Indianapolis Times, Volume 45, Number 302, Indianapolis, Marion County, 28 April 1934 — Page 10

PAGE 10

The Indianapolis Times <a st Kirrs-How aRd newspai'kk* HOT W HOWARD Present TALCOTT POWELL Editor EARL D. BAKER I'. .*;ne Manager Phone— Riley 5531

Member* of Gnlfpd l’re*, Srripp* • How * ril Nm sptpfr Alliance. New .pap-r pri Aiarwiat ion. Newspaper Information Service ai.i Audit Bureau of Circulation*. Owned and publlt.be 1 daily (except Sundavi bv The Indtanapolla 'lime* Publishing Company. 214-220 Weat Maryland street. Indianapolis. Ind. Prie* in Marion county. 2 rent* a copy; elsewhere, 3 rents— delivered hv carrier. U rent* a week Mail üb*rrtptlon rate* ) n Indiana, S3 a year; outside of Indiana, #5 cent* a month.

—~

Give Light end the People Wilt find Their Own Wap

SATURDAY. APRIL 28 1934 CALM DIPLOMACY ATTHEN Japan created another crisis in far " " eastern affairs by a series of trial statements asserting special interests in China the Washington government did not lose its head. It did not bluster. It did nor permit itself to be maneuvered into an exposed position—either by Japan or by the European powers. For all of which the American people can be very thankful. The far eastern situation is increasingly serious. It can be handled safely only with the greatest of skill. America is strong. America has no selfish interests to serve in the far cast. Therefore we can afford to move in this matter —as President Roosevelt and Secretary of State Hull are moving—calmly and with caution. The more irresponsible Japanese militarists become, the more necessity it is that we refuse to be hurried into a false move. In the end if Japan is determined to dominate China only China herself can prevent, it. Meanwhile, however, there are the treaties in which Japan agreed with the United States and other powers to respect Chinese integrity. As part of the bargain for peace treaties in the Pacific the United States agreed to refrain from fortifying her eastern bases and agreed to limit the American navy to a ratio favorable to Japan in eastern waters. The peace and naval treaties will stand or fall together. However it may appear to Japanese extremists. the rest of the world has supposed that the destruction of those treaties would involve a greater hazard for Japan—the smallest and poorest of the naval powers—than for any other nation. Nevertheless, if the Japanese government is bent on destroying the treaties, and the conditions which make such treaties possible, the United States can not stop her. America is anxious to stand by the treaties along with the other powers and co-operate to the full. But America has no desire to stand out alone, deserted by * Great Britain and France as happened for so many months during the Manchurian affair. In fact, Britain and France have definite imperial interests in Asia, and we have none—we even are setting out of the Philippines. What Japan does is more their concern than ours. Our primary interest is peace. That peace can be preserved only by the equal co-opera-tion of all the treaty powers. WE ARE THE PEOPLE! “ r T' , HE core of the American tradition." says Dr. Rexford G. Tugwell. "is to be found in a kind of defiance to fate.” Dr. Tugwell. who is either a smart young man in a big ,iob or a fearful bogev-man with claws and cloven feet, depending on your point of view, made this remark before the convention of the American Society of Newspaper Editors in Washington. He was trying to make clear that the administration welcomes criticism, and that any attempt at regimentation of American life in defiance of the will of the masses would be foredoomed to failure. And in this remark there is a shrewd appreciation of a fundamental part of the American character—a part which both radicals and tories tend to overlook. "We will not do what we do not want to do. and coercion can not make us," adds Dr. Tugwell. "We can be fooled, but not for long. We have a precious inventiveness which gets us out of holes. We have a saving irreverence for authority." Here is an excellent point for everybody concerned to keep in mind. It makes these terrors of Communism, Fascism, and so on much less terrifying; for all such schemes must, sooner or later, run their keels on to this hard rock of stubborn contrariness—the fact that, in the long run, we will not do what we do not want to do. which is just another way of saying that in the end the honest wish of the majority wii prevail. It reminds one somehow of that old story of the Fourth of July celebration in a small midwestern town half a century ago. The Governor, a senator, and a couple of representatives were to address the citizens in a public park. Pretty soon thin- started making their way through the crowd to the speakers’ stand and some flunky or other who was trying to clear a path for them railed out. "Make way for the representatives of the people." Instantly someone in the crowd called bark: Make way yourself. We ARE the people!" And that’s what it all comes down to. The peoples representatives, down at Washington, may advance any kind of theory or nostrum they choose; eventually, if their fellow-citizens don’t like the looks of it. they will hear that old cry—Make way yourselves. We are the people !* PIE FOR AMERICANS! T'XR. DUDLEY REED, director of physical education at the University of Chicago, seems to have raised a standard about which all good men and true can rally in these troublesome times. Dr. Reed wants to get back to that good old-fashioned dessert, which was rich, heavy, conducive to overfeeding and probably more or less unwholesome, but which was both delicious to eat and satisfying to the stomach. In fact, it Is Dr. Reed's notion that pie is the only really satisfactory dessert. He mentions the fact that too many desserts are built up around fluffy egc-whites and designed to please the eye rather than the palate; and he says. “I’d rather die on cherry pie than live on floating island " Here Is a little campaign which deserves a lot of support. Let pie be restored to its traditional place in the American scheme of things I

REAL HISTORY /''VNE of the- things that makes ordinary history seem unreal is its habit of trying to put its characters into full dress. The school books arc full of stately utterances and lofty poses; and while they sound and look very fine, most of us have trouble believing that they ever actually were said or done. Now MacKmlay Kantor, who recently wrote "Long Remember." a fine novel about the battle of Gettysburg, rises to show that our suspicions can be pretty accurate. In studying the battle of Gettysburg. Mr. Kantor devoted especial attention to the first day’s fight, when an advance guard of Union cavalry under General Buford tangled with the Confederates and got snowed under. Most histories, he remarks, represent Buford's superior. General Reynolds, as galloping forward and saying something like this: "General, the fate of the Union is at stake. At all costs, you must maintain your present lines until reinforcements are brought forward." But at last, in an old book of records, he found out what they really said. Said Reynolds, arriving amid the confused clamor, "What’s the matter. John?" Said Buford, "There's hell to pay.” Said Reynolds. “Think you can hold out until the first corps comes up?" And Buford replied. "Reckon I can." And all of this, somehow, is rather comforting. "There's hell to pay . . . reckon I can"—that's the way men really talk, in moments of stress. It sounds human, realistic; we suddenly see Gettysburg, not as a historic pageant, but as it really was. enacted by men who weren’t worried about striking attitudes for the history books, but who were trying to get on with the job at hand. Probably we'd find the same thing true of many other historic and picturesque occasions. Did John Paul Jones coolly say. “I haven't begun to fight"—or did he damn the Britisher's eyes and invite him to climb a tree? Did Ethan Allan say, ‘Open, in the name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress!” or did he, as a Yale professor once suggested, say something like "Open up there, you blankety-blank blank!” Scrape away the historic trappings and you'd probably find something very like this underneath many of those great moments. The fine phrases are made later, by men who weren't there. A MIRROR TO AMERICA 'T'HERE is more than shallow meaning to the regional exhibits of the paintings and sculpture done by jobless artists under the public works of art project, ** The 600 works of art. selected from the output of 3.600 artists on federal relief pay rolls, hold a mirror to the soul of America. Since these artists were in such desperate need that they gladly accepted a low weekly wage, their canvases might be expected to y display some rebellion, even despair. They do not. Without exception, as President Roosevelt remarked of the Washington exhibit, their art is that of hope and courage. Furthermore, it is robust and American. It lacks both slavery to classical standards and the decadence common to much European art. Even the picture. "Unemployed Boy,” called by Mrs. Roosevelt “almost the swellest thing in the exhibit.” shows a face, as she said, ‘more baffled than resentful." Tire PWAP is an inspiring adventure. It marks the beginning of a publicly-aided folk art that in time will embellish many of our public buildings. It has fired hundreds of hapless artists with new hope and faith. We trust that some way will be-found to carry on this type of project through the coming years. Without vision the people perish. SAYING THE LAND IT seems odd to think that land itself—solid, enduring, part of Mother Earth can actually be destroyed. But it can; and Secretary of the Interior Ickes asserts that the future usefulness of no less than 173.000.000 acres of public land depends on passage by congress of the administration’s grazing bill. This area larger than all of France is deteriorating, says the secretary, because of overgrazing by livestock. Removal of the forage crop makes the land a prey to wind and water erosion; if left to itself, it will eventually become a useless stretch of desert. The pending tuli would regulate grazing on the land, keep it in use to the limit of its potentialities, and save it for future generations. It ought to get congress’ approval without delay. VOLUNTARY CONTROL ■pvAIRY farmers have turned down a *165.000.000 benefit plan that the federal government wanted to institute under the agricultural adjustment act. The dairy farmers have lost; not the government, as represented in this instance by Agriculture Secretary Henry Wallace. For it is not impossible to foresee the time when the milk farmers will be going to Triple A begiing for some sort of help. The point of this controversy, temporarily settled, is not in the fact that a nation-wide program for milk production control has been postponed, although that is important enough. The fundamental thing is the new demonstration that the Roosevelt recovery program in agriculture is voluntary, a fact that critics have either ignored or forgotten. The milk control plan was mapped after Triple A had heard innumerable suggestions. It was offered frankly to the irtdustry for it to approve or disapprove. It chooses to disapprove. So. Secretary Wallace has dropped it. . The cotton plan now in operation is voluntary. whatever the critics may say. Neither the secretary nor his department went out and sought passage of the Bankhead cotton control bill, by the terms of which recalcitrant farmers may be compelled to join the campaign for the general good. The south voluntarily asked for this measure, and got it over Wallace’s disapproval. The wheat control program is voluntary, and so are all the others. It is the only intelligent approach, the voluntary one. In time—who knows?—compulsion may be necessary. B it. if it is. we believe the first cry for it will come from the farmers thefhselves. The cheap dollar is bringing many European tourists to the United Slates. If we've learned anything from them. NRA should set a separate price standard for the European*.

Liberal Viewpoint By DR. IIARRI' ELMER BARNES -= FMlnrlnx I* the wfond of throe article* hr Mr. Rarnc* on the now social credit idoa launched by Major C. H. Uouxlas and othor British economists. a a a social credit program led by Messrs. A Douglas. Soddy, Martin and Hattersley, combines three movements designed to put capitalism on a rational basis: (1) The technocratic conception that production must be controlled by expert engineers rather than by fogged and confused producers for profit: (2) The basic conviction that production must be guided primarily by the needs and powers of the consuming public, and 1 3) The conviction that our whole monetary system rhust be overhauled. In short, social credit exponents envisage an age of plenty, made possible by technological progress, and the ability to exploit this through “consumers capitalism.” Production must be in the hands of experts, trot this productive efficiency has no logic unless it is designed to serve the consumers. Major Douglas and his associates recognize that the major evil of our economic order is not capitalism, but the particularly type of capitalism which has developed in the last half century, namely, finance capitalism. a a a THE latter is intent upon immediate financial profits at the expense of productive industry. Its formula is to launch, water, build at great expense, mismanage, reorganize and ultimately steal, industrial, transportation and financial enterprises. Its goal and methods are, by and large, anti-social. Industrial capitalism, on the other hand, has made a great social contribution. It has solved the problem of efficient production and has brought production from handicraft to advanced mechanical methods. Finance capitalism, or "creditism" as Mr. Douglas calls it, has all but destroyed industrial capitalism by insisting on nonsocial or anti-social profits at the expense of business and mass purchasing power. The probem, therefore, is to wipe out finance capitalism and to preserve industrial capitalism. Such is the ambition of the Douglas followers. Social credit advocates recognize that we can not buy without money. They see that today there is not enough money to carry on the necessary volume of purchases and that such money as exists is concentrated in the hands of a few who can not and should not purchase and consume in proportion to their holdings. They further hold that the real source of the wealth of a nation is not in its precious metals —an archaic notion—but in the supply of useful goods and services. a a a HENCE, they propose to abandon the gold standard in both form and reality—holding that it has been abandoned in reality long ago. The state will assume and monopolize credit and money. It will base the latter on the necessary and useful goods produced within the country. The social credit protagonists lay special stress upon the inadequacy of our present monetary resources. Our real wealth in goods has increased enormously, but our monetary wealth remains but slightly more than it was in the days before high-speed production. To try to 1 consume adequately under our present system of finance capitalism and “creditism” is like attempting to take away the dirt from a steam shovel with a wheel-barrow. The social credit group goes farther than does the new deal in holding that we must adjust our perspective to an age of plenty and leisure. They would have scant patience with the production limitation notions of the Roosevelt regime in either industry or agriculture. Instead of trying to limit production to the present purchasing power of American consumers. they would raise the consumers’ purchasing power until it equals the cost of the goods which should be consumed in order to attain a civilized standard of living Tomorrow I shall indicate just how the social credit conception would be put into practice.

Capital Capers GEORGE ABELL 1

Governor gifford pinchot and his T fascinating titian-haired wife flew over from Pennsylvania midweek in the teeth of an electrical storm to be guests amid jonquils and gold plates at a formal White House dinner. Pinchot wore his usual broad-brimmed hat and a business suit as he arrived at the White House. Mrs. Pinchot was in traveling costume. They had landed their private plane at Congressional Airport and came into Washington by motor. Political significance attached to the White House fete on account of Pinchot's candidacy for the senate. There were five senators at the dinner—Steiwer of Oregon. Thomas of Utah, Thompson of Nebraska, Byrnes of South Carolina and Hatch of New Mexico. Near the very end of the list of sixty-two guests one found the inconspicuous name of Gerard Swope. NOTE: Senator Dave Reed, active opponent of Governor Pinchot, dined quietly at his S street mansion. nan BIG. lanky Andrea Ferrero of the Italian embassy staff, is known in Washington as the ‘Man Mountain of the Diplomatic Corps.” He has .iust put this distinction as a minor Carnertt to good use. Signor Ferrero w’as in a night club and became involved in a dispute with a drunken client there. Finally he gave the man a push. Since his hands are only slightly smaller than those of Mr. Camera himself, it was a real push. The drunken man staggered and fell. Immediately four friends of the fallen one approached menacingly. Ferrero saw trouble impending. "Do you know who I am" he told the quartet as they surrounded him. “No. Who are you?” “I am the brother of Camera.” replied Ferrero. inflating his chest and pounding it. "What happened then?” inquired an interested auditor as the Italian diplomat recounted his strategy. "Nothing,” shrugged Ferrero. "They believed me.” • tt a u JAPANESE AMBASSADOR SAITO put on his slouch hat the other afternoon and went down to the state department to explain the Japanese attitude on China. Newsmen quizzed the envoy about the matter and he answered their questions—somewhat nervously. "Any idea what the state department's attitude is. Mr. Ambassador” someone queried. Saitos face broke out into a smile. "I'm puzzled, too.” he said. n a tt MYSTERIOUS Ramon Franco. Spain's noted aviator, was one of the principals in an impressive ceremony at the Spanish embassy. Tall, handsome Brigadier-General Juan Azcarate. military attache of the Mexican embassy, j dressed in deep blue and gold uniform, received ! from Franco the Grand Cross of the Order of Military Merit of Spain. Commander Franco, in a simple green uniform distinguished only by a pair of wings on the collar, made the presentation solemnly: ■ Spain has sent me to reward your efforts ■ to find the Spanish fliers lost in the Mexican mountains.” he said. "We want to express our thanks to all Mexicans.” He placed the white ribbon from which depended the red and white cross around Azcaratr's neck. The beautiful Chilean wife of the recipient ! watched the ceremony from the sidelines. ■ Roger Babson, the economist, says no one can be blamed for the depression. Well, not at least until the next presidential election.

THE INDIANAPOLIS TIMES

MARY’S LAMB TURNS OUT TO BE A RAM!

/stopTN Ay, f, ( you CAN’T )

rpl tv yr „ j I” 1 icholly disapprove of what you say and will X He Message V><eiXter _ defend to the death your right to say it — Voltaire. _

(Times renders are in riled to erpress their views in these columns. Make flour letters short, so all eon hare a chance. Limit them to 210 words or less.) nan BASEBALL, MULES AND POLITICIANS By Timmy Cafouro*. It warmed one's heart to see Kate and Queen, ancient mules of the Polar Ice Company, back in the baseball opening parade. After years and years of pulling mayors and Governors in parades they still axe alive, but unable to draw the cigarpuffing bigwigs. The time-worn hides and the melancholy mien of the beloved mules was far more touching to the observers of the parade than all the patronizing smiles of would-be pudges, prosecutors and what not. Some politicians went to great expense to put up a big front for the parade. Consider why they are so anxious and eager to get elected? Why will they spend so much money? Does that bode good for the people nan ASSERTS LOAN COMPANY PATRONS USUALLY LOSE By I’m No Flh. After reading the letter by a loan company supporter, I should like to know if this person is an employe of a loan office or if it’s just another guy trying to start an argument? Will the reader kindly state just what well established ‘‘3 l /z per cent. $ 10-S3O company” ever failed? How come? Did they die? You bet the loan companies help the poor fellows, so that the poor fellows can support the worst organization of chiselers in the country; organizations employing less workers than any other considering dollars invested; organizations which carry on their business only with the unfortunate, without a chance of loss and. in many cases, they receive $2 for each $1 loaned before the contract is closed. They hound men from their jobs, cause social embarrassment, dishonesty. neglect of decent debts, min credit, break up homes and show a handsome profit while the "poor fellow” is rarely benefited in the least. If the loan companies were honest and benevolent, they would do business only with honest persons who need not pawn their souls to borrow money. When one signs a time payment contract of any kind, you are in a cold-blooded deal, but with a loim company, you cant be benefited. The statement that loan companies lose only one-half of 1 per cent is proof enough. What other business shows that small a loss? When you speak of “helping poor devils,” "benevolence,” "restoring prosperity,” "interest not high,” or any other utterance in defense of the business, I suggest that you become better informed before you enter upon any discussion on the subject. Don't worry, my friend, the loan shark is going. If the NR A don't get him the American people will —when they wake up. n n n NATIONS ARM WITH WAR TALK RIFE By Chrl<“ Burton. i The capitalist nations in recent years have made numerous peace treaties in an attempt to safeguard the world from war and let it be conceded that they have done this with a sincere desire for peace. The facts, however, are that at this time all the nations are arming to the teeth and are desperately preparing for war and expect war. And they know not the reason why. During the World war the ruling

Seriously Considers Dr. Wirt’s Charges

By Charles Hall llavis. Dr. Wirt's statement has aroused nation-wide interest, not merely because of his reference to Kerensky and Stalin, but because a large number of thoughtful citizens who believe in the American plan and theory of government, are seriously alarmed at the continuing and increasing concentration of power in the federal government and the scrapping of constitutional limitations on governmental powers. These citizens recognize that the avowed strategy of the Socialist school of thought is gradually to concentrate all power in government, and then seize the government and administer it, not in the interest of all the people, but of a class described as "the proletariat." They recognize that the present program, whether so intended or not, is aiding and furthering the plans of the Socialists, and is helping to make possible a political "coup" that may at one fell stroke destroy the American republic and end individual and political liberty. The Socialist platfrom of 1904, official document issued by the National Commitee of the Socialist party, pages 307-8-9, sets forth that the organization is not American but is ’world wide.” It "pledges fidelity to the principles of international socialism.” It contains the following: “To the end that the workers may seize every possible advantage that may strengthen them to gain complete control of the powers of government, and thereby the sooner establish the cooperative commonwealth, the Socialist party pledges itself to watch and work” for certain socalled legislative reforms. I have been a Democrat all my life and voted for Mr. Roosevelt. I cast that vote with full knowledge that when the President took office he would place his hand on the Holy Scriptures and take a solemn oath that he would "preserve, protect and defend the

elements invented slogans and caused to be shouted throughout the earth the slogan, "The war will make the world safe for democracy.” That slogan was a false prophecy. Today there is not one democracy on earth, but most of the nations are ruled by dictatorial power. I am not here criticising the dictators but merely citing the facts. Millions of men were preached into, urged and driven into the World war and most of the Americans are now in want and suffering for the necessities of life in a land where there is said to be too much raw material for clothing, too many houses. Every one knows that there is something wrong. a a EMPLOYE FAVORS COMPANY UNION. By N. Pe*C* I have'been a seamer at Real Silk nearly six years and I like my Job. I do not think our bad work penalty is excessive as I never have as much as SI out of my check a week for bad work. And I know my insurance would cost me much more if carried outside of our group policies. I always have been treated fairly by the E. M. B. A. and I never have taken any matter to our department head that he hasn't given me a square deal and decidedly I am not the type that cries on any one's shoulder, nor am I young or good looking. I know that Real Silk always has given me a square deal and I am proud to be a Real Silk seamer.

Cons ti t u tion of the United States.” Reforms in government were urgently needed, but the powers of the President and of congress were limited by the Constitution, which every member of congress has sworn to support. I did not vote to make Mr. Roosevelt a benevolent despot, but I voted for a President under a representative constitutional government. I hold no brief on behalf of Dr. Wirt, but I agree with him that the question of the identity of the man who made the refer--1 ence to Kerensky and Stalin is of minor importance. The real problem should not be camouflaged by a discussion of personalities, and the issues are too tremendous to be evaded or whitewashed by congress, or to be ridiculed by the press, in the effort to pigeonhole them, and thereby lull the American people into disregard of the present danger to the republic. Many of us have feared and still fear that the present administration’s policies, if continued, will ultimately result in an American Socialist, Communist, Soviet or Fascist state, in place of a constitutional republic. We have r.ot described the menace in terms of Kerensky and Stalin, though w'e have been alive to the danger of a Soviet republic as a result of nationally regimented and coded industry, and of the increasing combination and concentration of executive, legislative and judicial functions in bureaucratic appointees of the President. Congress, the President and the courts are on trial before the American people as their creators and masters. We want to know' whether they are endangering the governmental structure for the preservation of human rights and liberty, temporarily intrusted to their administration. We want to know how r they justify their apparent disregard of the constitutional limitations imposed on them by their creators and masters.

HE'S STICKING WITH COMPANY UNION By a I.oyal "R-eI Silker.” I have been a Real Silk employe for almost seven years and I am one of the many who is sticking with the E. M. B. A. The strikers have been saying that J. A. Goodman and the E. M. B. A. have been making false promises. During all my time at Real Silk, I have never known J. A. or the E. M. B. A. officials to go back on their promises. Mr. Goodman has proved it in every way, too numerous to mention. One is the way he is taking care of his loyal workers now and he will later on too. don't fear. They are saying that J. A. has puffed us up with this idle talk, but there couldn’t be any bigger wind-bags than the union organizers. They get the fellows all enthused with high, unreasonable wages such as one fellow wrote in here that knitting was worth SIOO a week, thirty-five hours at that and transferring for % 18-year-old boys, $35. How utterly silly. How long do you suppose the mill would last at that rate'’ They also tell them they can't be fired or no one can be hired if they belong to the union and they can give them promotions any time the union officials wish. If any little thing goes wrong, thev can run to the union officials and tell them and they demand the employer to do just as they say. Now do you suppose if you had a business of your own that you w r ould let some outsider come in and run

.APRIL 28,1934

it for you? You'd be an idiot if you did. In other words, if any one complains, and complaining would be going on continually if the union were in because I have never seen a union yet that was completely satisfied; they can call a strike and parade the mills and ask for the world and expect to get it. Well, they are finding out differently now and I hope they never get in. Another thing, the strikers have no right to call the loyal ones in the mill “scabs.” We are not scabs; we are just going ahead working, doing our job that the strikers were foolish enough to walk out and leave. If the mill had already been union and there was a strike, and some of the workers went back in, then they could be termed scabs. But, the mill isn't union and the ones inside aren't union, so the fellow who left his work on his own free Will shouldn’t be "hollering” about the ones on the inside. nan URGES SEAMERS TO JOIN STRIKE Bv a Real Silk Seamer. I am wondering where all of the Real Silk seamers are who continuously express dissatisfaction about the unfairness of the E. M. B. A. permitting the penalty on defective work and low wages, and the partiality and littleness shown by department heads? We wish to inform you that many of the seamers have averaged only from $7 to $8 a week since Jan. 1. Are you going to sit here and continue to sew this work that is knitted and shipped here by scab mills while the knitters are out fighting for better working conditions? Are you going to be good enough sports to fight our part of the battle? As long as this department continues to co-operate with the management's unfair policy to employes by reporting for work and sewing scab knitted stockings we are encouraging a continuance of the strike and by doing so we are not only retarding the progress of the striking knitters but we are also making our working conditions worse and continually lowering the morale of every fair thinking seamer in this department. Talk is cheap. It is time for united action. an n REAL SILK STRIKE AND POLICE GUARDS By Striker* from Georgia. Our strike is one week old today. Our Dalton police are understanding human beings. They don't swing mean riot clubs amid our strikers. They trust our striking citizens to the extent that the strikers are the guards at the Real Silk fences here. Our police love our children and they won't run away frem them and guard the E. M. B. A., no suh! Is that the force that is guarding Dillinger around the country?

Halliburton

BY POLLY LOIS NORTON You're going wandering far and wide To make come true your wishes! I should come, too! To Timbuctoo! But who'd wash the luster dishes? The royal road to romance is A most enchanting way. But if I went strolling off on it Who'd put the clothes aw r ay? You're going wandering far and wide And all the winders see. But I must bake an angel cake And have folks in to tea.