •* ' j jgS*. ' ** * A./4 „ X.- • ■ *y ■ 1 ; | mr D oesmcr r ~ '

The Message Center

ALLY OF DEATH

Banning of Arrested Workers Condemned

By Fair Flay. The action of officials at the Real Silk Hosiery Mills in barring sixteen former employes from returning to work because they had been arrested during the recent strike is a clean cut example of the vindictive spirit of many American employers. One young fellow I know was present as a bystander when some trouble occurred and was arrested. When his case was presented in court, it was dismissed, clearly absolving the young man of any connection with the trouble, on the evidence presented. But Real Silk officials decided they did not want him back,

again, but had I got a job that little pittance would not have marred me. tt t* u URGES SOLUTION OF PRIMARY MYSTERY By B. I- D. I want to congratulate The Times on its editorial about the still unsolved mystery of the changing of the primary election tally sheets. It is now two months since the primary and since someone deliberately changed figures in the HartHutsell and Wilmeth-Chamberlin vot- statistics. The grand jury just before its dismissal made a report in which it confessed its inability to discover the guilty canvassing board member. This unquestionably would have been accomplished if Prosecutor Herbert E. Wilson and grand jury members had made a relentless effort in their investigation. Whether the new grand jury will do any better, or whether it even attempts to investigate, still is a conjecture. 1 hope they will, and that Mr. Wilson obtains more definite results. Unless something is done, the fall elections may very well make Marion county the laughing stock of the state. a a a CONDEMNS DRINKING BY YOUNG GIRLS Bv Irate Mother. It is full time that city police and the sheriff’s office of Marion county took some action to prevent drinking by young girls in resorts of the lowest character. Girls as young as 15 know that they can get all they want of whatever they want to drink at these places. They know, too, that the proprietors do not care what goes on behind the curtains of booths as long as a sufficient amount is spent for food and drink. The condition is, of course, worse in the county and in the outlying and so-called ‘tough” sections of the city. But, girls from all sections of the city frequent these places. Can not something be done about them? I ask as the mother of a girl—and, of a boy—rapidly approaching the age when their friends will try, at least, to take them to such places. a u a ONE WHO PAYS SEES OVERTAXATION By Jat-a-Taxpayyr. James A. Collins said a mouthful • Tuesday when he told the Rotarians ; that it was silly to spend $56,000 for a primary election. And, William Fortune said a mouthful when he said Wednesday 1 that $9,000,000,000 was too much to pay for government. Os course, my protest is unimportant. I'm a member of the least

[1 tv holly disapprove of what, you say and will defend to the death your right to say it. — Voltaire. J

thinking probably their action would deter others from going against the company’s will in the future. Employers such as this injure the peace and good will of the community. They are a positive danger to the employer who is fair, for it is their actions which stir up labor trouble and upset otherwise peaceful relations between all workers and their employers. It seems to me that if enough publicity were given the actions of Real Silk officials, dispensing the Real Silk brand of justice, public opinion might be aroused enough to insure innocent persons a fair hearing in their fight for a job.

regarded class of citizens in the country. I'm just a taxpayer. All w T e do is supply the money spent by the class of misnamed public servants. It's about time somebody considered us. There'll be plenty of trouble if they don’t. Communists may not be able to stir up their beloved proletariat to the point of revolution, but history shows overtaxation has led to revolution more than once. tt tt a OPPOSES MOVEMENT TO “PURIFY” MOVIES By Irate Movie Fan. With customary meddlesome tactics, some are attacking another institution of the country, in their concentrated criticism of current moving pictures. Unable to plant their biased opinions as strongly as they hold them themselves, they are seeking to keep producers from portraying life as it really is. Church heads of several faiths are urging that certain topics be withheld from the screen. They would have their children grow up in a continued belief that everything is “sweetness and light” ir. a twentieth century world. There is no basis for the opinion that our young folk immediately will try to become all of the unpleasant characters that they see on the screen. It might even be brought to their attention that American youth, admittedly clever, will be able to make comparisons of proper and improper conduct by its portrayal on the screen, and regulate their lives accordingly. . Fairy tales are all right for children at a very tender age, but they can not continue to live in them. If drinking, seduction, crime and other unpleasant things exist in a real world, why should they be kept in the background in the one ere- ! ated in celluloid? tt tt tt ASSERTS MOVIES SUFFER FROM UNFAIRNESS By Theater Owner. May I protest against the unfair impression given by almost every newspaper of the quality of entertainment being produced by the major film companies of Hollywood and New York? These pictures are, for the most | part, not immoral. They are not. < for the most part, obscene. Theyj are not, for the most part, objec- j tionable. I know. I have to see more movies in r year than any churchman, I care not what his faith, will get to see in ten years. I have no fight with any church, but I do call for fair treatment

.JULY 6, 1934

for a great industry which has given employment, and well-paid employment, to many thousands of persons. industrial" barons “HOG THE ROAD” By J. T. R. The arrest of Alfred M. Binghan for picketing peacefully, and his sentencing by a New Jersey court for thirty days on that score, indicate that our courts may be ditching the constitutional guarantees of liberty of the person, for the “sacred rights” of inanimate property. That’s a good way to start, if we want another revolution to re-estab-lish the rights of persons, as they are now guaranteed by our present constitution. Dollar diplomacy seems to have bred dollar justice. Perhaps the New Jersey commonwealth will announce where the United States Constitution applies, and its boundary limitation. The “castles” of our industrials barons seems to include the public thoroughfare, and the public officers appear to be dummies of the feudal lords. Have they forgotten the Boston tea party? tt a HE OBJECTS TO CENTRAL STREET C AR SERVICE. Bv .1. R. Smith. I am writing you to see if you can tell me why the customers of the Indianapolis Street Railway Company who live on or near Central avenue should have turned out to be stepchildren. People who live on other branches of the car line are riding in elegant new blue and yellow cars which don’t threaten to fail apart when their speed is increased to more than five miles an hour. Also the seats in which they sit, when there’s room to sit, don’t leave them bent double like a man of 90 when they rise. 4 Another thing I wish you would take up with the street car company is why Central avenue street cars wait five or ten minutes at the corner of Vermont street and Massachusetts avenue during the rush hour when every one is in a hurry to get to work. I have timed their famed “speedy service,” and I positively can state that between 8 and 9 in the morning they never made the run from Twenty-second street and Ceneral avenue to Illinois and Washington streets in less than twenty minutes, and more often it takes half an hour. The distance, I might add, is less than two miles. I assume that this tortoise-like schedule is necessitated by the rickety old cars they use on the Central avenue lines. Then how about some of the new cars or are we really stepchildren?

TRIBUTE

BY VIOLA BARRETT I want to grow old in a garden As the years finger my face And hold a red rose close To share its color and replace My own that fades and leaves me then Dull as parchment beneath a sharp, full pen; I want to sit within the shelter Os the wall—though seen by all who pass— x To lift my lined eyes, softened In the shadow, and with distorted lips—alas To smile, that they seeing me may say She is old and yet—she has not rotted away.