Democratic Sentinel, Volume 16, Number 15, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 29 April 1892 — A REMARKABLE LETTER. [ARTICLE]

A REMARKABLE LETTER.

A Prominent Profeaelonal Man's Extraordinary B.element. [New York Sun,] To the Editors Sib—As my name and face have appeared in your paper and the public prints lately, and as many of my professional brethren are wondering at it, I feel it only just th'at I should make an explanation. The statement published over my name was made ten years ago, after long and mature Investigation, and I have never changed my mind to the facts then stated. At that time I said, as a physician, that I believed Warner's Safe Cure was the best of all known preparations for the troubles it was advocated to cure, and f gay »o still. 1 know it is considered the proper thing for the medical profession to decry proprietary and other advertised articles; but why should they do so? As the late Dr. J. G. Holland, writing over his own name in Scribner’s Monthly, said: “It is a fact that many of the best proprietary medicines of the day are more su< cessful than many physicians, and most of them were ilrst discovered or used in actual medical practice; when, however, any person knowing their virtue and foreseeing their popularity secures and advertises them, in the opinion of the bigoted all virtue went out of them.” Dr. Holland was an educated physician, an unprejudiced observer, and he spoke from a broad and unusual experience. Proprietary medicines should not be decried. The evidences of their value are overwhelming. I have seen patients recover from gravel, inflammation of the bladder, and Bright’s disease after using Warner's Safe Cure, even when all other treatment had failed. I- make this frank and outspoken statement In the interests of humanity, and because I know it to be true. I trust for the same reason you will give it to the public. Respectfully, R. A. Gunn. No. 124 West Forty-seventh St. New XpBK, March 1.