Decatur Daily Democrat, Volume 14, Number 225, Decatur, Adams County, 21 September 1916 — Page 3

JUT FOR WILSON r • () | in W. Gleckler. Former Progressive State Leader, Gives His Reasons -0 STATE CHAIRMAN pluses to be Disfranchised and Believes President Has Made Good. Indianapolis, Sept. 21—John E. ckelr of Indianapolis was one of the .. active and* effective of progresjve workers in the campaigns of »12 and 1914- He is also one of the ||lSt advanced thinkers among the (bor organizations, being among 10ge who assisted in bringing about B d in afterwards appreciating lejgis lt jon which benefits both employer nd employed. He says in a letter written to Denttratic State Chairman Bernard KorbTt has been my opinion, for many cars, that every good citizen should ike an active part in political aflirs.and to advocate measures which e feels are conducive to the public ood and to support candidates favorhie to such measures. ‘With this in mind I desire to enst with those who are striving for ie election of Woodrow Wilson. "During the past four years I have ttively supported the Progressive arty and its candidates, and had sinerely hoped that organization could ave been continued to finish the reat work which it had undertaken, 'he betrayal of that party by Rooseelt, Perkins and other leaders rented in its destinction, leaving sevral million voters who sincerely beeved in Progressive principles, teniorarily. without party affiliation, ortunately. however, the Democratic 'arty under the leadership of Woodnw Wilson has given an administreion which should appeal to al! who dhere to genuine Progressive priniples. I am convinced, after mature onsideration, that the democratic adlinistration has enacted into law early all the measures advocated by he Progressive Party. “Moreover. I believe that if measred by things accomplished and by instructive legislation Wilson’s adlinistration is the greatest we have tad since Lincoln’s. No President, rith the exception of Washington nd Lincoln, has had greater or mere otnplex problems to solve—problems rhich vitally affected the happiness, relfare and prosperity of the Amerian people. "The administration’s attitude on be European war and Mexican aftirs should receive the endorsement f s great majority of the people. President Wilson’s masterly handlag of the railway crisis in which lie verted national calamity shows ahtlly and courage of the highest order, nd his determined stand for child «hor legislation should earn for him hr gratitude of all who place huntnity above the dollar. "I ant confident, therefore, that nur organization can successfully ap*al for support to all Progressives, tgardless of former affiliation. 1 wish you success in your cam”'!rn - and assure you of my enthussupport.” PUBLIC SALE. •> s I have quit farming on account 1 had health. I will offer at public a|f ' at my residence, three miles a?t an(l three miles south of Mon,lf and one mile south and one and miles each and three miles 'irth of Berne, Ind., on what is lno "n as the Widow' Murphy farm. ® Tuesday, Sept. 26, 1916, beginning ' ! - o clock, noon, the following perProperty, to-wit: Horses: Four ’td of Horses: One sorrel mare, in cal ' ® y fi ars old; sorrel spring colt. ron gray horse, 6 years old; grey , ving mare. Cattle: Two head of a ttle; Jersey and Durham cow, 3 ,'' ars old; spring heifer calf. Hogs: lne * !ea< ' °f hogs, weigh about 100 ' u, ds each. Farming Implements: 0 a Deere corn cultivator, good as ’ • John Deere check rower, good llew 1 Osborn disc harrow, good as I’. & O. breaking plow, good as eu • spring wagon, iron spike tooth , ' go<M as new; sot of double harness and collars, good r,/ .' V Corn: Thirty-three acres of 'n the field; 200 shocks cut, in _shape; and other things too nucr °us to mention. V| 'l' rniß: —Credit of nine months a ' ,lp given, the purchaser giving n ')te with approved security. All p.'. 1 un< ler $5.00 cash in hand; 4 1 (p nt off for cash. No goods reuntil settled for. J( .„. HENRY SANDERS, ■‘iechty, Aut. Monroe, Ind. l)e, nocr7t~Want Ads Pay.

. ' *'“• • 1 — — . -■■■ ■■■■■ Quality First * » • A §56,000,000 "RUN” fYI\T A A T It/ITP'OC! PAD <JII A CAK

I "Run”-is lie word. It’s like a run on a bank. Only it’s a run on a car—a Chalmers car. It si tms endless. The people want more. And so more must be built for them—2o,ooo more. A ou remember awhile ago that six hundred men took one look at this new ear and bought $22,000,000 worth in forty very brief minutes. They were the Chalmers Dealers. Now they insist that more of the same kind be built —more of the 3400 r. n. m. Chalmers. £ So the Chalmers executives have put through a factory work order for 20,000 more of them. They built and delivered, in six months, 18,000. That was all they intended to build for an entire year. T hat completed their part of the $22,000,000 affair. We got them to build another 10,000. We thought that would be enough to last through the fall. But no, the 10.000 were quickly taken up during the summer months. So they are going to build 20,900 more. T1 it means,all told. 48,000 cars —or $30,090,000 worth of these remarkable 3100 r. p. m. Chalmers. So you see why I use the word w run.” The people who know good cars—like Emerson’s wise saving about the man who makes a better mouse trap, etc. will find a beaten path to his door, even though he live in the woods—they create this ever-increasing desire to own a Chalmers. They have sought quality —not price. We seldon have people ask us the price of this car. Vs hen we tell

KALVER-NOBLE GARAGE CO. AGENTS FOR ADAMS COUNTY I. A. KALVER C. C. NOBLE L. S. HOWER ■ * 1 . " —■— — —— :

VOTKE TO DEFENDANTS. I State of Indiana, County of Adams, ss: In the Adams Circuit Court, In va- • CH Vosias' Mevers "vs. Matthew Reed et al. - ’ ctuse No 933«. Suit to quiet tiI tie. • , Now comes the plaintiff by C. I, Walters, his attorney, and tiles nts complaint herein, and affidavit, togeth- » er with an affidavit by a competent person that the residence, upon ddiI gent inquiry is un fendants Mathew heed. Mrs i.eeu, whose Christian name Is uni known to plaintiff, wife of Mathew Reed- Mrs. McCoid, whose Christian ' name is unknown to plaintiff wife of James McCoid, ' Ce/rge i'autzenheiser: Mrs. Lautzenheiser whose Christian name >s un1 known to plaintiff, wife of Gorge Lauti zenhelser; George \' < ri^t!an ! ’ l iia'nie is Lotzenhlser, whose Christian name i. 1 unknown to plaintiff ita t l»e nh whoie "hristian name is un1 “ . i vi^e , ’Xi t sii!:!> l n^e;is ; ' u ; v known to plaintiff. w>fe of* <•'••• McMann' G S. Close, whose iltristaan name is unknown to plaintiff; Mrs. K . whose Christian name is ""known t? T’'“ ll v iff M^::;ll ;^ sa ii i trustees, creditois, Christian name is unknown to plain-

tiff. wife of David C. Moyers; Minzo itobinson; Mrs. Robinson, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Minzo Robinson: Albert Hancock; Mrs. Hancock, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff; wife of Albert Hancock; Elizabeth Lee; Mr. Lee,, whose Christian name is unknown plaintiff, husband of Julia A. Robinson; Lydia < Meyers; Mr. Meyers, whose Christian name Is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Lydia (’. Meyers; Julia A. Robinson; Mr. Robinson, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Julia'A. Robison; George Meyers; Mrs. Meyers, whose • hristian name is unknown to plaintiff. wife of George Meyers; David Meyers; Mrs. Meyers, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of David Meyers;* Emma Meyers; Mr. Movers, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Emma Me vers; Elizabeth Meyers; Mr. Meyers, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff. husband of Elizabeth Movers; Caroline Meyers; Mr. Moyers, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Caroline Meyers: Herman Derkes; Mrs. Derkes, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Horman Derkes; Gerard Derkes; Mrs. Derkes. whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Gerard I• ke«; the namea aii of wlmm are unknown to the plaintiff; that the names of the defendants are unknown and that they are believed to be non-residents of the State of Indiana, sued in this action by the following named and designated, towit: The children, descendants and heirs, the surviving spouse, the creditors and administrators of the estate, the devisees, legatees, trustees and executors of the last will and testament and the successors in interest, respectively, of each of the following named and designated deceased persons, towit: Mathew Reed, Mrs. lieed, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Mathew Reed; Mrs. McCoid, whose Christian name is unknown

> to plaintiff, wife of James McC< id; • George Laiitzenlmiscr; Airs. Laatzen- , heiser, whose ehrßiian name is un- • known to plaintiff, wife o.f George Lautzenheiser; George Lo’zcnhiscr; Mrs. Lotzenhiser. Whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of George lotzenhiser; Os<ar B. Haise; Mrs. Haise, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Oscar 1 Haise; J. J. McMann, whose Christian name is unknown to plain tff: Mrs. McMann, whose Christian rm n;e is unknown to plaintiff, wife of said J. J. McMann; G. S. Close, whose 'hristian name is unknown to plaintiff; Mrs. Close, whob • C hristian names is unknown to i; 1 in»•; ts. wife of sa id c. s. <Hose; Frank E. McKellog; Mrs. McKellog. whoso Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Frank E. McKellog; T. 11. Essig, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff; Airs. Esslg, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff; Mrs. Essie, whose 'hristian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of said T. H. ICssig: Win. F. Corts; Mrs. Corts, whoso (’hristian, name is un’•nnwn <n nlalnt'ff. wife of Win. F. Corts; David C. Meyers; Mrs. M ■e <. whose Christian name is unknown to pi.uiiifl, wtie of David C. Meyers; Minzo Robinson; Mrs. RobinsonJ Whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Minzo Robinson; Albert Hancock; Mrs. Hancock, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Albert Hancock; Elizabeth Lee; Mr. Lee. whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Elizabeth Lee; Lvdia (’. Meyers; Mr. Moyers, whoso Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Lvdia C. Meyers; Julia \. Robinson; Mr. Robinson, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Julia A. Robinson; George Meyers; Mrs. Meyer-’, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of George Meyers. David Meyers; Mrs. Meyers, lose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of David Myers: Emma Meyer.s, Mr. Meyers, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Em-

them SIO9O Detroit, they are very much taken back. We get little of the ’’price” trade. Most of those who come to us have passed that era in car buying. They want quality. And they know pretty will where to look for it. They look for it in the sound of the engine, in the action of the clutch, in the action of the steering apparatus, in the sound of tiie differential. They examine the radiator, try the brakes, observe the kind of glass in the windshield, note the kind of material in the top, and then poke around into the corners of the body. That much done, they get into the car and try her out. For they are smart enough to know that the biggest result of quality is performance. That’s w hat usually brings us the sale. For performance is the ears middle name. She’s got amazing acceleration so lively and full of spunk. And then she climbs hills so quickly and hugs the road so well at a rapid clip. And, best of all. she handies so easily. She’s as obedient as any creature man ever made. Once you try her you, to»>, will understand the’’run” on her. Il’s a thing diflicult to explain, but three editions of a car in a year's time is something to ponder over. We have it direct by telegraph that Chalmers will continue to make these 3400 r. p. m.’s next season. There’s no time limit set. As soon as these last 20.000 are built anil out of the way there will probably be more. > So you’re dead safe in getting a modi! of a earthat has iii no way readied its peak oi popularity.

ma Meyers; Elizabeth Meyers; Mr. Moyers,' whose Christian mime is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Elizabeth Movers; Caroline Meyers; Mr. Moyers, ‘whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff, husband of Caroline Mcxers; Horman Derkc. : Mrs Derkes, whose ' hristian name is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Horman Derkes: Henrv Derkes; Wilhelmina Derkes, his wife; Gerard Derkes; Airs. Derkes. whose Christian naniu is unknown to plaintiff, wife of Gerard Derkes; the names of all of whom are unknown to/plaintiff; the children, descendants and heirs, the surviving spouse, the < reditors ami admlni tors of the estate, the devisees, legatees, trustees and executors of the last will and testament and the successors in interest, respectively, of the do. < used widow of each of th*" following named and designated deceased persons, to-wit: Mathew Reed; George Lautzenboisc r; George Lotzenhiser, Oscar P. Haise: J. J. McMann whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff: J. S. Close, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff; Frank E. McKellog; T. H Essig, whose Christian name is unknown to plaintiff; Win. F. Corts; Minzo Robinson; Albert Hancock; George Meyer ; David Meyers; Herman Derkes; David C. Meyers; Henrv Derkes; Gerard Derkes; the imines of all of whom are unknown to the plaintiff: the widower of Mrs. McCoid. whose name is unknown to plaintiff; the widower of Elizabeth Lee, whose name is unknown to pm intifi; t lie widower of Lydia C. Meyers, whose name Is unknown to plaintiff: the widower of Julia A. Robinson, who e name is unknown to plain tiff; the widower of Emma Meyers, whose name is unknown to plaintiff; the widower of Elizabeth Meyers, whose name is unknown to plaintiff; the widower of Caroline Meyers, whose name is unknown to plaintiff; the names of all of whom are unknown to the plaintiff; all of the women once known by any of the names and des-

ignations above stated, whose names may have been changed, and who are now known by other names, which nanms are unknown to the plaintiff; the spouses of all of the persons above named, described and designated as defendants to this actioh who are married, the names of- whom are unknown to the plaintiff. That, the following named defendants sued in said action are non-resi-dents of the State of Indiana; y their residence being set forth in the complaint in said cause: Clara M. Fairchild, unmarried: Leona B. Troutner; Leonard Troutner, her husband; John L. Fairchild: — Fairchild, his wife; Milda Tompkins, unmarried; Ora J. Stewart: Naomi Stewart, his wife; Otis Stejvart; Myrtle Stewart, his wife; Emery Stewart, unmarried; Norman Stewart, unmarried. That said cause of action is for the purpose of quieting title to real estate owned by the plaintiff described jn his complaint in said cause, said real estate situated in the County of Ad i ns in th< State of Indiana and described as follows, to-vvit: “C< mniencing at the northeast corner of the west half of the northeast quarter of section nine (’.)) in township twenty-six (26) north, of range lift* en (15) east: thence running south seventy-four (74) rods, five (5) links; thence running west one hundred sixty (160) rods; thence running north seventy-four (74) rods, five (5) links; theme running east one hundred sixty (160) rods to the place of beginning, containing seventy-four (7i acres, more or less, except therefrom the cast part thereof described as /Commencing at the northeast corner of the we: t half of the northeast quarter of •■'lion nine (9) in township twen-ty-six <Ji;) north, of range fifteen (15) east; thence running south seventytour (74) rods, live (5) links; thence running west to Blue Creek: thence running north following said Blue Creek to the section line: thence run-' ning east to the ida«« of beginning, containing in said exciption thirl

(.’IO acres, more or less. Also the east half of the northwest qu.irler of the northeast <|Uarter of section nine (!») in township twentysix (26) north, of range lltteon (15) east, containing twenty (20) acres, more or I as. Fi.»th of said descriptions less said exception containing sixty-four acres, more or less.” in him the plaintiff against al) demands, claims ami claimants whatsoever; that a < auso of action exists against all of said defendants; that all of them are necessary uarties to said action an dthat they are believed to be non-residents of the State of Indiana. Noth v is, therefore, hereby given said defendants that unless they be and appear on the 50th day of the September term ot' the Adams circuit court, being Tucnilii.V' (Ii? 3ts( Dny of October, \. 1).. I!)Hi. at the court house In the City of Decatur, in said county and stale and answer or demur to said complaint, that the wHI be heard and determined in their hasenee. In witness whereof, I hereunto set mv band and affix (he seal of said < ouri at the ollie <»f the clerk thereof in the city of Decatur, Indiana, this sth dav of geptember. 1916. (Court Seal WILL HAMMELL. Clerk of the Adams (?’r» uit Court. L. Walters/ Attronoy for Plaintiff. 7-14-21 ATTENTION/ FARMERS! Book your sale with the live stock and farm sale auctlnoeer, who will get you the highest prices. HARRY DANIELS, Auctioneer, 206-e-o-d-ts Pleasant Mills, Ind. Democrat Want Ads Pay.