Indiana Palladium, Volume 8, Number 8, Lawrenceburg, Dearborn County, 10 March 1832 — Page 4

Continued from' first pige. of productions; and it is equally plain, that this enormous inequality is produced by the discriminating and partial taxes of the Government, laid for the - unrighteous, but nevertheless, avowed purpose of producing it. No soil however productive, no climate however propitious, no industry however efficient, can permanently maintain the competition under such circumstances. The most benignant dispensations of Providence, are counteracted by human injustice; and what add3 to the enormity of the outrage, the fairest portion of this great confederacy, if not the fairest , and, of Heaven, tbu most favored reg'on of the whole earth, is literally undergoing a silent, but irresistible process of decay and desolation, produced by a gross perversion of the very power which is under tho highest of human obligations to prevent it. The whole of the southern staples, proproduced for exportation, must u' ily cease, when they can be no longer exchanged, for foreign productions suitable to the demand of this country for consumption; and how long can the planting States continue to supply the market with any portion of the manufactures 'now imported, under the oppressive weight of a proscriptive tax, operating upon the very spring of their industry? It would be worse than voluntary blindness in those to whom

the rights, the interests, and the d e s 1 1 nies of the southern people, are, in an ! especial manner, committed, not to perceive and give warning of the inevitable doom that awaits th';rn, if that protecting policy, which impoverishes and destroys one branch of industry, to enrich and sustain another, be not utterly and absolutely abandoned. This Congre33 should adopt no halfway measures, no temporary xpdients, but "reform it together." The incidental protection, resulting from a mere vystem of revenue duties, of the lowest rate, is fearful odds against the planting States, and it is exceedingly doubtful whether even that will not ultimately destroy the business of rearing staples for exportation. As a subject of such complicated healing, will he best understood by plain and familiar illustrations, Jhe committee will now take leave to present a few hypothetical cases, showing forth the true relative operation of protecting or prohibitive duties, upon the different sovereign States of this "Federal Union." We will suppose that a number of cotton planters should form themselves into a company, for the purpose of exporting their cotton to Europe, exchanging it for manufactures, and importing these into the United States, with the view of selling them for the benefit of the company. When these manufactures should be brought into the port of Charleston or Savannah, the custom-house ollicer would demand forty per cent, on their yalue, before u " i.i ii ii,nB, u !,n inn,i0,i onJ ! - snl.l in tin TTniled Slates: and the 111' V I'.H I llf'lilllL 111 t ill Hi 111. KlllWtlJ 111 U . carnpany of planters would probably inquire why this duty was exacted upon their manufacture while the same articles, manufactured in the northern State?, were subject lo no duty or tnx of any kind? If the cfUcer of customs should truly personate the system of which he i3 the minister, he would answer this inquiry by saying: "it i9 not because the revenue is wanted to pay the debts, or provide for the common defence of the United State?, lhat you are required to pay this duty; but this burthen is imposed upon you by a wise, and just and paternal Government, for the avowed purpose of excluding ths productions of your oxen honest and iazrful industry from the market of your eiun native Slate, in order that a company oj Massachusetts manufacturers may obtain possession oj that market, and be enabled to sell inferior articles at higher prices" The history of the w orld may be confidently challenged for a parallel in I stance of outrageous injustice, perpetrated under the perverted forms of legislation. Il is very apparent, thnt, in the case just staled, the burthen or injury indicted upon the company of cotton planter?, by the discriminating tnx levied on their productions, would fall upon them exclusively, as the producers and venders cf imported manufactures; for we have supposed that they consumed no part of them: yet their burthen would be not very much less, than if they consumed the whole; for nothing can be more certain, than that they would have to pay, out of their own pockets, the whole amount of the tax Wied upon their productions, and yet obtain for thrm no higher price than their rival producers, the northern manufacturers, would obti for the same quantity of similar production?. Let it be supposed lhat the southern planters produced thee manufactures, which they now produce by the combined processes of agriculture and exchange, by the U6e of machinery, as they aie produced in the northern s tates; and that, upon the assumed grounds that their water power was never suspended by the cold of winter, and that they used a different and a cheaper lend of labor, Congress should impose an excise duty of forty per cent upon thtir ma-, nuftctures, Jeaving those of the north untaxed, is they now are whuein would this discrimn.ating duty differ from that which now txitU?

The only distinction would be in forms and nannies; the substance would be precisely the same, without a shadow of 'difference lo the producers, respectively, of the taxed and the untaxed manufactures. The duty wuuld be called an excise, instead of an import duty, and it would be levied upon articles made by the southern machinery, instead of beini laid upon articles made by southern agriculture; but would a duty cf forty per cent, be either more burdensome to the southern producers, or more beneficial to their northern competitors, under one name, than it would be under another? The most superficial reasoner must perceive that it would not . And yet no one would venture to deny, that a discriminating excise upon southern manufactures, such as we have supposed would throw a burthen upon the southern producers, not much, less than the amount of the duty, without regard to their consumption It wou d not be possible for them to obtain indemnity from the consumers, for the forty per cent, duty they paid to the government; for, if they should attempt to raise the price of their manufactures only 20, or even 10 per cent., their untaxed competitors, who could afford to sell as cheap as they did before the tax vra? impost-d, would undersell and drive them from tle market. The result would be, that they would be compelled to pay the duty, and still sell at not much higher prices than they did before, or abandon

thli- hncmcc. If npur v their vhn'e panital t (."pnofffp. and mi-i chinery, adap'ed only to manufactures, they could not abandon their present employment, without first submitting to the sacrifice or criminating tax upon their productions. Ti e ! litter alternative is the one which would be I .. t 1 : . i . . f .. ...... i aui'jifctj iii liitr iii st iu-.iaiicc, lot vciy ui.uu- ! reasons. The manufacturers ot the souiu ! woiiUl continue to rnanuftcturs with reduced ! and declining pre; fit? and wages, until these deI scended to so low a point, as lo make it expe dient to suer hce the capital invested, ra'Jier than use it in this way. This is almost preci&cty the present predicament of the planting states. They make manufactures, in a mole, II-K'aL !n fr omlA. 4l l.'l- . I l'lIl!Pint ui r :.- ki;,k ..i k., ; the consuming course of federal legislftiion. ' IIIC LICSSI' IT UI UCiUCII 13 UIIUIIH.U l'- i

nearly their whole invested capital. The at- I stand how it is possible ttiat a comminuy ian

ter native p esented to them would be, either be impoverished while this article is abundant, ; 're-Ked prosperity of all class- W A p?. 7 'Q $r ) g to mk his .ncrifiee. and thru en er upon the tneUxh-ly experience ot Spam to the con- be the inci ca-tcl p o p .tl JrJ x u W ixJ-l

some other employment, with the remnant of I trary, notwithstanding, the committee will en- es m the coitotl planting suuo, u u.. . THAT I forewarn all persons from

canital which thev mieht recue from the rums (leaver wexp.ain mo e precoy cu,... V;l nG 0i cotton w;:, luit u i u lu.io nr or r.H;mi: lor a note of hand. Riven

of that which they had abandoned, or to con- ! daceu ny imporun j tpec.e u.io . u.-. uu,cw ; . n0uniK and the aurecate

tinue the business of manulactu-.e, wun are- , wiut . ilic iim, - nl inter rop.fuer.t , is- .r .i k ! ..ni ,iw .Mt. r nt Www ol domeatiii nrouue- of the cotton planters., tu...t

uncuon n ne prongs 01 men- u nw ; . . .ii- r 1 n w...e nf th o, nmrnwiinno,! tn t'.P tk- ! lions : ail considered as the etUct ot protecting increased six millions ot dollars.'

No branch oi liuman industry can permanently ! currency, having circulation beyond its maintain itself in a competition with a rival imj; rpccicS WCT3 unknown, the very branch, under a discriminating tax of twenty, ! t iX L ' , nn , .1 c c i Tl - i ...; ; first etiect of the supposed duty, on nnportand much less of lortv per cent, 1 lie busi- ii i ness of rear. ng agricultural staples for e;:pur- ed aanufiCturcG would be to depress the extatipn must be gradually and 'progressively j changeable tralua cf tho staphs of exportation abandoned in the south, and that of making I very nearly to the extent of lhat duty. Hut as manufactures in the favored mode niu,t b j C1.- fhA nn:rP.i rPnrMntative of value.

siiDSiiiuisu in us piace, unuer an ui.snnvaus.a-, fifths n.ntPrtimrstPm not utteriv i i l i - 'i .1 .. .i n i o j - ; abandoned. A 'ready has this revolution com-j menced in the northern or t!ie planting states, and no human power can arrest its progress, it-ftXM L ov'iotin n 1 1 c n i ft until O 1 i 1 f 1 I ! liliul IMC LAlsuii i;unujf uimi w . j i Uiuuiu'c s jiuui. yea in tilt; uiuat va omu tions of those States, involving in the necessa ! ry transfer, the loss of ene half of their capital. I Kven now it is only wheie the soi1 is very pro- j ductive, ana the climate very propitious, that 1 the business of planting yields a remunerating ed in it, at one-fourth of the average wages of labor in the northern states. If any thing was wanting to conftim the argument which mainI " 1 1 1 w v uii ui-c raLiiuaiiti nu iawui ipiwj . tains that the protecting duties are specmcally taxes upon the productions of southern tabm, for the benefit of northern capital, it would be fully supplied by the fact of this vast and almost inci edible di.Teier.ee in the productive ness of agricultural labor in two portions of the ; same country. Nothing can be susceptible or clearer pi oof, than that if the soil and climate of the northern states were as usll adapted to tha culture of cotton, as those of the southern sta.e, it would not, and could not be cultivated therefor less than twenty cents a pound. In U..UIH.4 ..u u.u.g,., . ... ...1 il. .i 1.1 ....II Hn ...... W t.AA I maica inai one lauorer win jjiuuuvc hairs nfun!n.t rotton. riverarrinc three hunother necessary supplies. What, then, be the fate of a northern cotton planter, who paid fifty cents a day for each laborer, and sold his staple at eight cents per pound, the highest average now obtained for up'and cotton, &f,er defraying the expense of transporting it to market? He would not realize tor his pro dnction, half encugh to pay the wages of his laborers. When it is added that ihere is r o agricultural labor in the whole Union more etH cient than that which is engaged in the production of upland cotton, and that, naturally, no staple of the earth has so many adv tntiig s, the consquenceirresistiblyfoll.-s.thattheunwise, ui.inst, and discriminating taxes ot the federal government, have not only counteracted these .advantages, but reduced the wages of the lahnr pnffa(rp inihi n inii itr t ion . t o a o vv er rate than the wages of the btaiving operatives ot t If he duties upon imports were levied in kind, and the planters made their own eschanlees with the ioreurn manutactuiei s, wuhuul

would amount to one hundred and eighty dol- almost be purely nominal, and nearly propor- I flvornt.(, 300 oounds. the loss uoon ' 95 8'riowledgrm-nts on deeds morfgae?t

nov,n,l t twanh; rpntfl A non.'lf . I nrOUUCC U JU IU UIIUQU mivls wuiuti "wjiw , ftnn hMIll m 1 P. J III IV lUUllflllU

lars. At fifty cents a day, the wages of this ( tioned t0 the rise thrra in the value of epc- j -fc ,u0,lnt to nine hut. dred thou- conVf.r'inces of ,And' J,owers ol attorney laborer would amount to at least one lu-ndred j The second of thes? causes, would h? ! ' ' ,, ' . , t t j....ori! J eases, articles of agreement, &.c c. for thoso

W iheTon SeSiSu'l mve.W in lund, th5r8.U demand lor.lom.,c msnul3c dear ?aU, to the manufi.C ! ' """" l'" 10 tw and the expense ot management, a:nl ol itn'iiisli- tures, owing lo Ihii ternary ei0s,on of .,piircat that the ! C0lira,e ,e,m,:PTlmi ? PORTFR inir horees, tcricultKral implements and ull fotciRa tnsnotictofcs. 1 he llurd and prinei- tu' " . i HU.Ub lUKll.lt,

the intervention either of money or commercial ; seen (ia( iJie price of specie would be apprtciagents, the most unreflecting would perceive I a(aj jn rei iUitaiu consrq ien'iv, a smaller that the import duties were direct taxe s .upon . M fa rr ft Uen the productions of the planters. It, tor exam- 1 J .. pie, forty bales of their cotton were taken out ; quantity ol the staples of exportation than baof every hundred, when it passed the custom- furj the duty was laid on manuficftms. e house, going abroad, it would be impossible ! javc (V,ud the messuro cf the depreciation for them to obtain anv largetM;uuntity of goods i v,i5ch j ,r0(locea in tl0 .uice 0f southern for the remaining 60. in consequence ot this , protecting duties upon imlevy; because the agants ot the Govei nme;W expor.b, u i.o CL " .. would carry the other forty into the foreign ; ported mmufictuirs. He appreciation cf market, and, of course the supply would be uu- ) the value of specie abroad & its depreciation at

diminisliPiL In like manner, it forty bales of the merchandise obtained for the cotton exported, were taken out of every hundred , as it pasRed the f-.nstnmhousp. eoniinvr into the United States, the remaining 60 would have no great- j er exchangeable value in consequence ot ihe ' levy, because the agents of the government j would bring the oiher forty into the domestic market, and of course the supply in this case also, wou'd be undiminished. .No proposition in political economy is more universally admitted by all the opposing schools of that science, than that the price of an article cannot be enhanced in consequence of a tai. or duty, unless the supply be first diminished, or the demand increased. So far, therefore, as the southern producers are concerned, il would be better for them, that a public enemy should capture and destroy on the h gh sea?, the forty bales of cotton or of merchandise which the government levied as a tax; for, in that case, tne s-up ply would be diminished to the full extent of the destruction, and this would enable the pro ducers to obtain some indemnity tor the burthen "imposed upon them, or, in other woidsr for the increased cost of their production. But the use of money as the universal meas uie ofvidue, the admission of specie free ot du ty, uud the inter vuilifca uf tr.jK . ! -T

porting1 merchants in effecting the exchanges nf fore gn commerce, though they alter the form, and add to the complexity of the operation, do not, in ihe slightest degree, change the permanent effect of an import duty upon the productive agency engaged in supplying the exchanges or foreign commerce. But as these causes have the effect of involving the plainest truths in doubt and uncertainty, they require some explanation. All commerce, foreign and domestic, ultimately resolves itself in o an exchange of barter; money and merchants are but the medium, and the agents, by which it is effected. Bearing this in mind, the committee will proceed to consider what effect is produced by admitting specie free of duty, upon the operations of foreign commerce, under a system of protecting duties . It is said that these duties levied upon imports, are not equivalent to the same amount ot duties levied upon the exports given in exchange for them, because specie wh eh pays no duty, may be imported instead of merchandise subject to high protecting duties. Those who" use thie argument should be taught to suspect that it contains some lurking fallacy, by the undeniable fact that foreign merchandise burthened with protecting duties, sti:l continues to be imported in preference to specie which pays no duty at all. It would be a sufficient answer to this argument to say, that there can be ivo substantial relief in the ontion of imnovtincr specie, because it

wou.u be to . . i import precisely wnat we eo not want, as an article of consumption. But as specie is also, by un versal consent, the meas-J ure and the representative ot yalue, and as su- ; pemciai reasoners can nimuimw., duties Let it bo supposed, then, that under a system of perfectly free trade, tho northern manufacturers supplied one half of the dedm nd of (he country for manufactures, end j the southern planters tho other b-lf. In this j j s ate of the trade, let it be further supposed, - that en-average duly of forty percent, should ba imposed upon imported raanufecturea. 1 If specie were not the universal medium of f vchic. find mlmitted Irce VI UUiV; 33, tor ' 0J ' example, if each nation had a mero paper 1 1 , v-j't.W.W . ...W . , - - . . . , . t , ., . . v. t and 13 admitted without duty, the Cr&t (fleet r tt l ot tlie uuy ... : "i c cm impuncu mauuiai-iuics, , i would ba to suspend their importation Al jrst (n0 same q.jantiiy of specie could be . . ,n . . . btained abroad for the staples of exportation J a3 uui.mcu tiotc, ova . . moro advantageous to import the eprcie, and exchaDjce it for domestic manufactures, than t jm0or foreign manufticture3 under so high a duty. At first, also, the price cf domestic 1 u v - i i I I manunciures wou.u us vtiy ..w. ua ,,u but in a very short time, probably in less than 8jx months after the imposition of the duty, tb(3 raoney price of manufactures would be fcrty per cent, higher in the United States tlun they would bo in (jieat Britain, and the im portation of manufacture would ha resumed, j This rise in the relative price of manufactures j would result from (he combined operation 01 three causes which it is very important to distinguish and understand. The first nnd least of theso, would he the enhanced value 0f gpecio in Great liritain owing to the increased demand, lor it. Bnu me oimin- ' . . . ,s"e" vpanu.y Tbis would, of course, pal ef these causes, would ho ths depreciation in the value of specie in the United States, owing to the excessive importation of it, and the increased quintity retained in circulation. This causa would probably produce more than ona half of the rise which ivould take place in the money price of manufactures in the United States, and to this extent the money prico of every thing else would rise with the exception of the stsp'n of exportation ex changed for imported manufactures. While . of fi (h;n,. e3e J i ra sed, therefore, upwards ol 50 per e would bn cent, and i lhat of manufactures 40, th. money price ol i nntinn trviarfr and rip.?!, insieau ol risinir. woujj necessarily fall. 1 hese being articles "isea ior exponauon, w, . jr p. home, woulJ be governed by heir money price ia iue uiuiiiu umui;i. jui h j uau hem;, united, will c aetly give that measure. All tha unprotected articles the planters have occasion to buy, cost them upwards of -20 per cent, more, and all the protected articles, or cimilar imports, cost them 40 per cent, more, while the quantity of specie is actually diminished, which they obtain for their 3taples, and with which thy make their purchases. The exchangeable value of cotton is, therefore, diminished about two tents in the pound, and tbis loss the planter woold sustain es a producer merely, even if he consumed no protected manufactures, or similar foreign manufactures, whatever. To whatever extent he consume? these manufactures, he pays an additional duty of something less than 20 per cent., this being about the degree in which we have assumed that the exchangeable value of protected, and similar imported manufactures, is in Creadon ay i t!u AO prr rnt. duly. 1 tUiiiL' Cl iiiCsd Ul Uclv ;i r1 ;iiiwic- col.

as large a proportion a? the other eh? aes, they bear their full share of li e burthen imposed upon the consumption of the country, in addition to thai which they exclusively bear in their character of producers. For the sake of perspicuity, we have spoken of the planters on the one hand, and the protected manufacturers on the other, as the only producers respectively affected, injuriously and bene tidally, by the'protecting duties. Lookin to the entire effect of those duties, however, upon the planting and manufacturing states, as divisions of the Union, we must extend our views beyond the planters and manfacturcrs. Whatever destroys the prosperity of the great and leading pursuits of any community, ind greatly diminishes the incomes of the productive capitalists, must produce a corresponding diminution in the incomes of all the connected and dependant branches of industry. It is a hackneyed remark that a single wealthy man, expending a large inCome, will diffuse prosperity over a

whole neighborhood; anu uns pros perity will" be proportioned to the in rnmn enended. What then uouh income j S 1 But to the diminished income of all classtJ in the planthx' states, resultinc: from that of the planters, we must add 'the ; . , l ? ,.n Ar.n?, mn. ! mcrcau osi i - .J,ni,nV,p I tcctcd and similar impoited mam tac- j tiima. whir, i are consumeu ill tiiose states. In speaking of that consumption, some have strangely supposed that it is confined exclusively to the planters, whereas they do not constitutu one-fifth part of the free hite consumers. ine planting siaies, in the ncgrecatc. undoubtedly consume. in protected manufictures and in for-1 eign imports, an amount very pearly j equal to that of their exports. It can- j not be otherwise. What account cn j be given of the proceeds of their exnortsifit be not so? In wl.at nav do i they appropriate or expend them?! The onlv unprotected aiticies wnicn the planting states purchase from the other states, ore live stock irom tne west, lo the amount, probably, of three millions of dollars, and unprotected aiticies from the north, to about half that amount; making, in the whole, four millions and a half of dollars. But these are not paid for out of the proceeds cf the staples exported. The cotton alone which is sold to the northern manufacturers, to say nothing of rice, amounts to at least that sum. And here we have another large addition to tho burtherns imposed by the protecting system on the planting , states. It has been seen that the price of cotton in the United States is dimin ished two cents a pound by that system Estimating the quantity of cotton sold to the northern manufacturers at only presented as creating an additional demanii far cotton, is nothing more than the substitution of an artificial :md i h;id market for a natural and a iiood one a nd that the indemnity; which it has been supposed to a fiord to the cotton planters for their lo-3 ; upon what they export, consists m the additional loss of nearly a million cf dollars. If the protecting duties were repealed, can it be doubted that an Imoioo.I I'uv'iffn itnw.ir.fl wmil.l hn i , I itll.l L.llL.U lOlVlu' Ulll tlltt ,Bv., , . the . I . . . , , ' C'ueni mat me uouic;siie uetii uni uumu be diminished ? There is scarcely any limit to the demand for our cotton in A . I A il 1 i " I ...l ..lAIll I Europe, if we will frstly take manufcCtures j in exchange for it. Lei u? suppose that the ; repeal of the protecting duties would cause j an increased annual importation of foreign ; manufactures to the amount cf ten millions ; cf dollars, of which four million would ha ofo cotton manufactures For the whole of this iucre&sed importation., cotton would be re- t ceivtd, creating an increased foreign demand i for more than three hundred thousand bjles. j But the domestic demand for cotton would bo diminished, only, by the substitution of the four millions of imported, for the samj amount of domestic manufactures. And as the raw material required for that quantity of manufictures would not, at the utmost, amount to more than one million of dollars, it follows that the domestic demand for raw cotton would be diminished about thirtythree thousand bales only; and consequently, the increased aggregate demand for cotton abroad and at home, would be two hundred and sixty-seven thousand bales. This result will be fully understood when we rtlUct, that it would be produced by removing the heavy incumbrance of prohibitive duties, which now impedes and shackles he intercourse of the planting states with taeir n iaral markets. The natural market of all producers is that which willsfford the b-st price, and largjst demand for their produc tions. The people of the north uc-ueritaml j iKU nprfpilu trf ll; an I it is a remark, ft I 1 1 ui o it i-. i it t! i? m-.lt r I ! ti.'-' III

uuiiuuin iiK'ihi, "'-" .'- vi,v !Q iqiii 7 tf litcoider;

.1 1"yilM.ll 1 ' Jl ' Hi

fT. J .1JM '7Fu 2V TO 11 'pHK subscriber taks this me'liod to inform ' the pub ic in general that he hr.s establish ed the char mak.ng business, on High street, opposite the market house, w.' eie lie will keep constantly oa hand a large and sp'endii assortment of AND XVhulsor HC 32 A I II ; V Settees, &r. r Which he Warrants for durability and workmanship, equal to any in the western countr ; which he will dispose of, on reasonable terms. 1'ersons wishing to purchase, will please call j and judge lor theinseives. Feb. II, 1S3X. Fair Warms:?. rjpilFi undersigned requests those indebted it. to him by note or book account, to settle the same vn or before the first of April iux ; after that time no indulgence will be given to those neglecting this uotice FliEDEUiCK UrZ. boysome tjme ;n ijie latter part of April or May, in the year 1820, for the sum of twenty tight dollars, najsble to cne ilobo, one year after the said note vas given, for a clock; which clack waj insured to run and keep time for ono year, or no sale; and said clod: is ef no force. I therefore, forewarn all persons cf taking the said note on my account, as 1 am deter mined not to pay it, I consider it a fraud. WILLIAM LAKE. Jan. 21, 1832. 3-3 w. CIo Ih - Dress ii ig. TflK subscriber informs the public that Ida rioIll-lXrrsshlg' works at .YEJF liJLTIMOUE, OU10i are in complete operation for the execution of work of every kind in his line. From his long experience, and the care which he takes to accommodate customers, he hopes to rfceivo a share of public patronage. He has made arrangements for the reception of Cloth at Mrs. Mary Itadcl-Je's Caviling JForka in KirZASETXITOWN, OHIO, And for its return there when finished. Tba following ere his prices for worlr, per yard. Ft r IS ark cloth J5 Navy Hlue 1J Snuff Hawn 15 " IV . lVn k fmen's vear 15 cents do . do . do . " London P.roun & p.ouie Green l)rabb?of d Me:ent shades u lvtfht Snail (men's weai) u Fiiiiing Sc pressing any home colour " London lkcwn Flannel 14 (tiecn do. 18 3-4 do. 10 do. 12 1-2 do. 614 do. 12 1-2 do. 12 1 2 do. " All i tht r colours 10 do.Kiamifis colouied & rres?ed 4 do. JAMES KA UCL1FFE. October 2-2, 1331. 42 tf. Liccrdnii's ernes. riTlllK Recorder's cilice, of Dearborn y county, is kept in a room aUjoming the j t'5tderce of col. John Spencer, in the town j of Lawrenceburgb. The undersi-ned proposts executing ail manner ci uruing, suca "J'tnfh Jtr:?adc of Indiana JIi!i,ia, Printer's Jittieut, Jan. 7, 183 l.y rpHE several regiments composing sairs brigade shall be musetred at such place asthrir respective ccmraaudants may direct as f l!ow3. "The 3d raiment on Thursday, Oct. 4 14 h regt. on Saturday, Oct. 13. n ( K it 15th ret. on Wednesday, Oct. 3. 4 I'h ret. on Saturday, Oct 20. 5 5th regt. cn Saturday, Oct. G. GO'h ret. on Friday, Oct. 5. By order of the brigadier general. ISAAC CM A M B E U LI N, AW. rHAr I forewarn all persons from buy f in on trading for a note of hand, givt a th -21 day ot Ociobtr, 133 1 , for the sum of 25 dollirs, payable lo one liond and Co , fifteeo mom ha after the said note was given, for a clock, which clock was insured to run and keep time for fifteen months or uo ealej and said clock is of no force. I therefore, forewarn all persons of taking the said note on my account, as I am determined nut to pay it, as 1. consider it a fraud. PHILIP W ALDROFF. February 4, 1832. 5 lwRags! Rags! TWO cents per pound in Cash will ba given for any quantity of clean Cotton and Linen Kn at this office. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED KY Publisher of the Laws of the United States, 1:Jii!ii The PaUadium is printed weekly, on super royal paper, at THUKK DULh.lt per annum paid :,t ihe end of theear; but winch mav be discharged by ihe payment ot TAi 1)0! LMtS in u -v, or b paving 1VVO DOLL US an 1 Fib I V CEN I S al the expr.uion f .'.r n.v ! imsc w:.o i e meiv hV the m l r .!!(! . i'-'IM ;( v !.- ar;-i.'" o hrrw...., u "' U

a