Indianapolis Daily Herald, Indianapolis, Marion County, 11 December 1867 — Page 2
DAILY BEBALP.
*.*•
tf|^ .^o ■*> • ■•' " i y,
UABTC DKVgilJJT. ■*>««>■
OFTIOB—HBJBALD •OILDXIIO. 16 1.9 KMt Waahtmc««a Mm««.
WKDNE3DAY MOBNIKG, DECEMBER 11
BdVAL BISBTB IW XM9 D19TM1CT or ooLvaasB.
Tho Maakf opt Law. We have for tale the various blank foma l or applications under the bankrupt law. Atu rneys and others denrlng any number of 1 hese blanks, will please send In their orders a once.
The K'iMBces. The Journal labors hard to get up some Objection to the proposition offered in the Senate i>y Mr. HkSTdricks in regard to the payment 01 the public debt, and that paper does not even quote it correctly. It is as follows: Be it resolved, etc., That the public debt of tht United States, except where the law provides for the payment of coin, shall be pud and redeemed In the lawful money of the t ’ulUd States, and the faith of the United v :*tes stands pledged accordingly. Does the Journal approve this proposition? If tt does not, what purpose has It In attempt11 g to cast odium upon It by a misrepresentation of tho evident purpose of Mr. Hr.tfi Kicitsla offering the resolution? Mr. Shkrv, an, of Ohio, had previously offered a resolution pledging the Government tb'the payment 01 the whole of the public debt in coin and it v as referred to the Committee on Finance. Mr. Hendricks introduced his resolution In order that that committee might have all the suggestions that had been made in regard to tho obligations of the Government in the payno: nt or redemption of the public debt, fairly and squarely brought before the Finance Committee for its investigation and consideration, 't hat committee can not now make a report upon tho subject without considering the points which Mr. Hendricks’ resolution presents. . Tho Journal is upon the record in favor of paying the bended debt of the United States In coin when It shall become due. And In this connection it alludes to the proposition of payimr the debt of the United States Just as it was contracted to be paid, as “Mr. I'ewdletojTS scheme of quasi repudiation.” That is, the pay mint cf the debt in lawful money, when there was uo specific agreement to pay It in . oin, is ‘ in a pertain sense or degree,” for that D the meaning of the word quasi, repudiation. In this connection weecqufte, what necessity tor specifying that a certain portion of the bonded debt should be redeemed in twin, If it was not understood that the balance of the debt siiouM be paid in lawful money? And why contract that the interest should be paid la gold, and nothing specified in regard to the redemption of the principal? The Journal pronounces the proposition to pay tho public debt, just as contracted, as Mr. 1 ’ENDi.KToN’.s scheme to confiscate the bondI.ciders’ property. Would such be the case if M10 bondholders are paid Just according to the conditions of the bond, even to the pound of ib sb? That paper, in alluding to this point, inquire’: ••Will the Senator fail back upon the delumva project of providing treasury notes for re.teeming over ^l,«no,0«0.000 of bonded debt by withdrawing less than $300,000,000 of national bank notes, and substituting a like amount of treasury notes in lien thereof ?” Mr. 1’rnpt.kton has not suggested any such project. In his discussion of the question he distinctly stated that in bis plan for the liquidation of the public debt, he did not propose to add a dollar to the currency or a cent to taxation, yet he demonstrated bow the national obligations could be redeemed, how this terrible incubus upon the enterprize and industry of the country, could l>e removed In from ten to fifteen years. The Journal, quoting from the report of the Secretary of the Treasury, says the unfunded debt, matured and unmatured, amounts to lb, and this, it says, must be provided for before a beginning can be made in redeeming the bonded debt in greenbacks. Does the Journal propose to make this an interest paying debt, and in gold? Would tt not be wi.er policy to retire the national bank currency and issue greenbacks to an amount v.s'Ueient to pay the unfunded debt as it becomes due, for it has not yet all matured? Would net the interest on over four hundred millions be an item worth saving? Mr. McCtn.tccii will require one hundred and li'f.v-two millions next year to pay the interest upon the present bonded debt. This amount alone is more than double the entire annual expenditures under Mr. Buchanan’** ,i Iministration. Shall this amount be swelled lo one hundred and seventy-live millions, in gold, mind ye, by cancelling the unfunded debt with bonds? This is where the policy advocated by the Journal will land. What the Journal calls the scheme of Mr, 1'K.NDI.KTOW, is a plan to lift the load of public debt from the shoulders of the people as rapidly as possible. How is it with the individual? Is it not. his policy, if in debt, to get out ot the trammel as speedily as possible? Does a father desiro to mortgage the industry of bis posterity by entailing upon them his indebtedness? in private affairs, the (3rst purpose of the debtor is to get out of debt, for he well knows that his enterprise and Industry will be shackled until the incumbrance is removed. Andwhy should not the same principles and policy apply to society In the aggregate—to governments, as tn the case of individuals. And there is another consideration. Interest eaU like a moth. It never ceases. Upon a gold basis in sixteen years, we shall have paid a v sum equal to the entire public debt In interest and yet the principal still remains intact. If it can be doue, and that it can be has been demonstrated, why not liquidate the public debt in sixteen years and thus relieve the country from the burden, Instead of c.ontinutnglt as amortgage upon the Industry of the nation for generations to come.
Political Itcaia. —Tho Washington correspondent of the Cin«inn alt Bnyvifer says the Grant movement In New York Is having a desired influence in that city, and it is probable that the Republicans will take him withouttny pledge. —Mr. Hunnlcutt? It appears, Is classed as a third-rater.in point of ability, in theVirgmla convention. Tho radical leader is Mr. Porter, delegate from Chesterfield. Mr. Marye, Jr., conservative, from Fredericksburg, leads that
party.
—A Washington special says a number of prominent radical Senators have privately expressed their approval of Mr. Seward’s
West India purchase.
—The bill repealing the cotton tax, which
was rushed through tho House in such haste by Mr. Sehenck is regarded as Insulting to the helpless condition of the small planters of the .South. Its tendency will to be horde up cotton with the wealthy and raise the prices of horses, mules and farming implements, while
it oilers no relief for a year to come. A Jokk on Senator Sumner.—
A copv of the New York Antl-Olavery .standard created quite a sensation In the senate, u continued a letter from its Washington eorrexpondant, charging that two millions of dollars were used in passing the Russian tr«s*y through tho Senate, and that a Senator who was never burdened previously with much money, had slnco purchased a fine residence in Washington st a cost of $30,000. As Mr. Sumner is tlie, only Senator who has lately Invested in » residence here, them was n disposition to Joke him ss the Senator alluded *0 by the correspondent. He not only admitted the purchase, but said the other part ef the Inscription also fitted him, as he bad never born burdened with cash. This slander upon tne senate, however, loses all Interest in view of the fact that there were but two Senators opposed to the treaty on tls first presentation to that body, and neither one of these voted
v gain st tea ratification^
sgatoet ita n
—As a reliable newspaper, we have been bunking considerably upon the Indianapolis Herald, but an article In Monday’s Isauo, in relation to “influences,” Shakes our faith slightly. Speaking of Secretary McCulloch’s annual report, the Herald says: ‘‘Ho argues In favor of the policy of contracting the currency at the rate of $t,noo.ooo annually, as now provided for by law.” Reduce your “annually ” down to monthly, Mr. Herald, If yoo want to illustrate the McCulloch idaaof mmtng the country to the devil on quick timer— —.Vorpa* County Gazette. m " Mistakes will happen in the best regulated printing offices, but the error td which the Gazette alludes was so palpable that everybody could see It, but m tbatpaper thinks a correction necessary, we r1*S tt In its OWE
wofdi.'' #
THE lEDfatfaPfiTja Herald,—We publish In this Isauelbe prospecluaof the Indianapolis FEMDDr Aside from the fast that tho Herald Is the Democratic State organ, and as sock deserving the eupport of the Democracy of the State, It is a first-tlate newspaper. Its telegraphic reports are of the latest and most re* llibln nature, pWo it* market reports; and ti addition, contains a large amount of State items, political and general toteUlasnee, Why send to New York or Cincinnati for a paper, when you can g-'t a better one at borne for the
Met of Cetumta should be farced to eubmu sixSf&sz.'Bs r. that tho people of Indians are not consistent. I am not prepared to aay that the people of Indiaun. upsm so grave a question ss that, would deliberately place themselves in an Inconsistent position. I think If the question could be submitted to the men of Indiana whether the negroes of the South, under a policy which clothes all the negroes with the right to vote and strips a portion of the white population of that right, ao as to give the supremacy to the negroes, I think if that question could be submitted to the people of Indiana, such a policy would be defeated by a majority unknown in the politics of that Stale 1 knew that my colleague considered it an act of Inconsistency to force this policy upon the South and not to aetume tt at home, for I had observed his very able speech at Columbus in the recent canvass In which he declared to the people of Ohio—I can not give his words, nor can I express the idea nearly as well as he expressed it—but be substantially declared to the people of Ohio that supporting this policy of enfranchising the negro as in the South, if they retused to do tt in Ohio they would be naked to the scorn and condemnation of the world. Well, sir, they saw lit to stand In this immodest attitude, which my colleage described, bv, I think, about titty thousand majority. Now, how can be say that a people, fair,honest and generous, who would repudiate a policy when applied to themselves as being unworthy of them, unjust to them, unsafe to their institutions, would force that same policy upon another people—upon the District of Columbia? This District was no part of the rebellion. This Distnct was always, during the war, within the lines and wtthin the power of the General Government. Then why can my colleague aay that the voters of Indiana would repudiate negro suffrage at home and yet would vote for tt in the District of Columbia? I can not believe that they would be thus inconsistent; and as I believe that at home the people are oppoeed to this, I am opposed to it for the District of Columbia. If my colleague and I to-day were In the Legislature of Indiana, how would we vote upon this subject? He was the Governor of the State for years, and he delivered his message, and he never called upon the people of Indiana to amend their constitution so as to enfranchise the negroes. His party was largely In the majority in the Legislature, and yet they took no substantial steps to amend the constitution of the State so as to allow this that Is claimed as aright to the negroes. They would never venture upon it as a political test at home, were seeking all the while to avoid tt, hoping that there Is that sentiment in the people which will induce them to force upon another community that which they will not ac-
cept-for themselves.
Now, I submit to Senators is that right? If it Is right to refuse the negroes the franchise in the State of Indiana, where there are not many but few compared with the entire white population, Is it right to force it upon the people of the District of Colombia, where their vote is a much more Important one, the numbers being so much larger? Upon that question my colleague and I differ. I think the people of Indiana would not, if the question was submitted to them in any substantial and distinct form, vote to force negro suflrage upon the people of the District of Columbia, nor do I believe if they had the power to express their views upon the subject that they would
force it upon the Southern States.
Mr. Morion—Mr. President, I have not taken part In this debate for the purpose of making any criticism on my colleague; nor do I now dosire to enter into such an argument. But, sir, when the Senator says that the time has come, and he thanks God for it, when the opprobrious epithets to which he referred tor ward the men who have been in this rebel-
lion—
Mr. Hendricks—No, sir; I did not say that. Mr. Morton—The Senator did not hear me out, quite. I understood him to say that the time had come when opprobrious epithets toward the men who have been in this rebellion and those who have sympathized with them in the North as we understand them to have
sympathized—
Mr. Hendricks—I did not say that, either. Mr. Morton—That, I understood to be the
Idea of the Senator. Mr. Hendricks—No, sir.
Mr. Morton—The Senator said that the time
h«tws«a E—at— 1 mm* m«rt«w la MM a*a—1 «a turn
at* laautat.
The bill for the security ef equal righto in the Distnct of Columbia was .under consideratiou in the Senate on the 6th instant, when the following discussion took place between tbe Senators ffrom this State upon the condition of public sentiment- in Inditna sad throughout the North on the issue ot negro suffrage and tupremacy: Mr. Hendricks. I have but one remark to make upon this bill mors than what I have already said, la my reference to the elections that took place this fail 1 do not speak of the geaera! elections, and I hope that no Senator will suppose that 1 would bo guilty of tbe bad taste of referring to an election in any boasting way. Tbe reealta that I referred to were the vote given by the people at the recent elections upon tbe questions submitted te them whether they desired the negroes to hsvs the right to vote in the States. The distinct proposition was submitted to the people in the form of a constitutional amendment In the State ot Kansas, or in some legislative form; in the State of Ohio in the form of a constitutional amendment; in the State of Minnesota some form—exactly what tbe form was I do not new recollect; but these three Slates give the expression of their people upon that question, and I expressed my surprise that a Senator coming from either of those states should wish to force upon tbs people of this district a policy in regard to tbs colored race which had been repudiab d by thepeoplsof his own State. We legislate tor the people of tbe diatnet not merely to gratify our personal pleasure, not because we can pan s law; but because, in our judgment, it is for tbe good of the district and for tbe credit of the country that the law should be passed; and as I said before, when I vote upon a bill that affects tbe people of the District of CoinmbU, when I can net get their instruction on the subject, I certainly would be delighted to follow tbe instruction given by the people st home. The Senator from Kansas [Mr. Pomeroy ] reminded me of the fact that since I took my seat here in 1363 there bad been an expression once or twice perhaps. In the State of Indiana contrary with the view of the party with which I act; but the Senator was not able to point out a single instance In which my action here bad been contrary to the known will of the people of Indiana. I think be will be unable to find a single instance in which my vote In the Senate has been In conflict with any well expressed opinion of Dispeople of the State of Indiana; but I do not choose to discuss that. He referred to the fact that I had not resigned when there had been a change for toe time being in popular opinion In my State. I have never beard of any case of resignation under such circumstances. It has never been understood that a man yields his position; in the Senate merely because cf the result of a popular election; but if the legislature gives an instruction to a Senator, many hold that tbe instruction mu-t be obeyed or tbe Senator resign. There has been no such case presente d to me. I do not choose, however, to explain or vindicate here any course of mine upon any such question. That is between me and tbe
folks at borne..
I regard this as an important measure. Why have tbe people of Ohio, of Kansas, and of Minnesota recently, ami tbe people of Wisconsin and Connecticut formerly, bat in later years, said that tbe negroes ought not to be allowed to vote? In tbose States tbe negro population is small compared with tbe white population; they never can override them at any popular election, and therefore no public inconvenience, no serious public harm, could be apprehended from allowing them tbe right to vote lo tbose States. But in the District of Columbia tbe negro population almost equals, I believe, tbe white population, and I think at some election recently tbe negro vote was larger than thn white vote; so that here it Is a very important question. As I think, it is like that question which is now being considered, and considered very earnestly, by the Ami rican pet p’f: Whether the Southern white population snail by legislative Interference and military power be placed under tbe government and control of tbe negroes. It is a very different and more important question in
the District of Columbia whether the negroes 1 pas &ed when the epithets which bad been shall have the political power than it is in gppiied toward the Democracy of the Noith— tbe State of Ohio, where the white race, not- | |f tIie senator will accept that atatement of withstanding this privilege might be extend- | tt—could not be any longer used. I think the ed to the negroes, would maintain its supre- ; senator will find himself mistaken. I think
to renounce and abjure? discharge feta duty
macy.
I am opposed to this policy which subjugates the white race to tbs colored race. Now, ibis bill proposes not only that negroes shall be allowed to hold office, and I suppose any office In the District of Columbia, but tb*t they shall be allowed to sit upon Junes. Of course tt will follow that they may be judges. The spectacle will then be presented of negro courts to try cases. It is not in accordance with tbe taste of tbe people I have the honor in part to represent; and as I would not vote that tbe people of Indiana should be thus governed, I will not vote to govern thus the people of the District of Colombia. Wbat I think is right and fair and honest to tbe people of Indiana. I think is right and fair and honest toward tbe people of this District. Mr. Morton—Mr. President, my colleague has made one remark which I do not desire 0 have misapprehended by the Senate, and I rise not from any desire to criticise his course, but simply to have a correct understanding. He says that he has not by bis votes in tbe Senate gone in favor of any proposition which has been declared against by the people of Indiana, and not against any proposition which has been declared In favor of by them,
as I understand him.
Mr. Hendricks—Not exactly.
Mr. Morton—That was snostanuaiiy u, as x understood the Senator. The people of Indiana In tbe elections of 1364, both the State and presidential elections, declared strongly in favor of the policy ot prosecuting the war and putting down the rebellion by force of arms. They declared against the policy of a suspen- 1 sion of hostilities for tho purpose of opening
the popular hatred of this rebellion, aad the hatred of tbose who aided and abetted it In tbe North, is just as strong as it ever was; and tbe idea that this feeling has passed away and subsided will be found to be a mistake. It may sometimes sleep; while the people have their minds diverted to some other questions they may turn aside incMmttally, and for a time even act with tbe AMer party; but, sir, in ten years from this time that feeling will be stronger than it is to-day, and twenty years hence, in my opinion, it will be overwhelming; and the next generation will entertain tt
far more strongly than the present.
Bat, Mr. President, this is unimportant to tbe present purpose. The Senator’s position may be stated br&elly thus; the Senator acted with tbe Democratic party of Indiana and the North; he was and is a prominent and distinguished leader. If that party was in favor of the prosecution of the war and of putting down the rebellion, and in favor of the measures necessary for that end, then tbe Senator was in favor of that; if that party was not, then the Sena tor was not, because he was
and is in harmony with his party.
Mr. President, in regard to the inconsistency of enforcing negro suffrage at tbe South and not doing it at the North, J said—and I said what IB a fact, mad the Senator’s intelligence will accord to the truth of it in a moment— that there are men everywhere in the North who are opposed to enfranchising the negroes in the Northern States on account of their prejudices against them on the ground of color, and who say there is no necessity for it in Indiana, there is no necessity for it in New York, there is no necessity for it in Ohio, be-
- V J * ., ■ . . ^ AVJA7\, l u l.l C its Li KJ ZACtoUBflV/ L\Jl lb 1U vyuiu* A/x:ueffotiAtloM with the confederate authorities. ; cau*e there the negroes are protected anyhow During that canvass also the question ol toe i | n t|j e enjoyment of their rights, and they say abolition of slavery by an amendment of the | there is no necessity for it there on account of
Constitution of tbe United States was freely th* p U bhc safety.
and fully discussed, and the public sentiment j That is tbe argument they use. I do not by a majority of thirty thousand was unques- 1 accord with tt myself; but the same men are tlonably manifested in favor of that proposi-| j Us t; ^ earne t;{|y | D f a y 0r n ovr of negro suftion. In 1866 the constitutional amendment frage in the South as any other class of men-
In 1866 the constitutional amendment
of that year, known I believe as the fourteenth article, was a direct issue all over our State, and the people of Indiana declared in favor of it by a majority of some fifteen thousand. The policy In opposition to it was maintained I believe ably ny ray colleague in common with his whole party In that State. I sbail not new refer to tbe manner in which ray colleague has voted in the Senate on these questions; I simply desire to state what has been tbe poHcy of tbe people of Indiana as manifested by over-
whelming majorities in 1364 and 1866.
One word now in reference to the elections that have recently token place, Mr. President. It was yesterday said by the Senator from Connecticut [Mr. Dixon] in the discussion of another question, that New York, by fifty tbousandpaejortty, bad declared against the policy of reconetruction tbst has been adopted by Congress. I must be allowed to aay that I differ entirely from that Senator in regard to the effect and in regard to the character of that election. It is trne there la n large number of ItepubllcMa in tbe Northern States who are opposed to negro suffrage In their own States. It results from • prejudice which has not yet been conquered. They argue in this way, that there is no necessity for negro soffrsge in Indiana and in other Northern States for tbe protection of the colored race, or even for the safety of the country, but events have forced them to tbe conviction that there is a necessity for tt in tbe Oonthern States; and therefore many persons who I know are opposed to negro suffrage in Indiana or Ohio, because they any there is no necessity for it there, tre equaily strong in favor of it, for the purpose of sustaining loyal State governments
Southern States. If tbe question
In all tbe seunwro states, u tbe question was submitted to the people of New York as istber the negroes of tbe South should be e<Uo vote for the purpose of overcoming -eefi majority down there, I have no t they would declare by a majority of
to whether the negroes of tbe South should be allow -------
tbe re
doubt they would declare by a majority of more than fifty thousand that they were in favor of it, first, for tbe protection of the negroes themselves, end secondly for tbe public
safety.
Now. sir, in regard to ths District. There is understood to be a Urge majority of tbe white people who. if they did not actually take part In the rebellion, at leatt sympathized with it, and are exceedingly hoetlle to tbe policy of Congress and to conferring say rights on tbe colored race. If the question was submitted to the people of Kansas or to the people of Indiana whether full political power should be conferred upon the colored citizens of the District of ColamMs, I have no doubt that each State would decide in favor of
tt by a large majority.
It may be said that this U Inconsistent. 1 grant tt, and Ircgre^undor the circumstances that tbe fact U so; but still I think no inference can be drawn against the policy ef Congress either in regard to this district or In regard to the South, from the recent slectious. It Is well known that they turned entirely
upon other questions.
Mr. Hendricks.— Mr. President, mr colleague has referred to tbe canvass of 1364, in which he says one of tbe questions mainly dtsauasod aad on which tbe people did vote was a vigorous prosecution of tbe war. I do not know what be means by that reference, fie refers to no vote of mine in the Senate on that subject. If be means to say that I sup. ported General McClellan upon tbe Chicago platform, and bis letter of acceptance, he is right. I did support him. That waa la tbe canvass at home. 1 did it with wbat of enor. gy i possessed; but why my eaUsague should refer to that la conpsction.with tho obaarvaMon that I mmft ftrit the Senator from Kansas bad been uaabte to point out any ease in which my setiou in the Hen ate waa im conflict with tbe expressed optnfrm or flesh* of tbe people of Indlaae, I am not able to perceive. 1 took my ground openly in tbe contest. Tbe views tbst I expressed are la some Instances P He aim »*ys that in *» in Oto State of Indlafia the constitutional ame«daeato then proposed were approved by tbe people. I voted Ssaasraffrassrscsss; that tbe propoeed constitutional amendments were largely dlseuined. I tblnk I may rater to
. without i
shame aad dishonor? Caff we teM
because events have proved that it is necessary in orderto tbe establishment of legal and loyal State governments down there, not because they love tbe colored man in the Sonth better than they love him in Indiana or Ohio, but because public events have shown that loyal State governments can not be established and maintained in the late rebel States without bis vote; and perhaps tbe same feeling prevails in regard to the government of this district—the domestic government created here by charter. It is believed that a very Urge majority of white voters here are disloyal—have either participated actually or sympathized earnestly with th« rebellion; and for that reason I undertake to say that the majority of fifty thousand who voted against negro suffrage in Ohio would vote for it in the District of Columbia, because they believe that here tt is a necessity to tbe establishment ot a loyal domestic city government. THU Kight •» ExpatriatlMt—Speeds •V Judge Tliariaan, mt Colaasbaa,
Ota la.
On Saturday night last, a very large and enthusiastic meeting of the citizens of Columbus, Ohio, was held to take action with reference to the conduct of the Government of Great Britain and Ireland in arresting and confining American citizens suspected of violating tbe laws of England, and denying them the rights of aliens. Judge Thurman, the Democratic candidate for Governor of that State, at the October election, was one of the speakers upon the occasion, aad be made an able aad eloquent speech in vindication of the rights of adopted citizens. We find n synopsis of bis remarks in tbe Columbus Statesman, and we reproduce them to show the questions involved la the controversy, and the unmistakable
duty of our country In the matter.
Judge Thurman commenced by saying that he was glad that this meeting had assembled, ana thst tt hod been called without reference to party, reii^ioua nnraaizatton of any kind, or nativity. As bod been most *«,h. neatly remarked by the chairman, the subject to be considered concerns every body, nod it was, therefore, very proper thst every body should ta£e a part in the proceedings. Tbst subject woe the Right of Expatriation—that is to say, the right of an individual, acting in good faith aad openly, to remove from one country to another, and, becoming a citizen or subject of the same,exonerated him from all allegiance to tbe former. It seemed strange that so reasonable n light should be anywhere denied, end yet it waa denied by many govern menu; and be was sorry to aay that the highest judicial tribunal in tbe United States bad never distinctly affirmed it. But the time bad come when it must be asserted, and he bad no doubt that the people and every branch of the Government would distinctly do so. And be hoped to see it not only asserted but
maintained.
The doctrina of tbe Government* that deny
the rights la expressed by the maxhn, “ A'emo potest ezucrepatriam”—that is. No one can renounce his own country. Or, as it is often expressed* “Once a subject always a * abject.” According to this doctrine, tho fact of n man’s being born In * particular country, forever binds him to owe allegiance to that country— on allegiance that he eaa not in any way shake off without tbe consent of Its GoveramoBt. The Government may be the worst In the world, and tbe Individual may have tho best of reasons for wishing to change his home and Ms allegiance, aad yet the right la denied him.
If born in Ruseia he muat remain a ~ subject; if born in Dahomey he must all his life to be a subjoet of Its savage
murder one KIbie.
Such wae the doctrine—a doctrine that the
United States can never ssasnt to without an unspeakable degradation. Honor, jnatlee aad interest alike require ue to eoadema ft. Why tt appear* by tbe last census that nearly on*
•fth of the white population of the
an of foreign birth. The proportion of born In tho cities m much greater. ~ New York, It 1b nearly ene-haif: la ** ,n
nSreKSS
1R Chicago, SC „ Cieefanntt, onefaelf; ahd according to the beat mJeolation fee could make ft was oae-half la Columbus. Tho foreign bortt ta WH w*a aver four mtlllOB#. They are now at least
when you can grt a better one at home same money ? Bead tbe prospectus.—De/pAi A mew in Xantend amused h*maatf b/ aatahw lag peoniee in nts meolb ■awaftowod fine at > thorn—A total eaaoeUfiffrfMmf
And na we toil to
injustice,
. to do it
without Injuring our prosperity, teaming eur strength, and lowering our character the civilized world over? There can bo hut one answer to these questions. These people are now American citizens, as much $0 «a if they had been born on our soil. Between them and the native born there is but one legal distinction, aad that is, that to be a President of the United States a man mast be a native. In all other respects there is no distinction between native bom and naturalized citizens. They arc alt alike entitled to the proteotlen of the Government; and suicidal indeed would tt be for us not to assert and maintain this
doctrine.
The Judge then proceeded to detail many interesting facts that showed the 1 immediate importance of the subject and the present necessity for determined action by eur Government. Ue spoke of the late conviction iu British courts of naturalized American citizens on indictments for treason—indictments that could only be sustained 00 the ground thatthe accused still owed allegiance to the British Crown. In particular, he spoke with great emphasis of the conviction of Colonel Meany, a citizen of Ohio, for words spoken in New York city. Is that, said he, to be endured? Is free’ speech in Americs, by an American citizen, to be punished as treason in Great Britain ? If that be so what la to prevent my friend DeLany here from being convicted of treason, should he ever revisit his native land? He has spoken here in Columbus a* bold words as Meany ever spoke in New York, and according to the ruling in Meany’* case, he is therefore liable to be indicted in Dublin as a British traitor. Tbe proposition is simply monstrous and ourGaverament will be forever dishonored and disgraced, if it fail to require the proper redress. T£e Impressment of naturalized citizens into the military service of the German States, and especially of Prussia was next spoken of—and it was shown that the instances were far more numerous than our people are generally aware of. Of these there was one case that waa particularly striking. It was that of a youth about twenty, a sou ot an American Consul, who had been taken from the Consulate of tbe United States, over which floated the American flag, and from his father who was a naturalized American citizen and held an American commission, and required to serve in the army of Prussia—upon the ground that having been born in|Prugsian he owed to its king a perpetual allegiance. The Judge then gave a very interesting history of the maxim, “tfemo voteet ezuere patriam ” He showed that it was not the law cf the ancient world; that the right of expatriation existed in Greece, and had been asserted and maintained by Rome, for centuries; that the subsequent denial of it grew out of the prevalence of feudal institutions, and especially by tbe system of military tenures, by which the landholders being bound to perform military service as a consideration for their lands, were regarded in the light of soldiers; so that for one of them to leave his country without tbe permission of bis sovereign was looked pretty much ss the desertion of a soldier would now be considered. He then turned 'to our history and showed conclusively that our people and Government have always asserted the right of expatriation. One of the offenses with which the Declaration of Independence charged George the Third, was that, “He has endeavored to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the laws for the naturalization of foreigners; refu-ing to pass others to encourage their emigration hither, and raising tbe conditions of new appropriations of lands.” That waa one of the causes, and a very prominent one, of our war of independence. He was aware that the naturalization spoken of in the declaration, did not, according to the British theory, free the naturalized subject from his allegiance to the land of his birth; but he did not believe that our forefathers sanctioned any such doctrine. He did not believe that they regarded tbe naturalized Germans, Hollanders, Swede), etc., among them as still owing allegiance to those countries. The proviMon in the Federal Constitution authorizing Congress to establish a uniform rule of naturalization; the naturalization laws passed by Congress, every one of which from the set of 1705 inclusive, down to the last set, required a renunciation under oath of all allegiance to every foreign power; the war of 1312, one of the chief causes of which was the impressment by Great Britain of our naturalized citizens, and the case of Kostzx, who was delivered up by the captain of as Austrian ship, upon the menace of the commander of an American war vessel that he would sink tbe ship if be were not delivered up, and tbe approval by our Government of the act of an officer were next commenced on, as bearing out the assertion that our Government is fully committed to the maintenance of the right of expatriation. Our own Federal system was then referred to. It is admitted, said the speaker, that treason may be committed against a State. Dorr’s case, growing out of the difficulties in Rhode Island, settled that. There is, then, allegiance due to a State; for as before said, where then is no allegiance there con be no treason. We. of Ohio, for instance, owe our allegiance to Ohio. Now, if the doctrine that allegiance is perpetually due to the State of one’s birth were true, in wbat corflition would the people of the United States be placed? If the millions who have removed from one State to another yet owe allegiance, respectively, to the States where they were born, how absurd and perplexing would be their condition? Such an idea can not for a moment be admitted—and hence our very Federal system may be said to ba a protest against the doctrine ot “once a subject, always a subject.” The Judge then spoke, wlthmuch earnestness, of the degrading character of the doctrine just mentioned—a doctrine that made the mere accident of a man’s birth place bind him to a perpetual servitude; a doctrine that was opposed to his natural freedom, to the civilization of tbe sge and to the welfare and happiness of mankind. After speaking briefly of tbe oppi c.-sions of Ireland, be concluded' by saying that tbe rights of thousands of our naturalized citizens had been violated by foreign Governments, but if there were but one such case, and that tbe case of the most humble man living, tt would be the duty of our Government to protect him at all hazards. The Judge’s remarks were received, with shouts of approval, and all around us we heard the remark “That’s wbat should be heard on the floor of the United States Senate.”
Steate Politics.
Lawrence County Convention.—The Democracy and conservative men of Lawrence county, met In mass convention at the Court House, in Bedford, Indiana, on the 7th day of December, 1367, pursuant to a call made by the Democratic Central Committee, for the purpose of appointing delegates to the 3th of January convention of 1868. Captain S. W. Short was called to the chair, and Thomas H. Malott, appointed secretary. A committee of three were appointed on resolutions, who reported as follows: Whereas, Tbe national debt from its gigantic magnitude, is impoverishing the people and drinking the very life blood of the Ra-
tion, therefore.
Resolved, That we are in favor of taxing the Government bonds as other property is
taxed.
Resolved further. That we are in fav«g ef paying these bonds as fast as they fall due, in legal tender notee, except whereby act ot Congress otherwise specifically provides for— believing that if greenbacks were good enough to pay the gallant eoidier who offered his life for the Constitution and Union of the States, they are good enough to pay the bondholder who, when his country was in danger, loaned tt his money at an enormous Interest. Resolved, That we are uncompromisingly opposed to tbe reconstruction policy of Congress. seeing that tt has prautisoUy dissolved the Union and reduced to a state of abject poverty aad dishonorable servitude, ten sov-
ereign States.
Resolved, That we are opposed now and forever, to negro suffrage in this or any other State or in any Territory or District in thtm
Union.
The above resolutions were unanimously
adopted.
On motion, the Hon. A. J. Hostetler was sleeted chairman of the Lawrence Democratic
Central Committee.
The following delegates were selected to represent this county in the State convention: Fllnn Township—W. A. Holland and Dr.VV
H. Smith.
F. Ban Townshlp-Qeorge Starr and James
Ragsdale. Perry To Ttncher.
J. Creek Township—T. G. Williams and D.
Boone.
S. Talley Township—Dr. John Burton and R. L. Route. Marion Township—Dr. T. J. Biggs, Robert Hell and Jefferson Hutstettor. Bond Township — Dennis Furedyce and George Steele. Shawswick Township—S. W. Short, Homer Rawlins, L. Dalton and T. H. Malott. Guthne Township—W. T. Dixon and J. F.
Foster.
Marshall Township—WineparkKInaor. On motion, all Democrats from Lawrence county who may be at the State convention, are authorized to act ns delegates from this
county.
The following resolution was unonunomly
jwn.ki r —a., H. Gainey aad James
adopted by the convention:
Resolved, That tbe Democracy oi Lawrence county. Instruct her delegates to east the vote of this county in the Bute convention for the Hon. Thomas A. Hendricks for Governor ef the State of Indiana, and far Hon. Ambrose
B. Carlton, for Secretary of State.
On motion.the New Albany Ledges and Indianapolis Herald, be requested to pubttah
ths proceedings of this earned * which tits convention adjourned.
H. Malott.
State ticket for Cterk of the Supreme Court. Frofa-oar nermnat will prove on eSefcent and faith fat pwbiie sorvsnt in the discharge of_the dutm of the
rotten rrLAaKi owqrwg^ Wring tne mt-gjmi i iwneaapu PfffoMen. Special Corre>iK>ndcnce Of the Hersl#. WmavtAC, Decentt*erR, 1367. Ma* Herald: Youmty have noticed the fact that LTMaX Blair, Esq., ef Michigna City, some two years ago, commenced boring near Fcanoevtlfr, in this county, tor oil. Tho work has steadily progressed until last week. A depth of 880 feet was reached. Several times during the work we had reports of the success of the undertaking; but notwithstanding there has been oil obtained for some considerable time, it has not boon found in quantity sufficient to make the enterprise successful. Mr. Blair is, however, sanguine that he will obtain oil la paying quantttiee at the depth of 1,000 feet. He has expended seven thousand dollars ia the experiment, aad seems determined that he will not abandon thn work until satisfied that oil In paying quantities con not be found ia this section. Some two weeks ago two gentlemen from Clay county vlsted this plsce to make contracts for the delivery of iron ore to some point on the C. Jk G. E. railroad. It was supposed at the time that the ore, which is found in groat quantity in our prairies,could bo mode quite a source of revenue to the owners ef the land, but the nail price offered per ton has about satisfied those who were contemplating going into the business 1 tt can not be delivered at the price offered, and the probability is that the speculation will prove a failure. Lost week, David Conn, an old gentleman formerly a resident of this county, but more recently of Cass, while attempting to stop from a corn erib upon the wheel of hlo wagon, foil across the tire aad died tho next day from tho Injury received. He was highly respected by the community in which he resided. Slnco my lost, our beautlfal weather has changed and we have stern winter- The Tippecanoe river is frozen almost sufficient for teams to cross. The weather, however, la propituous for pork packing and the market opens well. Prices for dressed hogs yesterday was $7 to $7 30. The crop In this section is quite light; there is thought that there is not half the number fattened tills year. The Cincinnati and Great Eastern Railroad have a heavy force engaged in taking up the old rail, mud putting In its place new. The company intend to have the new rail down from the New Albany crossing to Logons port during the winter. The new road, for such it is, after the iron is down, is very fine, and the public will hear of fewer accidents upon this part of the line after it is completed. The State convention will be largely attended this year from the Northern counties. It is proposed to make the meeting a grand success. It has been suggested by some crats who attended our State convention a few years ago, that the Democracy should erect a suitable monument near the stand upon which the gallant Yoorhees stood ot the time the loyal imps of Morton trained their cannon upon it. That cowardly demonstration was worthy the radical party in tbe days of the reign cf terror. Truly, _ PtLARXI. Stmte lianas. —Brazil coal is being Introduced at New Albany and Louisville at thirty-two cents n bushel. —That intolerable ass. Josh Billings, lectured at Fort Wayne last night on “milk.” If the lecture partook of the character of hia writings, it would have been more appropriately called “dish-water.” —Jeff. Godman, who had a leg broken some time oinee, aad which had so for gotton well as to admit of his walking a boat with seruteh, on Saturday evening fell upon the sidewalk and had it broken over again.—Lafayette Journal. —B. F. Masten has resigned his position as Superintendent ot the Northern division of tho Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railroad, to take tffert January 1,1668. —A prisoner named Spencer yesterday escaped irom the penitentiary .at Jeffersonville by scaling the prison walls. He waa trusted, and had provided htnuelf a suit of citizen’s clothing prior to making his escape. At iaat accounts ho had not been arrested.—iVetoAidany Ledger. —On board the steamer J. N. McCuiloueh, the late boat last night, six r. M., while tho passengers were at supper, an employe of the Adams Express Company at Nashville, Tennessee, attempted to commit suicide by cutting his throat. In this be failed, only severing the left jugular vein. From the hemorrhage he fainted. The syncope arrested the bleeding. By free stlmolationhe was restored, and hi* wound of the neck, and one of the abdomen, (maue by a common dirk knife) were dressed by Dr. Conway, of this city, who happened to be on board at the time. When the Doctor had left the boat, at eleven P. M., the gentleman, Mr. J. Warren, had so far recovered as to convene freely. He resides in Rhode Island, and had no money to carry him home; hence the rash act. He preferred to go home a corpse rather than go home without money. He has a wife and a large family dependent on his labor. Failing in this he became desperate and tried to ehd life and trouble.—Madism Cornier. * Retrenchment.—The Cincinnati Gazette, in alluding to the proposition si Mr. Hooper, in Congress, to reduce the revan us from customs and internal Improvements to three hundred millions, and keep the aggregate appropriations within that amount, remarks: “ For expenditures Mr. McCulloch wants lfi2 millions for interest on ths public debt—a thfng that can not be retrenched. Gen. Grant wants 67 millions for the army; Secretory Welles wonts 47 millions for the navy. This makes 266 millions, leaving but 34 miilioM for the civil service, pensions and Indiana, Which last year cost 77 millions. Perhaps tt is better to specify what items ot expenditure shall be reduced, before nuking the reduction of the Income. There should be a rigid redaction; but ft can not be saade without touching something. We have got to lay a heavy hand on army, navy aad civil service to rednoa qur expenditures to 300 millions. We believe tt may be done, bat inasmuch sa we can torn all oar surplus in to pay the principle of the debt, we had better make the redaction in the expenses first, and see what the Income stops at in the transition, before we ent It down to tee measure of what the owpemlMttree ought to be” _ .
CHINA TEA STOCKOTHKTIK TO Tit IIIHklS.
I>ooline in Te»»! THE CHINA TEA STORE
(ICatHbliwhed in IfeSS.)
"WTITH many thanks to the public for past V V Cavora, we would announce that we are now receiving a carefully selected invoice of CHOICE GREEN, BUCK AND JAPANESE
TEAS!
Purchased directly from the importers, and with special attention to their qualities in the cup.
•Mer m iteceteA tatemd
Efeanete aalxaM Teat.
We aever
■tmclc.
We mever pmrcl
We aever teay a colored Tea. We aever feave tasaadled a <~
aged t ea.
An experience ef many years In your midst; a careful attention to theTen trade, and n thorough w rledge of the Tea business, enables ns to say
oenfidence that
know! with
We will eeatlmae te sell ttae Meat TiiAJB tnuported at tfee loweoa
A slight decline in gold, I anally large crop of Teas way, enables ns to place ou
together with an unnrecelved and on the
way, enables ns to place our new Teas at the fol-
lowing prices, which
Hxcetelor Writing l?uid
iiillllsi® I***: The quality is uniform and re The Mercantile Fluid te pints and quarto, —- - -■ -— --
Combined W
copying properties.
fhe most liberal discount* will at nil times be made te wholesale lots, that the current cash value of materia)
will allow.
MT for sale te Indianapolis by Bowen, btowart A Ca, whntssnls ste tioners, and by dealers generally,
novtodten
GEO. CRAWFORD & CO., Commission Merchants, Imperters and Dealers te tedw Ante. Sal —da- Cmwntlc tioda, Foamtiry Fact awn, % ^stiEBEmKImwN HEBREW w ffisihfia* Mac., Etc., NO. ffOff WALNUT STREET. Claelamatl, Otalo. ' novtOdSm
CINCINNATI.
Strotaridwe Co., UTMfilAPmSAMUMIATEM an F«Mi«ker« Hit FfortraiU.
^SHUMTCON. Lincoln,
w
Washington as a Free Mason. New Masonic Chart, in oil colon.
Odd Fellow’s Chart.
Grant, Lee and
'V
HKgftnfrr Diplomas
foS^four 1 ^ ^ ° r Uuami °
A Uo,man!]f&cturers Insurance Company House
Also, aU kinds of Lithographic Work.
Afro. Agency Continental Bnnk Note Company.
OCCRJ (i9BI
CHARLES GRAHAM,
E A HUTCHINSON & CO,
and Jobber* te
IHSORAftCP-
M kBTI.l, MOrklXS 4 FOLLITT, (orKICK, NSW JOURNAL BUILDING), Represent the following excellent Companies: Assets. Ins. Co. North America, Phil* $1,880445 34 International ItuumaceCo., N. Y 1,444,*$ K Continental Insurance Ca»X. Y L$?3,711 Enterprise Ins. Co., Cincinnati. l.MMM M Yonkers and New York Ins. Co., N.T. .. 676,860 M Merchant* Insurance Co., Chicago SGQJtiO 3T City Fire Ins. Ce., Hartford, Coon 400,000 00 Northwestern Mutual Ufa, W icons in Xfetjm Bt Accident Insurance Cm, Columbus, O. .1,000,000 00 Total Capital Represented •ti.118.0M 08 nor4 dtm
hair restorer.
ta or Black: prevents Its pvjaTKbis;
color, either Brown — '
j off: cures all h
scalp; makes hair crow on baU. 1 by disease, (t is clean, does no* cum thn hair, ia ly perfumed, and n splendid dreisteg;
Are ffs Uw as Raj Wifflesale ■••se caa afliird to sell the sa** qualities hy tht largest qualities. •*» *1 40, tt 60, it 80; very bwatffgGmmpmw6er,(Greea,) $1 eO> bent. $9. Ymmmf JByumm (Creom,) $1 60; ctaoic- «•«, •*- Hynmm, (Oreem,) am extra ctaolce »w—t Tam, and will am it tta* nanut fasti*lama. Price $9Omlmmw. (Black,) «1, «i 40, $1 gOi alBGHlt %*• Emjglinta Breakfast, (Black,; very $1 eo; bent, $9. Japam, fft 50, $t t;0, $1 SO. »9- toe mnake a -peeialtty Japaae-e Teas, aad pa re tarn— moae hat ttae beet. tMtxeA Green aad Black, ffl, t SOI beat %9 (These ore our own mixture*, and are recommended.) We also keep a carcfu’.ly selected stock of Mocha, Java and Rio Coffees, LOVERING’S REFINED SUGARS, Tnrt «rff«i4 aid Whole SPICES, CROS&B AND BLACKWELL’S PICKLES, Baker's Chocolates,Cocoa and Broma
THE CHINA TEA STORE,
H A.:RI> WahRE,
Mb* M W aim at street.
Me tween Ttairti mad C»emrl »te„
Manufacturer of IRON BRIDGES, BAtIBGE CASTINGS, Bridge Bolts, Girders, Tanks, GASHOLUF.B'*. And all kinds of Wrought Iron Work, Nee. 974, 976 amd 976 Went Frent bt., OIX^OINIsT ATL ^
JJ^lMtoprovedJdaohinery f
for the manufacture
nc tue lowest rates.
octMdSm
me to furnish them
bquare Thread Sctews ctit.
«I. «• KIIAHOIT Ac CO., Fashionable Tailors, Me. 904 Walmmt Street.
oot26 d2rn
CINCINNATI.
CnfCnfMATI, OHIO. norfO dAwte - *
iJohn Dubois. W.U. Williams.
J. S. Augur.
DVBOiN ft AUeum, Commission Merchants, J No. 87 West Second afreet. 1 CINCINNATI, OHIO.
advances made on
'eoi!K£
Liberal
Is of
FLOUR, GRAIN AND PROVISIONS. noted dtan
JOUI\ V. BIEKKLE,
Manufacturer au.t Cooler in
LADIES’ FANCY FURS,
GENT’S FTTRS,
GLOVES, CAPS 3 SLEIGH RC8ES, ETC.,
iar
.Wain Ht., between Third aad > ourth,
INSURANCE.
Him. TOM Fellows* Uaoll. octal dtp m
L£B.
WHOLESALE GROCERS.
A. JONES & CO. WHOLESALE GROCERS* No*. 74 and TM{ Beknuirsuev Oiovt, >
South Meridian Street,
Indiaimpotie. Indimam.
A. zona. ■. OLar. S.r.MHX j.w.jom
tebSdly
FOSTER, HOLLOW AT & CO., WHOr^ESALK O- IR, OGEE/S, COMMISSION AND STORAGE MERCHANTS,
AEE YOU INSURED ?
IF YOU ARB POOR
yOU may die and leave your family poor. It fodeamneTleee yonr Life Insurance, it per* von a good Interest on your investment, and the beet coasidering yon run no risk.
ENSVBK IN THK [OLD BBE.KABJUE
F* kinds
oxisroiisr xvA.xj.
eh cleaned, repaired and altered at shortest •■otice. The highest cash price paid lor ail of Furs. 00at; diiii
CHAS. S. CMEEVER,
Manufacture.- of
PAPER BOXES,
998 Main street.
BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE CO.
riTTSFIXLD, MASS.
Flour, Fish and Salt Dealers, Iren Freni, Nee. 68 and to Semtk Delaware street, 1 N X> 1JL NjJL P O X-1 8. sets dBm
RESTAURANT.
Conrad Lehrrltter.
John ▲. Lehrrltter.
C. LEHBBITTBR & CO., CAPITAL SALOON
PAUKAIIT, Ne. t4 Kmet toentafmgvim street, (Martin Hag's old stand.)
AVENG fitted up Uw Capital hi great ex
sSoleoaondkeoteuxaal, we par
TTAVENG iELSTC.
Intend to keep
tentee the nfrhtte to givo ns a eaU. aa wo an* Bar wettstocked with ttae hast
affords. In foot we Intend to keep « first house, and give satisfaction to oar pntroas.
host the market
st olase
aeptl dlv
D?-WRIGHT'S Tar Syri’ j '
“Facts are stubborn things.” says tho old proverb. and in these alone de we tetoad to deal, te presenting WRIGHT'S TAB SYBUP to the public. All know the secessity ef guarding against Colds, os well at the necessity for taking tbe peeper remedies when the Colds are upon us. We soy, without fear of contradiction, that tho superior ef Wright’s Tar Syren for the cure of Censumption. Couchs, Colds, Bronchitis, aad nB diseases of the Throat aad Lung*, does ate exist. Below ore te-timonisls from person*, some ef whom are known ia ail parts of the country: Dr. B. Sheltoa Mackenzie. Literary Alitor Forney’s Philadelphia Frees, writes:
Pnn.tPKi.rui*. July iff 18*7.
Dear Sir: Late Christmas, for th* first time ia my life, I was much afibeted hy % very severe C®id, with almost constant Cough and sore obest. ‘‘Practice make* perfect” tee proverb says, hut tee more I coughed the worse I did it. By what 1 then considered na neeident, but aew believe to have been_a Providence, I wantodaeed to try Dr.
on. and y enred
and truly declared, more than a century ago, that “Westward th- march of Empire take* ifr way,” and among these were two treatises te whieh be uSr&eases fromCte^tetotea pforre* 4 ];^ tereterejA wltetee eogeacyofSEerSBtabop-s
that they were
Cask Assets, ... CUias FiM, - - -
M $m,m m
All Policies Mwt«Al a«A
All Kinds ef Policies Issued.
If you ore alive, to yourself U Gate; tf you die before, to tee paam named.
hum Ttrdaj for $20,000
t.K. it::
* art tea yooie from to-day you get thoeateyour-
tweyear*. 44 percent, peg oenkto
aymootiomtoallfopfan. ahtoaafof wu insure you for two year* and three •yeteer company you insure ffa <m*
W anted.
INMAN
REMOVAL.
T. Mm FMRR1NE,
CONSUMPTION
novfSdly
M tee eporattea of ^fCoasumptioo,
“Tbe Pea is Eigktier tbffB tbff MntiT THE GOLD PEN, BEST AN0 CNBAPCSTBr PSRffi. Morton’s ’toid-Pens, THE BEST KJKIITHI RQBUl
■Mitsass ■ssasss*
MMOVAL.
sum, ffGNMI 4 GOOONMn, WMNffABM ANfo COMMISSION MERCHANTS*
Cl NCi^i XATI,
OHIO,
Oct7 t<->,
JAo. HAMILTON * CO., SHIRT MANUFACTURERS,
And dealers in
FVKNISHIKU GOOD*. 161 Main Street, four doors above Fourth, OlT^eiJNlN A.XE. J^*8hirts made to order. octS d;5m BAM. LOWENTHAL & CO., Manufacturers and Importer* of O I <3- -A. IRj S ,
And wholesale dealers in
Leffif and Plug Tobaccos,
No. te Main Street, below Pearl,
oert dSm
CINCINNATI, OHIO.
X>cirhzig > e>x % Co.,
TKADB
MARK.
Manufactwrero at Fine Toilet Soaps, AND I* © x* fix in e i* i © s » 87 Walnut street, oort dSm CUNCI^VMjAXI.
WILSON ft CLARK, Manufacturers of the Universal {Shirt, had LENTS* FURNISHERS, a X. COBMXB FOURTH AND WALNUT 9TA, C tenet aaati, Okie. Shirts and Underwear made to Order. 4#taf» for the Remis’ Patent Shape Collar.
OHIO MACUtJNK WORKS,
(Successors to Lon A Leavitt,)
Have oa hand »nrl are mnanfeoturing to order, FOBTABffJE ANE> »TATI ON AH A STOANf EISrOIKnES,
Portable Circular Saw Milk. B. H.
’s Patent Eccentric Head Blocks, Machines, Stave Machines, Saw Man
drlis. Saw Glimmers, shafting. Hangers and
Casting* of off kinds made to order.
Dealers m circular Saws, Belting, Packing ami
Mill Furnishing of ail kinds. ~ ‘ shinerv ma
orks."will re-
ial attention, as we have all the
B°SSJ. Shingle Mac!
t jH^^Bepairin^: of ^Machinery made by Lee A
special attention, as C both Mtabliahmaate.
naive our
ocka—Corner Walnut street and Hamilton
HMMi-
Ban tne as Office—180 West Second street, OCffdSm CINCINNATI, OHIO. McSESNRY ft CARSON, (AS FUTURE AID tAIP DEPOT* • Emet Fwmrtta amd 189 toaim street, CftZVClftRATl, OHIO, Dealers ia ClMiHftffiller* ffiffid lam**, and Steam Pipe, Fittings CUimney* and Wicks, at Eastern prices.
MERCHANT TAILOR.
W, t&L RAJRICEK*
MERCHANT TAILOR,
a*. tffRartta rammsFiwfrmtff «*•«*»
Oppoteto Odd Ffrtewt’ Hail,
A fete tench ef Foil and
AM VESTINGS.
, frhteh he wttl mntat up te »te tea tofrote price*. octMdSm
