Democratic Sentinel, Volume 12, Number 33, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 7 September 1888 — SYNOPSIS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICES —OFHON V. ZIMMERMAN, [ARTICLE]

SYNOPSIS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICES —OF — HON V. ZIMMERMAN,

Candidate for Representative of the 10th Congressional District. [From last week concluded. ] TEXT books. Mr. Zimmerman, presented the following resolution to the Indiana Senate at the session of 1887 in connection with a bill providing for the publishing and distributing text books fcr our common schools at cost: Whereas, Under th, copyright laws of the United States the text bodks used in the public schools have been copyrighted, and the publication and sale thereof to the people has been monopolized by a few publishing houses, thereby greatly enhancing the price and cost of said books to the people, be it

Resolved, Ey the Senate, the House concurring therein, that our Senators and Representatives in Congress are requested to secure ihe passage of a law repealing all <■-upright law, so far as the same may apply to the text books used in the common schools. Resolved, That the Governor of this state be and he is hereby requested to furnish each of our Senators and Representatives in Congress with a copv of this resolution. [See Senate Journal of 1887.] In support of the report of this bill Mr. Zimmerman spoke as follows* Mr. President —Next to the General Appropriation bill and the necessary measures looking to the welfare of the various State i .stitutions, the bill now under considof more vital interest to the masses of the people of this great Commonwealth than any other measure now pending before this Legislature. This bill is being discussed at every fireside throughout the State and if it were left to a popular vote by the people it wo’d carry by an overwhelming majority. □A two-fold ot ject is to be attained by the passage of this bill. 1. A uniform series of school text books throughout the State. 2. Economy, or in other words, a material reduction in the price of these books.

The salutary effects of this bill vill reach tne homes of the well-to-do as well as the poor. Mor.especially, howevei, will it be a blessing to the poor man, for it is he who raises the largest family, and concequently needs the most school books; it is the poor laboring man who is compelled to move from one locality to another m search of work, and thus very often he finds the school books already bought for his children useless property, and is subjected to the hardship of buying new books. The great injustice which our present text-book system inflicts upon that class of people is incal - culable. t After the laboring man provides for the necessaries of life, such as food, raiment, shelter and medicine, there is precious little left for school books. And when we consider the extortionate high prices exacted by the school-book monopolies of this country, and the irregular system iu our State of permitting a different series of text-books in the various counties and cities, is it not timely for this Legislature to come to the immediate relief of that class of people for whom we profess so much love and sympathy? Two years ago I had the pleasure of casting my votes for several acts which were intended to protect and dignify labor. I am proud to-day of the position I took then, and at the convening of the present session I resolved in my heart not to relax in my efforts to further the amelioration of the con-

dition of the laboring men and women of Indiana. In my opinion of all the so called labor bills passed and still pending before the Legislature, the bill under discussion is of greatest significance to the thousands of wage-work ?rs and poor people in general of this State. And no Senator on this floor can afford to ignore that fact. The cardinal qualifications of good citizenship is intelligence and knowledge, which can be best obtained through the ch nnels of our public schools. Ignorance breeds vice and crime. Then is it not the duty of a State to educate her childi-en at the expense of the State and properly prepare and fit them for the competent discharge of the dut es and responsibilities of citizenship? In this State everything is furnished pupils except nooks In the States of Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, California and Maine, text books are furnished free to the children. Wisconsin, too, has a similar law. I assert right here that if 1 possessed the power 1 would inaugurate a like system in thi State, and place in the hands of every child, rich >nd poor alike, text books free.— Then, and not until then, will our public schools be free schools not only in name but in fact. But, thinking that free text books, would be considered a step too radical by a portion or the people, I am contented with the next best thing—that is, to furnish text books for the children of the State at the mere cost of printing and binding. Such a law is now in force in the State of Minnesota. A first reader, for instance, the retail price of which is from 20 to 35 cents in Indiana, is furnished’to the children of Minnesota at 10 cents, and other t?xt books at correspondingly low prices. So long as the state of Indiana will permit herself to be he willing slave of grasping school book monopolies, so long will our public schools be only a partial success. The unreasonably high prices now charged for text books are a serious obstruction in the progressive march of education, and this odious practice puts a fine, as it were, upon the fertile intellects of the youths of the state, and the intended and muchdesired usefulness of our public Schools is greatly impaired thereby. I have before me the re} ort of Hon. John W. Holcombe, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the years 1885 and 1886. I am no little surprised at his opposition to the system provided for in this bill. Mr. Hol-.ombe must have anticipated legislation on this subject, and to shape pubiie sentiment in advance against the theory embodied in the bill before us now, he took great pains in accumulating and publishing in his report, the opinions of certain state superintendents who are hostile to uniformity of text books and the publishing of them Dy the state. Among thnn appealed the (pinions of the state superintendent of Minnesota, one given in the year 1880 and another in the year 1884. It must not be forgotten here that the text book law of Minnesota was a new venture from ’BO to ’B4, snd that since the law has been amended and shorn of its imperfections and oljectionable features —a fact which Mr. Holcombe treats with silence. But in order to give weight and credence to stale testimonials of superintendents from other states, men who are strangers to us, and whose motives we may or may or may not question. Mr. Holcombe adds his opinion to theirs, and thus arrays himself squarely ol the side of school-book monopolies as against the people. Now, the best evidence to me that the Minnesota law meets with the approval of the people of that state is the significant iact that its Legislature dare not attempt to repeal the law. But in spite of the boasted progress of our public schools; in spite of a school fund reaching the enormous sum of $10,000,000; in sp.te of the 10,000 school houses costing over $13,000,000, and in

which are employed 14,000 teach - ers; in s: ite of all these advanta - ges a most alarming feature presents itself to our thoughtful at-t-ntioD in the careful perusal of Mr. Holcombe’s report I find that the total number of school children in the state between the ages of six and twenty-one years, for the year 1886, is 744,998. Out of that number 506,126 were admitted in io the public schools.

The average daily •’ttendanoe was but 349,575, or, in other words, 159,551 did not attend school regularly. But this is not the worst feature of this important subjeot. In addition to the 159,551 who do not attend school regularly there are 238,872 between the ages of six and twenty-one years who were not admitted to the public schools at all, making a grand total of 398,423 Supposing now that 50,000 of these attend private schools and academies, ana supposing further that 150,000 between the ages of fourteen and twenty-one years already possess a limited or superior education, still the unf leasant and indisputable fact remains that 200,000 children, in round numbers, are to bs either partially or wholly deprived of the blessings of our public schools, and thus thousands up in ignorance. State Superintendent Holcombe in his report gives the number of children between the ages of ten and twenty-one years who cannot read or write, 2,665. A very small per cent, of illiteracy, considering that 200,000 children do not attend public school at all.

Not wishing to reflect ad»ersely upon the educational status of my own state, in my judgment the number of children between the ages of ten and twenty-one years who cannot read or write in this state, is far beyond the statistical figures referred to. What is presumably ti e cause of this state of affairs? Whose children are these 200,000 who are shut out of the public schools? The answer is obvious. They are the offspring of the poor. Last Sunday I visited for the first time the Reform School for boys at Plainfield. I was highly pleased with the management of that institution, yet the very cause which brought the 508 boys there left a sad impression on my mind. Among other things I was informed that nine-tenths of the boys were of poor p» rentage, and as a rule but few could read or write when received at the institution. Why should we wonder any longer then that poverty and ignorance, and at last crime, go hand in hand, when our present contemptible text book system prevents tho poor man and the poor widow from sending their children to school for the simple reason that the priee of text books is far beyoud their ability to purchase. Upon us as Legislators of a great state res-s the grave responsibility of completely purging Forever the public schools of ludidiana from this present pernicious s, stem.

Mr. President I had intended to call the attention of the Senate to the corrupt influences brought to bear upon school superintendents and school trustees by the wily agents of school books and other school supply corporations under our present system, but believing that every senator is fully informed on the existing evil, I will pass this unpleasant subject without further comment. The bill before us is p>.ain and easily understood. Its comprehensive provisions are free from any temptations to those who ores’de over our public schools. So plain and simple are its provisions that the most shrewd and cunning can not misconstrue them. There is not the slightest room for jobbery or bribery. The work of compiling the books is left to the State Board cf Education—the highest educational authority in the state. The high character and reputation of the men who compose that body is sufflcient guarantee to us that the work will be accomplished honest-

ly and faithfully. But, said superintendent Holcombe, in his report: “It would be the work of years to provide a senes that would compare favorably with the many excellent text books now issued by educational publishers.” Admitting such true, are the people of Indiana forever to he dependent upon, and forever to be the helpless victims of heartless school book monopo - lies? Are we not possessed of the courage and ability to make an honest effort in that direction—the sooner the better—and thus gradua’ly cut loose from these corporations? I have unbounded confidence in our State Bdard of Education, individually and collectively. I believe that they are fully competent to compile textbooks which will not only compare favorably with the present standard works, but which will be a great improvement over them in many respects. First and foremost, the children of Indiana should be enlightens 1 upon affairs and things pertaining to their own state. It is of paramount interest that the children of Indiana should be maae familiar with the history, geography, commerce, res' urces and government of their own state. - They should know more of th* glorious past of the state; abouf its patriots, heroes and statesmen, about its population, its industries its streams and lakes, its boundaries, and its soil, and tne productiveness of the same. The authors of the severs! standard textbooks, being non-residents, residing principally in the eastern states, do not g’ve us this desired information. ence, the authorship of text books by home genius, so to speak, by men who have spent a lifetime in the educational fields of Indiana, is to be much preferred over that of non-resident authors, for the reason that they are more compe tent to compile books especially adapted to the children of this state.

Admitting again, for argument’s sake, the incompetency of our State Board of Education to compile text boo<. s of such high order as to compare favorably with the already recognized standard works, I call the attention of the senate to the fact that the bill is carefully guarded for an emergency of that kind. Section 2 provides that the State Board of Education may purchase of author or proprietor of any one or more works of the first order of excellence, the exclusive right to publish and sell said work or works in the state of Indian . So there need be no danger should the State Board of Education be incompetent or unwilling to compile said books. It is left to their judgment and discretion to compile or cause to be compiled or purchase any one or more of the series of text books enumrated in Section 1. It ii furthermore left to their discretion to introduce but two books of the new series in anyone year into the public schools, thus avoiding a sudden change. No hardship will be imposed upon the public and in ‘ he course of several years the new series will gradually find its way into our public schools without inflicting serious loss upon anyone. The printing and binding,as provided in section 5, is to be adver tised and let to the lowest responsible bidder by the Commissioners of Public Printing in a manner as now provided for by law. The distribution of books is to be conducted in a business-like meth d. The trustees of the various school corporations of each eounty are to certify to the county superintendent the number and kind vs books wanted. The county superintendent makes a requisition on the state superintendent, and the latter on the text book contractor. Section 10 provides for an ap propriat'onof $20,000 for compiling or causing to be compiled this series of books by the SUte Board of Education.

Section 11 provides for an appropriation of 850,000 to pe set apart and used as a revolving fund to carry out the provisions of this act The county commissioners of each of the several counties shall likewise create a revolving fund to enable the county superintendent to purchase the state text books and to pay the cash for them. Thus the state will be reimbursed for every dollar appropriated and expended. In conclusion, Mr. President I ask the senate to bear in mind that the day is not distant when Indiana, too, must fall in line with other states m compulsory education. Though compulsion in anything is somewhat repulsive to the Ameri can character, yet the people of those states that have tried the experiment of compulsory education could under no circumstances be persuaded io abolish it. . It is the only and positive method to completely and forever dispel illiteracy from within the borders of our state. I hope that day may soon come. Would it then be just and right to establish compulsory education in Indiana under the present odious text book system? Would it not be intolerant and oppressive to compel the poor man, or poor vidow, to send their children to school when they are destitute of the means for supplying them with the necessary books? Unless we shall first place into the hands of every child text books free, or at laast reduce the price thereof 50 to 100 per cent., compulsory education can never be put into practical and successful operation in the public schools of Indiana. And now, Mr. President, in the interest of the intelligence and all the virtue s and attainments which tend to elevate and perfect manhood and womanhood in this beloved commonwealth, I hope that my motion to substitute the minority report for the majority report will prevail.

SOLDIEBS. The soldiers have in Mr. Zimmerman a true friend. He has at all times sustained the rights of the private soldier and accorded to the loyal man with the musket his just claims and full measure of gratitude. He introduced into the Indiana senate in 1887, the following resolution : Resolved, That the pension laws should be so amended that rank and title should not be taken into consideration in granting pensions, and that in granting pensions, all soldiers should be equal and share alike; that the only distinction made should be in grading disability, and not rank. [See Senate Journal, 1887.] In support of this resolution Mr. Zimmerman said: “If ever a resolution was offered on this floor which is in perfect harmony and accord with the true spirit of our form of government this one is. It represents, to my mind, the most vital and essential features of free and popular gov- - *rnm.nt, namely, justice and equality before the law. Our present pension laws recognize classes, and therefore Congress is directly chargeable with class legislation of the worst character. Why should an officer, having lost a leg or an arm, or having received lodily injuries otherwise, be entitled to ten and twenty times the amount of pension than the private soldier vho has sustained like injuries? Why should the rich widow of an officer receive from $3,000 to $5,000 per annum, while the poor and needy widow of the private soldier receives the beggarly sum of $144? Why should the claim of the dependent widowjand mother of the private soldier be less sacred and less binding upon the Government than the claim of the dependent widow and mother of the officer? I ask, Mr. President, why this unjust discrimination before the law in allowing pensions? Officer and private entered the army with one common object m view—to save the Union, to bring it about that this country should be one people, having one flag; that there should be no distinction, no class,/no one rewarded above another,\ but that all should share equally and alike in the glory of a common country. True during the service the officer was charged with greater responsibili'y than the private, but for it he received greater pay; and

he was thus enabled to secure for himself such comforts and extras as were denied the private soldier. While the private soldier subsisted on p< rk and beans, the officer — and especially he of higher rank—{>artook not infrequently of the uxuries of civil life. But when the war was over, anti the boys in blue returned to their homes agaij, office is and privates alike wei e relegated to their usual walks of private life Then the struggles and hardships of warfare, and the dangers and responsibilities connected therewith, were practically ended. And now the officer must stand, not above, but equal with the private soldier. It was contemplated by the founders of our form of government that rank and title should not exist among our people in civil life, and it is sad indeed for the American people to know that strong symptoms of aristocra?y have crept into our system of government It is humiliating for the American people to know that the despicable reli? of imperial laws are from time to time incorpated Into the laws of our country. Mr. President, I move the adoption of the resolution.”

The resolution offered by Mr. Zimmerman was adopted. Mr. Zimmerman zealously worked and voted for the act providing fer the separation of the Soldiers’ Orphan’s Home from the Home for weak and f eble-minded children, also to retain the Soldiers’ Home at Knightstown, Indiana. And in appreciation of his efforts in that behalf, he was the recipient of the following communication from McClung Post G. A. B.: Headquarters McClung Post, 95 G. A. R., Rochester, Indiana March 1, 1887. Hon. V. Zimmerman, Senate Chamber, Indianapolis Indiana: Dear Sir - By a unanimous vote of the Post this night, it returns to you its thanks for the interest you manifested in looking after, and aiding in carrying out our requests in regard to the separation of the Soldiers’ Orphan’s Home, and weak and feeble-minded Home also in the location of said Home for the Soldiers’ orphans. Very Respectfully,

H. C. LONG

Post Commander and Adjutant. HUNTING ON THE KANKAKEE. Mr. Zimmerman introduced and secured the passage of a law, now on our statute book, preventing rich capitalists from monopolizing the pleasures of hunting in the region of the Kankakee, to the exclusion of all other 3, and by this act opened up this region to all who may desire to participate in the pleasure of such sport. [See Acts of General Assembly, 1887, page 56, Senate Journal, 1887. J

Henry Clay—“No one, in the commencement of the protective policy, ever supposed that it was to be perpetual.” “If I had my way about it, I would put the manufacturers of Pennsylvania, who are more highly protected than anybody else, and who make large fortunes every year, under the fire and fry the fat out of them.” —Senator Morrill. Go to Kannal’s Jewelry Palace for Ladies Gold Watches and Chains, on payments—s2s. School Teachers, remember here is the place for bargains. Remember the place—“ Gold Star Watch Sign,” Nowels’ Block, Rensselaer, Ind.