Democratic Sentinel, Volume 8, Number 28, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 8 August 1884 — DEMOCRATIC TICKET. [ARTICLE+ILLUSTRATION]

DEMOCRATIC TICKET.

FOR PRESIDENT GHOVER CLEVELAND, oT New York FOR VICE PRESIDENT, TROMAS A HENDRICKS, of Indiana *«4 • ► * Democratic State Ticket. For Governor, COL. ISAAC P. GRAY, of Randolph. For I.ieutonnnt Governor, ■GEN. M. P. MANSON, of Montgomery. For S cre'ar. of State. CAPT. WM. It. .MYERS, of Madison. For Annitor of State, JAMES li. RICE, of Floyd, For Treasurer of State. JOHN J. COOPER, of Marion. For ACorney Gtneral, FRANCIS T. HOltD, of Bartholomew. For SupeTintondent..f Public Instruction, JOHN IV. HOLCOMB, o! Porter. Reporter of Supreme Court, JOHN W KERN, of Howard, Judge of Sitprjmc Court, .1, A. S. MITCH't,LI., of Elkhart. For Congress— Tenth District, THOMAS. J. WOOD, of Lake County. For Judge,,3oth Judicial Circuit, I AMES T. SAVNDERSON, of Newton county . For Pros. Attorney. 30th Judicial Clicuit, DAWSON SMITH, of Bentou county.

The Republican p eas, in their anxiety t'- besmirch ilie character and ealam mute Governor Cleveland, »*»em to furpet their beloved, the late *.Vloxa” Morton. In intro hieing Maj. John F. Miner, ©t New York, (who had just returned from coi'flnoment in the Libby fpison,) early in 1802, lo ex-Vice Pr esideni, Hendricks. Mr. Lincoln ■nid: “Mr. Hemlrieks is on the other side of the house politically, you know; but I have no truer friend Jji Washington, and ho will do as much for the soldier and for his country as nn> man in Congress. You may take hi in on my endorsement.” “U. L. C.” Thmups-n regards it a serious reflection upon nim for auy one to suppose that he would thwart the wishes of a majority oi his party in Jasper County. The majority for judge was given for Chilcote, Thompson, preferred Ward. Ho hied himself to Goodland What he did to secure the casting of he vote of this county for his favorite, we know not. Benton, too, had a candidate. The .ote of Benton was thrown in the same lirecton. we nr* informed, by two gentlemen wi:o on different occasions expressed to the editor of the Sentinel their unalterable opposition to Mr, Wa ! d. Thompson is given credit for this move. We may safely conclude that Mr, Ward owes his nomination tu “On- Sitnwu.” One ■good turn deserves another, and we ask again; Will not Newtcu couuty concede the nomination of Re,Tea sentative to him?