Evening Republican, Volume 18, Number 251, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 23 October 1914 — Page 3 Advertisements Column 1 [ADVERTISEMENT]

FACTS polit '- c^'- ti i FIGURES / ■ ■ ■ . 1 CS“** V * c? 1 . . - .. , 111 Mill - I ' * . Since the presidential election in November, 1912, much conflicting information has been disseminated regarding the political situation in Indiana and throughout the country. The best way to get the real truth ' - '■ is tb study the results of the registrations, primaries and elections that have been held since that time. * L Cold, official figures tell the story better than words. There can be no way of going behind these figures. O V « ' ’ -w . ' Let the Official Figures Speak for Themselves All the Way Across the Country . ' * •«* - •'*7 . 1 , - v . ' ■ , . ~ NEW YORK '/ PENNSYLVANIA MAINE OHIO ILLINOIS MINNESOTA Th» reported result of the New York state The official result of the 1914 primary in The official results of the Maine election, The official results of the Ohio state primary, The official result of the Illinois primary, The official results of the primary held Sept 28 1914 and a comparison Pennsylvania and a comparison with the 1912 held Sept. 14, 1914, and a comparison with the held on Aug. 11, 1914, and a comparison with held on Sept. 9, 1914, compared with the 1912 primary together with the vote or with the 1912 vote of that state follows: vote follows: presidential vote of 1912 follow: the vote in that state in 1912 follow: vote in that state follows: low: *fi“, A, -SB*- ' sSSr *2B. • - *22, -22. ’ - "*“jr “. mss*.- IJf-IJI SIIJII SSSV::=-=:“-!S?:| jSSj gasSL jig jjgj SSSS.— —dSjS SXS SSSEZ.=dSiSi !£SS isiEz "ffl <SS ! The Progressives of NgW York, Roosevelt’s 83 n" cent Pro * rel, ‘ ive lo “ 65 per cent „ The Ohio primary revealed the fact that the The Progressive vote in Cook County was loan 1 97 wmmmk . home state had a warm contest for the guber- rro * resslve los ® p Progressive party has practically disappeared bat 7,391, less than one-twentieth of what it . . natorial nomination between Shlser and Buven- Recently the Progressive nominee for Gov- After California, Maine was the strongest in that state. The primary vote was less than was in 1912. The returns show that’this party The Progressive vote was not large enoujrnw port, and in spite of this the total vote fell off ernor of Pennsylvania withdrew in favor of the Progressive state in the country in 1912. They 4 per cent of the total Progressive vote in that has disappeared in a number of Illinois coun- get the ticket of that party on tne omciai w 8? per cent, compared with tljeir 1912 vote. Democratic nominee. carried seven out of sixteen counties. state in 1912. ties. 1 «sjkr->- lot for the November election.

At any ejection if you heard such returns from tlmse seven states you would KNOW the result. If the above figures do not convince you, read still the following

CALIFORNIA The results of the state-wide primary held In California on Auk. 26, 1914, for Governor and a comparison with the presidential vote of 1912 follow: 1914 1912 Primary Election Democrat! 99,537 283,436 Republicans 269,315 3,914 Progressives 104,447 283,616 The Republican vote in the primary was larger than the Democratic and Progressive vote combined. The Progressive candidate for Governor of California is none other than Hiram Johnson, who was his party’s candidate for Vice-Presi-dent in 1912 on the ticket with Colonel Roosevelt.

MICHIGAN Figures compiled "by the Michigan state board of canvassers on the recent state-wide primary, together with a comparison of the pres- 0 idential vote in Michigan in 1912 1 follow: 1914 1912 * ■ d Primary Election Democrats 31,299 156,751 Republicans —262,175 152,244 Progressives 6,998 214,584 Republican gain - 32.7 per cent Democratic lass -79.3 per cent Progressive lees 96.7 per eent V

lOWA The official results of the 1914 primary 1 ' in lowa and a comparison with the 1912 vote in that state follow: 1914 1912 Primary Election Democrats 76,415 185,426 Republicans 146,277 119,865 Progressives 5,359 161,819 ißepublican gain . 17 per cent Democratic loss 58 per cent Progressive loss 96 per cent

There is but one possible conclusion : THE VOTERS ARE DETERMINED TO RETURN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY,TO POWER AND BRING TO THE NATION THE PROSPERITY TO WHICH WE ARE ENTITLED. I * NOTHING CAN PREVENT IT '■■■ -* ' . ■ -j 7 ‘ 1 ~ " ■ t v L . i ' The Citizenship of Indiana is not different from that of other States, and in November this citizenship will speak in terms just as certain —and the Republican pstrtynvill again give to Indiana the efficient, economical government we deserve

Indiana wilt again prove to the country“ e,ta> she can he depended upon