Evening Republican, Volume 20, Number 66, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 17 March 1916 — Father Argues Against Son In Valparaiso Sand Case. [ARTICLE]

Father Argues Against Son In Valparaiso Sand Case.

Valparaiso, Ind., March 16.—1 t was father against son here today in an injunction suit in which former Confressman E. D. Crumpacker represented the plaintiff and his son Fred of the Hammond law firm of Crumpacker & Crumpacker represented the defendant. The suit was that of the Krug Sand company against the American Sand company on trial before Judge Loring in the circuit court. Because of the father and son relationship the case attracted considerable attention among attorneys who agreed that the confidence of the'litigants in their Respective lawyers was a fine tribute to the professional integrity to the Crumpacker family of laiwyers. ''Don’t you find him a little more difficult to handle than in the days when you were the complaining witness, lawyer and judge in the woodshed?” Crumpacker pere was asked regarding his son’s legal work this noon. —, , . “Well, I admit,” said the father with a proud smile, “I might have my hands full, but z with the assistance of several Chicago lawyers, we hope 'to lick him.”

Isaac Saidla returned Thursday from Colfax, where he had been called <by the sickness of his sister. He arrived there only about 12 hours before her death. She was unconscious and did not recognize him. Her name was Mrs. D. C. Loveless and her age was 56 years. Erysipelas was the cause of her death. The funeral will be held Sunday. Mr. Saidla does not know whether he will return for the funeral or not, as he is himself almost sick.