Indianapolis Times, Volume 44, Number 245, Indianapolis, Marion County, 21 February 1933 — Page 5
FEB. 21, 1033
TOOL—ENGLISH THEATRE
in ci tor **' • )• * hoice or AYERS LOI'DOIS ‘ fc<>l\inator is the uni- - —mm who know. | 1 y ' Jjgp&j t S Kelvinatcr HKK ' f i i e \Varid's Finest SB B _‘ ff Tp In dtp .. four'■f'paratr zones HHj I v ?erar°r at the oni' time. ■Bpgj m I 1 Is. rent pur;xfc.. . neces- WKSm £ * refrigeration, and <>arli fully : to ?rt nothing to remember jp| iode.il elprtur led rmeral loll . |||||| r>l g,f*t and live general lv invited to \ isij our store |§EBuEß|9Bßgp| smßS henutiful new n.13 mod 'wpwJ Hbß nHSB HB& m iII IB The R-42 Model—the low-prired quality refrigerator 1 m which has many of the features of the larger, more hoc xt r expensive Kelvinator Models. Small down payment, J2BIN. l enn. easy terms.
booking School ekeeping Institute :E SUBJECT • t* x • Dorothy Ayers Loudon ▼ i —I ■ Bring our Pencils 3PY WELCOME! I and Xolf 1! " <lks I THEATER
sperity” Gas Mange ers Loudon, the Famous sj t, During the Free Cookr! Housekeeping Institute i- Now in Progress at J the English Theater iff, , & aJK Sears New Prosperity Gas 4 R an S e Was Selected for This \\yo Demonstration Because of Its Many Modern Features 1 * s ec l u W e d with the New PsaS oc * ern Type Burners, 55 \ \>§ proved in actual use to be g ' • mare efficient than the This Ntew Prosperity Range .1 uses either natural or artiU" , ficial gas. Every stove is j|| , £|4 guaranteed “Satisfactory or HgQSjIEjEudHHBB your ; money back.”
rtRNOON SESSIONS 2 P. M.—THURSDAY NIGHT SESSION 8 P. M.
'/fcHfib' The Times Cooking School Usherettes Are Wearing Wirtiimor ' fl|l . i '^ as * l . i^ resses BraoJclatht !
What About Ironing After \ou^^^ Have W-A-S-H-E-D?^^| i For a Complete Laundry Outfit See the New SffigS Washer-lroner & Wringer, Complete L—_ZZte| s^%jw^.so Pi o%r This modern combination is on display at The Times ——mb=-i ' Cooking School and Block’s Fifth Floor! It takes ijjjijr : - Pilllfirpr on ’ y 1® split seconds to convert from a washer to an JMMm I 11 j iMllllMlla ironer. See how simple and easy it’s done. A marITmE velous value that no thrifty or modern housewife can f V-”n S 1 wtft \ si afford to be without! Thor Combinations Formerly I M l M m l \ll Sold at 5149.00. ([ | 1 Pay sl-35 I) y[ © rJfflHfK Per Week V~\ j I I HBHN i 'n On Block's Easy Pav--111 Ik a 1 mmt Plnn Soon Pays f B J P&. |aHr §, lgggl| j for This Out fit.
Let Us Help You Enjoy the Cooking Show We Are Only Two Minutes from the Theater CENTRAL PARKING GARAGE A || OPPOSITE UN CO _| ■? AG? I jfcfr’-- . ... *....*. . . . ..... ... - I • 3 Hours PARKING FREE (with PROGRAM COUPON ONLY) 10c, 4th Hour; 5c Thereafter
THE INDIANAPOLIS TIMES
Let’s Explore Your Mind BY DR. ALBERT EDWARD WIGGAM. D. Sc.
y IF ONE Os A RAIR Os TWIN 6 BECOMES MORE LIKELY TO BECOME A CRIMINAL J THAN AN OR 6I&TE2 • ■ y lIwlV Zz&zH _ WERE TME ASCENT r liflß V GREEK PEOPLE Os HIGHER 1 //* |r V INTELLIGENCE THAN OUR WN//* r \ vAJi \\ PEOPLE OF TODAY? AA ' I V I "A\ '
1. Yes, if they are the kind of twins that excite attention and are poplarly called “twins”— the kind that are always of the same sex and look much alike. These are known scientifically as “identical” twins-born from one germ-cell. The other kind are not much noticed and are termed “fraternal” twins-born from two separate germ-cells. They are no more alike than ordinary brothers and sisters. Lange, German biologist, found that if an “identical” twin is a criminal his or her mate is about 1.300 times as likely'to be a criminal as is the case with “fraternal” twins, or ordinary brothers and sisters of criminals. The reason seems to be that the “identicals” are born with almost identical natures. If one “identical” twin is good the other is almost sure to be just as good. 2. No, usually with women of about their own level. Men are afraid brilliant women will deflate their egos. They do not like
Contract Bridge
BY W. E. M’KENNEY Secretary American Bridee Lcaeue IN my two previous articles I explained to you that the second constructive bid, unless a forcing bid, is not in itself forcing. However, the third constructive bid becomes a forcing bid, and it is after the third constructive bid that the partner must be extremely careful. If his response is constructive, then the partnership has decided to go a game. If he is not prepared to go to game, he should make a sign-off bid, and the only sign-off bid that he can make is to re-bid any suit previously bid by the partnership. Now let us take up a few examples. The original bidder bids one heart—partner responds with two clubs, a constructive response. The original bidder then bids two diamonds. This is the third constructive bid and it therefore is forcing. Partner then responds with two no trump. This bid of two no trump is not a sign-off bid, due to the fact that partner did not bid no trump to sign the hand off at his first opportunity. Therefore, it must be treated as a constructive bid. a u o NOW the original bidder knows that he and his partner must not pass until a game contract is reached. If the original bidder were now
“ rt6 L rR ° D
women of great learning unless they, themselves, are famous scholars. Avery learned woman better keep her information under cover—until after marriage. No man in his senses, of course, ever fell in love with a woman's brains first. He is first attracted by her personality, but if she does not pretty quickly show intelligence about equal to his own, he usually looks elsewhere. 3. No, I do not think so, but they had an unusual number of families of extraordinary intelligence. Their intermarriage, I think produced that marvelous array of geniuses known as the “galaxy of Grecian greatness.” I think the average ancient Greek was about as intelligent as the average American. Sir Frances Galton, English founder of Eugenics, after much research, concluded the great achievements of Grecian genius which left so notable an impress upon the world, were due to only about 500 families.
to bid three hearts he would be stating, “Os my two suits, hearts and diamonds, hearts is the stronger. I prefer to play the hand as a game in hearts.” The re-bid of hearts is a signoff bid. However, it is not a game sign-off bid, due to the fact that the partnership already has agreed that they will go game. Therefore, what is the original bidder attempting to state? Simply that he is only interested in a game and not a slam. However, if he were to respond with four hearts, remember there was no necessity of him jumping to game. Therefore, the jump to four hearts is an additional constructive bid and states: “Partner, not only am I interested in a game in this hand, but I also would like to try for a slam if you have any additional values.” However, remember that this fifth constructive bid is not a forcing bid—it simply is a slam invitation. Here is another interesting example. The original bidder opens with one heart. The left hand opponent overcalls with one spade, the partner of the original bidder now bids one no trump This bid of one no trump is not a sign-off bid. The sign-off bid would have been to pass, as the bidding has been kept open for partner and there is no need to put in the bid of one no trump unless it is constructive. Therefore, it becomes the second constructive bid. Supposing the original bidder now
PAGE 5
WOMAN CALM WHILE WAITING DEATH RULING Hammer Killer May Be Second of Sex to Die in Pennsy Electric Chair. BY JOSEPH S. WASNEY United Pres* Staff Correspondent SUNBURY. Pa.. Feb. 21.—The last tribunal to pass on life in prison, or death in the electric chair, for Mrs. Mary Stancavage. 49, hammer slayer of her 70-vear-old husband, is the state pardon board. The swarthy Italian-American calmly sits in her cell “waiting news" of whether she must die for the brutal slaying. Clement Kiselefski. 52, stepson of the slain man. who now is serving ten to twenty years for part’cipating in the crime, has evidenced little interest in Mary's fate. Slain by His Bride Jacob Stancavage, an examiner, was beaten to death by his bride and stepson so they could have j “hLs home to themselves." They I endeavored to blame burglars, i Mary claimed witchcraft had : something to do with the murder. | She contended Clem, a hopeless ! cripple who struggles around on ; knee-pads, threatened to curse her with “black-magic” and strike her blind within six weeks unless she killed her husband. Forty-five days must elapse between the death sentence and the date to be set by the Governor for execution, to allow appeals. Mary, | however, pleaded guilty to the ! murder. Just two years ago the first woman to be executed walked j through the “little green door” at Rockview. Second on “Last Mile” She was Irene Schroeder, blond I sun-girl, who, with Glenn Dauge, killed a Pennsylvania highway patrolman in attempting to evade : arrest after a robbery. Mrs. Stancavage may be the | second Pennsylvania woman to “walk the last mile.” Mitigating circumstances will be the plea of the woman's attorney in seeking executive clemency. They contend she was under the influence of Kiesclefski. The state contends, however, that she dominated the stepson and planned the entire crime. bids two clubs. If the partner were now to respond with two diamonds, he would be making the fourth constructive bid and this would become the game force. The bid of two diamonds also would be telling the original bidder that he would like to play the hand at no trump. tt n TF the original bidder were to respond with two no trump, he would then be saying: “All right ! partner, let's play the hand for a game at no trump.” However, if he were to jump to three no trump, pot only would he be stating that there was a game 1 in the hand, but he would be mak- | ing a milu slam try. I You readily can see how flexible this type of bidding is. A player may make a mistake in one of his responses, but in the constructive system of bidding a player must make two mistakes before he gets the partnership into any serious I trouble. In the next article I will explain some of the forcing responses in the constructive one-over-one system of bidding. (CoDvrizht. 1933. bv NEA Service 1
