Daily Wabash Express, Volume 19, Terre Haute, Vigo County, 10 September 1869 — Page 2
DAILY express
TEBKE HAUTB. INU^'
Friday Morning, Sept. 1©H»»
1
The
v,YV._
1869-
Th* Union (Mo.) Appeal, in response to the objection of «*cotemporary to illiterate negroes voting, says it is hardly fair to require the Radical negro to make himself a walking encyclopedia, while the Democrat is only expected to know whisky irom water—and car^folly avoid tbe wator. k#*'*
New York Nation has a correct
conception of the party of "dead issues It says: "The Democratic party has had onlyjimbecilea for chiefs since Iho South ern ones went into delirium bat madness seems more curable than idiocy, and that still prevails in thoir councils in our Northern section." Every one who has paid the last attention to the recent proceedings of the Democratic party in Ohio •j and Pennsylvania, and who roads the papers of that faith, will Bgro® in opinion with the Nation. as
r,
18T0.Ee
Aftkk the first of January,
Hknby Ward Bkkchkb
will assume edi
torial control of the Church Union, an independent religious paper in New York, designed to unite all Protestant*) on the common platform of tho Bible, without respect to human creeds. In ih? con nection a colemporary remarks: "It popularly supposed that all things are possible to a
Bbrchbb,
sure but the
and we are not
Bbkchbrs
share this opin
ion but it will take more than the com bined talent of the entiro family to bring about tbe result contemplated."^ 4
THE PETRI MURDER CASE.
Decision of the Supreme Court Granting a New Trial.
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUSTICB GREGORY.
From the Indianapolis Journal, 9th.] In the Supreme Court yesterday the fol lowing opinions were filed in tbe case Morgan, the Torre Haute murderer, on an appeal from the Vigo Criminal Court, in which tbe defendant bad been sentenced to be banged:
Morgan
VS.
Thk
State.
Ray, Judge
—The appellant was indicted in tbe Vigo Criminal Circuit Court, on tbe 15th day of July, 1869, for the murder of John Petri, on tbe 11th of the same montb.— He was arraigned and plead not guilty upon the day the indictment was found and entered upon bis trial on tbe 19thday of the month.
A motion was made for a change of venue, supported by tbe affidavits of the appellant and two other persons.
The affidavits alleged lliat a bittor feeling and intense excitement existed over the entire county created by the circnmstances attending the death of Petri, which would prevent tbe appellant from receiving a fair and impartial trial within tbe jurisdiction of that Court. That certain publications had been made in all the jurisdiction of that Court. That certain publications had been made in all tbe newspapers of that locality calculated to causo and which had resulted*-in producing, a conviction in the public mind of tbe guilt of the accused and rendering impossible to secure disinterested and unbiased triors. Counter affidavits were also prosentod by the Stato, embracing ono made by the Sheriff of tho county, and also the sworn statements of five other citizens that tho excitement and illfeeling manifested toward the prisonor was confined to the city of Terre Haute, and that a jury froe from all improper influences could bo socured from other portions of tbo county. Tho appellant thereupon moved the Court for leave to file other and additional affidavits in support of his application for a change of. venue. This tbe Court refused. Inasmuch as no additional affidavits were offered, no question arises upon the ruling. The judgment of the Court is not to be invoked in moro wantonnoss. Upon tho presentation of an affidavit for tho pur posa of flting it in fie case, a ruling of ibe Court may bo required, which roav be the subject of review hero. Upon an examination of an affidavit thus presented, with all the circumstances attending the motion, brought beforo us by a bill of exceptions, wo bavo a basis upon which to question or approvo tho judgment of the Court bolow.
Tho motion for a changd of venue was overruled. Wo are asked to roview this action of the Court. In tho case of An derson v. Tho State, 28 Ind., 22, tho same point was prosonted, and after a careful consideration of the subject, we affirmed tbe ruling of tho Circuit Court. The present application for a chango of venuo is not moro strongly supported. Tho affidavits horo prosonted, discloso a feel ing of strong excitoment in tbo city near which the crimo was committed. This was not extraordinary. A tornblo of fence had been perpetrated. The residenco of a reputable citizen had boon felonious ly entered on Sunday noon, during tho abionce of the family, and upon tho eud den return of the proprietor, he is killed in his own bed room by the felon. Tho arreBt follows tbe same ovoning Horror at tbo crimo, indignation against the per. petrator, and a desire for swift and sure punishment, convulse tho community Tbe Grand Jury aro at onco summoned, an indictment iB found, and on tho fourth day from tho tragedy tho accused pleads for his lifo in the midst of a community thus wrought upon—pleads whon his counsel oven net undor appointment of the Court. Under Buch circumstances the position of the Judge before whom Ihesu9p6cted criminal stands, involves grave responsibilities. Under such circumstances it sometimes happens that public clamor demands of tho Court, not a just administration of the law, but its aid in securing through legal forms some victim to popular indignation. It were better that tbe mob should execute its Will—terrible as tbe alternative may be —than that a Judge should yield one right secured to the prisoner by the law. The Court, when tho excitement is passed, will retain the public confidence in its due and proper administration of tbe law, a loss of wnich would be irreparable. The excess of popular violence, although it can not correct the injustice it may have worked, will bring an assured repentance.
We do not intend by these remarks to imply that we are satisfied in this case, that there has boon an abuse of the discretion confided to the Court, but that it is apparent that tho surroundings were not such as most certainly to secure what the applicant was elearly entitled to, a fair trial before men who bad not pre judged his case. We aro not content by oursilence seemingly to approve the haste, which places the accused within the woek his alleged victim expired, in the midst of a community excited by the outrage, on trial for his life. A jury, however, was empanelled from other portions
of the county, where it was alleged no flnmmal excitement existed, afcd as the statute places the matter of a change of the locality of the trial, within the d"«cretion of the Judge before whom the application is made, we do not feel tbat the present case authorizes us to reverse tbe ruling, if indeed we ought to doso under any circumstances.
On tbe examination of personb called as jurors, as to their competency, five of the panel answr *cd that they had formed an opinion as to tbe guilt or innocence of the appellant, from rumor ahd- newspaper statements on that subject. Upon further examination, each of said per. sons answered that it ould require neither more nor leas ovldc iceto satisfy them of tho existence or nonexistence of the material a involved' in the ct3e, by reason of such a'.rcidy formed opinion. The Cot -t, therec ion, overruled the challenge by app* lant "for cause."
Tliis callin: was in full r» jord with the decision o. this Court in ne case of FahnBtock v. Tho State, (23 Ind., 231). It is in vain, in tbe presence of a tolegraph that throbs with every beat of the world's life, and a daily pre? to register each pulsation, for courts longer to expect a un iondf ignorance of a matter made notori. ous by publication, will seldom be found where sufficient discrimination exists to detect falsehood from truth. Tho rapid! ty with which information is conveyed and the hasto to place it before the public, involve so much inaccuracy in the statement, that experience soon instructs tho reader, and the impression formed fades at once before tho living witness.— An impression so light is practically harmless, and a theory which rejects such jurors can not bo abandoned in practice.
On tbe trial, tbe statements made by Petri, on Sunday afternoon, about au hour after the shoo' ng had occurred, in regard to the circumstances attending the injury, woro offori 1 a1*his dying declarations, and upon certain evidence as to his condition at tho time the statements were made, being adduci j, the Court, over the objection of the appellant, permitted them to go to tho jury. It is assigned as error, that the evidence as to tho condi tion of Petri did not show him to have been in extre. its at tbe date his
declara
1
tions were mado. It is a relief, when called upon to test a given state of facts, by a rule of law, to find that rule well defiaed, marked and clear founded upon a plain reason and sustained by uniform authority.
Such is tbe rule under which certain statements made by ono speaking, notun der the obligation of an oath, but in the very presence of death, are received evidence. No well considertl case has attempted to extend or limit the establish edrule, and where error has been committed, it has occurred in its application to facts. The principio, as st» 1 by Lord Chief Baron Eyre, on wbicb ti.is species of evidence is admitted, is tfc"i they are declarations made in extreme/, when the party is at the point of death, and when every hope of this world is gone, when every motive to falsehood is silenced and the mind is induced by the most powerful considerations to speak the truth. A situation so solemn and so awful is considered by tbe law as creating an obligation equal to that which is imposed by a poeitive oath in a court of justice. Woodcock's case, 1 Leach, 502.
In the last edition of Greenleaf on Evidence, Judge Redfield bad added this note to the text. "This evidence is n«» received upon any other ground than that of necessity, ia order to prevent- murder going unpunished. What is said in the books about the situation of tbe declarant, be being virtually under the niost solemn sanction to speak the truth, is far from presenting the true ground of the admission, for if that were all that is re quisite to render the declarations evidence, the apprehension of death would have tho samo effect, since it would place the declarant under the same restraint as if the apprehension were founded in fact. But both must concur, both the fact aud tbe apprehension of being in extremis.— This presumption, and the probability of tbe crimo going unpunished, is unquestionably the cbiof ground of bis exception in the Law of Evidence." Vol. 1, p. 182. And accordingly they are received "only when the death of the deceased is the subject of tbo charge, and tb6 circumstances of tbo death tho subject of tbe declarations." Rex v. Mead, 2 Barn. & Crcs. 605 2 Phillips on Evidence, vol. 1, 287 1 Gree iloaf on Evidence, 181.
As this class of ovidence forms an exception totbgeneral rule as thoro can be no cross-t lamination of the declarant as tbe accuscd can not often moet his accusor face to face, and there must of necessity ex 't great danger of abuse, it must cloarl appef that the statements offered in evidenc have been mado under a full realization that the solomn hour of death has come.
In tho cue of Smith v. tho Sute, 9 Hum, 9, it is said: "Test: lony of this characlor Is only admitted 'rom necessity, and on abi^o it is guarded against by the law with most minu',0 particular ity. Thon. is no ono principio bottor os tablished than that such declarations shall not be rociived, unless the proof clear ly.ih( us that the decef-sed was in extremis,—(perilapf the words in articulo mortis, which aro r»od by some of the au thorities to express the condition, are more accurate)—and that he or she at the time of making them was fully conscious of that fact, not as a thing of surmise and conjecluro or apprehension, but as a fixed and inevitable fact" Ono emu nont writer calls it tho apprbension of "impending death"—2 Ev. I'oth., 293. In tho notes to Phillips on Ev. it is said "In the meantime bo is not only certain of ultimate death, but hois strongly persuaded that death is rapidly approaching. It is so near that all motives to falsehood are superseded by the strongest inducements to strict voracity"—290. "Tho Judge should be satisfled that tho declaration was made under an impression of almost immediate dissolution."—lb. vol. 2, noto 453.
In Rex. v. Callaghan, McNally's evidence, 385, Bosanquet judge said: "To rondor a declaration of this kind adrais si bio, tbe decease most havo had the impression on his mind of an almost immediate dissolution."
It is not required that the deceased should havo declared in terms that he oxptc'od to firo at once, if bis condition bo such that of necessity such an impression must exist on bis mind.
I Woodcock's case ante, it was deemed sufficient to show that tbe deceased had boon mortally, wounded and was in a condition which rendored almost immediato doalb inevitable and that she was thought by every person about her to bo dying. Do matter ho* strong the expression of certainty of daath may be, if there be any evidence of hope,, in tbe language or actions of tbe declarant, his statement will be rejected.
The bill of exceptions state the follow ing as the evidence upon which the declarations of Petri were admitted. Charles May stat«d: "I asked John what was the matter?" John pulled up his shirt and said: "lam in a bad fix and John said be could not recover. This was ab*.ut one or two o'clock on Sunday, about an hour after the shooting. That after this conversation took place be (May) went for a doctor for Petri."
Moritz Hasenobr states that "he saw Petri about an hour after he was shot, ami before a docior_got there and he (Petri) told me he felt bad, and thought he would not get well." Tbe wounds were two in number, each from a small pistol ball one in the left jaw, not dangerous, and the other lodged in the cavity of tbe abdomen. It has, from experience during the late war, become a matter of popular knowledge, that wounds in suoh parts of tbe body, are not of necessity, fatal, and where death does not at once result, it can only be foretold by
the careful examination of, a person of •kill in snch matters. It is very clear dot
^^JSEe evid^lse (Xwrt
to
authorize the
did die
adHqit dw
pr»f
trl
Itherk
statement of Petri
"iThcrk
that the deceased regmed
proof
mmseff aa'
at
the point of death. The wounds did not authorize Buch a conclusion. The fact that he
at the close
him.
as
of the aoxt
day is certainly not sufficient. After the wounds were received, the deceased had followed Morgan with his gun for a quarter of a mile,
and until he lost sight
a
of
tw d«W^^himseir
dying nkan
In
thmt pursuit,
and,
within an hour after the woynds, is it not an unfair presumption to assume that he felt in tho hands of death?—death, immediate and inevitable? In tbe language already quoted, the proof must clearly show that the declarant waa, in fact, at the very point of death, and that he
"I
pectation exist! of
ill,
"Yoii
"was
fully conscious of the fact, not as a thing of surmise and conjecture, or apprehension, but as a fixed and inevitable fact." We all know bow readily from the lips of tbe sick and the suffering,
come the
words, oft repeated,"I shall nevor recover!"
shall die!'' when
no
real ex
such
a
one who has
result. Any
stood by the bedside of the
and heard these words, if at last the attending physician pronounce the fatal sentence,
must die," knows tbe
change comes over the face of the sufferer.that The light fades from tbe eye,
and tbe flush from the cheek, as hope for timo deserts the patient. Such expressions of mere impatience and roUlossness are not a sufficient foundation for a court to rest a safe conclusion upon as to the actual condition of tho speaker's mind Far from clearly establishing the fact, that all bope has fled and that immediate dissolution is oxpected, tboy can hardly be said to creato a presumption that such is the Actual condition of the mind,
It seems impossible to deny that the Court committed error in allowing tbe statements of Petri to go to tho jury, as dying declarations.
This error having occurred, did it harm tbe appellant? The presumption isjthat it did, and unless it clearly appeared that it did not, wa must reverse the case. .Indeed the only ground upon which tliis error can be treated as harmless, is th.Usuch testimony supplied the defec tive proof and testified the action already taken by the Court.
Ia the course of his examination chief, Cbarles May stated that he was brother-in-law of tbe deceased that wben he saw him on Sunday afternoon be ask ed him: "What's the matter." Petri answered: "Charley, I am in a bad fix go for a doctpr." "I went for a doctor got a doctor and went home. Went and saw him again. He told me that believed he would die. This was Sunday afternoon. John told me an hour befool tbat he would die."
Moritz Hosmour testified that Petr told him "he bad given up all hopes. This was_ about 2 o'clock Sunday after
noon.
Dr. Armstrong testified that be saw Petri about 3 o'clock Sunday afternoon He called again at 5 o'clock and at 1 o'clock at night, and the next morning at five, and the last visit was made at I o'clock on Monday afternoon. He states: "I do not remember he said he was in fear of dying or not. The character of the wound led me to believe it would prove fatal. was not satisfied it would •prove so at my first sight. It was hard to determine how long it may be before wound may terminate fatilly. Slough ing produces secondary hemorrhage."
In this evidence we have tbe statement of Petri that he "had given up all bope, and yet with this comes hij call for physician, and though not much is to be rested upon this fact, still it may not be unreasonable to infer that some hope still existed of aid. Then, too, the physician who examinod bim at 3 o'clock can not recall that Petri even expressed a fear of dying, nor was the doctor himself enabled to determino the condition of the patient. And can it be supposed that under such circumstances tbe physician gave his patient no encouragement—animated him with no bope while bis friends were about him This seems to fall far short of tbe proof required
In Rex v. Crockett, 4 Carr and Payhe, 544, the surgeon testified "1 had told tho deceased sho would not rocover.^tnd she was perfectly aware of her danger, told her I understood sho had taken something. She said she had, and that damned man had poisoned her. 1 asked what man She said Crockett She said she hoped I would do what I could for her, for «he sake of her family, I told hor there wis no chance of hor recovery Bosanquet, JudgO, said: This shows degree of hope in her mind. To render a declaration of this kind admissible, she must have had the impression on her mind of an almost immediate disiolu tion.'
Giving full weight to the aftor fact, that Petri did dio about six o'clock on Monday ovoning, would it bo reasonable to assert from the evidence that it clearly oppears that he approhonded even, much less was absolutely assured of immediate death In Rex vs Van Butchell, 3, Carr & Payne, 629, the deceased declared to his surgeon that he bad an injury in bis bowels (having been operated on by quack) that ho would never recover.— Tho surgeon endeavored to encourage him, really thinking him not in danger of dying, but he persisted in saying,that he felt satisfied ho should nevor recover. Hullock, B., rejected the proposed decla ration as evidence. In tho case of The King, vs. Spilsburg,,?, C. & P., .187, it was proposed to give in evidence the dying declaration of a deceased person, and it was provod that about the lime of making the declaration, the deceased was askoc if ho thought ho should recover, aDd how he was to wbicb he answered that he thought he should not recover, as he was so very ill. Ho had been previously inr sensible, but romained sensible for an hour and died the nert day. Tho evi denco was rejected by Coleridge, J. on the ground that ho did not feel fully con vincod that the deceased had no hope of recovoring.
In Reginavs. Mayson, 9 Carr. Pay no, 418, in a case of murder, it appeared tbat two days before the death of the decoased, the surgeon told her lhatshe was in a very precarious state and that on the day before her deith when she bad become much worse, she said to the surgeon that sho found herself growing worse, and that she had been in hopes sho would have got better, but as she waa getting worse sho thought it her duty to mention what had taken place. Immediately after this she made a statement. Kolfe B. said "I think it does not sufficiently appear that tbe deceased was without hope of recovery. I think I ought not Jto receive the evidence."
In tbe case of Rex vs. Bonner, 6 Carr & Paine, 386, cited in the dissenting opinion, it will be observed that Patterson J. states of the person who made the declaration tbat "it is quite clear that he did not expect to survive the accident, and it is evident that he thought on tbe Wednesday that he might die on tbat day."—
As the statement was made on Wednesday uader expectation or death that day,wben
the case seems to come within the rule. But the casee we have cited establish tbe rule aad exhibit the extreme caution observed by courts of the highest reputation in restricting evidence within its limits.
The reason of this strictness is evident. The irritable condition of the wounded sufferer tbe natural inclination to justify one's own coaduct the disposition condemn another as the cause of one'sto suffer-
ing the presence of sympathizing friends the strong sense of wrong and outrage the feelings of anger and revenge—all these are not calculated to induce
party. To overcome these there Is not[ oven the saoetfly of an oath nothing, deed, but Uncertain looking for of ditatl —inevitabliand Immediate. This a fol can bo looked to aa securing truth, wh there is no oath, ho cross-examination, no confronting of witnesses.
The only safe rule for the admission of such declarations is that the declarant must be fully persuaded that death is rapidly apptoiching. That it so near that all motives to falsehood are superseded by the ptrongast motives to strict .veracity* and that the prooi render Chis condition of the mind clear to the Judgo before whom it is offered. And as the chief value of the law rests in its faithful administration, the rule can not bend to cases of seeming hardships. In the pres ent instance the State has the declarations of the deceased, made a few hours before his death, when the physician states he was in a dying condition, in addition to the excluded testimony.
The statements made on Saturday after noon should have been rejected. The appellant presents a bill of excep tions containing the instructions given by the Court to the jury. The only statement in regard to the punishment to be inflicted, in the event of a conviction for murder in the first degree are contained in the following instructions: "Murder in the first degree is defined as follows Sec. 2. If any person of sound mind shall purposely, and with premedi-. tated malice, or in the perpeteation or attempt to perpetrate any rape, arson, robbery, or causing tho same to be done, kill any human being, such person shall be declared guilty of murder in tbe first degree, and uE&n conviction thereof shall suffer death the only portion of the section applicable to the case now under con sidoratioDMs embraced in the following words to-wit: If any person of sound mind shall purposely and with, premeditated'malice kill any human being, such person shall be deemed guilty of murder in the first degree and upon conviction shall suffer death I"
The appellant insists tbat the jury should have been informed that the statute provided that "any person convicted of treason or murder in the first degree may, instead of being sentenced to death, in the discretion of the jury, be imprisoned in the State prison during life." 2 G. & page .43, section 4.
The records, however, shows that the exceptions were taken by presenting tbe bill of exceptions pending tbe motion for anew trial, and as there is a question made whether this can be regarded as at the proper time, within the provisions of the statute on tbe subject in criminal cases, we do not discuss the question, as the case must be revised for tbe error in admitting tbe statement of Petri made on Sunday afternoon.
Judgment reversed and cause remand ed for anew trial. Gregory, J. files a dissenting opinion.
DISSKNTINQ OPINION.
Gregory, J. I am very clearHIfat the judgment in this case ought to be affirmed.
The facts, in my opinion, make a case of courier in the first degree, and are of a character to justify tbe infliction of tbe highest penalty of the law.
The defendant entered the house of the deceased, and committed a felony was detected after perpetrating the crime, and to enable bim to make his escape, he shot tbe deceased with a revolver, with which he was armed, indicting a mortal wound, of which the deceased died in about twenty-nine hours.
I differ with the majority on tbe application of rule as to the dying declaration.. The deceased was shot through the body and also in the jaw in a struggle with the prisoner he had bled freely in his wounds he had pursued theappellant for about a quarter of a mile bad returned to his house, was in bed be sent for a doctor he said be was in a bad fix that be thought he shouid die that be had given up all hope.
The medical witnesses concurred in saying that tho wounds were mortal it is true, that the attendant physician was not clear in his mind at his first visit, tbat tbe wounds were mortal, but he be came satisfied tho same day that they were so. It is very clear to my mind, that tho deceased, at the time he made the declarations introduced in evidence, was laboring under apprehension of almost immediate death.
In Rex v. Bonner, 6 Carrington & Payne, 386, (25 F. C. L. 487) tho deceasod had mot with an accident, which happened about two o'clock on the morning of Sunday, the 11*11 of August, 1833. Tho surgeon Btatcd tbat he attended the deceased on Sunday, the 11th, wben be found bim with six ribs broken,and other injuries that he inform ed tho deceased that he could not expect to recover. Beavan (the deceased) replied that he was aware tbat he must go out of the world unless he was relieved by medicine. Ho was better on Monday, but passed a very bad nigbt on Tuesday, and that on Wednesday he was very ill, and said that be'was satisfied that be must go out of tbo world. A clergyman also stated that the deceased told bim on Wednecday tbatbedid not expect to live. A brother and son.in-law of the docoased also stated they were sent for by tbe de ceased, and saw him on Wednesday when be expressed his great anxiety to settle his worldly affairs, as he had not long to live. He died on the following Saturday It was contended for tho prisonor that the fact the deceasod did on tbe Sunday oxpress himself in terms which clearly showed that he hoped to recover, and tbe fact that be did live until tbe Saturday, made the dying declarations not receivable in ovldence.
Patterson, J. (who tried the case) said: I think that I am bound to admit the declarations of tbodoceasod. It is quite cloar that be did not expocl to survive theaccidont: and it is evident tbat be thought on the Wednesday that ho might die on that day. It is not necessary to prove expressions of apprehension of immediate danger and tbe circumstance tbat ho lived until Saturday did not alter tho state of things on the Wed' nesday."
In tho case under consideration, the nature of the wotindp, tbe declarations of tho deceased, the short time he lived, were all matters to he considered dotormining tbe question to whether he was laboring under tbe appronsion of "al most immediate death. Under tbo nil ings in all tbe cases on this subject, if it had been proven to tho satisfaction of tho judge trying the' caso that the deceased was, at the time be made tbo declarations in question, laboring undor tbo apprehension that he would die within -tbo then next twonty-eigbt hours, then they would undoubtedly have been proper testimony to go to the jury.
Tbe nature of the injury, tbe short time tbe deceasod lived, his expressions that bo "did not expect to recover," "that he had given up all hope," satisfy me that tbe Court below committed no error in admitting the evidence. Indeed, I do not see under tbe rulings, how the Court could have done otherwise.
Tbe rule is a reasonable one, and is as old as tbe common law it only applies to cases of homicide. Tbe felon by whose unlawful act the tongue of hiE victim has been silenced in death has no good tight to complain. There is no rebson why the rule should be so restricted in its application as to make it of little or no practical use.
I am of opinion that tbe instructions of the Court to tbe jury are not properly in tbe record. Of course when I say that tbe judgment ought to be affirmed it is in view of the legal presumption tbat the Court properly directed the jury as to the law of
the
case,
The Portland
a
calm
true, unbiased statement from the injured
«9i. 3
Argus
two
says that gen
tleman when coming up the bay,acounted twenty seals sunning themselves on one or
ledges known as the Brothers
Thi^anadian p»»s i«Wft so mousai theKpglttttowriraqie Aft Old Irish ISdy hu disinhefl only child, daughter, out of $45,000, be* c&u*e «be became Roman Catholic,
.That?-!.* l*»J* I well-known charch spires in Boston is as follows: Christ Cbhrcb) Vtfi feet, fioilia street, 196 and Park street, 218.
Tbe Revenue Bureau publishes an Mimate that there are 79,000,000 gallons of whisky in the bonded Warehouses of the country.
The Kansas Agricultural College is in its fourth year of successful operation. Lfuita are admitted, and tbe catalogue sbowes 73 ladies to 97 gentlemen.
IV is stated tAt one hour-after the gas of Loudon is lighted the air is deoxidized as much as if 600,000 people had been ad ded to the population.
A very successful Methodist camp-meet-ing was recently held in Oregon_y laymen. presiding Elder, pastors and local preachers were prevented from attending.
A petroleum company. which, has been "bjriog for lie" in Louisiana fo^,/nearly three years, has struck a. bed ol aulpbiir 205 feet thick.
a n:(t
ami} it-
.The Paris fete of the 15th of August only cost the trifle of $10©,600, which dan be added to the city budget.
A newsboy in Cincinnati, ten years old, supports bis father .and mother, two brothers, and himselfl The parents are both invalids.
An oil refiner, of Glasgo w, has offered £450,000, or $2,200,000, for the Island of Arran, on the coast of. Scbtland, and outbid the Marquis of Bute by £50,000.
The number of homieides ia Southern Italy, last year, was 19.84 to every 100,000 inhabitants or ten times the proportion in England, and more than a hundred times that in Belgium.
Tbe Spanish Government Is experimenting with a new rifle, called the Nunez rifle, which can be dis6harg«l thirty-eight times per minute, and is reported to be very effective.
Here mee fust tben jedge Mee.' It hapened thuswisely I wuscanvassin the Mawmea Flats fur owr Bluvid Kedentry & the Post Offis sucksechun. In thet land uvpewer Delita struck a snag Thee Fever Ager tuk me, & thee cbUl •& Shivers sbuk me—shuk mejike a Nold loos button on a Sbaiky smoke-House doar til mi fraim uv 40 Sammerz luked like sum Ole plaid Out bumerz on a mornin wen his Gin iz gon & hecan't git no moar 1
a
(N. B. This is not
rit by Edd. A. Powe but it cumsso awlfired neer too it thet you woodn't no (be difrunce in the dark.)
In tbi* ourfui eggstremmitty I Elue at wonts tu a Nold lady fren' uv Mine & toald hur pai kritterkel pbix. Shee hes no'd mee Long & Luvd me Well & she cawls me Pet Names. "'Troly," Sez Shoe (sech iz the.Plaiful knifenomtm uv mi Boihood) "yu orter taik a good Dosle up PtANTASffDN Riturz. I've livd & Suferd in the^z swaumps every sens tho 3 tbayers wus Hung & I no, to a ded
BUT
tihly, thet l'r.aktasuun Brrtm2 iz thee on'y reel kewer fur the Shaiks l" "B— b—but air tha a 1—1—loyawl drink?" asked I, shiverin'l, feerin Loast I mite bee incufridgin suththin uv a suthern Nacber. "Doont bee skeord. 'Troly," replidethe eastimabul Dorcuss, "tha air Maid uv Callasayya, S. T.—1860 & the Verry loyawlist kind uv Sahty Crows Rum." Mi Douts bein remuved & mi Feers fur tbee Post Offis asswaged, I tuk an awlmity Dosto uv "Plantashun" & yu bett brutherin, it thaid mee bile I' I tuk anutber in 2J ourz & mi shaiks quit. I may sa, tba "parsed in thair Checks I' Tha got) Not wun uv 'em lingurd too say good bi I Now I am a
Plantashun
missbunery I go abowt preechin the good Tidin's to Awl shakers (& "uthers requirrin aJentel atimmerlent." sea small bilz.^ I hev traided off my Post Offis & may Now be found talkin
Plantashun
Biif-
T7Kzr in the hiwaiz & thee biwaiz, frum Erly Morn* till DeWey Eve. What sinnin, sufriu, shaiken 'bruthor 'H hev thee next Bottul? iTAWLWiynt •fi iJI I!
Magnolia Watkb.—Superior
Multum
in
to the
best imported German Cologne, and sold at half tbe price. ,10-dvlw aft- iio
MILITARY CLAIMS.
iiaviii s. iianalinmni Military A Horary, Notary aad Clalai Aeeal, Re^alaiiy AatkerlzM aad McmsN.
Office—Farrington Block, N. E. Corner Public Square, •$•.
5,4
tfr 9raias, Tiaar Doea, TEBBE 11ACTE, ISD. _rJ. Pension Claims I'rosScuted, Arrears of Pay Procured., bounty money collected,
SVMrto Merchant', Bankers and Citizens generally, and to any one of ibe thousand wboae claims have been obtained by me.
Mar All Invalid Pensioners not exempted, or not having passed two B!nnlal examinations, nr.oat be tsauiiaed Sept. 4, 1889. They shcald be bera on tbat day.
JaMwtf
8-
DAHALDSOH
£JRESS MAKING. Mrs. S. E.HfiD€SEai
Haa removed her Cloak and Dress Making eetableahment to Naylor's new baildrng, on Ohio, between Fourth and Fifth streets, where she will be pleaaed to meet all who desire tha moat perfect work la this line.
Particular attention, will be given, aa heretofore, to the latest styles.
Tbe most skillful aasistaatt hav«been engaged Wedding Uosuunaa, Ball aad Party Uresaas Ladiaaaad Ohildren'a Woaka and l'rnssws menu actaiad with promptness aa# dl*patch,H|lttf
~~witeg8f
t'ir" vtJi'f
forty jrewi ia .«noe—fnl sralloa. Dtmsl adiaatagM la^olU sail inn—MJmmis»-. mr tf Mr Mitt-MMlvtMlw lr latin hmhi akoatSfctta'
MID, A. Priadptl.
BCATTT, «V. A.
ONLY «n MU1B
90JD CoaMbntors^ tSttMh Wiachaan1
Sptciaea __ IMmt,'!! Oftrntrflf, Bortaa
Preserve Im toUkeri inrmtrRTMT! msk nxr'sMi. thirty jwaraS^b*Mt^aa«
1
fi:: 'q. If**™,'.
Aromatic
SOLD iTAU
:«r
The Howard University, at Washington, has been presented with a copy of Bunyan's "Pilgrim's Progress," complete printed in tbe Chinese language. It was brought from China by a negro sailor.
The old hotel in which the first Constitution of tbe State of Vermont was adoptj|in July, 1777, is still standing^in,Windsor. It has been sold within a few days, and the purchaser intends to preserve the main building.
The extensive steel works of John A Griswold& Co., of Troy, N.Y., destroyed by fire last fall, have been rebuilt upon an enlarged scale, with a capacity to manufacture 20,000 tons of steel rails per annum. ,, -HW
Nasby Talks "Plantation." I hev traided off my Post Offis & tuk mi Pay in Plantashun I P'raps yu may be supprized to here uV mi relinquiBhin my Guv'ment Offis with Awl its glory in sech a Caws.
.'~
Mama. LimiKOtT ttmvui, fitbtni|t, li. flatn-fft taw two «wn»K yjonr fafca ofOoni fiawa. our Mill, and Aad tli«m, ln_point or ru•™fi«'pMior.V.-. v- y'f
LfppeaeoU & BalLewtir&
Patent Ground,
£gO IBCf A lt '.-n
SA-V5rS£::^1,i',au Y«U* •.•'.iiytts JtMUTOWH, N. Ti
InruiHtft
Bakbwbu:—We-h»Teb«
latent Oovatad Scoop.
bo trouble
with your S»w« thoy don't tiAWf 16 lined with paptr wo pat them o*' tb« Mulril Ut ]lhey go right along. 1
Tempor perfectly uniform an A quality Bnaarkw d. Bmpoctfotlir. OHAS.A.FOX.
pass-d. Boapoctfotlir, I LIFPEKCOTI A
.Toa
iiKlWILL,
WHAT WILL IT« DO
Irat inquirjr the aiek maka' eoaoeraia* a to. Suppose TAltBUirH tfLTllB APIis the subject of tha interrogatory, what
Is the flrat Medietas, RfKNT Is then? Stiapty this reply. It WtU ItttCM MM care hradacfce, aaasea, tafleacc, a costtveaess, debility, auieasacsa aad lloa.
Sold by Bruggiats sTerywhere. 5f li
1£BRA8KA.-ltB wtaiasto ast ftiifc pamphlet tot S5o. Addrsaa CreppW y'ii, '.
Na
rorparttrtdars
JCa addtess & M. SPBHOCJt' OO-,. Bra tile* Iboro, Vt.., -,,-v 'i.vv.KKWIHQ MiCHUE. $«
Tha celebrated. PBttnWI MW, 1NO MAOUM B, .wartadted, has no equal iuiiea pronoaao* timne thu pricc willstitch, hemt bind, braid, cord aad esabrqide*rdegaiply.— Agents clear flOJtct S3i| par day. A.sample machine, boxed,with directions for aslng, private
iv raMtWB-aswf yaarsj pripa |8j no* it,, worth three iem, fair, tack, qtHH,
ter, New York $100 Per day Diseonlinued. Having'obtained an" ertoBsfVe and widespread sale fttr our *'VIUilVltI,'annouaceJdmt-OtUpaper:
The trade, ara iavlted to sendfbr tlrtalari. jr.14NtlU.AII0, Near Terk. 1MTCBOIIANOI, ar SOVICHARIUM. A won derful book it ahowf how aitber sex can fhsclnate afly one they triah instantly. (All pos sesses this power.) It taaahaa how to get rioh.— Alchemy, Dr. Dea'aand. Alioii'a. Oaball», Jilading*, Horceiias, Incantation,, Demonology, Msgic, Mesmerism, Spiritllldlani, Marriage Guide, and a thousand otner wonders. Sent by mail for 29 'cents. Address f. ViVGnk 100.', Publishers, south Seventh street^ Philadelphia, Pai I iTrtu GRAND INVESTMENT
toe yi
Pabvo.—Therd'T?cMtiiln-
ed in Morse's Pills the principio We have many thousands of testimonials of their havingrestored the sick to health which can be seen at our office. Use Dr.] Morse's Indian Root Pills and find them nrft only a curative of disease but also a preventative. Tbey should be used in all cases of Billiousness, Headaches, Liver Complaints, Female Irregularities, &c.— We make no secret of tbe formula from which this medicine is prepared. Ask your storekeeper for the Ometa Almanac, read it carefully. Use Morse's Pills.— Sold by dealers. [aep.dwlm
'ills tbe principio of bealtb.
GOLD AND SILVER Mining Company Located at Manltor, Alpiae county, Califernla. W parties having |i!3. to 96,000 to Invest la the NAFBST AND BWTMllflNS KNTKiraAl KT1I OFPKKI» ra tse PUBLIC, ara deiirad to write uuouiiu for I'lrtSlBH ul terms ot aubfcription, to J. UlNVilnTtB, Pres't, Jaha Btteet, NeWYotk,
ASK yaar Vactar or Branlit liar 8WGKT It eqaaU (bitter) Quinine. M'fd by f. HXKAMMf), TABB CIO., Ofaemists, New York.
Great Distribution by Use •strapalim «ifl Ot.-€aih Oifto to tbe amaaat'of |SS*,«S«,Ktery Ticket Biaasa Vrlss. it
5 Cash Gifts 10 to 200 300
Tea will kaew what jrear Prtae to yea pay Air It. Any prise may be xxoaaaacb lor auottter of the same value, la aiflaks. Our patreascan depend on iaft dealing.
Opialaas of the Fraae.—"The arm ia re liabie, and deaarve thair saccesa."— IPasMr Tri btute, Jfay 8. "Wa know them to ha a fair dealing flnn. --.Jr. P. BsroU, May 38. "A friend of oars draw a $SOO prise, which waa premptly ra I ocivad."—Zs% Mem,
Jea«
circular.
$16,00.
wsr 1
IW
....Xach $20,000 10,000 „. 6,000 •*, '1,000 200
J00
60 Xlexant Boeewood Pianos... Bach $300 to $760 75 Melodeoaa 75 to 100 iwiag Machin»s CO to 175 ioeUold Watches 76 to 300
Oash Prists, Silver Ware, Ac., all VALUED AT 91,000,000 A Chance to Draw Aap of 1' a&oM prises for 25c Tickets describing Prlsea are aa&ua in Kavelopes and tharonghly mixed, Oa receipt ones ceats, a Sealed Ticket ia drawn withoat choice and sent by mail to any addrsaa. The Prixe named opin It wHI be delivered to tha ticket-hoMrr oa paymeat of One Ootui. Pirlaea asa immediately seat to any .addresa by exprasa or latorn •Ail,
BarEBKitCBS.—We aaleat tba follawiag from many who have lately drawn Valuable Priaw aad kiadiy permitted as to publish t&em Andrew J. Bans, Chicago, $M,0W Mite eiara 8. Walker, Plaao, $609 James M. Matthewa, Detroit, $S,00C: John T. Andrews, Savannah, $6,000 Miss Agaea Simmona, Charleetoa, Piano, $M0. Wa pabiiah ao aamea without parmiastoa.
Ittboral isdncameata
Send far. Agents. aga of Sealed Bavelopea ea&tti* aaa cusaut. Six Tickets for $1 IS
Hatisfoction gnarintsed. Itvaiy p»
for
S2
SS
All letter* should baaddrsesed to wunoi
»»TII|M»ITI
F—ina •help tor •saRd
Addraa, Bwiu AaaociarHiii,
Wva as a oallji.
forM
110
far
A C«.
,mS4wit *.T.
r., Phlla., Pa
MUUVTUir Up "gf mnaHi aailhir ffaal Km*" Mtrrimgr. Mtlhtii fnaUlalag iaajlattB aad oagraviaga ot th* aaatoaiy of tae
PkftMo-
Tk« chiasm book ovar
i. iBifBl aiodo of aaahowa by a raport of iV adViMIr to tho BiarrM
fi(MlhrjMrnnM4ik|nViMilt •». LA zf omoli. £H mm Im *nw,n. t.IhijMMK hi ka cmkIM mm any of tho iWaiii apeiTwMsfchi*books trtat, ottfao rr-
Mai IT IT If—" MflciMMtr part of tko worM.
it ).5 "if
to M|
!»V :J :v". AND COMFOKT.
I.: ii
or
HT, aad mrKOT S1QBT
aaa oal* ho ofetaiaad by atfag MUlOt a 1o .ij.
rocarlnlr whicl WBKI. KBOWN- iiibn
Oeealtato mmd OpIiciMi^ HASTVOltD eONM^ KANWAOfHWUS. ttfwMiifil' ., -s tn Perfected Spectacles!
1
ttfl '!i» oil,
Patent Temper,
'••Ti-'.i. sjivj ffici .,h*. •.•jvmtw ns (STAMPED),.
,1 Ihi .• -."'i- .- kMvadtt years of JUporiaaoa, Kxparimaat, aad ua erection of ooatly tax^hiaary, beoa aaabledtoprodooe that ORAND DESIDBKATDM,
Perfecfc Spectacles whfeh haTabeao fOid with aallialted aatiafectioa to tha woarara la Maaaachnaatta, Hew York,
New JerMy,Bhode Jaland, ,'1
4,1
Jnsus'- Ohio, PaanaylTanla, ,i}« Onaaarticat,Michigan, ,,,
IUinoii, Maw Hampkhtre
4
Vermont, Maine,' and the"* .. Britifh Proviac**, daring the put nine yaar, Thoaa.Oolabratad Perfected Spectacles aarar ttra theeye, and Taat many yoara wlthontohaag*!
Meaara. LAZARUS* MOBBI3 hare appointed
Sa
v,,,No.
alt
jt-
11
..•is
DaalsainallUndsof Aaoarleaa aad Swlaa Watah aa, Vina Jewelry, Diamonds, Solid Silver and Plated vara, Clocks, Faacy Qoods, Ac Ac. ,. ,lr j,
161 Main street, National Hotel bailding, Sola Agent for Ttrra Haute, led
it a-.
M.
gTONE and MAILBLB WORKS
WALTIR A
Krrill«HHII8K!«
0ft[:aAt•^0tvu.^h
iS'tq n. n'vfr,ni{ -JO: -vbiiftj iitsJ nana landtag «ert^s UaUaa Marble aad 7*q '. tfrii .j. i.ettu Scdtoli Granite Monuments •arftlt, Sl«t« and (Iram Baatali, and lat
Steam Works ahd iho pa oa OOBBElv at., be* twean 9th and 10th, aear Main SVr specimens of onr work walaafar to DsmlDg'i ttook. Ms2ropolttaa Mock, Cory's and Sage' MlKHugs, Katioaal^itata Baak, Mew .Poatofloe, Ma 0rag»rt«a«i4 Dem'ng'a Monamants, Ac., Ac. ^sm sla
INDIANAPOLIS. ,i id} a
-.0 itfrrfitf o? tfi
brand of, Ctync-
ing tobacco, %e desire tp that we shall nor pack daiiy $100 In tha small tin foil after thi^ daW, Jalylat, 18&S, ita merltabciagto favorably raeog^fzsd tint this iadaceaient Is aa longer' necessary. To' avott miaapprahension, howeTor, we would add that wa shall Continue to pack ordera for MMaaoAua Pins ia ortr "YACHT CLUB" and "KlIRKBA" brands of Skok I NO TOBSCCO.
The "YACHT G10B" la devoid ol Nicotiaa-, and cannot lajnro tha health aad is especially recommended to people of sedentary occupation, or nervotiK constitutions.
1
1
-ivj-if? C* u, iK.-'-ih MITCHELL A RAMMELSBERfi JiW
FURMITURCI CO.,
•J V.-W 1- Mi!/, T:alwl
Indueeii|»ents
a. -jcj baa ,ei i,
)jcq« !h9rji/a »§.. tfgoyttii ferii jnkmi iU gnibe an ila •.-# abin im. iaj •....
"'•l«
,*
I'tlrta asKJlt »d)
1
ttflia -1 aiift?~
|t*
GLOBE
.... :Vs
Ia all woods, and osvored In Terry, sp, Hair Oloth, Damask or Platb. .JII W TrOJ I nt n.i matm "Cfiamber Suiter^ •v afiiHawjfet 'Vr-. j.... In oiled walnut, ash, oheetaut, oak, u. tttuM. vfi.pr rosewaod., •, ant oa?
Dining
JS
I'
In all wooda.-fftrjit* tfefnAij
rt«Iet. a4!" *{fS Cane »nd Wood. Sent Chairs,
... y—.
SOFAS AKTD LOXJKQE8.
TABLES of
every kind,,
Ut *v6(p»., IMS
5UJ OfltaalpfclB (ft iif Mantle JSc Pier Glasses, ,3
Inlaid and Boquet Stands «S^c. f/B r&jf ft Ait"br*. ,..i •, v,
fl
"everything In tbe
FURNITURE LINJG! i&T Of tha vary flnset make, and aa same qsality af msanf,rtare oaa be aay other point, east or west.
ml
cbeap aa I obtataed
7 4.
MITOHKLL A BAMMBLSBBBO ., .' ,r FDBMrtlIBB OOMPABT rn-u-ii ''a»«k
S
aswsa
-i .j I Waahington St., TailaBaf»ll|.
.c .fv 1 -i
INSURANCE.
trimuMii un MSDBMOe COBPlHf
Or THK WORLD
I Ja*
A
Tkfmn
LIFE INSURANCE (50., 'urM'i nn-l United Etatss of: Amwica
diiiiiii ij ilMiu iWil' MuOfi" ttw. i&iAv in
CASH «AP1TAL $|,000,UO«
I lit
Brahoh
ao Yalaabla k* PMMCT
Orrtca,
ituui*.
VBli AJDBLfJHU.
omCBBS:
dtABkilOVH. OLABK, Philada p^laf Vo-elSeiit. JAT UOOtl, Ckabata n|M* aad IttcmiH Committee. BBMBT D. OOOKB, Washington, yice-PrtsMeai. BMBBSOB W. rnrir,
Philadelphia, Century
aad Actuary.
TBAM01S O. SMITH, M. Dr., Ph^slphia, Mad VfiJcai»lraotor.,}i.^
This Oompany issaad, of ila cx(stance
-f
in tha Km VBAB.
7,070 POLICIES, C.-UJ ,/•
1N8011NG 0vBBiiaa
19,250^000.00.
The Annual PrenflnAs SrfclcK amount to
OVER $750,000.00.
THE NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, affords unequaled security to its Policy holders and combines all the advantages offered by other Companies, with several, peculiar to itself. Its wonderful success proves it to be
the
most popular Life Insurance Company in the world,
with the Pub
lic, as well os with Agents.
•^^Applications for Insurance or for Agencies can be made to the Company direct, or te au£ of the following: -1 -tt p-j ", jrom w.ellis a co. I.'V 5^ CINCINNATI, OBIO, General Agents for Ohio and Central and South ern Indiana. .I I H. JT, JSC fi£Z/£jR, r'tf
Mdwly ...fj, Agant tor Terra Haute, lad^^
RAILROADS.
vf 1 ),!( fit ptmjiuw INDIANAPOLIS ST. LOUIS E. & S XJMMER ARltAN&J&MENT.
TBIOUGH Bimss
•-L
u'fhi v.rtfic-vja iia 38 East WashlagtOB Rlreat, ••-jfiHij. ifi-wi-a-: m- oii it li-
AK iB: ..H MBIAKAPOLIS. UtVf .V\ -VX iiv.tiiif: jV lf( '.ftjFl.
We hata lately rsmared from oar old waftroam, Mo..3» Boath Illinoia Btraet to the abova location, whara wa ara prepared to offsr fci •I'Bvaif*'
«a!W8n*#t
DAILV
O 4^ II i. rfboap __ HTfiw Ttrre Haute ana all Cities aud Wtr 4tH Condensed Time Schedule, May
15. 1869
*'**, 1 Dally Kvtry thiy (Accept Staudays. Westward. Might ax. Fast ax. Niphtex. Terre Haute, laava H.lO 6 36 a in io 30 a in Mattoon, arrive l:t7 am 9:10 am' 1:12 ui Tolono, Champaign, Ohloago, Oep.traila, Oah*, •aa. »l catur, Alton, St. Louis.. via. North
1&I9 pig^l:t) nt
1:06
pm
pm |:6fi a ui
1:06
'6:10 pn '.6:4a ni 8:l&a ai ,1b:60 am &4S 1:16 4:00pm SioOa ia S:(K) am 3:36 am JliOOam &|8 5:20 am 6:60 0:61}
CD
tf:3S am 2:18pa MSpu K:26 am 4:00
Mo. B. B. laava Pacific B.k. Kacon, arHva Jsffsrson City. Kaaaaa City, Iieavenworth Lawrence, Topeka, St. Jcseph, Omaha,
7:60 ui
HI
9:38 a BS 4cMp ttL 9i30 am 9:16 am 4:46 pas. l5an 6:30p Ka' *:30 a tu 8:1 pm 11:21 3:15aaa 11:00 p'm 6:00 am 11:00 a Bi 18:15 a ra «:80 a jb 12:16 am 10:36 am 10:36 am 10:36 a xu 12:06 12-0$ W hi 12:00 8:15 am 19:00
Ol
7.00a ni 3:SD 7:1# am
AcoonmodaWon train la^vea farraHautedaily, except Sunday, at
ts6&p
m, arrtvat at Hattoou
7:36 m. Tolona 1:23a aadOhfcagb 8:00a m. Ptltce Sleeping Oxft on all Night Trains.
Through.
Baggage Checked RH»1 I. D. HXBKIKBB, JNi
Gen'l Sup't.
S. OAKLAND, Gen'l Pass'r Ag'l.
niytl ..
iBhogany -liiW /r
'BERG'8
^UNIVERSAL RUSSIAN HEALING This valuable remedy baa effected innumerable cures, and haa galaed for 5t*»lf a great reputation. Tha dlacovatar ol this Salve has applied it with eiafnsat asmaMatkssaMlaof esses during the Orimern War, and b« cured dangerou* wonnds, ia many cases considered mortal.
Mr A Baaoiatha sola peasessdr 'it tba valuable secret of making this Sdlvs frata bis experience in nsiog It io Europe and the success »tteading lU applicaticn there, be has been Induetd to Introduce it into tba Uuited State
IT KELlKVBii PAIN: those who have wounds, brnlsas, aula of all kinds, or a or. a, Felons, Scratches, Mosquito Bites, Frost Bitten Joints. Sore Iiifs, Obifbiaios Children's Scorbutic Complaints ou Head and Face are speedily cured. It haa proved ofgTeat advantage to ladles, aad la peculiarly aduutad tor gathered breaats, sore legs, Ac., tbrongb con. aaamaat, aad other censes. •Mieia removing Boils, Pimples, and Ontaaaoos Utseasss, aad haa bseo succeesiully used lor Corns, Banloas aad Sore Throat lr applylag externally every evening b.fore going to bad.
For aalo by all drnygisu. Price 25c,, 60c, and fl per Jar. Offlca 860 Bowery, if, If. kooa genuine unless coon tarsi goad «. BCBO'S Uniyork* a"Uo* 6° Bawary, Mew
For aala by John F. Henry, No8 Collage Place jaiy&lly
COAL.
GULLIVAN COUNTY OOAL. *•'"4
prsparatf to All all orders ior Sul
BOW
livan County Ooaf, which la claimed to b? edttai to tbe Braail, for all doasawto parpoeea, oili doMvar to any part of tha city, by laavtag yoar ordar at o«ce uf B. B. Bryant A Oo' 0. Blpley, or J. A. Foot a Use Stare, with wbotn I have BMda aaraagaawata io ail a» ordere. am all inloraeatioate ragged la t^a haaia^e. oMdtf
Blp-
I
aad give
MOBOAN.
OIVJfiK COAL. All JOHN McFABLANB la aav ealllaA tha best article of BiverOoal, aaraaned ou tbe vldbst scraen la use ia Vigo county, at aa low a an loieriocartiaie aaa ha parehaaed.
T1hmInter-aaaaaflgure
wish
ing to lay la amptf should look to tbeir eats, aad'bay the beat when it is aa ehiiap poor ftf tictoa
Orders lalt at the Poet OBca Lobby, at tha "T^oOouat^ Scales," or addrsasad to Box F. O., Terra Hantai vrtU
•mam
..x
ata» rsosive prompt attea- .# |*|17dtf
iuf
-'m
i" •«.. 4i
