Democratic Sentinel, Volume 6, Number 21, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 23 June 1882 — Justice Rendered in a “Trade-Mark” Case at Bombay, India, April 14th, 1882. [ARTICLE]

Justice Rendered in a “Trade-Mark” Case at Bombay, India, April 14th, 1882.

Nathoo Mooljce, a resident druggist at Bombay, India, offered Pain Killer for sale, an imitation of the genuine Davis Pain Killer. Mr. H. Ballentine, agent of Perry Davis & Son, entered suit against him for pirating on the Trade Mark. The case was called on the 14th of April. The court found him guilty of pirating the Trade Mark “Pain Killer,” and fined Mooljce 500 rupees. Everywhere at home and abroad has Perry Davis & Son sustained their rights to the name of Pain Killer. No man with money about his clothes should ever retire without having a woman with him, a wife, of course, to frighten off the burglars. A reformed thief yesterday told us that a burglar, would sooner enter a room containing four men and twice as many revolvers as one having only one woman in it—for neither the men nor the revolvers can squeal like a woman.— Kentucky State Journal. Sixty per cent, of the mechanical energy converted into electricity and applied to a Faure storage battery has been reconverted into work on discharging the battery.