Democratic Sentinel, Volume 22, Number 18, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 14 May 1898 — Supreme Court Sustains the Foot-Ease Trade-mark. [ARTICLE]

Supreme Court Sustains the FootEase Trade-mark.

J/wgWin, in Buffalo, m gfn hi# ordered ji permanent injunction,Vlth Stitts, and a tall accoant--Ib* of sales, to issift against Paul B. Hudson, the manufacturer of the foot powder called “Dr. Clark’s Foot Powder,” and also against a retail dealer of Brooklyn, restraining them from- making or Klliag the X&l&laxi*E Pool Powder, which is declars&H« the decision of the court, an imitation end- infringement of “FootEase,” the powder fortired, aching feet, to shake into your shoes, bow so largely advertised and sold WlloTer the pountry. Allen 8. Olmsted of Le Roy, N. 1., is the owiMr si 4he trade-murk "Foot-Ease,” and he. ip the first inditidaal who ever adrertis&i a foot powder extensively orer tbfejeeptttry. f He wlll'seod'ie sample Fifee tdapyoße who will wriMhim for it. The dequgoto inthis case fpnflds hi* tramsmarlrStad renders all parties liable wso frg.udulent?f-h4«*ihpt to profit by the tensive "Foot-Ease” advertising, in ing upon the market a spurious and ahmlarjippearing preparation,,labeled and pit np in envelopes and boxes like Foot-Ease. Similar salts will be hronght against othjSP J&P WSK'»P*PW¥I, F and common law nghm.