Indiana Gazette, Volume 10, Number 22, Corydon, Harrison County, 1 April 1826 — Page 1

x IK t (r?' 5r- . i a - V'-- r " . jjIMP! 23W a VOL X B LOOMJLNGTON, (INDIAN A,) SATURDAY, APRIL 1, 1826; 'if.

v.. . --tv

o.- - . iTow

- ""i- -V'-'.' ' - '"'-'" C ' ; ;' ' ; ' 1 -h

BTtA.-JDON k CO. &QjYDITI(JYS;: tuice, itIVio j'irJ pe anniini, paid ia ad 'ucc, tb adiUtit d of Tvtnty Jrt arts far ery three month dtUy iu the ptn-nt buhscf'i;n r.ilUtaacc.orouiof the count

Moardt will be required ia advaacc, and no

vitiiuftr.ee without, unl at the ijtum of the

1 tor j

mgoo-

itorJ. Vl s.ibcrl;'tion fur tlmn one jf ar. I'A failure lo'nftviusrarrciu iivrcs. and tut

'Ltlceaf adiioiitiuuauco imuctually nt tUe clCJe of 4 "ti? ycnr.will b ou.ui.lt rn! ;1 a bscri.tin fr I i . tae year iiicfrclir.c' iid the paper wili lc

f t irdmgly fonv lricit f (We. K Jvertise;n ti acco.np:mifd itS the.ca.ii, will be iuicric J Uiiec limes at $1 per srpiiuc, r-t . 2S rcnU for r;Ktt continuance. L" Aiffrtiicnu.uti will -not br. contuncd for

mire ihaa one yc.ir, onles payment m made for ta f r?t yeir , " Lc tin ' anJ commiHii?.itin addrecd to

the Dh ori nmsl be puU pau, tr uiey caanot be

acraded to.

second Monday of December next. In support of his motion, Air. M. said he was without any profession il claims to the consideration of the House; and but too', 6ensrhle thai ho had no other ground, on which to rest th hope of finding its.attentiou. in the present stage of IfiiVprotracted debate. Convinced, hwever(unfavoralle the recent indications of the temper of the House might seem (o be, that a decided rmjoi il v of its members would prefer a di Ho rent .system, from that which the bill proposed, he could not Hid it V:1vi'n:ng,toJtts f.nal consumrjt UrfvKt(5r). iiftrthQT e&ivt to arrpt iii :&gtcitijff throwing iftysel?nc tnoresa(d,MrF M on the ih-.i il't iiv-e of tt.o? Http, Tdo

I hut.o'K'y tlte impul-e dF an irrcsis: j tible ixji'iat i 'ce-sity, to say' if pos-

(Cjr.ti.i.z.1 J'rur.1 our la.!.)

And r.s fcf I in hnov

iiie Union has mailt: at. y ?ptctil pro1; . '. . "". ' 7j3ion.that anr particular amrker f V-felV1'

. :.'..J j siblu, a'mc-tji c fraupht, ,as 1 heft fata ia ! lit;Vc. 1 '''s !u vit'v i'ul)lic cAlami---.1 tv. . :-f;

fiu.-ci hr.ll concur in j.ch ju.- a4?.. i:c M('e court tor other ca I.vLsitt.ifTHV5

existed: buiwuerei also 'the diligence of an able district Judge .vas aiready applying an eifectttal and speedy remedy, .ns4he disposal of no Iesthan'two thousand causes, in the disposal of no less than two thousand causes, inllie" compass of three years, clearly demonstrated. I neither praised nor blamed the legislature. ,nof the courts : bf, Kentucky. "I -' spoke, as an historian might rritc, of facts involved in the inqtiry vrhich I had begun. I maintained as 1 still do, that the remedy' Avhich the present- hill proposes for the distresses - cfthpoT3e of that commonwealth.ouldlbe in cpcrative,,0:ess it lead to a reversal onthtL judgments', otlie suprme cj'trt; A;; fhe Voat; and sud-

morc important to that air,uxr.::itj den 'aiiij.Tterjtation . ol the numbers

hut hitherto undiscovered: tv anr m oi mat courr, inreaieiiL-a wai c-

-4?ny f qumeroui ;adve?arie3. lielore ; suit, it was tairly nnpitanie-:io me

I reach it, let me pause tor arr.c-! u melt;aua ue linpuvuipa -vb ment to comply with a req ie?t of sustained by .the argument urged in the Chairman ofthe Judiciary Cam- j favor of. this measure, that the mitW. . Hie honorable rr.trru.er Judges of ihU 'court should mingle

now to adopt the arfedn:ent!;Vc Ul" i awl ''V li ? rttMT? ,f lh ntl.-lnnn tn.rn U ,.r.rifl J COhfH Cluld.7i induced to SailC-'

whaJ-ouM be the roult One I l!0n5a'-J Vr- ex?crcc re.ultHouldbe t!i5, th.tt the 3utejlo;vct! l" ilulc ur !;!h

5U ---I coruuKmight derlarc a law of Cor- co:iul P"e, wmc; fmW;- - gross void, but the supram cour: ,uv-lv.r?i1'ru,:l.lV,e lna!?a5 nt rc'i!J not reverse the doi., t v a?t.1 l"V;Uei.aUvC a well a? LeXrV3V Ctbftl.e concurrent of the ma- -:bl,v" "-r';Vct ol tac vcrrr . iburt, ft? exumplc. coi :,i5ti ffJr,Ju,hri:,,Iv'l,I,n- r,,r the.Iast hv5,:tv ;Ijud2es. lHSuorum U three, an J a jc,a.!:nv uo io protntsc omert''J31 .VmritVof that iuorum, two. ot on t:,e cvtraordttuiry cour S&VV&l lr5? pr,.er,t, and of course ofth rcc c, debate, in the con, tefKwJ VMhith ehou!d ra --cas.v-.;a m tnc .to:. -:. Tl PVVl'..i i.L .iyk wt. ( t..4 :. . truj oucstion which vcauued it.

perfect as I admit it t hare . been, which I did employ; in penng this

debate.

The chief mistake iato which I

fell, of all those which hav e be en so rigorously noticed, was in suppoiih

as 1 had been informed, that the court of East TeniiesseeiWas a dis

trict, not - a circuit court and for my argument against the judicial

inequality of; this bill, it was altogether immaterial, while all, or a single bne, of the other anomalies,

in the Northeh cpuTt of mv ork

and the Western c'oaTts of Virginia

and Peehsylvahia. remained unno

ticed and unprovided tor. V,

I shall have, in the further pro

gress of my present areunisra, atio-

thcr error to JicKiiowlecipel mi'.th

frorn- IVfastachutct U - a'ppritts - rce that I errediiti supposing the chivzt

of opinion to be of recent 'origin,

rwhich he acknowledged he' had un

der gone, in" relation, to the ex pa-.

dienry of discharging the judges of

the supreme court horn circuit dutie's : Ie assures mc, aul Cncod

scarcely say, that I -jconhde iii that

with the t)dople,to learn to modify

th.e "general jifinciples" of the law, by referenceMo the iejl-ct of their decisions." This doctrine,;! farther contended, would it-ad to tiie corruption of the court itself, by pening an avenue to $ bosom,. or popular paaiiori and proiuulc

y"Tningpe in nsaectsior.s.

assurance, that he haslong UcM4 , Vln the discharge of this obviou- N.utplnionT.he ' cause .of TJfJJt Uf, I have leu assailedf with lo

I take pleasure lii having cotrjU U.tJJ KecW who have thus'lrMight

b;ictieu3 trst, h a House w u.t mey wa.c

will perceive in tjis scpu-l n.y j i:alei a .faaiily"-iuarrel, the. inlro-

arunicn:

tc troug,ht o: thr.t j':d;;t'lap'ttiViie curt,- ii.v or

p ro e::' j t tit

mean; mtC".pj-'reiWn Je.t '-'

na, beeat-f-hl.fcigjt of entirely, averred, ih:it;i altc.cy.f. f ts or viewed tltreugh 9 medium of ir- tJuct'j fmnvth- dcpj.et'apita.. ratatod feeing .but li;Me ctilculated the surjeeme ctvnx " vfrutv;..- v-! i tradictKV"1 'rc;t.-. o . vi-r.

t.MV

.culd .-or.cui: and it i'-.e n:.. i i' ''' t:,i;i - "iu" 1 r--g-. f . j. u,,f ment of the jrcntlcrr.au a.-m uo '-uj ?-'ur.:J. th.t, if jutice were

tacky wrc adoptti, th

suit would happen, tin. orL-inalj

question turned ur,:,a a iepu;.ii.-

between - a Zrr. ii

law cfaslat. and the in.iui-v vv.-r.-. 1 ;'i

which of t!u twu r, uncof -'.!,'!!-' ''' (ional ar;J void. I t.ct oi.iv i

Li 'a i tr.c C-ir.::j.ttce,

.r'At.'isnt which 1

to the

J- i'".rt t i this"

V'H'.i'I !" ( ii-ir-1.-! Mo on ino.

j'pr-viCiiC-! t;;i, ;:o- ;, !::;!loved 3ub-

A ! ,:i; ?.nn nf tvhifh urtoh this f.oor,

Mefore I quit tli '.l torv r :t ih.--v hiv-'h.-u.'hi .roper'to invpute

!.ill, allow ni2, sir, io;a , l.'i.u-t .y ai.mnqnt.. v

"v? thc:?jiVg;;'tHleinen throw

ttoiiiut the n"cra;:crs 6f t!.:-'.'--4

wit!i respect to the accr.n. u ittr.il ba2".i:e ;n t.e federal- e. awts o j jnr.t. tueir respective ctate?. it . tr:,ot t:;( one . t.:.r.e

ave escipej t!;e recolk-cih.n r.f He-:h of our !h

h i clithat bud y the n con-

sistcd, 21 voted on he final nasSMfrc, of thn hill, i hnm

ajintlet invokes m- tcri . 0 . . . T, ,v,

utii 'Fo this ,

te'ni; How did th SeiQator5, of tha West, as watchful guardians I presume, ofthe interests, and as faithful or-( gans ofthe feelings of theirs respective states, ire are ; of the . r i ghts and w tslies of i our constituents, hoy let " ine ask dithey j I eard that v6ry vf stent. wJiicUJ" T when recommended by tiiy ffieM0vd N.; Carolina, airM:mysel as received on this fldtir, with so mcch misapplieid resentment ?; ' ? "if$&idin''my handii- . tcral extracts from tiie journal of the ,$en ute, on . that occasibn, and 1 find, tliat, of s e vea of the we te r n .'it utes , Alabttinaand Missour- wcr&

not then in? the, irnioiifive , voted for the senates bill, u H f one only against it, .'ind one . - , :. was divided-? ;es; siiv 1! :

lennesseehio, Missis?fp. pi and Louisiana, voted for this biHj" Indiana, only vote&agaiast it, and the sena?

tora of Illinois were dividrd on its passage. o I further, discover sir,":

tinit ot the 4 senators, ot

the hou-;';

many om f!

1 "

Lia:

iiiiiv :;;! u.'ii

suhi.'ct. lurnt-

1 1

u 11

j t.) deprive her i'

iV.A 'lid I j'

u.:: the nu ll: .iti fX.'I't

:!'ia :;iir; : awvrl into u)em- j 't'-'Ueo, wa di-t ulc-d iu lii-, (.pc-:i;,'. I :j-!y pjlif itons iiid'Mt, to j raiment; and t!..-it it was c.a.fit.vd !

but niair.taic, th.a go:: I u-i dtfeienrc jLouM L.. v't.cv, n

t -J. Il-J!'l l:v co-ritr

a rrrea-

.5 ifit vecce Nith vx.'iv '.uii ot :uy 1 v i i v ;i'izViJ. I

. ic no i:tjur!:u5 ren'r: i-fis o:t the

1 tws; that it h the ex.:rci.-e a ! t "

i:'.ch arid delitat-- u U r.;-

' .bounce t'rem void, iial : .Jl ! ,,!,;" trw U'e-t: I declared on 'c my .way clear, to- imp.;- fvi,-... ?:5' '( '-;ry, wtt'a a r.ountenanrc tions on t;e supit-me couii. it. thoir a" 5 ln :l "hlch no man Jeeisbr.? upon State law,, wIj;( i( '''Id Glider t.n::, tin: iva ill I are not imposed on State tilhu, ai,. !,:,v"; , r yl'ensUed t v..,id, that in reran! ri'h.M-(,fi!...ip .-v., !, -.v , i " ' ! !!i-Tiiici, : a;.vl ia 'viiich

- - o ..... , ,

.i. Ml. -v I ill ft'. I

' 'c uiu u i iae tiuicu ;i.:i:.. At the sam-.' tin-.', it .a:.:u.t doubted, what coarse !i-c:v.-ia

will usually iii':t;ite (. a. e'r.tl:i!

I yii M v se

r' Jew.

a:v

the !hrr s UlUo-W ill, J eojiriit(T" : "

d ivttivo; i;,!t;,bitaut?. J'!:'

ipl s .;:!,; i--.. ta-nt hv v.liii :

and ti

V'lC T I ' - i

t the court.-, of th, spv: :i . i;v:it. hoi th re.-it !j.i hinv;eU rrVrid iti' cinmitlee la tr ; i c'n iit.i'i !

:r. :.::.', ;e.t. '.ii-t ' V- . . 1 '. . .u.i in- ! in

g'.Mttlernan'i arr:.r.v.:, V. ttanet of a oi who, Ui j iiv-M u d . ..... t.it.ise.lf of tl.l- v i! h . Ii id tiais aciui:vu. o: ;--i-ii : . :;-:h .

roai.rattce, and ;t..::

moral esteem oi :..-a:-:::: 1.

t'iiitii:!:; tl.r prt.-fi.i bii:,

aiorin-i.t, !

Lo r

!;i 1i:V of th.-c ili tt .ti

:rv.

i. io ;h- ('!;: '. iiCi

C ' et Hr.' r.t, an;'. : un-

... to u- r.. ;a-:i..te ihnl they : ..'..title 1:.e r,Koo-..i reform '-.ivurnhh : - -id ! it-i- ...;:-c

i..e L-

j,; 'Ve. . . -diti'-att-.n :

i:n-

i ki;. sI.t.i. v.hl.h c".i!d cmeiiir.Je t;. sup-Port of a !:rjo:i?y ot l.'oii;:r.; ::.

character, r.rd .o

t a.: ivu tf i i,

. To !''M'iV.

i 1 1 1 : i i , t i t iii nil" . i s i

aet oi i ) , '.vine!

ti''tn

are eJvi.,-d : .v-i at -i-r. o i. i t -I ,:,05,-.rl,t- ''."-y vved to he. whe. sliTi'i to Vet' r thv .i".w-( t to iii ar iii-- i 1 r'-',ly or tt-ar. it n-rtho

k,-V4 :

r:o!t'icrk Jhari to rnaii.it ma1t-roi lv'g'jkuvi: pr.'i.ion. . Mr. Mitcht.il,' of Tvnn-, -,id that he hadto hostility to i.r. position cfth? ir;emb.?r front ;,... -Jin, Mr. I'orjyth, hut !.? r --M x.ot vctc fer :t a"tpr-:tt ; as lio hd r-riC:r.Ce dtitTinine.l !,ot to voi ia favour ofany iime lament to 'hti bill, or any thing which m'::' ;;,r-

ac to retard or to prevent its n se. His only reaoj; i'or vciir. against the a;aerdiiv-r.1, a. :t.cu its fttfect wo'tl.l he to tr:u;i;nt I the. mi:i pie3tion.' 1'hero a, besides Kuch a tUii4g''as eonsistcMM-. ;ad efttle.mjn wJio !.e:ild vte iiairiFt .lis propositi. :i a an amet.dmeaf. to ;his bill, might rea-ider tiieui-o-lvei ii b jutid tu vote, iigalnft it hereafter, if presn.tf d iii the form of a ii-tinct prop--..i..n. He would J.hcrcfore, mrh prefer that the jentleT.in wouid. .lor the ri sent. Tithdraw his amenanieiit, and let ths question be ta. en un the original bill. Mr. Mrr;cr, of Vir,ma, tl.-n

nv.-ved that the further ccrisidar.i-1

tie

otia ' .'b-iinc !i,:t!.; '; v aetC! sane. H it I did hope, I i:::d a tir;!il to expet.;, that, alter ihc ' ' tn-li.i and rt -peated jxpia:;atioiis of my colleague .tti'l of my honorable friend from N. v.'ar 'ii.'Ki. a-3 '.veil m of rm self, the opponents of this bill would not have hecaajrain charged with sentinto'r.ts iv inch they not only never did

express, but did, rrto-t distinctly,

utsavow. So nueh, sir, for tiie extraordinary feeling manifested on

i'.;MO

T frcMH thf VV.t f lioA;-' !,;...

i !'!,.. ....... i . .

" oi i.-. ,:i wim ii ;ii.' to famish thi- inform itio.-.-, - o.

relened lo uitic,:.; hriroo-i !

7 - w ...mi iv, . i . V ' 1 1 i . r .

aioue oi f evi uTi.o.".',

1 i 1

l V.a" 'I'Cjv.iU.d. as

'r.i tseeti tt -na

tion to ii-

nuttec, and in tie: p- iitioa ...f thej Chainuat),v.d'.e, lor An Ihti ovidence relied not ca them, but ;:i uenlle-! men who were t'.'.emseiv : l-.-nt. !

aid, not from an oh-

h'ii the o h.av.

s i r :

though the cr-.raor .iir.arv

Jov i) to t!,, rio-e of ihc last .-.t.':.!ik..; rkumurrcr.l iC:;ecu:Jto'tio:'"s of the vcrV

to::., h.'.h hnve had tferc honov

1 1 ti

ll o use. A

sys-

a gentleman frcra '::. ' ok' thut ! lcm wh':h ges ofthe their tMtimnv A I 'Fei.-.a, -court, trom their circuit

1 could juds'e, :r, iVom the facts ! " tn, 'xleaitV the r.ress of

I t.nM. . ,.f 4V,..,. !.,.,.. j i . !.-..ce vrn'Me its oastr'tf Ji'.'ji would

neither been, heard, norevt o irna-1

gined, To ihcsc fact?, I did devote lv, -1 -A. A fMI l -

..fathorouHiiavP,fi.fi,,i-.fM,.m (A tIiC !ut PreSiit;Ilt aS,

i be of vital iimirv. i J

The lafet annunl address

,s of New v v"T:laire, St Georgia" whohnp-

; ncned to be abst lit ; t ti e

! .j jtsage ofthe bill, but hud j voted, with two of their col- ; - leagues, for its engrossment, ",l"":and I have then twenty-;:,-'(. I five of the senate, in favor

t ! -jof this now deprecated sys

tem. To tlic 14, who voted a-

jraiustirs eno:rossment. and

thus I make its avowed op- '

poncnts 15 iu number; but, from these, 1 take 11; among them, the senators from Illinois, who had previously voted to abolish the circuit courts entirely,.an'd to transfer their Jur .sdiction to the district Judge, or lor the very system now proposed by the gentleman from Geoi pia, Mr. Prsyth. a system, which also con

curred in discharging the justices of the Supreme Court from their ciicuit duties I am, therefore, au

thorized to afiirin, rhat but

to the

1 have been, also, charged n-ith was the opinion, that the suhh-i. 1 n t His subject, not less CX- j fo;ir jnembers of the Senate mistaki-g facts an.l misconceiving" augtmntaf ieri -f bu.sir.css ia the ! rdicit, mid iiVCIl more ear- nV t,. div rnnpi.fJ the vie of oth.-r g?nthn-r:, in re- courts ofthe scvei.tn cir. ait, d:rli.ot'ti tj t -i" ' CftncUcU III latter, to ihearious nue.oioiis pre- nut arise frcm t;e f !U' d defj. ',, .n ; ". U! ' .mine- tm. mCWB UOW become SO

iiue.oioiis pr

sented by thi- bill, Sir, the misappreheT.si?:.g of in o'.vi riigaraeiit, perverted, as I am v. illing to i;citve it has b.e.: bv liio (a!c rae(iiuni t!:rcch vi.ii h it has been we wed, is the fruit la 1 source of all these allegations, the greater pait of whi; :U :;eed ni other renlv, than that, which their authors furnish. If they havo not already perceived

w Oi

h. ; ilMiia prcueeerssor.

Antl vvh;it litis the lejis'.V'Iature doner As iate as

er haa s o: I a bill passed the Sc:j-

late, i?hich provided for the ! -gradual reduction of the i numberof the Judges ofthe

lathis investigation, I waj ir; Supreme Court, to five; re-

tlns, I am mclincd to believe ma- yen, oi necessity, to consider buth M-ved them from itinerant nv oi i:iem iiave done, I ask of them tne otcupytng claimant, and th r- j i i v v i other retribution, thananatten- lief laws of Kentucky, where the duaca; and established a

the present judicial jyst United State:, La. a ca-isas, cither muhlTi;..;

(i oon-residei.r, .,: t :a ! d late-. ani of

the Last; or irem a coarse ot legislation; which induced tho piaintid to prefer the Federal, tth; -Uut-i courts.

tionoflhe bill be pestled U the tive perusal of the argument, im-1 grc?V'. acci!nvafin M' bt!.i!ies SUperate Circuit COOrt sys-1 or more additional justices-

popular in this lloase. Kven the senators ItVomln?anu were, content with tbe; appointment yf "two vfeitior.al district judges joi'Ey and Tennessee, who should ? hold, wiiiitlie district iudf-i es hi ca.tnmi8sion,, th- err , euit courts of those states.

A proposivionto appoint one

'- '.C? , f.. .S Ci..-.i'.....w.,i.T W

-; j --"gfj ' ' r ; .-,-, ..- v

5 l if

, , : i' ; j - . f-

& - - w a

.V" 41 W torn

- ' tern

. V.fcai: f ..'-Vv5i:.?:j..Viv'1.. I w ,"T.,'.V',- -?. r.-; v