Democratic Sentinel, Volume 3, Number 16, Rensselaer, Jasper County, 30 May 1879 — Page 2 Advertisements Column 2 [ADVERTISEMENT]

BAR-POCKET —OF THEJUNE TERM, A.D- 1879. Begiqg June Judge Hon. E. P. Hammond. Prosecutor— F. W. Babcock. Clerk—Charles H. Price. Sheriff—George M. Robinson. THIRrIA O JTJ JTHJ THJR.AA, 187 a Sum. : Mom ’ Tub. : Win; Thu. : Fra. : Sat. : r? pS7 41 57 c /; 2\ 3\ 4 5\ 6 7 : 7: 8i ■' 97 io: n: 12 | 8: 9 10 11 12 13\ 14 ‘ 15 ' 16 17 2 A RH2SIDH3NT ATTORNEYSBoroughs. John F. James, Horace E. Spitler, Marion L. Babcock, Frank W. Miller, Daniel B. Snyder, Harper W. Chilcote, Mordeeai F. Pierce, Wiley 11. Thompson, Simon P. Dwiggins, Robert S. Pierce, William C. Thompson, David J. Dwiggins, Zimri Phillipa, Elza Yeoman, Ira W. Douthit, James W. Wright, Charles P. JURORS: C. C. Jonee, E. D. Fairchild, John C. Ree’h Jamea Yeoman, James E. Lamison Jahn Lewis. F’ETTIT JURORS: William Adair, ’ Asa Prevo, Christian Heneler’ Alfred Thompson, Thomas H. McCollough, JasperN. Jenkins, Osman W. Church, Henry C. Phelps, Sidnial King, William M. Hoover, Abner F. Griswold, Charles B. Booth. BUIsJS Otf 1. Motions for changes of venue from the County or the Judge, both in Civil and Criminal Cases, must be presented on or before the second day of the Term, except in eases wherein the process is returnable after the second day. In cases of the latter description motions for change must be made on or before the day succeeding the return day. An exception to this rule is allowable when the affidavit upon which the ■ motion is based shows that such motion is made as soon as the cause for the change comes to the knowledge of the party making it; but, in such case, if the motion is sustained, the costs accruing subsequent to the time above specified, will be taxed against the party obtaining the change. But nothing herein shall prevent an application for a change of venue at any term of Court, if made on or before the second day. 2. After calling a case for trial, time will not be granted to prepare an affidavit for continuance. 3.. A request to instruct the Jury in writing must be made before the commencement of the argument. 4. Special instructions to be given to the Jury must be written and given to the Court before the argument is begun. 5. Admissions and agreements about the proceedings in a cause will not be enforced unless in writing, or made in Court with the knowledge of the Judge. 6. Motions to require surety for costs must be made on or before the first calling of the Docket, and if sustained, tho undertaking for costs must be filed on the day following. 7. Executors, Administrators and Guardians are required to account for trust moneys not invested or paid into Court, at 6 per cent, per annum from the first day of the next term of Court after such moneys come into their hands. But this rule is not intended to relieve Guardians from their duty under the law to keep the money of their Wards properly invested, nor from responsibility to account for all profits derived from such money by way of interest or otherwise. 8. Executors, Administrators and Guardians should not, without an order of Court, pay money into Court. - 29th Ind. 294, Act of March 9, 1875. 2d R. 8. 1876, p. 17. 9. An application to have a pereen, alleged to be of unsound mind, placed under guardianship, will not be heard in the absence of such person, unless he has been personally served with summons at least ten days before the term. 10. The Petit Jury will be summoned to appear on the third, and the Grand Jury on the seventh day of each term, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 11. Smoking not permitted in the court room while Court is in session. First Day—Administration Causes. No. Estate. Adm’r. or Executor. 163 William H. Martin, dec’d Helen M. Martin 171 William T. Maxwell, dec’d Zimri Dwiggins 187 E. L. Timmons, dec’d C. A. Eastburn 189 Lemuel Osborn, dec’d E. L. Clark 192 John Clark, dec’d David Nowels 196 Josiah Hammond, dec’d Charles F. Hammond 199 John Reese, dec’d E. L. Clark 202 Abigail Merhly. dec’d B W. Harrington 214 Rhoda Lakin, dec’d John Shields 220 Williiam Railsback, dec’d B. B v Jeffries 223 ?l ar y Seitzinger, Frank W. Babcock 224 Wm. Railsback, dec’d, vs heirs of decedent, B. B. Jeffries 225 John Alter, dec’d I. &M. A. Alter 227 William Campbell, dec’d Joanna Campbell 2>9 Kesiah Freeman, dec’d Harriet Rhoads, executrix 234 Reuben Raymond, dec’d N. C. Wickwire 235 Charles Hathaway, George F. Bloom 238 John Sayler, dee d William D. Saylcr 239 John Baker, dec’d Lewis Davisson 241 John Miller, dec’d M. F. Chilcote 242 Jackson Evans, dcc'd M. F. Chilcote , 243 John Phillips, dec’d David Gray 245 Isaac R Lewis, dec’d Geo. H. Brown 250 Shelby Daniels, dec’d Wallace W. Murray Guardian Causes, 13 Minor heirs Rice M. Porter, dec’d Mary A. Porter, Guardian. 46 “ “ Nancy Coghiil, dec’d James W. Smith, “ 61 “ “ Caleb C. Hopkins dec’d Mary S Tharpe. l - 85 “ “ Cynthia A. Priest, dec’d William Priest,. “ 92 Frank G. Sale, Jane S. Antrim “ 101 Mary Ann Raker, William N, McGinnis, “ 102 Lydia E. Brows, Stillman Gates, “ HO Viola May Cook, Mary J. Cook, “ 121 Minor heirs of Lottie Dunning, dec’d Charles Jewett, “ 122 “ “ Ruth Burns, dec’d Martin Burns, “ 123 “ “ William Coomes, dec’d C. R. Harmon, •- 125 “ “ George W. Pruitt, dec’d Matilda Pruitt, “ 126 Frank Lee Parkinson, JaleyA. Green, “ 130 Minor heirs of Reuben Middlesworth, dec’d Joseph Robinson, “ 135 “ “ John Reese, dec’d J. M McGinnis, 11 136 “ “ John S. Luckey, Rebecca Luckey, “ 137 John S. Hurst, David L. Pritchard, " 138 Minor heirs of Elizabeth Turner, William Turner, “ 141 Jesse J. Warner, John Faris, “ 143 Minor heirs of Abbie E. Beese, George Beese, “ 144 William O. Coomes, C. R. Harmon, “ 145 Minor heirs of Sarah Jane Nutt, John W. Nutt. “ 146 “ “ George W. Sage, Mary Ann Sage, “ 147 “ “ William Millener, William Nichols, jr., “ 148 Sarah E. Qnees, A. P, Rowen, “ Third Day—State Causes. No- Pl’ffs Attorney. Parties. Def’ts Attorneys. 213 F. W. Babcock State vs 234 “ ” “ « Malone & Vallet Thompson & Bro. 240 *• “ “ “ Record Jno. F. Boroughs 251 “ “ “ “ Miller Dwiggins and M. 252 “ “ “ “ Teuter 253 “ “ “ “ Teuter 254 “ “ “ “ Ten er 255 “ “ “ “ Record 256 “ “ ** “ Teuter 257 “ Tenter 258 “ “ “ “ Robinsonetai 260 . “ “ " “ 261 “ “ “ “ Brondage 262 “ “ State vs Civil Causes. 427 Wflfard vs Cooket al 506 Thompson & Bro. Yount vs Thayer et al 554 Chilcote. Martin vs Judkins et al 704 Thompson & Bro. Alldridge et al vs Barns et al 764 Thompson & Bro. Eastburn vs E. L. Timmons’ heirs 765 Thompson <fc Bro. Kingman vs Middleswarth et al 867 Chilcote. Hammond vs Hammond et al 1034 Thompson & Bro. Paddock, adm’r, vs Suirc et al 1162 Thompson & Bro. Harrison vs Harrison etal 1193 Thompson & Bro. Reynolds et al vs Reynolds 1300 Snyder & Chilcote Wade vs Graham et al 1320 Chilcote. Stahl vs Cale et al 1840 Assignment of J. H. Tribby & Co. M. F. Chilcote. 1348 Dwiggins. Green vs Sharp et al Thompson & Bro. 1437 T. C.Anabel. Rank vs P. C. & St. L. Railway Co. Thompson & Bro. 1519 . Assignment of Babcock, Clark, assignee 1521 Dwiggins. Mills vs West et ai 1522 Dwiggins. Sanford vs Roudebush et al 1560 Yeoman. State ex rel Peppinger vs Smith et al F. W. Babcock. 1618 Thompson & Bro. Hardesty vs Boonstra et al P. H. Ward. Fourth Day. J?? 7 T- & Bro. Aneas H. Kltng vs Jacob T. Pettit et al Miller* Doutbit 1681 F. W. Babcock. John W. Hughes vs. James Brannon et. al Thompson & Bro. 1697 Snyder &C. Jesse J. Bright vs W. W. Foster et al 1723 Thompson & Bro. A. Leopold vs. Wm. H. White et al 1734 Thompson & Bro. MaCready et al vs W. W. Foster et al Dwiggins’s 1757 Chilcote & Test. Hellqn M Sample vs. McDonald et al Dwiggins’s, T 4 B. 1795 Miller & Douthit. Schutz et al vs Elizabeth Schneider et al Thompson & Bro. Admr’s Bright vs Cath. L. Kelley et al Boroughset al I<9B R. S. &Z. D. Stevens vs Charles E. Barney et al 1804 Thompson <fc Bro. Simon P. Thompson vs Bryant et al 1805 Thompson & Bro. Simon P. Thompson vs Myers et al 1810 Thompson & Bro. Hoge vs Geo. Petro impleaded with Athey 1823 Miller & Douthit. State’ex rel Manson et al vs Major et al 1826 Chilcote. Leonard et al vs Harvey Phillips et al Phillips, r. b. azd 1849 F. W. Babcock. Stae of Indiana vs George Lightc'ap et al John F. Boroughs. 1854 Healey & Jouv’t Pitts Sons vs Raymond etal Daniel Moran. 1855 Thompson & Bro. Esther York vs Oliver G. Wilder Healey * Jouvnat. 1857 F.W. Babcock. Bobinson vs Wood imp with Chapman 1861 F.W. Babcock. Beatiy et al vs Clematis et al Thompson & Bro. 1862' M. F.. Cbilcnte. Hosannah Mclntosh vs Boroughs et al 1863 M. F. Chilcote. Nathan Fendig vs Charles Sefiatzley Miller * Douthit. 1864 Thompson & Bro. Mary Bennett vs George Bennett 565S 65 n ..... Fitz W Bedford vs David Gray, Adm’r PhiiMpw*T * Bro. 1866 D. B. Miller. Mallon vs Chilcote, Adm’r M. F. Chilcote. 1867 D-B. Miiler. Davisson vs ChHeote, Adm’r M. F. Chilcote. 1868 D. B. Miller. Goldsberry vs Chilcote, Admr M. F. Chilcote. 1869 D; B. Mflfer. Brewer vs Chilcote, Adm’r. M. F. Chilcote. 1879 Dwiggins’s. Hoilett et al vs Bloom, Admr Thompson * Bro. 1871 F. W. Babcock. George Webb vs Mary Gill et al 1872 Thompson <fc Bro. Simon P. Thompson vs Potte et al M. F. Chilcote. 1873 T. * B.andL. aE. Leah Burkhalter vs Burkhatter et al Fifth Day. 1874 Thompson * Bro. McCoy & Thompson vs Burke et al Phillips &H.a J. *875 3 hompson & Bro. John Makeever vs Wm. H. Irvine et al 1876 Thompson & Bro. John Makeever vs Wm W. Reed et al Elza I. Phillips. 1877 Thompson & Bro. George W. Simms vs Ballard et al 1878 Oa P and Ta Bro. Henry Timmons st al vs Swan et S. aW. and 8a M. jß<9 J. a H. and Miller American Insurance Co. vs Keene Thompson & Bro. 1880 Thompson a Bro. Nichols, Shepard & Co. vs Gray et al 1881 Thompson a Bro. Nichols. Shepard & Co. vs Thomas etal 1882 Thompson a Bro. Chase et al vs Samuel M. Black 1883 Thompson a Bro. McCoy & Thompson vs Martin Gill et al 1884 Thompson a Bro. John Mitchell vs Thomas Dobbins Thompson a Bro. Warner and Bedford vs John Groom M. F. Chilcote. I - Thompson a Bro. McCoy & Thompson vs Angiemire et al M Dodson vs Henry C. Harris Thompson & Bro. M. F. Chilcote. Chilcote, Adm’r, vs Lewis S. Alter et al John F. Boroughs. Thompson * Bro. Lemuel C. Janes vs Jos. C. Heukle et al John F. Boroughs. IS? Thompson a Bro. George Kessler vs John L. Nichols M. F. Chilcote. 1891 I hompson a Bro. Robert Howe vs James Spencer JS? 2 . Rdward Sanford vs James Benson et al 1893 J. T. Saunderson. Alexander J. Kent vs M. L. Todd jr. etal Peter H. Ward. i.'S* „ State on comp Helves et al vs Hurley 11<9.» Babcock a Pierce. McDougle vs F. M. Hays et al P- 8-Winkley. James W. Owens vs Jerome Casto Bunnel, aT. a Bro Healey a Jouvnot. Constantine B. Cones vs Lyman Zea. on? Healey a Jouvnot. Constantine B. Cones vs Lyman Zea Healey a Jouvnat. George Hardy vs Hnfiman Keen Thompson a Bro. Barney Spitznagle vs R Ralph etal Ijol 1 hompson .i Bro. Frank-Jouvenat'vs Frederick Hoover